Cover not available
Part of
Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade
Edited by Bettelou Los and Pieter de Haan
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 243] 2017
► pp. 265–290

Chapter 12
Verb particle combinations and word order change in Dutch-lexifier creole languages

 | CLS, Radboud University Nijmegen
 | CLS, Radboud University Nijmegen
 | Edinburgh University
This paper discusses the development and structural properties of verb + particle combinations in various creole languages for which Dutch was the main lexifier: Afrikaans, Berbice Dutch Creole, and Virgin Islands Dutch Creole (Negerhollands). In addition, it examines creole languages which have had substantial lexical influence from Dutch, such as Sranan, Ndyuka, and Papiamentu. The paper focuses on the interaction between grammatical patterns of object / verb order and lexical patterns involving verb + particle combinations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Afrikaans
  • 3. Berbice Dutch
  • 4.Virgin Islands Dutch Creole
  • 5.Loans involving Dutch verb particle combinations in non-Dutch lexifier Creole languages
  • 6. Discussion and conclusions
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.243.12slu
References (30)
References
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1996. Samenkoppelingen en grammaticalisatie. In Morfologiedagen 1996, Eric Hoekstra & Caroline Smits (eds), 6–20. Amsterdam: P.J. Meertens-Instituut.Google Scholar
Borges, Robert. 2014. The Life of Language. Dynamics of language contact in Suriname. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Bradford, William. 1986. Virgin Islands Dutch Creole: A morphological description. In Papers on Negerhollands, the Dutch Creole of the Virgin Islands [Amsterdam Creole Studies 9; Publikaties van het Instituut voor Algemene Taalwetenschap 51], Hans den Besten (ed.), 73–99. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana & Baayen, Harald. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer & Joost Zwarts (eds), 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.Google Scholar
de Cubber, Walter. 1973. De splitsing van scheidbaar samengestelde werkwoorden in hedendaags proza. Studia Germanica Gandensia 14: 39–63.Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole. 2002. Particle verbs in English: Syntax, Information Structure, and Intonation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 59]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Particle verbs in Germanic. In Word Formation, An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe [HSK series], Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 611–626. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
van Diggelen, Miep. 1978. Negro-Dutch. Amsterdam Creole Studies 2(20): 69–100.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce. 1993. A Grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elenbaas, Marion & van Kemenade, Ans. 2014. Verb particles and OV/VO in the history of English. Studia Linguistica 68(1): 140–167.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Bart & Pieter Muysken. In preparation. Heritage languages in a post-colonial setting: Focus on Papiamentu. In Heritage Languages: An Introduction, Suzanne Aalberse, Ad Backus & Pieter Muysken (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
de Josselin de Jong, Jan. 1926. Het Huidige Negerhollandsch (Teksten en Woordenlijst), Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Academie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, Nieuwe Reeks, Deel 26, no. 1.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Booij, Geert. 2003. Preverbs: An introduction. Yearbook of Morphology: 1–12. Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1975. Dutch as an SOV Language. Linguistic Analysis 1: 111–136.Google Scholar
. 2008. A reappraisal of classical V2 and scrambling in Dutch. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 46: 27–54.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia. 1994. A Grammar of Berbice Dutch Creole. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Roux, Cecile. 1988. On the interface of morphology and syntax: Evidence from verb-particle combinations in Afrikaans . MA thesis, University of Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou, Blom, Corrien, Booij, Geert, Elenbaas, Marion & van Kemenade, Ans. 2012. Morphosyntactic Change: A Comparative Study of Particles and Prefixes. Cambridge: CUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 2000. Bilingual Speech. A Typology of Code-mixing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Oosthuizen Helena, Höhle, Barbara, & Southwood, Frenette. 2010. Motion events in Afrikaans: Their expression by adult speakers and by children with and without language impairment. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 40: 55–77.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine & Cuyckens, Hubert. 2013. Towards a typology of shared grammaticalization. In Shared Grammaticalization: With special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets. & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, Ardi. 1998. Rightward incrementality in encoding simple phrasal forms in speech production: Verb-particle combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24(4): 904–921.Google Scholar
van Sluijs, Robbert. 2014. What’s past is past: Variation in the expression of past time reference in Negerhollands narratives. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 26(3): 272–321.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido (1989) `Object shift as an A-movement rule. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 256–271.Google Scholar
de Vos, Mark. 2005. The Syntax of Verbal Pseudo-Coordination in English and Afrikaans. PhD dissertation, Leiden University. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Suzi. 2004. Germanic verb clusters: The empirical domain. In Verb Clusters: A Study of Hungarian, German and Dutch [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 69], Katalin Ã‰ Kiss & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds), 43–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeller, Jochen. 2001. Particle Verbs and Local Domains [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 41]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1993. Dutch Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. PhD dissertation, Groningen University.Google Scholar
. 1997. Morphosyntax of Verb Movement. A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar