Cover not available
Part of
Formal Studies in Slovenian Syntax: In honor of Janez Orešnik
Edited by Franc Lanko Marušič and Rok Žaucer
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 236] 2016
► pp. 23–54

On second position clitics crosslinguistically

 | University of Connecticut
This paper examines factors that are responsible for the availability of second position clitic systems crosslinguistically based on a variety of unrelated languages, including (but not limited to) Pama-Nyungan, Uto-Aztecan, Iranian, Slavic, and Romance languages. The proposed account has consequences for a variety of phenomena, including the Lobeck (1990)/Saito & Murasugi (1990) generalization that functional heads can license ellipsis of their complement only when they undergo Spec-Head agreement, preposition-stranding, and the licensing of pro.
Published online: 8 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.236.02bos
References (155)
References
Abaev, Vasilij I. 1964. A Grammatical Sketch of Ossetic. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Center in Antropology, Folklore and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive Cyclicity, Anti-locality, and Adposition Stranding. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435-483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ajlarty, Asæmæt. 2002. Fæzzygon didindzhytæ. Dzæudzhyqæu: Ir.Google Scholar
Aldridge, Edith. 2004. Ergativity and Word Order in Austronesian Languages. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Alpher, Barry J. 1991. Yir-Yoront Lexicon: Sketch and Dictionary of an Australian Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter K. 1995. Double case marking in Kanyara and Mantharta languages. In Agreement by Suffixaufnahme, Frans Plank (ed.), 363-379. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2006. Jiwarli. In International Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Vol. 6, Keith Brown (ed.), 125-129. Oxford: Elsevier. <[URL]> DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2003. Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1991. Woiwurrung. In The Aboriginal Language of Melbourne and Other Sketches, Robert M.W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 31-124. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bleam, Tonia. 1999. Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. PhD dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2001. Nhanda: An Aboriginal Language of Western Australia. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2001. On the Nature of the Syntax-phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related Phenomena. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
. 2002. Clitics as non-branching elements and the linear correspondence axiom. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 329-340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Be careful where you float your quantifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 681-742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 1-45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. On the clausal and NP structure of Serbo-Croatian. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Toronto meeting, 2006, Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska & Ulyana Savchenko (eds), 42-75. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
. 2008. What will you have, DP or NP? In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 37, Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds), 101-114. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
. 2009a. On Leo Tolstoy, its structure, case, left-branch extraction, and prosodic inversion. In Studies in South Slavic Linguistics in Honor of E. Wayles Browne, Steven Franks, Vrinda Chidambaram & Brian D. Joseph (eds), 99-122. Bloomington IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
. 2009b. The NP/DP analysis and Slovenian. In Proceedings of the Novi Sad Generative Syntax Workshop 1, 53-73. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet u Novom Sadu.Google Scholar
. 2012a. On NPs and clauses. In Discourse and Grammar: From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds), 179-242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. On clitic doubling and second position cliticization: How much does D matter? Presented at Clitics and Beyond , University of Göttingen, Germany.
. 2013a. Adjectival escapades. In Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 21, Steven Franks, Markus Dickinson, George Fowler, Melissa Whitcombe & Ksenia Zanon (eds), 1-25. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Traces do not head islands: What can PF deletion rescue? In Deep Insights, Broad Perspectives: Essays in Honor of Mamoru Saito, Yoichi Miyamoto, Daiko Takahashi, Hideki Maki, Masao Ochi, Koji Sugisaki & Asako Uchibori (eds), 56-93. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 27-89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Getting really edgy: On the edge of the edge. Linguistic Inquiry 47:1-33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko & Hsieh, I-Ta Chris. 2015. On the semantics of the NP-internal word order: Chinese vs Serbo-Croatian. In Slavic Languages in the Perspective of Formal Grammar: Proceedings of FDSL 10.5, Brno 2014, Markéta Ziková, Pavel Caha & Mojmír Dočekal (eds), 101-120. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko & Şener, Serkan. 2014. The Turkish NP. In Crosslinguistic Studies on Nominal Reference: With and Without Articles, Patricia Cabredo Hofherr & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds), 102-140. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal. 1999. The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 185-234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Casad, Eugene H. 1984. Cora. In Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar, Vol. 4: Southern Uto-Aztecan Grammatical Sketches, Ronald W. Langacker (ed.), 155-459. Dallas TX: The Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Charney, Jean. 1993. A Grammar of Comanche. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Hsu-Te Johnny. 2013. Argument Ellipsis, Classifier Phrases, and the DP Parameter. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509-542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339-405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1985. Subject clitics and A’-bound traces. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8(1):1-23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra. 1990. VPs and verb movement in Chamorro. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 559-619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The syntax and prosody of weak pronouns in Chamorro. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 547-599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collard, Howard & Scott, Elisabeth. 1974. Castellano-Mayo Mayo-Castellano [Serie de Vocabularios Indigenas. Mariano Silva y Aceves. Nro 6]. Mexico: Instituto Linguistico de VeranoGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert. 1992. On deriving left branch extraction asymmetries: A case study in parametric syntax. In Proceedings of 22nd Conference of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society, 67-84. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael. 2003. Towards a typology of pronominal cliticization. Handout from the 5th Association for Linguistic Typology conference , Cagliari, Italy.<[URL]>
. 2005. Morphology in the wrong place. A survey of preposed enclitics. In Morphology and its Demarcations. Selected Papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna. February 2004 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 264], Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds), 17-37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Wiltschko, Martina. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409-442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dedrick, John M. & Casad, Eugene H. 1999. Sonora Yaqui Language Structures. Tucson AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan. 1998. Yingkarta [Languages of the World/Materials 137]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Despić, Miloje. 2011. Syntax in the Absence of Determiner Phrase. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
. 2013. Intensifiers, focus, and clitics: Is pronoun position truly an argument for D in SC? In Nominal Constructions in Slavic and Beyond, Lilla Schürcks, Anastasia Giannakidou & Urtzi Exteberria, 39-74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2002. Australian Languages: Their Nature and Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dočekal, Mojmír & Dotlačil, Jakub. 2015. Experimental evidence for neg-raising in Slavic. Paper presented at SinFonIJA 8 . Ljubljana, September 23-26.
Douglas, Wilfrid. 1981. Watjarri. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 2, Robert M.W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dvořák, Boštjan. 2007. Slovenian clitic pronouns and what is so special about them. Slovenski Jezik – Slovene Linguistic Studies 6: 209-233.Google Scholar
Erschler, David. 2012. From preverbal focus to preverbal ‘‘left periphery’’: The Ossetic clause architecture in areal and diachronic perspective. Lingua 122: 673–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Féry, Caroline. 2013. A comparative perspective on intervention effects on left branch extractions in Slavic. In Non Progredi Est Regredi: Festschrift für Alla Paslwaska, Wolodymyr Sulym, Mychajlo Smolij & Chrystyna Djakiw (eds), 266-295. Lwiw: Pais.Google Scholar
Fontana, Josep M. 1993. Phrase Structure and the Syntax of Clitics in the History of Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Franco, Jon. 2000. Agreement as a continuum: The case of Spanish pronominal clitics. In Clitic Phenomena in European Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 30], Frits Beukema & Marcel den Dikken (eds), 147-190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franks, Steven. 2007. Deriving discontinuity. In Studies in Formal Slavic Linguistics, Franc Marušič & Rok Žaucer (eds), 103-120. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2010. Clitics in Slavic. Glossos 10: 1-157.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven & King, Tracy. 2000. A Handbook of Slavic Clitics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki. 1988. Deriving the differences between English and Japanese. English Linguistics 5: 249-270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Naoki & Speas, Margaret. 1986. Specifiers and projection. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8, Naoki Fukui, Tova Rapoport & Elizabeth Sagey (eds), 128-172. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity and word order pragmatics in Ute. In Topic Continuity in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 3], Talmy Givón, 141-214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Ute Reference Grammar [Culture and Language Use 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golden, Marija & Milojević-Sheppard, Milena. 2000. Slovene pronominal clitics. In Clitic Phenomena in European Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 3], Frits Beukema & Marcel den Dikken (eds), 191-207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, Lilián. 2004. The Syntax-semantics Interface in Yaqui Complex Sentences: A Role and Reference Grammar Analysis. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Guerrero, Lilián & Belloro, Valeria A. 2010. On word order and information structure in Yaqui. In Information Structure in Indigenous Languages of the Americas, José Camacho, Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo & Liliana Sánchez (eds), 115-137. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Halpern, Aaron & Fontana, Josep M. 1994. Xº and Xmax clitics. In Proceedings of the Twelfth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Eric Duncan, Donka Farkas & Philip Spaelti (eds), 251-266. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. 2007. On the development of pronominal clitics and affixes in Uto-Aztecan. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 26(1).Google Scholar
Hercus, Luise. A. 1986. Victorian Languages: A Late Survey [Pacific Linguistics B 77]. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2005. A Grammar of Cupeño [University of California Publications in Linguistics 136]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Honeyman, Tom. 2005. Topic and Focus in Ngardi. BA thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Hudson, Joyce. 1978. The Core of Walmatjari Grammar. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1986. Three issues in the theory of clitics: Case, doubled NPs, and extraction. In Syntax and Semantics, 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Hagit Borer (ed.), 15-42. Orlando FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, Li. 2012. Nominal Arguments and Language Variation. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kang, Jungmin. 2014. On the Absence of TP and its Consequences: Evidence from Korean. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keen, Sandra. 1983. Yukulta. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 3, Robert M.W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 191-304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klavans, Judith. 1985. The independence of syntax and phonology in cliticization. Language 61: 95-120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroeger, Paul R. 1993. Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1984. Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar, Vol. 4: Southern Uto-Aztecan Grammatical Sketches. Dallas TX: The Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne. 2008. Warlpiri and the theory of second position clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 3–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lobeck, Anne. 1990. Functional heads as proper governors. In Proceedings of the 20th North East Linguistic Society, 348-362. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marelj, Marijana. 2011. Bound-variable anaphora and left branch condition. Syntax 14(2): 205-229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, J. Alden. 1950. The Language of the Papago of Arizona. Philadelphia PA: The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Matthews, Robert Hamilton. 1904. Ethnological notes on the aboriginal tribes of New South Wales and Victoria. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 38: 203-381.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick. 1983. “Only” and related concepts in Gurindji and neighboring languages. Ms, School of Australian Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1996. Gurindji grammar. Ms, Canberra.Google Scholar
McDaniels, Todd. 2008. Pronoun second position in Comanche as an archaic survival. <[URL]>
Meakins, Felicity & Nordlinger, Rachel. 2013. Bound pronominal clitic placement in Bilinarra (Pama-Nyungan, Australia). Paper presented at the ISSLaC Workshop , Universität Bielefeld, Germany.
