Cover not available
Part of
On the Syntax of Missing Objects: A study with special reference to English, Polish, and Hungarian
Marta Ruda
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 244] 2017
► pp. 179–192

References

Published online: 16 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.244.refs
Abels, Klaus. 2001. The Predicate Cleft Construction in Russian. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 9, Steven Franks & Michael Yadroff (eds), 1–19. Bloomington, IN: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O. & Dyakonova, Marina. 2009. Predicate doubling and parallel chains. Lingua 119: 1035–1065. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alberti, Gábor & Farkas, Judit. 2013. Nouns: Characterization and classification. Ms., University of Pécs and the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Preliminary version of a chapter to be published in Comprehensive Grammar Resources – Hungarian: The Noun Phrase. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2013. Manner vs. result complementarity in verbal alternations: A view from the clear alternation. In Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the North East Linguistics Society, Stefan Keine & Shayne Sloggett (eds), 39–52. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita. 2007. Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Schäfer, Florian & Spathas, Giorgos. 2013. Delimiting Voice in Germanic: On object drop and naturally reflexive verbs. Handout, Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop 28, University of Leipzig, 3–5 October.
Allerton, David J. 1975. Deletion and proform reduction. Journal of Linguistics 11: 213–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
AnderBois, Scott. 2012. Indefiniteness and the typology of implicit arguments. In Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennett (eds), 43–53. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Aoun, Joseph & Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 2008. Ellipsis and missing objects. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 251–273. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arregi, Karlos & Nevins, Andrew. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Authier, J.-Marc P. 1989. Arbitrary null objects and unselective binding. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds), 45–67. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Emmon. 1979. Control in Montague Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 533–581.Google Scholar
Bailyn, John Frederick. 2011. Kak tebe lingvistika? Nenavižu! How (not) to analyze Russian verb-stranding constructions. Handout, Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 20, MIT, 13–15 May.
Bárány, András. 2015. Inverse agreement and Hungarian verb paradigms. In Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba Conference [Approaches to Hungarian 14], Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi & Éva Dékány (eds), 37–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar. 2017. Pro as a minimal nP: Towards a unified approach to pro-drop. Ms, University of Minho.
Bartos, Huba. 1999. Morfoszintaxis és Interpretáció. A Magyar Inflexiós Jelenségek Szintaktikai Háttere (Morphosyntax and Interpretation. The Syntactic Background of the Hungarian Inflectional Phenomena). PhD dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University.
Beavers, John. 2011. On affectedness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 335–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Aspectual classes and scales of change. Linguistics 51: 681–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John & Koontz-Garboden, Andrew. 2012. Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 331–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bende-Farkas, Ágnes. 2001. Verb-Object Dependencies in Hungarian and English: A DRT-Based Account. PhD dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
Bender, Emily. 1999. Constituting context: Null objects in English recipes revisited. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 53–68.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian. 2012. Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6: 267–294.Google Scholar
Bird, Steven, Klein, Ewan & Loper, Edward. 2009. Natural Language Processing with Python. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C. 2003. A Constructional Approach to Resultatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bobrowski, Ireneusz. 1981. Zasady subkategoryzowania czasowników przechodnich występujących w zdaniach bez dopełnień bliższych (Subcategorisational rules of transitive verbs used in sentences without direct objects). Polonica VII: 97–105.Google Scholar
. 1985. Cechy Subkategoryzacyjne Polskich Czasowników Przechodnich (Subcategorisational Properties of Transitive Verbs in Polish). Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich/Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
. 1994. Pomiędzy koniecznością a przydatnością kategorii gramatycznej (na przykładzie elipsy) (Between the necessity and usefulness of grammatical categories (based on ellipsis)). Polonica XVI: 5–34.Google Scholar
Bondaruk, Anna. 2009. Constraints on predicate clefting in Polish. In Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertová & Petr Biskup (eds), 65–79. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2012. Copy deletion in Polish predicate clefting. In Sound, Structure and Sense. Studies in Memory of Edmund Gussmann, Eugeniusz Cyran, Henryk Kardela & Bogdan Szymanek (eds), 55–70. Lublin: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2008. What will you have, DP or NP? In Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the North East Linguistics Society, Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds), 101–114. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
