Cover not available
Part of
Biolinguistic Investigations on the Language Faculty
Edited by Anna Maria Di Sciullo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 235] 2016
► pp. 145–166

The interplay of silent nouns and (reduced) relatives in Malay adjectival modification

| Université Laval
This paper considers parametric variation in the area of adnominal adjectival modification from the viewpoint of Malay. Cinque (2010) has shown that, in spite of the great deal of variation found in adjectival modification, it is possible to identify two main classes with clear-cut syntactic and semantic properties: direct and indirect modification. Working on a restricted subset of adjectival classes, namely intersective, subsective and evaluative adjectives, we put forward a general proposal aiming to characterize in a precise way the syntactic distinction between these two main types of adjectival modification. Our proposal crucially involves the presence of silent/overt nouns, cf. Kayne (2005), and a possessive relation in the case of direct modification, and (reduced) relatives for indirect modification. Under the set of proposals put forward in this paper, variation will mostly follow from (a) externalization, cf. Berwick and Chomsky (2011), Chomsky (2010), Richards (2008), Di Sciullo (2015), and (b) the set of silent nouns available, a “lexical parameter” of a quasi-inflectional nature, cf. Chomsky (2001).
Published online: 24 November 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.235.07esp
References (40)
References
Ackema, P. & Marelj, M. 2012. To have the empty theta-role. In The Theta System, M. Everaert, M. Marelj & T. Siloni (eds), 227-250. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ahmad, A. 2012. L’acquisition de la définitude en français langue étrangère par les apprenants malais. MA Thesis, Université Laval.Google Scholar
Amritavalli, R. 2007. Syntactic categories and lexical argument structure. In Argument Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 108], E. Reuland, T. Bhattacharya & G. Spathas (eds), 49-62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Artiagoitia, X. 2006. Basque adjectives and the functional structure of the Basque noun phrase. ASJU XL(1-2): 107-132.Google Scholar
Bendjaballah, S. & Cabredo Hofherr, P. 2006. Modification of the noun in Somali: Comparative evidence from other Cushitic languages. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 27: 27-38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berwick, R.C. & Chomsky, N. 2011. The Biolinguistic Program: The current state of its development”. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 19-41. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, M. 1989. The semantics of gradation. In Dimensional Adjectives, M. Bierwisch & E. Lang (eds), 71-261. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G. & McConnell-Ginet, S. 2000. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond, A. Belletti (ed.), 104-131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1-52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. Poverty of stimulus: Unfinished business. In Universals and Variation: Proceedings of GLOW in Asia VIII 2010, M. Gao (ed.), 1-17. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. 2010. The Syntax of Adjectives. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, P. & Hermon, G. 1995. Is wh-in-situ really in-situ? Evidence from Malay and Chinese. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, R. Aranovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss & M. Senturia (eds), 189-204. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Collins, J.T. 1983. Syntactic change in Ambonese Malay: The possessive construction. In Studies in Malay Dialects, J.T. Collins (ed.), 28-41. Badan Penyelenggara Seri NUSA, Universitas Atma Jaya. Google Scholar
Corver, N. 1997. Much-support as last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 119-64.Google Scholar
Davies, W. & Dresser, C. 2005. The structure of Javanese and Madurese determiner phrases. Paper presented at AFLA XII , UCLA.
Di Sciullo, A.M. 2015. On the domain specificity of the human language faculty and the effects of principles of computational efficiency: Contrasting human language and mathematics. Revista Linguistica 11(1): 28-56.Google Scholar
Freeze R.. 1992. Existentials and Other Locatives. Language 68: 553–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hassan, A. 1969. Bahasa melayu pasar di Malaysia barat. Dewan Bahasa 13: 207-218.Google Scholar
Hung, H. 1987. Lexical and Functional Categories in Bahasa Malaysia. MA thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1977. X’-Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jayaseelan, K.A. 2007. The argument structure of the dative construction. In Argument Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 108], E. Reuland, T. Bhattacharya & G. Spathas (eds), 37-48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H. 1975. Two theories about adjectives. In Formal Semantics for Natural Language, E.L. Keenan (ed.), 123-155. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H. & Partee, B. 1995. Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition 57: 129-191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. 1966. The Philosophy of Language. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kayne, R.S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Movement and Silence. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. On parameters and on principles of pronunciation. In Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, H. Broekhuis, N. Corver, R. Huybregts, I. Kleinhenz & J. Koster (eds), 289-299. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008a. Antisymmetry and the lexicon. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8, J. Rooryck & J. van Craenenbroeck (eds), 1-31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, R. & Cho, S. 2003. Temporal adjectives and the structure of possessive DPs. Natural Language Semantics 11 : 217-247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsy, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Richards, M. 2008. Two kinds of variation in a minimalist system. In Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 87, F. Heck, G. Müller & J. Trommer (eds), 133-162. Leipzig: University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Scott, G.-J. 2002. Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of nominal phrases. In Functional Structure in DP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 1, G. Cinque (ed.), 91-120. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. 2005. Classifiers and DP structures in Southeast Asia. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, G. Cinque & R. Kayne (eds), 806-838. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, H.Á. 2004. Meaningful silence, meaningless sounds. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 235–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sproat, R. & Shih, C. 1988. Prenominal adjectival ordering in English and Mandarin. In Proceedings of NELS 18, J. Blevins & J. Carter (eds), 465-489. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
Vander Klok, J. 2013. On the nature of adjectival modification: A case study in Javanese. In NELS 40: Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, S. Kan & C. Moore-Cantwell (eds), 227-238. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Wong, B.E. 2008. Wh-questions in Malay: An explanation for the restriction of extraction to subject position with Yang. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature – The South East Asian Journal of Language Studies l4: 81-94. Google Scholar