. In press. A Grammar of Bilinarra, an Australian Aboriginal Language of the Victoria River District (NT). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Migdalski, Krzysztof. 2015. On the loss of Tense and verb-adjacent clitics in Slavic. In Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Information-Structural Interactions, Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds), 179-196. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 2000. The Gabrielino enclitic system. In Uto-Aztecan: Structural, Temporal, and Geographic Perspectives, Eugene H. Casad & Willett Thomas (eds). Sonora: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Mushin, Ilana. 2005a. Second position clitic phenomena in North-Central Australia: Some pragmatic considerations. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, Ilana Mushin (ed.). <[URL]>Google Scholar
. 2005b. Word order pragmatics and narrative functions in Garrwa. Australian Journal of Linguistics 25: 253-273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Motivations for second position: Evidence from North-Central Australia. Linguistic Typology 10: 287-326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mushin, Ilana & Simpson, Jane. 2008. Free to bound to free? Interactions between pragmatics and syntax in the development of Australian pronominal systems. Language 84: 566-596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, Masanori. 1996. Economy of Chain Formation. PhD dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel. 1990. A Sketch Grammar of Bilinara. Honors thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
. 1993. A Grammar of Wambaya. MA thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Norman, Warwick, 1973. Baradha and Biri field notes. Ms.Google Scholar
Orešnik, Janez. 1983-1984. Slovenske breznaglasnice se vedejo predvsem kot proklitike. Jezik in Slovstvo 29: 129.Google Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana. 2005. The rise and fall of second-position clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23:103-167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Daniel. 2011. A Comparative Dialectal Description of Iranian Talish. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1992. Zero Syntax, Vol. 2. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Priestly, Tom. 1993. Slovene. In The Slavonic Languages, Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 388-451. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Press, Magaret L. 1979. Chemehuevi: A Grammar and Lexicon [University of California Publications in Linguistics 92]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rackowski, Andrea. 2002. The Structure of Tagalog: Specificity, Voice, and the Distribution of Arguments. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Rackowski, Andrea & Richards, Norvin. 2005. Phase edge and extraction: A Tagalog case study. Linguistic Inquiry 36(4): 565-599. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 1999. Complementizer cliticization in Tagalog and English. In Proceedings of The Sixth Meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (AFLA): Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 297-312.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Runić, Jelena. 2014a. A new look at clitics, clitic doubling, and argument ellipsis: Evidence from Slavic. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
. 2014b. A new look at argument ellipsis: Evidence from Slavic. In Proceedings of the 43rd Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol. 2, Hsin-Lun Huang, Ethan Poole & Amanda Rysling (eds), 91-102. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru. 2016. Case for labeling: Labeling in languages without phi-feature agreement. The Linguistic Review 33:129-175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, Mamoru & Murasugi, Keiko. 1990. N'-deletion in Japanese. In University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics 3, Javier Ormazabal & Carol Tenny (eds), 87-107. Storrs CT: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1930. Southern Paiute: A Shoshonean language. In Proceedings of the American Society of Arts and Sciences 65.
Schachter, Paul. 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 491-518. New York NY: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2002. Grammaticalized restrictives on adverbials and secondary predicates: Evidence from Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 22: 231-264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schweiger, Fritz. 2007. The pronominal clitic complex in Walmajarri. Folia Linguistica Historica 28: 251-268.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur. 1988. Complementizer-cliticization in Hebrew and the ECP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 191-206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shopen, Timothy. 2007. Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Complex Constructions. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Smith, Ian & Johnson, Steve. 2000. Kugu Nganhcara. In Handbook of Australian Languages, Vol. 5: Grammatical Sketches of Bunuba, Ndjébbana and Kugu Nganhcara, Robert M.W. Dixon & Barry J. Blake (eds), 357-507. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. Clitic constructions. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 213-276. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steele, Susan. 1977. Clisis and diachrony. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 539-79. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Stjepanović, Sandra. 1998a. On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: Evidence from VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 527-537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998b. On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: Evidence from clitic climbing and VP ellipsis. In Proceedings of the VI Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, Željko Bošković, Steven Franks & William Snyder (eds), 267-286. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
. 1998c. Extraction of adjuncts out of NPs. Paper presented at the Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Workshop , Bloomington, Indiana, June 1998.
