Part of
Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency
Edited by Lars Hellan, Andrej L. Malchukov and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 237] 2017
► pp. 124
Abraham, Werner
(ed.) 1978Valence, Semantic Case, and Grammatical Relations [Studies in Language Companion Series 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Bare and prepositional differential case marking: The exotic case of German (and Icelandic) among all of Germanic. In Case, Valency, and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 77], Leonid Kulikov, Andrej Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 115–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth
2012The case differential: Syntagmatic versus paradig-matic case – Its status in synchrony and diachrony. Transactions of the Philological Society 110: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Agel, Vilmos, Eichinger, Ludwig M., Eroms, Hans Werner, Hellwig, Peter, Heringer, Hans Jurgen & Lobin, Henning
2003–2006Dependenz Und Valenz / Dependency and Valency [Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 25/1&2]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
2006The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–212. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allerton, David J
1982Valency and the English Verb. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Apresjan, Jury D
1969Eksperementaljnoe issledovanie russkogo glagola. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Barthakuria, Apurba Chandra
1997The Philosophy of Sanskrit Grammar (A Critical Study of Karaka). Calcutta: Punthi PustakGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Zakharko, Taras, Bierkandt, Lennart & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
Blasi, Damian E
2015Assessing transitivity prominence from a statistical perspective: A commentary on Martin Haspelmath’s “Transitivity prominence”. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), 149–154.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
2001Lexical Functional Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela & Lenci, Alessandro
Forthcoming. Gradience in subcategorization? Locative phrases with Italian verbs of motion. Studia Linguistica.
Chomsky, Noam
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Colleman, Timothy
2002The Contragram Verb Valency Dictionary of Dutch, French and English. In Symposium on Lexicograhy X: Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Lexicography, May 4–6 2000, University of Copenhagen [Lexicographica: Series Maior 109]. Henrik Gottlieb, Jens Eric Mogensen & Arne Zettersten (eds), 63–76. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Copestake, Ann
2002Implementing Typed Feature Structure Grammars. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2012Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael, Haspelmath, Martin & Malchukov, Andrej
(eds) 2010 Semantic maps: Theory and applications. Linguistic Discovery 8(1). [URL]Google Scholar
Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp
2008Ga verb features. In Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 100], Felix Ameka & Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu (eds), 91–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faulhaber, Susen
2011Verb Valency Patterns. A Challenge for Semantics-based Accounts. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Kay, Paul & O'Connor, Catherine
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language 64: 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Iren, Haspelmath, Martin & Taylor, Bradley
(eds) 2013Valency Patterns Leipzig (Online Database). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Leipzig: MPI. [URL]Google Scholar
Hartmann, Iren, Haspelmath, Martin & Cysouw, Michael
Haspelmath, Martin
2003The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and crosslinguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–243. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2014Arguments and adjuncts as language-particular syntactic categories and as comparative concepts. Linguistic Discovery 12(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Transitivity prominence. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), 131–148.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Hartmann, Iren
2015Comparing verbal valency across languages. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), 41–71.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars
2016Representing bare ominalizations in Norwegian. Ms submitted, based on presentation at SLE 2015.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars & Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp
2010Identifying Verb Constructions Cross-linguistically [SLAVOB Series]. University of Ghana. [URL]Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars, Beermann, Dorothee, Bruland, Tore, Dakubu, Mary Esther & Marimon, Montserrat
2014 MultiVal: Towards a multilingual valence lexicon. LREC 2014.Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas, Heath, David, Roe, Ian & Götz, Dieter
2004A Valency Dictionary of English. A Corpus-based Analysis of the Complementation Patterns of English Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbst, Thomas & Götz-Votteler, Katrin
(eds) 2007Valency: Theoretical, Descriptive and Cognitive Issues. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2014Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1987The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369–411.Google Scholar
1990Semantic Structures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1936Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6: 240–88. (Also in: Jakobson, Roman 1971 Selected Writings, vol. 2, 22–71. The Hague: Mouton).Google Scholar
Kay, Paul
2005Argument structure constructions and the argument-adjunct distinction. In Grammatical Constructions: Back to the Roots [Constructional Approaches to Language 4], Mirjam Fried & Hans C. Boas (eds), 71–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010The limits of construction grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Graeme Trousdale & Thomas Hoffmann (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Koontz-Garboden, Andrew
2009Anticausativization. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27 (1): 77–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012The Monotonicity Hypothesis. In Telicity, Change and State. A Cross-Categorical View of Event Structure, Violeta Delmonte & Louise McNally (eds), 139–161. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korhonen, Anna & Briscoe, Ted
2004Extended lexical-semantic classification of English verbs. In Proceedings of the HLT/NAACL Workshop on Computational Lexical Semantics, Boston MA. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
1998Actancy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1991Predicate classes and PARTICIPATION. In Partizipation: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Sachverhalten, Hansjakob Seiler & Waldfried Premper (ed.), 183–239. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2005Case pattern splits, verb types, and construction competition. In Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case, Mengistu Amberber & Helen de Hoop (eds), 73–117. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Valency classes and alternations: Parameters of variation. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), Vol. 1, 73–130.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Comrie, Bernard
(eds) 2015Valency Classes in the World’s Languages. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Merlo, Paola & Esteve Ferrer, Eva
2006The notion of argument in prepositional phrase attachment. Computational Linguistics 32(3): 341–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A.
2015Sign based construction grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Montague, Richard
1974The proper treatment of quantification in English. In Formal Philosophy, Richmond Thomason (ed.). New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Stefan & Wechsler, Stephen
2014Lexical approaches to argument structure. [URL]Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl J. & Sag, Ivan A.
1994Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
1998Building verb meaning. In The Projection of Arguments, Miriam Butt & Wilhem Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Say, Sergej
2014Bivalent verb classes in the languages of Europe: A quantitative typological study. Language Dynamics and Change 4: 116–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2009The causative alternation. [URL]Google Scholar
Schütze, Carson T.
1995PP attachment and argumenthood. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26: 95–151.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Éleménts de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku
1981Split case-marking in verb types and tense/aspect/mood. Linguistics 19: 389–438.Google Scholar
2015The hierarchy of two-place predicates: Its limitations and uses. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), 1597–1626.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr.
2001An Introduction to Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wichmann, Søren
2015Statistical observations on implicational (verb) hierarchies. In Malchukov & Comrie (eds), 155–183.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1953Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Przepiórkowski, Adam
2018. The origin of the valency metaphor in linguistics. Lingvisticae Investigationes 41:1  pp. 152 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.