. 2012. On NPs and clauses. In Discourse and Grammar: From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds), 179–242. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1978. A realistic Transformational Grammar. In Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, Morris Halle, Joan Bresnan & George A. Miller (eds), 1–59. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1982. Polyadicity. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Joan Bresnan (ed), 149–172. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Browne, Wayles. 1971. Verbs and unspecified NP deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 259–260.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2009. Selectional asymmetries between CP and DP suggest that the DP Hypothesis is wrong. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 26–35.Google Scholar
Bułat, Ewa. 2004. The correlation between the type of object, aspect and genericity. Rozprawy Komisji Językowej XXX: 159–164.Google Scholar
. 2009. Towards symmetry in the classification of null categories. In PASE Papers 2008, Bożena Rozwadowska & Marek Kuźniak (eds), 35–44. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo ATUT.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory Norman. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Sybesma, Rint. 1998. On dummy objects and the transitivity of run . Linguistics in the Netherlands 1998: 81–93.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Vicente, Luis. 2013. Verb doubling in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 22: 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1994. Syntactic bootstrapping and the acquisition of noun meanings: The mass-count issue. In Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition, Vol. 1, Barbara Lust, Margarita Suñer & John Whitman (eds), 301–318. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 1995. The variability of impersonal subjects. In Quantification in Natural Language, Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds), 107–143. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Ladusaw, William A. 2004. Restriction and Saturation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1988. On si constructions and the theory of arb . Linguistic Inquiry 19: 521–581.Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo & Gawron, Jean Mark. 1996. The context-dependency of implicit arguments. In Quantifiers, Deduction and Context, Makoto Kanazawa, Christopher Piñón & Henriette de Swart (eds), 1–32. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Coppock, Elisabeth & Wechsler, Stephen. 2012. The objective conjugation in Hungarian: Agreement without phi features. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 699–740. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth. 2013. A semantic solution to the problem of Hungarian object agreement. Natural Language Semantics 21: 345–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert. 1990. The Syntax of Left Branch Extractions. PhD dissertation, Tilburg University.
Costa, João, Martins, Ana Maria & Pratas, Fernanda. 2012. VP ellipsis: New evidence from Capeverdean. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2010, Irene Franco, Sara Lusini & Andrés Saab (eds), 155–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cote, Sharon Ann. 1996. Grammatical and Discourse Properties of Null Arguments in English. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culy, Christopher. 1996. Null objects in English recipes. Language Variation and Change 8: 91–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummins, Sarah & Roberge, Yves. 2004. Null objects in French and English. In Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 258], Julie Auger, J. Clancy Clements & Barbara Vance (eds), 121–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. A modular account of null objects in French. Syntax 8: 44–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia & Lopes, Ruth. 2012. Null objects are ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese. Handout, International Workshop ‘ELLIPSIS2012’, University of Vigo, 9–10 November.
Cyrino, Sonia & Matos, Gabriela. 2002. VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese. A comparative analysis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1: 177–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalmi, Gréte. 1998. Object agreement in Hungarian. Working Papers in the Theory of Grammar 5: 91–119.Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 2011. Bare noun phrases. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 2, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 1088–1108. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Wiltschko, Martina. 2002. Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dékány, Éva. 2011. A Profile of the Hungarian DP: The Interaction of Lexicalization, Agreement and Linearization with the Functional Sequence. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Depiante, Marcela Andrea. 2000. The Syntax of Deep and Surface Anaphora: A Study of Null Complement Anaphora and Stripping/Bare Argument Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. When Hungarians agree (to disagree)–the fine art of ‘phi’ and ‘art’. Ms, CUNY Graduate Center.
