Cover not available
Part of
Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages
Edited by Annika Hübl and Markus Steinbach
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 247] 2018
► pp. 173–206

What is a Narration – and why does it matter?

| University of Bamberg
Despite the increasing interest in textual structure and the specific use of linguistic means in narratives, the concept of Narration has so far not been an issue of theoretical concern within linguistics but has rather been used than defined or problematized. In this respect, the chapter takes a closer look at the concept of Narration itself. The starting point is the basic assumption that the analysis of Free Indirect Discourse (FID) – a phenomenon which seems to be restricted to Narration only – will offer crucial insights with respect to characteristics of the underlying narrative structure when read “against the grain”. In this regard, the alignment of formal approaches of context shift and cognitive approaches of perspectivization leads to the conclusion that the narratological differentiation between narrator and character can be seen as a projection of the grammatical differentiation between speaker vs. observer, which is reflected on the different linguistic levels in a recursive manner. Consequently, I argue that the complex unfolding of different layers of discourse allows for poly-perspectival resp. metarepresentational effects on the textual macro-structure and hence constitutes a core characteristic of Narration. Against this background, the proposed model is not only able to align micro- and macro-structural accounts of Narration but also allows for a new perspective on the specific use of grammatical means in narrative discourse. In this respect, the paper argues that Narration does indeed matter for linguistics.
Article outline
  • 1.The mystery of Narration
  • 2.What is a Narration?
    • 2.1Micro-structural conceptions of Narration: The sequence of events
    • 2.2Macro-structural conceptions of Narration: The double-layered structure of discourse
  • 3.The anatomy of the double-layered structure of Narration
    • 3.1The case of free indirect discourse (FID)
    • 3.2 The How and What of narrative discourse
    • 3.3Is there a narrator at all?
    • 3.4Who speaks?
    • 3.5Interim conclusion: the configuration of narrative discourse structure
  • 4.Narration in oral story telling
  • 5.What about fictionality?
  • 6.Why it matters
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.247.08zem
References (93)
References
Abbott, H. P. 2008. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abraham, W. 2012a. (Inter)subjectification or foreign consciousness/other’s mind alignment as synchronic and diachronic concepts of change? Conceptualization and data fidelity. In Covert patterns of modality, W. Abraham & E. Leiss (eds), 24–78. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2012b. Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, W. Abraham & E. Leiss (eds), 67–108. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, N. 2012. Implicatures in discourse. In Discourse and Grammar. From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, G. Grewendorf & T. E. Zimmermann (eds), 11–42. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, N. & Lascarides, A. 1993. A semantics and pragmatics for the pluperfect. In Proceedings of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 93), 250–259. <[URL]>
2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to do things with words. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bally, C. 1950. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Banfield, A. 1982. Unspeakable Sentences. Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1993. Where epistemology, style, and grammar meet literary history: The development of represented speech and thought. In Reflexive Language. Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, J. A. Lucy (ed.), 339–364. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, K. [1934] 1999. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache, reprint. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
Caenepeel, M. & Moens, M. 1994. Temporal structure and discourse structure. In Tense and Aspect in Discourse [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 75], C. Vet & C. Vetters (eds), 5–20. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. & von Stutterheim, C. 2007. Durch die Grammatik fokussiert. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 145: 35–60.Google Scholar
Carroll, N. 2001. On the narrative connection. In New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective, W. van Peer & S. B. Chatman (eds), 21–41. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, J.. 2005. Oral Narration in Modern French. A Linguistic Analysis of Temporal Patterns [Research Monographs in French Studies 19]. London: Legenda.Google Scholar
Chatman, S. B. 1980. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davidse, K. & Vandelanotte L. 2012. Tense use in direct and indirect speech in English. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 236–250.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duden. 2009. Die Grammatik, 8th edn. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Eckardt, R. 2012. Particles as speaker indexicals in free indirect discourse. In Particles, L. Hogeweg & E. McCready (eds), 99–119. Special issue of Sprache und Datenverarbeitung.Google Scholar
2014. The Semantics of Free Indirect Discourse. How Texts Allow us to Mind-read and Eavesdrop. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, S.. 1990. Point of View: A Linguistic Analysis of Literary Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. [1985]1994. Mental Spaces. Aspect of Meaning Construction in Natural Language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fleischman, S.. 1990. Tense and Narrativity. From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fludernik, M.. 1992. The historical present tense in English literature. An oral pattern and its literary adaptation. Language and Literature 17: 77–107.Google Scholar
. 1993. The Fictions of Language and the Languages of Fiction: The Linguistic Representation of Speech and Consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frege, G. 1979. Posthumous Writings, ed by I. Baulbach, trans. by P. Long & R. White. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. & Hutto, D. D. 2008. Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice. In The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12], J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, C. Sinha & E. Itkonen (eds), 17–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. [1972] 2007. Discours du récit. Essai de méthode. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
1982. Frontiers of narrative. In Figures of Literary Discourse, G. Genette (ed), 127–144. Translation by A. Sheridan. New York NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Glas, R. 1984. ‘sollen’ im heutigen Deutsch. Bedeutung und Gebrauch in der Schriftsprache. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gloning, T. 1991. Bedeutung und zusammenhängendes sprachliches Handeln Sollen und das Vorausdeutungsspiel. In Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung, Bologna 1990. Part 1, S. Stati, E. Weigand & F. Hundsnurscher (eds), 123–134. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Günthner, S. 1999. Polyphony and the ‘layering of voices’ in reported dialogues: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 685–708.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Perspectivity in reported dialogues. In Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse [Human Cognitive Processing 9], C. F. Graumann & W. Kallmeyer (eds), 347–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamburger, K. 1957. Die Logik der Dichtung. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Herrmann, A. & Steinbach, M. 2012. Quotation in sign languages – A visible context shift. In Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross Disciplinary Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 15], I. van Alphen & I. Buchstaller (eds), 203–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoorn, J. F. 2012. Epistemics of the Virtual [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J.. 1979. Some observations on the typology of focus and aspect in narrative language. Studies in Language 3(1): 37–64.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hübl, A. 2013. Role shift, indexicals, and beyond – New evidence from German Sign Language (DGS). In Proceedings of Texas Linguistics Society conference, L. C. Geer (ed), 1–11. <[URL]>
Johanson, L.. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Ö. Dahl (ed), 27–187. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kiefer, F.. 1987. On defining modality. Folia Linguistica 21(1): 67–94.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kindt, T. & Müller, H.-H.. (eds). 2003. What is Narratology? Questions and Answers Regarding the Status of a Theory. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, W.. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koch, P. & Oesterreicher, W. 1985. Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36(85): 15–43.Google Scholar
2011. Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lamarque, P.. 2004. On not expecting too much from narrative. Mind and Language 19: 393–408.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 2011. The English present. Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy. In Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect, and Epistemic Modality [Human Cognitive Processing 29], F. Brisard & A. Patard (eds), 45–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leiss, E.. 1992. Die Verbalkategorien des Deutschen. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der sprachlichen Kategorisierung. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2012. Epistemicity, evidentiality, and Theory of Mind (ToM). In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, W. Abraham & E. Leiss (eds), 39–65. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maier, E. 2012. Quotation and unquotation in free indirect discourse. Ms, University of Groningen. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Martínez, M. & Scheffel, M. 2003. Narratology and theory of fiction: Remarks on a complex relationship. In Kindt & Müller (eds), 221–237.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1978. World-creating predicates. Versus 19(20): 79–93.Google Scholar
Meibauer, J., Steinbach, M. & Altmann, H. 2013. Kontroversen in der Forschung zu Satztypen und Satzmodus. In Satztypen des Deutschen, J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach & H. Altmann (eds), 1–19. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molendijk, A. 1994. Tense use and temporal orientation: The passé simple and the imparfait of French. In Tense and Aspect in Discourse, C. Vet & C. Vetters (eds), 21–48. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nerbonne, J.. 1986. Reference time and time in narration. Linguistics and Philosophy 9(2): 83–95.Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, K. 2012. The constructional underpinnings of viewpoint blends. The past + now in language and literature. In Viewpoint in Language. A Multimodal Perspective, B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (eds), 177–197. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Öhlschläger, G. 1989. Zur Syntax und Semantik der Modalverben des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pascal, R.. 1977. The Dual Voice. Free Indirect Speech and its Functioning in the Nineteenth-century European Novel. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Patron, S. 2009. Le narrateur: Introduction à la théorie narrative. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
. 2010. The death of the narrator and the interpretation of the novel. The example of Pedro Páramo by Juan Rulfo. Journal of Literary Theory 4(2): 253–272.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pier, J. 2003. On the semiotic parameters of narrative: A critique of story and discourse. In Kindt & Müller (eds), 73–97.Google Scholar
Pietrandrea, P. 2005. Epistemic Modality: Functional Properties and the Italian System [Studies in Language Companion Series 74]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, G. 2003. Surveying narratology. In Kindt & Müller (eds), 1–16.Google Scholar
2008. Narrativehood, narrativeness, narrativity, narratability. In Theorizing Narrativity, J. Pier, L. García & J. Ángel (eds), 19–27. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Propp, V. [1928]1968. Morphology of the Folktale, 2nd edn. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Quasthoff, U. M. 1980. Erzählen in Gesprächen. Linguistische Untersuchungen zu Strukturen und Funktionen am Beispiel einer Kommunikationsform des Alltags. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Rauh, G. 1978. Linguistische Beschreibung deiktischer Komplexität in narrativen Texten. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2000. Oratio obliqua, oratio recta: An essay on metarepresentation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Recanati, F.. 2007. Perspectival Thought. A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Truth-conditional Pragmatics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, H.. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P.. 1980. Narrative time. Critical Inquiry 7(1): 169–190.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, S. 2006. Concepts of narrative. In COLLeGIUM: Studies across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 1: The Travelling Concept of Narrative, M. Hyvärinen, A. Korhonen & J. Mykkänen (eds), 10–19. Helsinki: Helda. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Ryan, M.-L.. 2007. Toward a definition of narrative. In The Cambridge Companion to Narrative, D. Herman (ed), 22–36. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, P.. 2004. Context of thought and context of utterance. Mind and Language 19(3): 279–304.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, W. 2003. Narrativity and eventfulness. In Kindt & Müller (eds), 17–33.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. 1981. Tense Variation in Narrative. Language 57(1): 45–62.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R.. 1975. The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History 6(2): 319–332.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharvit, Y.. 2008. The puzzle of free indirect discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(3): 353–395.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šklovskij, V. B. [1929 2 ]1991. Theory of Prose, ed by B. Sher. Champaign IL: Dalkey Archive Press.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 2003. Modes of Discourse. The Local Structure of Texts. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Domain of tense. In The Syntax of Time, J. Guéron & J. Lecarme (eds), 597–619. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Titzmann, M. 2003. The systematic place of narratology in literary theory and textual theory. In Kindt & Müller (eds), 175–204.Google Scholar
Tomaševskij, B. [1925]1965. Thematics. In Russian Formalist Criticism. Four Essays, L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (eds), 61–89. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, L.. 2009. Speech and Thought Representation in English. A Cognitive-functional Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A.. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wüest, J. 1993. Textsortenabhängiger Tempusgebrauch. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 103(3): 231–243.Google Scholar
Zeman, S. 2013a. Zur Diachronie der Modalverben: Sollen zwischen Temporalität, Modalität und Evidentialität. In Funktion(en) von Modalität, W. Abraham & E. Leiss (eds), 335–366. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeman, S. 2013b. Vergangenheit als Gegenwart? Zur Diachronie des Historischen Präsens. In Sprachwandel im Neuhochdeutschen, P. M. Vogel (ed), 236–256. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zeman, S. 2014. (C)overt modality and its perspectival effects on the textual surface. In Modes of Modality. Modality, Typology, and Universal Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 149], W. Abraham & E. Leiss (eds), 457–484. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016a. Introduction. In Perspectives on Narrativity and Narrative Perspectivization [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 21], N. Igl & S. Zeman (eds), 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b. Perspectivization as a link between narrative micro- and macro-structure. In Perspectives on Narrativity and Narrative Perspectivization [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 21], N. Igl & S. Zeman (eds), 15–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Elmeligi, Wessam & Mona Khattab
2024. Virtual Catharsis: Decoding Empathy in VR Refugee Narratives in the UNVR Films. In Screenwriting for Virtual Reality [Palgrave Studies in Screenwriting, ], ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
West, Donna E.
2022. Promoting Dialectic Processes Through Dialogic Inquiry. In Narrative as Dialectic Abduction [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 64], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Stokke, Andreas
2021. Free Indirect Discourse in Non-fiction. Frontiers in Communication 5 DOI logo
Eckardt, Regine
2020. Narrative Mikrostruktur. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 48:3 ► pp. 495 ff. DOI logo
Zeman, Sonja
2019. The emergence of viewpoints in multiple perspective constructions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo
Zeman, Sonja
2020. Narrativität als linguistische Kategorie. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 48:3 ► pp. 447 ff. DOI logo
Zeman, Sonja
2020. Grammatik der Narration. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 48:3 ► pp. 457 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.