Introduction
Issues in contrastive valency studies
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Valency and valency alternation in linguistic theory and description
- 2.1Derivational designs
- 2.2Subsumption designs
- 2.3Larger structures
- 3.Typological/contrastive studies of valency
- 4.Contributions to the volume
-
Notes
-
References
References (66)
References
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth. 2012. The case differential: Syntagmatic versus paradig-matic case – Its status in synchrony and diachrony. Transactions of the Philological Society 110: 1–26. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Agel, Vilmos, Eichinger, Ludwig M., Eroms, Hans Werner, Hellwig, Peter, Heringer, Hans Jurgen & Lobin, Henning. 2003–2006. Dependenz Und Valenz / Dependency and Valency [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 25/1&2]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian. 2006. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–212. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allerton, David J. 1982. Valency and the English Verb. London: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Apresjan, Jury D. 1969. Eksperementaljnoe issledovanie russkogo glagola. Moskva: Nauka.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barthakuria, Apurba Chandra. 1997. The Philosophy of Sanskrit Grammar (A Critical Study of Karaka). Calcutta: Punthi Pustak![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blasi, Damian E. 2015. Assessing transitivity prominence from a statistical perspective: A commentary on Martin Haspelmath’s “Transitivity prominence”. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), 149–154.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical Functional Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cennamo, Michela & Lenci, Alessandro. Forthcoming. Gradience in subcategorization? Locative phrases with Italian verbs of motion. Studia Linguistica.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Colleman, Timothy. 2002. The Contragram Verb Valency Dictionary of Dutch, French and English. In Symposium on Lexicograhy X: Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Lexicography, May 4–6, 2000, University of Copenhagen [Lexicographica: Series Maior 109]. Henrik Gottlieb, Jens Eric Mogensen & Arne Zettersten (eds), 63–76. Tübingen: Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Copestake, Ann. 2002. Implementing Typed Feature Structure Grammars. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cysouw, Michael, Haspelmath, Martin & Malchukov, Andrej (eds). 2010. Semantic maps: Theory and applications. Linguistic Discovery 8(1). <[URL]>![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp. 2008. Ga verb features. In Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 100], Felix Ameka & Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu (eds), 91–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Faulhaber, Susen. 2011. Verb Valency Patterns. A Challenge for Semantics-based Accounts. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles, Kay, Paul & O'Connor, Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone
. Language 64: 501–538. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartmann, Iren, Haspelmath, Martin & Taylor, Bradley (eds) 2013. Valency Patterns Leipzig (Online Database). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Leipzig: MPI. <[URL]>![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and crosslinguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–243. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2014. Arguments and adjuncts as language-particular syntactic categories and as comparative concepts. Linguistic Discovery 12(2). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. Transitivity prominence. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), 131–148.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin & Hartmann, Iren. 2015. Comparing verbal valency across languages. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), 41–71.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hellan, Lars. 2016. Representing bare ominalizations in Norwegian. Ms submitted, based on presentation at SLE 2015.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hellan, Lars & Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp. 2010. Identifying Verb Constructions Cross-linguistically [SLAVOB Series]. University of Ghana. <[URL]>![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hellan, Lars, Beermann, Dorothee, Bruland, Tore, Dakubu, Mary Esther & Marimon, Montserrat. 2014 MultiVal: Towards a multilingual valence lexicon. LREC 2014.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herbst, Thomas, Heath, David, Roe, Ian & Götz, Dieter. 2004. A Valency Dictionary of English. A Corpus-based Analysis of the Complementation Patterns of English Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herbst, Thomas & Götz-Votteler, Katrin (eds). 2007. Valency: Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: EUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369–411.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, Roman. 1936. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6: 240–88. (Also in: Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Selected Writings, vol. 2, 22–71. The Hague: Mouton).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kay, Paul. 2010. The limits of construction grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Thomas Hoffmann (eds). Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2009. Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27 (1): 77–138. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2012. The Monotonicity Hypothesis. In Telicity, Change and State. A Cross-Categorical View of Event Structure, Violeta Delmonte & Louise McNally (eds), 139–161. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Korhonen, Anna & Briscoe, Ted. 2004. Extended lexical-semantic classification of English verbs. In Proceedings of the HLT/NAACL Workshop on Computational Lexical Semantics, Boston MA. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazard, Gilbert. 1998. Actancy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehmann, Christian. 1991. Predicate classes and PARTICIPATION. In Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, Hansjakob Seiler & Waldfried Premper (ed.), 183–239. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej. 2005. Case pattern splits, verb types, and construction competition. In Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case, Mengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds), 73–117. Amsterdam: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej. 2015. Valency classes and alternations: Parameters of variation. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), Vol. 1, 73–130.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej & Comrie, Bernard (eds). 2015. Valency Classes in the World’s Languages. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merlo, Paola & Esteve Ferrer, Eva. 2006. The notion of argument in prepositional phrase attachment. Computational Linguistics 32(3): 341–377. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michaelis, Laura A. 2015. Sign based construction grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds). Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montague, Richard. 1974. The proper treatment of quantification in English. In Formal Philosophy, Richmond Thomason (ed.). New Haven CT: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, Stefan & Wechsler, Stephen. 2014. Lexical approaches to argument structure. <[URL]>![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pollard, Carl J. & Sag, Ivan A. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meaning. In The Projection of Arguments, Miriam Butt & Wilhem Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Say, Sergej. 2014. Bivalent verb classes in the languages of Europe: A quantitative typological study. Language Dynamics and Change 4: 116–166. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schäfer, Florian. 2009. The causative alternation. <[URL]>![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schütze, Carson T. 1995. PP attachment and argumenthood. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26: 95–151.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tesnière, Lucien. 1959. Éleménts de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1981. Split case-marking in verb types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics 19: 389–438.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 2015. The hierarchy of two-place predicates: Its limitations and uses. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), 1597–1626.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2001. An Introduction to Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wichmann, Søren. 2015. Statistical observations on implicational (verb) hierarchies. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), 155–183.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.