Cover not available
Part of
Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance
Edited by Martin Hummel and Salvador Valera
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 242] 2017
► pp. 47–80

Chapter 2
Parameters in Romance adverb agreement

| University of Cambridge
Many Romance varieties are known to employ adjectives in adverbial function. This paper explores the parameters involved in the distribution of agreement of adjectival manner adverbs across Romance. Agreement is shown to be sensitive to specific structural configurations which can ultimately be retraced to the phenomenon of split intransitivity: agreement is typically controlled by nominals which at some level of representation are associated with the object relation, although some exceptions to this generalization are noted producing what appear to be ergative patterns. Looking at such evidence from within and beyond Italy, the paper sketches a typology of the differing licensing conditions on adjectival adverb agreement in Romance in an attempt to identify the precise semantico-syntactic parameters involved in the relevant patterns.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Narrowing the field
  • 2.Parameters of adverbial agr(eement)
    • 2.1Pattern 1: No agr
    • 2.2Pattern 2: Full active/stative split
    • 2.3Pattern 3: Restricted active/stative split
    • 2.4Pattern 4: Ergative split
  • 3.Formal approach: A quick sketch
    • 3.1Parameter hierarchies
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 21 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.242.03led
References (62)
References
Antrim, Nancy Mae. 1994. Italian adverbial agreement. In Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIII April 1–4, 1993, Michael L. Mazzola (ed.), 129–140. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2008a. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132], Theresa Biberauer (ed.), 351–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Delia. 2006. Split Intransitivity in Italian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian & Sheehan, Michelle. 2012. Complexity in comparative syntax: The view form modern parametric theory. Paper presented at the Formal Linguistics and the Measurement of Grammatical Complexity Workshop, Seattle, 24 March.
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian. 2012. The significance of what hasn’t happened. Paper presented at Diachronic Generative Syntax 14, Lisbon, 4 July.
. In press. Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. In Proceedings of the XII Diachronic Generative Syntax Meeting, Anthony Kroch (ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-binding Approach. Foris: Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 1997. Subjects and clause structure. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 33–63. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2004. Toward a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115–165. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chircu, Adrian. 2008. L’adverbe dans les langues romanes. Etudes étymologique, lexicale et morphologique. Cluj-Napoca: Casa Cărţii de Ştiinţă.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Company, Concepción. 2014. Adverbios en -mente . In Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Tercera parte: Adverbios, preposiciones y conjunciones. Relaciones interoracionales, Concepción Company (ed.), 459–614. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica y Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Cresti, Diana. 2003. Aspects of the syntax and semantics of ne . In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Christina Tortora (ed.), 67–101. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2010. Aspetti morfologici e sintattici degli avverbi in siciliano. In Studi sui dialetti della Sicilia [Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt n.11], Jacopo Garzonio (ed.), 21–42. Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
Dinică, Andreea. 2012. Adverbul (în secolul al XIX-lea). In Studii de istoria limbii române. Morfosintaxa limbii literare în secolele al XIX-lea şi al XX-lea, Chivu Gheorghe, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Adina Dragomirescu, Isabela Nedelcu & Irina Nicula (eds), 223–248. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Dinică, Andreea & Mîrzea Vasile, Carmen. 2013. Adverbs and adverbial phrases. In The Grammar of Romanian, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), 432–450. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Martin. 2000. Adverbale und adverbialisierte Adjektive im Spanischen. Konstruktionen des Typs Los niños duermen tranquilos und María corre rápido. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
. 2011. The interfaces of adjective and adverb in Romance. Facts and arguments for discussion. <[URL]>
. 2014. The adjective-adverb interface in Romance and English. In Adjectives in Germanic and Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 212], Petra Sleeman, Freek Van de Velde & Harry Perridon (eds), 35–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Los adverbios flexionados. In El discurso de la gramática, Carmen Galán Rodríguez, María Luisa Montero Curiel, José Carlos Martín Camacho & María Isabel Rodríguez Ponce (eds), 205–233. Cáceres: Universidad de Extremadura.Google Scholar
. 2013. Sincronía y diacronía de los llamados adjetivos adverbializados y de los adverbios en mente . Anuario de Letras I(2), 215–281. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
. In press a. Existe a concordância adverbial no português brasileiro? Considerações acerca de vamos diretos, todas contentes, bastantes grandes, muitas boas . In Funcionalismo linguístico – vertentes e diálogos, Mariangela Rios de Oliveira & Maria Maura Cezario (eds). Rio de Janeiro: Eduff.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 1989. Facets of Romance past participle agreement. In Dialect Variation on the Theory of Grammar, Paola Benincà (ed.), 108–140. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000. Parameters and Universals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005a. Movement and Silence. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b. Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French. In Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds), 3–69. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2000. A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2003. Linguistic theory and the mysteries of Italian dialects. In Multilingualism in Italy: Past and Present, Anna Laura Lepschy & Arturo Tosi (eds), 108–140. Oxford: Legenda.Google Scholar
. 2009. Grammatica diacronica del napoletano [Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie Band 350]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011a. Morphosyntactic typology and change. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Vol. 1: Structures, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 724–734. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2011b. Adverb agreement and split intransitivity: Evidence from southern Italy. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 96: 31–66.Google Scholar
. 2012. From Latin to Romance. Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Greek disguised as Romance? The case of southern Italy. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory, Mark Janse, Brian D. Joseph, Angela Ralli & Metin Bağriaçik (eds), 184–228. Laboratory of Modern Greek Dialects, University of Patras. <[URL]>.