. 1999. What do Second Position Cliticization, Scrambling, and Multiple Wh-fronting have in Common. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Masahiko. 2011. Some Consequences of Case-marking in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Talić, Aida. 2013. Extraordinary complement extraction: PP-complements and inherently case-marked nominal complements. Studies in Polish Linguistics 8: 127-150.Google Scholar
. 2015a. Adverb extraction, specificity, and structural parallelism. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 60: 417-454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. Syntactic mobility of the host and accent shift to proclitics. In Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society 45: 117-130. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
. 2016. Spelling out enclitics and giving their tone a voice: Cyclic clitic incorporation in BCS and breaking the cycle. Ms., University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann. 1990. Clitics and Configurationality in Ancient Greek. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Terrill, Angela. 1993. Biri, a salvage study of a Queensland language. BA Honor thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar
. 1998. Biri [Languages of the World/Materials 258]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Thordarson, Fridrik. 1989. Ossetic. In Compendium linguarum iranicarum, Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), 456-79. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Todorović, Neda. 2016. On the Presence/absence of TP Cross-linguistically: Syntactic Properties and Temporal Interpretations. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Trenkić, Danijela. 2004. Definiteness in Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian and some implications for the general structure of the nominal phrase. Lingua 114:1401-1427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1981. The Djaru Language of Kimberley. Canberra: Western Australia Pacific Linguistics B-78.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1988. On Government. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
. 1995a. An F position in Western Romance. In Discourse Configurational Languages, Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), 153-175. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1995b. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79-123.Google Scholar
. 1996. Determiner clitic placement. In Current Issues in Comparative Grammar, Robert Fredin (ed.), 257-294. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wanner, Dieter. 2001 From Latin to the Romance languages. In Language Typology and Language Universals [Handbook of Linguistics and Communication Science 2(2)], Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1691-1706. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Willet, Thomas. 1991. A Reference Grammar of Southeastern Tepehuan. Arlington TX: The Summer Institute of Linguistics/University of Texas.Google Scholar
Willim, Ewa. 2000. On the grammar of Polish nominals. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 319-346. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2013. Tagalog infinitives: Consequences for the theory of phases, voice marking, and extraction. Ms, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Yar-Shater, Ehsan. 1969. A Grammar of Southern Tati Dialects. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Zanon, Ksenia. 2015. On Hybrid Coordination and Quantifier Raising in Russian. PhD dissertation, University of Indiana, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Zepeda, Ofelia. 1983. A Tohono O’odham Grammar. Tuscon AZ: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Živanovič, Sašo. 2008. Varieties of most: On different readings of superlative determiners. In Studies in Formal Slavic Linguistics: Contributions from Formal Description of Slavic Languages (FDSL) 6.5, Franc Marušič & Rok Žaucer (eds), 337-354. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Zlatić, Larisa. 1997. The Structure of the Serbian Noun Phrase. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Cited by (24)

Cited by 24 other publications

Marušič, Franc Lanko, Petra Mišmaš & Rok Žaucer
2024. Placement and Ordering of the (En)clitics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics, ► pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Syntactic evidence against deficiency. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Conclusions. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Morphophonological evidence against deficiency. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitic combinations. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitic climbing. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Historical overview. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitics in embryo. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Properties of Romance object clitics. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Introduction. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. The rise ofadverbalclitics. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Deriving enclisis in ‘V1’ clauses. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Romance Object Clitics, DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Theoretical preliminaries. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. ‘V2’ and clitic placement. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Höhn, Georg F. K.
2020. The third person gap in adnominal pronoun constructions. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
Baker, Mark & Ruth Kramer
2018. Doubled clitics are pronouns. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36:4 ► pp. 1035 ff. DOI logo
BOŠKOVIĆ, ŽELJKO
2018. ON PRONOUNS, CLITIC DOUBLING, AND ARGUMENT ELLIPSIS: ARGUMENT ELLIPSIS AS PREDICATE ELLIPSIS. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 35:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bošković, Željko
2023. A Typology of Stranded Phonologically Weak Elements. Studies in Polish Linguistics 18:3 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Silently Structured Silent Argument [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 259], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. List of abbreviations. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Copyright Page. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Series preface. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2023. Serbian Clitics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 229], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.