Doron, Edit. 1990. V-movement and VP-ellipsis. Ms, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duguine, Maia. 2014. Argument ellipsis: A unitary approach to pro-drop. The Linguistic Review 31: 515–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dvořák, Věra. 2015. Syntax of generic null objects revisited. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Anna E. Jurgensen, Hannah Sande, Spencer Lamoureux, Kenny Baclawski & Alison Zerbe (eds), 71–97. Berkeley, CA: BLS.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. The inverse agreement constraint in Hungarian. A relic of a Uralic-Siberian Sprachbund? In Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Jan Koster, Riny Huybregts & Ursula Kleinhenz (eds), 108–116. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2012. Null pronominal objects in Hungarian: A case of exaptation. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 44: 192–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. The Inverse Agreement Constraint in Uralic languages. Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics 2: 2–21.Google Scholar
Embick, David & Marantz, Alec. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf. 2007. Distributed Morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reis (eds), 289–324. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Enç, Mürvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 1–25.Google Scholar
Erterschik-Shir, Nomi. 1977. On the Nature of Island Constraints. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, Ibnbari, Lena & Taube, Sharon. 2013. Missing objects as topic drop. Lingua 136: 145–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Féry, Caroline. 2013. A comparative perspective on intervention effects on left branch extractions in Slavic. In Non Progredi est Regredi. Festschrift für Alla Paslwaska, Wolodymyr Sulym, Mychajlo Smolij & Chrystyna Djakiw (eds), 266–295. Lwiw: Pais.Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. 1987. DO pro in Hungarian. In Approaches to Hungarian, Vol. 2, István Kenesei (ed), 191–209. Szeged: JATE.Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. & de Swart, Henriëtte. 2003. The Semantics of Incorporation: From Argument Structure to Discourse Transparency. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane & Rapoport, Tova. 2013. A lexical and information structure account of English instrument-subject constructions. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory, Valentina Apresjan, Boris Iomdin & Ekaterina Ageeva (eds), 41–49. Prague: Charles University.Google Scholar
Filip, Hana. 2005. On accumulating and having it all: Perfectivity, prefixes and bare arguments. In Perspectives on Aspect. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, Henk Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds), 125–148. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
. 2008. Events and maximalization: The case of telicity and perfectivity. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan D. Rothstein (ed), 217–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Lexical aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed), 721–751. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1986. Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In Proceedings of the Twelth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 95–107.
Fodor, Jerry A. & Fodor, Janet. 1980. Functional structure, quantifiers, and meaning postulates. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 759–770.Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson & Kučera, Henry. 1979. Brown Corpus manual. Tech. rep. Department of Linguistics, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Frascarelli, Mara. 2007. Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro: An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 691–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce & Ross, John Robert. 1970. Idioms and unspecified NP deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 264–265.Google Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel & Portero Muñoz, Carmen. 2002. Understood objects in Functional Grammar. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 76: 1–24.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Merchant, Jason. 1997. On the interpretation of null indefinite objects in Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics 17: 141–155.Google Scholar
Gillon, Brendan S. 2012. Implicit complements: A dilemma for model theoretic semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 35: 313–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2001. Patient arguments of causative verbs can be omitted. Language Sciences 23: 503–524. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Constructions, lexical semantics, and the Correspondence Principle: Accounting for generalizations and subregularities in the realization of arguments. In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 215–236. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gribanova, Vera. 2013a. A new argument for verb-stranding Verb Phrase ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 145–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Verb-stranding Verb Phrase ellipsis and the structure of the Russian verbal complex. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 91–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 279–326.Google Scholar
Grochowski, Maciej. 1972. Znaczenie polskiego czasownika: Aktualne, potencjalne, habitualne, uniwersalne – w świetle kategorialnego znaczenia form czasu teraźniejszego (The meaning of the Polish verb: Present, potential, habitual, universal – in the light of the categorial meaning of present tense forms). Studia Semiotyczne 3: 161–168.Google Scholar
Groefsema, Marjolein. 1995. Understood arguments: A semantic/pragmatic approach. Lingua 96: 139–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grzegorczykowa, Renata. 1978. O generycznym użyciu nazw (On the generic use of names). Polonica IV: 73–76.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1987a. Complement ellipsis in English: Or how to cook without objects. In Studies in Honour of René Derolez, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (ed), 248–261. Ghent: University of Ghent.Google Scholar
. 1987b. Register variation in English: Some theoretical observations. Journal of English Linguistics 20: 230–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge & Sag, Ivan A. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth. 2002. Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78: 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. In Proceedings of the 9th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 127–144. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun & Roberts, Ian. 1993. Middle constructions in Dutch and English. In Knowledge and Language, Vol. II: Lexical and Conceptual Structure, Eric Reuland & Werner Abraham (eds), 183–220. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhn, Georg F.K. 2016. Unagreement is an illusion: Apparent person mismatches and nominal structure. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34: 543–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoji, Hajime. 1998. Null object and sloppy identity in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 29: 127–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 533–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
. 1991. Remarks on the status of null objects. In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, Robert Freidin (ed), 56–76. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Husband, Edward Matthew. 2011. Rescuing manner/result complementarity from certain death. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society , 111–124. Chicago, IL: CLS.
Hyams, Nina & Wexler, Kenneth. 1993. On the grammatical basis of null subjects in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 421–459.Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard. 1993/1994. Input and learnability: Direct object omissibility in English. Language Acquisition 3: 95–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Janic, Katarzyna. 2011. On development of antipassive function: What do Australian and Slavonic languages have in common? In Formalization of Grammar in Slavic Languages: Contributions of the Eighth International Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages – FDSL VIII, University of Potsdam, December 2–5, 2009, Peter Kosta & Lilia Schürcks (eds), 207–220. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Jiang, Li. 2012. Nominal Arguments and Language Variation. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Kardos, Éva Aliz. 2012. Toward a Scalar Semantic Analysis of Telicity in Hungarian. PhD dissertation, University of Debrecen.
Karolak, Stanisław. 1984. Składnia wyrażeń predykatywnych (The syntax of predicates). In Gramatyka Współczesnego Języka Polskiego. Składnia (The Grammar of Contemporary Polish. Syntax), Zuzanna Topolińska (ed), 11–211. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Description. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate. 2011. Semantics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmilan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenesei, István, Vago, Robert M. & Fenyvesi, Anna. 1998. Hungarian. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keresztes, Júlia. 2013. On Hungarian Object-Drop. MA thesis, Pázmány Péter Catholic University.
Keyser, S. Jay & Roeper, Thomas. 1992. Re: The Abstract Clitic Hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 89–125.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc. 1990. Noun incorporation in Hungarian. Ms, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Published as Kiefer, Ferenc. 1990–1991. Noun incorporation in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 40: 149–177).
. 1994. Aspect and syntactic structure. In The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian, Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds), 415–464. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Alaktan (Morphology). In Új Magyar Nyelvtan (New Grammar of Hungarian), Ferenc Kiefer, Péter Siptár & Katalin É. Kiss (eds), 189–284. Budapest: Osiris Kiadó.Google Scholar
. 2006. Aspektus és Akcióminőség Különös Tekintettel a Magyar Nyelvre (Aspect and Aktionsart with Special Reference to Hungarian). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kim, Soowon. 1999. Sloppy/strict identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 255–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kowaluk, Agnieszka. 1999. Null objects in Polish: Pronouns and determiners in Second Language Acquisition. RCEAL Working Papers 6: 135–152.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2005. Building resultatives. In Events in Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, Claudia Maienborn & Angelika Wöllstein-Leisten (eds), 177–212. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 187–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and Contextual Expression, Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & Peter van Emde Boas (eds), 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Lamontagne, Greg & Travis, Lisa. 1987. The syntax of adjacency. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 6, Megan Crowhurst (ed), 173–186. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2006. Chain resolution in Hebrew V(P)-fronting. Syntax 9: 32–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 357–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 1988. Implicit arguments in situation semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 169–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard (with Marcela Depiante and Arthur Stepanov). 2000. Syntactic Structures Revisited. Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos. 2013. Null and cognate objects and changes in (in)transitivity. Evidence from the history of English. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 60: 69–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Chi Wai (Patrick). 2014. Learning and Unlearning Object Drop in Nonanaphoric and Anaphoric Contexts in L2 English. PhD dissertation, Newcastle University.
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1970. Verbs and deletable objects. Lingua 25: 227–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. Objecthood: An event structure perspective. In Proceedings of the 35th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Sabrina J. Billings, John P. Boyle & Aaron M. Griffith (eds), 223–247. Chicago, IL: CLS.Google Scholar
. 2013. Verb classes within and across languages. Ms, Stanford University.
