Cover not available
Part of
Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade
Edited by Bettelou Los and Pieter de Haan
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 243] 2017
► pp. 187–212

Chapter 9
Beowulf and Old English metre

Relics of a pre-V2 state?

 | Radboud University Nijmegen
 | University of Edinburgh
This chapter builds on various suggestions in the literature that the syntax of the Old English poem Beowulf is constrained by its metre, an inheritance from Common Germanic. The differences are particularly evident in the position of the finite verb. An inventory of how clauses map into the a– and b–verses of the poem revealed that the metre favours clause-final verbs over verbs in first or second position, which might suggest that the metre of Germanic epic poetry predates the emergence of verb movement. With finite verbs mapping onto the non-alliterating fourth stressed position, the metre allowed the poet to choose his verbs freely. As verbs encode the key actions that drive the narrative, this greatly facilitated composition.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Dating Beowulf
  • 3.What poetic prominence can tell us about the grammar of verse
    • 3.1introduction
    • 3.2The metre and the poet
  • 4.Metre and verbs
    • 4.1Finite verb positions and a– and b-verses
    • 4.2Constructing patterns
    • 4.3Verb-final word order
    • 4.4V1 word order
    • 4.5 V2 word order
    • 4.6The Beowulf metre and the position of the verb
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.243.09tan
References (52)
References
Allen, Cynthia L. 1977. Topics in Diachronic Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & Hogg, Richard M. 2003. The actuation problem in Optimality Theory: Phonologization, rule inversion, and rule loss. In Optimality Theory and language change [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 56], D. Eric Holt (ed.), 91–119. Dordrecht: Kluwer.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bliss, Alan J. 1962. The Metre of Beowulf. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1980. Auxiliary and verbal in Beowulf. Anglo-Saxon England 9: 157–182.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cable, Thomas. 1974. The Metre and Melody of Beowulf. Chicago IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Callaway, Morgan. 1913. The Infinitive in Anglo-Saxon. Washington DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 2003. Old English Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Chase, Colin. 1981. Opinions on the date of Beowulf, 1815–1980. In The Dating of Beowulf, Colin Chase (ed.), 3–8. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Dobbie, Elliot Van Kirk. 1953. Beowulf and Judith. Washington DC: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dresher, Elan B. & Lahiri, Aditi. 1991. The Germanic foot: Metrical coherence in Old English. Linguistic Inquiry 22(2): 251–286.Google Scholar
Diamond, Robert E. 1970. Old English Grammar and Reader. Detroit MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Dumville, D. N. 1988. Beowulf come lately: Some notes on the palaeography of the Nowell Codex. Archiv fur das Studium der Neueren Sprachen und Literaturen 225(1), 49–63.Google Scholar
Thórhallur, Eythórsson. 1995. Verbal syntax in the early Germanic languagesPhD dissertation, Cornell University. Google Scholar
Fulk, Robert. 1992. A History of Old English Meter. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Fulk, Robert, Bjork, Robert & Niles, John. 2008. Klaeber’s Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg [Toronto Old English Series 21]. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Fulk, Robert. 2014. Beowulf and language history. In The Dating of Beowulf: A Reassessment, Leonard Neidorf (ed.), 19–36. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar
Getty, Michael. 2000. Differences in the metrical behavior of Old English finite verbs: Evidence for grammaticalization. English Language and Linguistics 4(1): 37–67.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. The Metre of Beowulf: A Constraint-Based Approach [Topics in English Linguistics 36]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eric. Haeberli 2002. Observations On The Loss Of Verb Second In The History Of English. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax: Proceedings from the Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, C. Jan Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 245-272. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Petrova, Svetlana. 2010. From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120(2): 315–28.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, Bellenden R. 1995. Old English Poetic Metre. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. V2 and embedded topicalization in Old and Middle English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 326–352. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2000. Jespersen’s cycle revisited: Formal properties of grammaticalization. In Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds), 51–74. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kendall, Calvin B. 1991. The Metrical Grammar of Beowulf. Cambridge: CUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiernan, Kevin 1996. Beowulf and the Beowulf Manuscript. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2013. Electronic Beowulf. London: British Library.Google Scholar
Klaeber, F. 1941. Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg. Edited, with introduction, bibliography, notes, glossary, and appendices. edition with supplement. Boston, etc.: Heath.Google Scholar
Köhler, A. 1867. Der syntaktische Gebrauch des Infinitivs im Gotischen. Germania 12: 421-62.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 2008. A reappraisal of classical V2 and scrambling in Dutch. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 46: 27–54.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Hans. 1933. Zur Wortstellung und-betonung im Altgermanischen. Reprinted 1969 in Kleine Schriften: Aufsa?tze und Rezensionen aus den Gebieten der germanischen und nordischen Sprach-, Literatur- und Kulturgeschichte, Vol. 1, Sprachgeschichte, Verkunst, Dietrich Hofmann, Wolfgang Lange & Klaus von See (eds), 18-103. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 1999. Infinitival Complementation in Old and Middle English [LOT Series Dissertations in Linguistics 31]. The Hague: Thesus.Google Scholar
. 2000. Onginnan/beginnan + to-infinitive in Ælfric. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Annette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 251–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The loss of V2 and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English [Oxford Studies in the History of English 2], Anneli Meurman-Solin, María-José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 21–46. Oxford: OUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magoun, Francis P. 1953. Oral-Formulaic character of Anglo-Saxon narrative poetry. Speculum 28 (3): 446–467.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCully, Chris B. & Anderson, John J. (eds). 1996. English Historical Metrics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donka. 2006. Old and middle English prosody. In The Blackwell Handbook on the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 96–124. Oxford: Blackwell.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minkova, Donka & Stockwell, Robert. 1994. Syllable weight, prosody and meter in Old English. Diachronica 11: 35–64.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1968. Two syntactical notes on Beowulf. Neophilologus 52(1): 292–299.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1985. Old English Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce & Robinson, Fred C. 2011. A Guide to Old English. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Molencki, Rafał. 1991. Complementation in Old English. Katowice: Uniwersytet Slaski.Google Scholar
Neidorf, Leonard (ed.). 2014. The Dating of Beowulf: A Reassessment. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1991. Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Pope, John Collins. 1966. The Rhythm of Beowulf. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Peter. 1994. Imperfective aspect and episode structure in Beowulf . Journal of English and Germanic Philology 93: 313–325.Google Scholar
Russom, Geoffrey. 1998. Beowulf and Old Germanic Metre. Cambridge: CUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sievers, Eduard. 1885. Google Scholar
Zur Rhythmik des germanischen alliterationsverses. I. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB), 10(2): 209-314.
Smith, Jeremy J. 2009. Old English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Seiichi. 1996. The Metrical Organization of Beowulf: Prototype and Isomorphism. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar