Cover not available
Part of
Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade
Edited by Bettelou Los and Pieter de Haan
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 243] 2017
► pp. 9–34

Chapter 2
From OV to VO in English

How to Kroch the nut

| Università Ca’ Foscari, Venice
The paper addresses word order change in the history of English and proposes a novel account arguing that an intricate combination of two factors led to the pertinent changes. In particular, I will address the data and generalisations in Kroch and Taylor (2000) and outline a scenario that may be seen as a first step towards cracking the nut posed by them. To this end, I argue that the grammaticalization of the definite determiner at the end of the Old English (OE) period in combination with the loss of Case in early Middle English (eME) destroyed the balances in a system in which mixed word orders were determined by information structural and prosodic conditions and led to a reanalysis in the interface between syntax, prosody and information structure.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Word order variation in OE
    • 2.1The effect of information structure
    • 2.2The effect of grammatical weight
    • 2.3The interpretation of these effects
  • 3.On the complex interaction between syntax, prosody and information structure
    • 3.1The weight condition as a prosodic condition
    • 3.2The mapping between syntactic structure and prosodic structure
    • 3.3Focus, prominence and rules of accent placement
    • 3.4The interpretation of OE word order variation in the interface approach
  • 4.Word order change in the history of English
    • 4.1The effect of the grammaticalization of the definite determiner on word order
    • 4.2 The effect of the loss of case on word order
    • 4.3Word order variation in eME
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.243.02hin
References (47)
References
Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax, Band 4. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by Phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Crosslinguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal. 1996. Deficient pronouns: A view from Germanic. A study in the unified description of Germanic and Romance. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Vol. II [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 38], Höskulder Thráinsson, Samuel David Epstein and Steve Peter (eds), 21-65. Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fuß, Eric. 1998. Zur Diachronie von Verbzweit: Die Entwicklung von Verbstellungsvarianten im Deutschen und im Englischen. Phd-thesis. University of Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Fuß, Eric & Trips, Carola. 2002. Wortstellungsvariation in den älteren germanischen Sprachen. Ms., Universität Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1983. A semantic analysis of the nuclear tones of English. Indiana University Linguistics Club. Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1987. An Essay on Stress. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2014. On the interaction between syntax, prosody and information structure: an interface approach to word order developments in Germanic. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics 213], Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds), 341–376. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Scrambling, Optionality and Non-lexical Triggers. In Triggers [Studies in Generative Grammar 75], Anne Breitbarth and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 173-204. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Scrambling, Remnant Movement and Restructuring. Oxford: OUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Studies in Basic Word Order, Word Order Variation and Change. Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 1-116.Google Scholar
. 2010. Information structure and basic word order in older Germanic. In Information Structure from Different Perspectives, Caroline Fery & Malte Zimmermann (eds), 282–304. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2009. A Phase-based comparative approach to modification and word order in Germanic. Syntax 12(3): 242–284.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg. 2000. Word Order Change in Icelandic: From OV to VO [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 31]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 25]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Los, Bettelou. 2006. Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 224–248. Oxford: Blackwell.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Milićev, Tanja. 2012. Syntax and discourse in Old and Middle English word order. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes, Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds), 239–255. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Westergaard, Marit. 2012. Syntax and information structure: Verb second variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English [Oxford Studies in the History of English 2], Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria-José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 87–118. Oxford: OUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1984. Fokus, Topik, Syntaktische Strukur und Semantische Interpretation. Ms, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
. 2008. Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55: 243–276.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Ann. 2000. Verb-complement order in ME. In Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds), 132–163. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ladd, Robert D. 1986. Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology 3: 311–340.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, Robert. 1996. Intonational Phonology. New York: CUP.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon. 1997. Prosodic Words [HIL Dissertation 34]. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1999. Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement [Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 43]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1991. Phrase Structure in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English word order. PhD-thesis. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann. 2006. The loss of OV-order in the history of English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade and Bettelou Los (eds), 249-278. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1997. Directionality and word order change in the history of English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 397–426. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress and phrasing. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John Goldsmith (ed.), 550–569. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan. 2012. Verb order, object position and information status in Old English. York Papers in Linguistics Series 2: 29 – 52.Google Scholar
. 2010. Investigating information structure in Old English. Paper presented at the LSA annual meeting, Baltimore, 9 January 2010.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and ponological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Michael. 2005. Asymmetries in prosodic domain formation. In Perspectives on Phases [MITWPL 49], Norvin Richards & Martha McGinnis (eds), 329–367. Cambridge MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Wallenberg, Joel. 2008. English weak pronouns and object shift. In Proceedings of WCCFL 26, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 489–497. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1982. Another argument that passive is transformational. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 203–238.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred. 1993. The diachronic consequences of first and second language acquisition: The change from OV to VO. Linguistics 31(5): 903-931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1977. On Clitics. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Catasso, Nicholas, Marco Coniglio & Chiara De Bastiani
2022. Interface phenomena and language change. In Language Change at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 275], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
De Bastiani, Chiara
2022. Chapter 5. The reanalysis of VO in the history of English. In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358], ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Struik, Tara & Ans van Kemenade
2022. Information structure and OV word order in Old and Middle English: a phase-based approach. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 25:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. Argument structure. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. Changes outside of the CCore. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. Overview. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. A′ constructions. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. Universals. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. Grammatical functions. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. Learning, complexity, and competition. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. Constructional change in Germanic. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. 197 ff. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. Language Change, Variation, and Universals, DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. Recapitulation and prospects. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. 274 ff. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. Constructions. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Culicover, Peter W.
2021. Constructional economy and analogy. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
De Bastiani, Chiara & Roland Hinterhölzl
2020. On the syntax of object pronouns in Old English and Early Middle English. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Copyright Page. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. List of Abbreviations. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. xv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Preface. In Language Change, Variation, and Universals, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.