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1999. Two structures for compositionally derived events. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 199–223. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1975. Adverbs of quantification. In Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Edward L. Keenan (ed), 178–188. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 457–489. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lipták, Anikó. 2012. V-stranding ellipsis and verbal identity. The role of polarity focus. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2012: 82–96.Google Scholar
. 2013. The syntax of emphatic positive polarity in Hungarian: Evidence from ellipsis. Lingua 128: 72–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saab, Andrés & Lipták, Anikó. 2016. Movement and deletion after syntax: Licensing by inflection reconsidered. Studia Linguistica 70: 66–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Dilin. 2008. Intransitive or object deleting? Classifying English verbs used without an object. Journal of English Linguistics 36: 289–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–665.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 2008. On little n, √, and types of nouns. In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedűs & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 105–144. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lu, Bingfu, Zhang, Guohua & Bisang, Walter. 2015. Valency classes in Mandarin. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 709–764. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Marelj, Marijana. 2004. Middles and Argument Structure across Languages. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria. 2006. Emphatic affirmation and polarity: Contrasting European Portuguese with Brazilian Portuguese, Spanish, Catalan and Galician. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2004 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 278], Jenny Doetjes & Paz González (eds), 197–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Double realization of verbal copies in European Portuguese emphatic affirmation. In The Copy Theory of Movement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 107], Norbert Corver & Jairo Nunes (eds), 77–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Emphatic polarity in European Portuguese and beyond. Lingua 128: 95–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martí, Luisa. 2015. Grammar versus pragmatics: Carving nature at the joints. Mind & Language 30: 437–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diane & Roberge, Yves. 1989. Recipe context null objects in English. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 134–139.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1991. Clause structure, ellipsis and proper government in Irish. Lingua 85: 259–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McShane, Marjorie J. 1999. The ellipsis of accusative direct objects in Russian, Polish and Czech. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 7: 45–88.Google Scholar
. 2000. Hierarchies of parallelism in elliptical Polish structures. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8: 83–117.Google Scholar
. 2005. A Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 1999. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and Identity in Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Cruz.
Mittwoch, Anita. 1971. Idioms and unspecified NP deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 255–259.Google Scholar
. 1982. On the difference between eating and eating something: Activities versus accomplishments. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 113–122.Google Scholar
. 2005. Unspecified arguments in episodic and habitual sentences. In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 237–254. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montalbetti, Mario M. 1984. After Binding. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Mykhaylyk, Roksolana & Sopata, Aldona. 2016. Object pronouns, clitics, and omissions in child Polish and Ukrainian. Applied Psycholinguistics 37: 1051–1082. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & van de Koot, Hans. 2012. The linguistic expression of causation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Tal Siloni, Martin Everaert & Marijana Marelj (eds), 20–51. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Szendrői, Kriszta. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 671–714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Németh T., Enikő. 2000. Occurrence and identification of implicit arguments in Hungarian. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1657–1682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Az implicit alanyi és tárgyi igei argumentumok előfordulásának lexikai-szemantikai jellemzői (The lexical-semantic properties of the occurrence of implicit subject and direct object arguments). Ms, University of Szeged. (Published as Németh T., Enikő. 2008. Az implicit alanyi és tárgyi igei argumentumok előfordulásának lexikai-szemantikai jellemzői. In Stukturális Magyar Nyelvtan, 4: A Szótár Szerkezete (Structural Grammar of Hungarian, 4: The Structure of the Lexicon), Ferenc Kiefer (ed), 71–128. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó).
Nevins, Andrew. 2007. The representation of third person and its consequences for Person-Case Effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 273–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Oku, Satoshi. 1998. A Theory of Selection and Reconstruction in the Minimalist Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Olsen, Mari Broman & Resnik, Philip. 1997. Implicit object constructions and the (in)transitivity continuum. In Proceedings of the 33rd Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society , 327–336. Chicago, IL: CLS.