. 2015. Parallels in Romance nominal and clausal microvariation. Revue roumaine de linguistique LX: 105–127.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, A. In press a. The verb phrase. In The Syntax of Italian, Giuseppe Longobardi (ed). Cambridge: CUP.
Ledgeway, Adam. In press b. From Latin to Romance syntax: The great leap. In The Oxford Handbook of Diachronic and Historical Linguistics, Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Lonzi, Lidia. 1986. Pertinenza della struttura tema-rema per l’analisi sintattica. In Tema-rema in italiano, Hans Stammerjohann (ed.), 91–120. Tübingen: Gunther Narr.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 1998. Sintassi comparata dell’accordo participiale romanzo. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
. 2016. Auxiliary selection and participial agreement. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), 802–818. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Maria-Rita & Savoia, Leonardo Maria. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa, Vol. III. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Mîrzea Vasile, Carmen. 2012a. Eterogenitatea adverbului românesc: Tipologie şi descriere. Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.Google Scholar
. 2012b. Adverbul (în secolul al XX-lea). In Studii de istoria limbii române. Morfosintaxa limbii literare în secolele al XIX-lea şi al XX-lea, Chivu Gheorghe, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Adina Dragomirescu, Isabela Nedelcu & Irina Nicula (eds), 597–626. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Române.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1975. A global agreement phenomenon. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 413–435.Google Scholar
Parry, Mair. 2000. Accordo e soggetti posverbali in piemontese. In Congrès international de linguistique et pihlologie romanes, Bruxelles 1998. Vol. 6: De la grammaire des formes à la grammaire du sens, Annick Englebert, Michel Pierrard, Laurence Rosier & Dan van Raemdonck (eds), 391–402. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johann van der Auwera (ed.), 187–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2012. Macroparameters and minimalism. A programme for comparative research. In Parameter Theory and Linguistic Change, Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopez & Juanito Avelar (eds), 320–354. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Subject clitics and macroparameters. In Diachrony and Dialects. Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italy, Paola Benincà, Adam Ledgeway & Nigel Vincent (eds), 177–201. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Holmberg, Anders. 2010. Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In Parametric Variation. Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 1–57. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle. 2014. Towards a parameter hierarchy for alignment. In Proceedings of WCCFL 31, Robert E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), 399–408. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Sheehan Michelle. In press. Parametrising ergativity: An inherent case approach. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Silvestri, Giuseppina. 2014. Participle and adverb agreement: Split intransitivity in northern Calabrian dialects. Paper presented at meeting of the XLI Romance Linguistics Seminar, Trinity Hall, Cambridge, 3–4 January.
Smith, John Charles. 1993. La desaparición de la concordancia entre participio de pasado y objeto directo en castellano y catalán: Aspectos geográficos e históricos. In Actas del primer congreso anglo-hispano, I: Lingüística, Ralph John Penny (ed.), 275–285. Madrid: Castalia.Google Scholar
. 1999. Markedness and morphosyntactic change revisited: The case of Romance past participle agreement. In The Emergence of the Modern Language Sciences: Studies on the Transition from Historical-comparative to Structural Linguistics in Honour of E. F. K. Koerner. 2: Methodological Perspectives and Applications, Sheila Embleton, John E. Joseph & Hans-Josef Niederehe (eds.), 203–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Marina Chumakina, Oliver Bond & Steven Kaye
2023. Agreement beyond the Verb, DOI logo
Métairy, Justine
2022. Verb Classes in the Resultative Construction in Germanic and Romance Languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 120:2 ► pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Hummel, Martin
2017. La structure “verbe + adjectif”. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.