Part of
The Noun Phrase in English: Past and present
Edited by Alex Ho-Cheong Leung and Wim van der Wurff
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 246] 2018
► pp. 187222
References

References

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan
2008Register variation: A corpus approach. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds), 175–197. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, Hubert & Shank, Christopher
2009A diachronic perspective on the grammaticalization of zero-complement clauses in English: The case of think, feel and realize . In From Will to Well: Studies in Linguistics, Offered to Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Stef Slembrouck, Miriam Taverniers & Mieke van Herreweghe (eds), 117–134. Gent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
COHA: Corpus of Historical American English. Davies, Mark 2010- The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 million words, 1810–2009. [URL]
Dehé, Nicole
2014Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax-Prosody Relation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2013Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Finegan, Edward & Biber, Douglas
1995 That and zero complementisers in Late Modern English: Exploring ARCHER from 1650–1990. In The Verb in Contemporary English, Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 241–257. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Gries, Stefan T.
2009Assessing frequency changes in multistage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24(4): 385–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2009Initial I think: Main or comment clause? Discourse and Interaction 2(1): 49–70.Google Scholar
2010Pragmatic functions of parenthetical I think . In New Approaches to Hedging, Gunther Kaltenböck, Gudrun Mihatsch & Stefan Schneider (eds), 243–72. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2007On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 852–897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mantlik, Annette
2011The Historical Development of Shell Nouns: A Diachronic Study of Abstract Noun Constructions in English. PhD dissertation, Munich University.Google Scholar
OED Oxford English Dictionary Online (OED3). [URL].
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1991On the history of that/zero as clause object links in English. In English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds), 272–289. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Roland, Douglas, Elman, Jeffrey L. & Ferreira, Victor S.
2006Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences. Cognition 98: 245–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001‘Presupposition can be a bluff’: How abstract nouns can be used as presupposition triggers. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1529–1552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Non-compositionality and emergent meaning of lexico-grammatical chunks: A corpus study of noun phrases with sentential complements as constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 51: 313–340.Google Scholar
Staum, Laura
2005When stylistic and social effects fail to converge: A variation study of complementizer choice. Ms, Stanford University. [URL] (30 July, 2014).
Stvan, Laurel Smith
2014Truth is, sentence-initial shell nouns are showing up bare. In Complex Visibles Out There. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2014: Language Use and Linguistic Structure, Ludmila Veselovská & Markéta Janebová (eds), 591–606. Olomouc: Palacký University.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony
1991aThe discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 13: 237–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991bA quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie
2010A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: Accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14(3): 399–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 42(2): 295–332.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Horsch, Jakob
2024. Cuanto(s) más datos, (tanto) mejor. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1  pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Pinson, Mathilde
2022. The (inter)subjectification ofbottom linephrases. Lingvisticae Investigationes 45:2  pp. 276 ff. DOI logo
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2020. How the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model might enrich Diachronic Construction Grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34  pp. 306 ff. DOI logo
Schmid, Hans-Jörg, Quirin Würschinger, Sebastian Fischer & Helmut Küchenhoff
2021. That’s Cool. Computational Sociolinguistic Methods for Investigating Individual Lexico-grammatical Variation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.