Otani, Kazuyo & Whitman, John. 1991. V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 345–358.Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, E. Phoevos. 2003. Empty nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 381–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, Walter. 2011. Implicit arguments, paychecks and variable-free semantics. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches & David Lutz (eds), 155–175. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2013. Noun phrase structure in article-less Slavic languages: DP or not DP? Language and Linguistics Compass 7: 201–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa, Pirvulescu, Mihaela & Roberge, Yves. 2008. Null objects in child language: Syntax and the lexicon. Lingua 118: 370–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, Ana Teresa, Pirvulescu, Mihaela, Roberge, Yves & Castilla, Anny. 2013. On the development of null implicit objects in L1 English. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 58: 443–464.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Pinto, Manuela. 2013. Tracking reference with null subjects. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2013: 131–145.Google Scholar
Pisarkowa, Krystyna. 1968. Zaimek w polskim zdaniu: 3. Obserwacje zaimka odmiennego w grupie orzeczenia (The pronoun in the Polish sentence: 3. Observations about the inflecting pronoun in the verb phrase). Język Polski XLVIII: 187–201.Google Scholar
. 1969. Funkcje Składniowe Polskich Zaimków Odmiennych (Syntactic Functions of the Polish Inflecting Pronouns). Wrocław: Zakład Narowowy Imienia Ossolińskich/Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul. 1969. On so-called pronouns in English. In Modern Studies in English: Readings in Transformational Grammar, David Reibel & Sanford Schane (eds), 201–224. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Potashnik, Joseph. 2012. Emission verbs. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Tal Siloni, Martin Everaert & Marijana Marelj (eds), 251–278. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998. Determiner phrase in a language without determiners (with apologies to Jim Huang 1982). Journal of Linguistics 34: 165–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Przepiórkowski, Adam, Bańko, Mirosław, Górski, Rafał L. & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (eds). 2012. Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego (National Corpus of Polish). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo P. 1986. On the null object in European Portuguese. In Studies in Romance Linguistics, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Carmen Silva-Corvalán (eds), 373–390. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2008. Lexicalized meaning and the internal structure of events. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspect [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan Rothstein (ed), 13–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 1998. Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds), 21–38. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, François. 2007. It is raining (somewhere). Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 123–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The Theta System: An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.Google Scholar
Resnik, Philip. 1993. Selection and Information: A Class-Based Approach to Lexical Relationships. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
. 1996. Selectional constraints: An information-theoretic model and its computational realization. Cognition 61: 127–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reuland, Eric. 2001. Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 439–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Sally. 1988. Unlikely lexical entries. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 202–212. Berkeley, CA: BLS.
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1995. On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 405–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa. 2000. Impersonal SIĘ in Polish: A Simplex Expression anaphor. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8: 199–237.Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa & Milojević Sheppard, Milena. 2003. Indefinite reflexive clitics in Slavic: Polish and Slovenian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 89–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Cinnaminson, NJ: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. A deletion analysis of null subjects. In Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 58–87. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2012. On the nature of syntactic parameters: A programme for research. In Parameter Theory and Linguistic Change, Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopes, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar (eds), 319–334. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rocquet, Amélie. 2013. Splitting Objects. A Nanosyntactic Account of Direct Object Marking. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.
Ross, John Rober. 1969. Guess who? In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia M. Green & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 252–286. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Ruda, Marta. 2013a. Dopełnienia domyślne a elipsa frazy werbalnej: Analiza składniowa kontekstów konfirmatywnych w ujęciu minimalistycznym (Null objects and VP ellipsis: Syntactic analysis of polar contexts within the minimalist framework). Polonica XXXIII: 193–212.Google Scholar
. 2013b. Wypowiedzi emfatyczne i topikalizacja V(P) z powtórzeniem czasownika jako elipsa VP i realizacja akustyczna dwóch kopii V (Verb doubling emphatic affirmation and V(P) topicalisation as VP ellipsis and accoustic realisation of two copies of V). Polonica XXXIII: 213–243.Google Scholar
. 2014a. The impersonal subject -􀨎/􀨔 construction in Polish and the typology of Voice heads. Studies in Polish Linguistics 9: 203–243.Google Scholar
. 2014b. Missing objects in special registers: The syntax of null objects in English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 59: 339–372.Google Scholar
. 2014c. On the V-stranding VP ellipsis analysis of missing objects in Polish. In Proceedings of the Third Central European Conference in Linguistics for Postgraduate Students, Balázs Surányi & Gergő Turi (eds), 60–85. Budapest: Pázmány Péter Catholic University.Google Scholar
. 2016. NP ellipsis (effects) in Polish and Hungarian: FFs on Fs, Agree, and Chain Reduction. The Linguistic Review 33: 649–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming. Syntactic representation of null arguments: [NP e] as [ np n] (minimally). In Understanding Null Subjects. A Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective, Federica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Runić, Jelena. 2013. A new look at clitics: Evidence from Slavic. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Third Indiana Meeting 2012, Steven Franks, Markus Dickinson, George Fowler, Melissa Witcombe & Ksenia Zanon (eds), 275–288. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Ruppenhofer, Josef. 2004. The Interaction of Valence and Information Structure. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
. 2005. Regularities in null instantiation. Ms, Saarland University.
Ruppenhofer, Josef & Michaelis, Laura A. 2010. A constructional account of genre-based argument omissions. Constructions and Frames 2: 158–184.Google Scholar
. 2013. Frames and the interpretation of omitted arguments in English. Ms, Hildesheim University and University of Colorado.
Rutkowski, Paweł. 2002. Noun/pronoun asymmetries: Evidence in support of the DP hypothesis in Polish. Jezikoslovlje 3: 159–170.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru. 2007. Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43: 203–227.Google Scholar
Saloni, Zygmunt. 1976. Cechy Składniowe Polskiego Czasownika (Syntactic Features of the Polish Verb). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2006. When less is more: Implicit arguments and relevance theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 139–170.Google Scholar
Şener, Serkan & Takahashi, Daiko. 2010. Ellipsis of arguments in Japanese and Turkish. Nanzan Linguistics 6: 79–99.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2011. Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 267–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sopata, Aldona. 2016. Null objects in adult and child Polish: Syntax, discourse and pragmatics. Lingua 183: 86–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tancredi, Christopher Damian. 1992. Deletion, Deaccenting and Presupposition. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Thoms, Gary. 2010. ‘Verb floating’ and VP-ellipsis: Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing. Ms, University of Strathclyde (Published as Thoms, Gary. 2011. ‘Verb floating’ and VP-ellipsis. Towards a movement account of ellipsis licensing. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2010, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed), 252–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
Tomioka, Satoshi. 2003. The semantics of Japanese null pronouns and its crosslinguistic implications. In The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 61], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 321–339. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Topolińska, Zuzanna. 1977. Wyznaczoność (tj. charakterystyka referencyjna) grupy imiennej w tekście polskim, II (Reference (i.e. referential properties) of noun phrases in Polish texts, II). Polonica III: 59–78.Google Scholar
. 1984. Składnia grupy imiennej (The syntax of noun phrases). In Gramatyka Współczesnego Języka Polskiego. Składnia (The Grammar of Contemporary Polish. Syntax), Zuzanna Topolińska (ed), 301–389. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Trinh, Tue. 2009. A constraint on copy deletion. Theoretical Linguistics 35: 183–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tryzna, Marta Maria. 2015. Acquisition of object clitics in child Polish: Evidence for three developmental stages. Lingua 161: 67–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1977. A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese: The First Step towards Discourse Analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria & Papadopoulou, Despina. 2006. Aspect and argument realization: A study on antecedentless null objects in Greek. Lingua 116: 1595–1615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turkowska, Maria. 1981. O wyznaczoności (On reference). Polonica VII: 47–66.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vicente, Luis. 2007. The Syntax of Heads and Phrases: A Study of Verb (Phrase) Fronting. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Wang, Qi, Lillo-Martin, Diane, Best, Catherine T. & Levit, Andrea. 1992. Null subject versus null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition 2: 221–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen. 2010. What ‘you’ and ‘I’ mean to each other: Person indexicals, self-ascription, and theory of mind. Language 86: 332–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Word Meaning and Syntax: Approaches to the Interface. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Alexander. 2012. Null Complement Anaphors as definite descriptions. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Anca Chereches (ed), 125–145. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
. 2015. Arguments in Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willim, Ewa. 2000. On the grammar of Polish nominals. In Step by Step. Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 319–346. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Event, Individuation and Countability. A Study with Special Reference to English and Polish. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.Google Scholar
. 2012. On the feature valuation/interpretability biconditional in Minimalist Theory. The case of (un)interpretable gender. In Sound, Structure and Sense. Studies in Memory of Edmund Gussmann, Eugeniusz Cyran, Henryk Kardela & Bogdan Szymanek (eds), 761–806. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2004. Relevance and lexical pragmatics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 343–360.Google Scholar