Part of
Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces
Edited by Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 251] 2019
► pp. 257293
Acquaviva, Paolo
2008Lexical Plurals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology. In York Working Papers – Special Issue York-Essex Morphology Meeting May 2009, Alexandra Galani, Daniel Redinger & Norman Yeo (eds), 1–21. York: University of York.Google Scholar
Arregi, Karlos & Nevins, Andrew
2017Beware Occam’s syntactic Razor: Morphotactic analysis and Spanish mesoclisis. [URL] (25 november 2017).
Ascoli, Graziadio Isaia
1873Trascrizioni e altri additamenti elementari. Archivio Glottologico Italiano I: XLII–LIV.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
2008The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldi, Benedetta & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2017Le vocali toniche nelle varietà friulane, ladine e romance. Ladinia, XLI: 53–80.Google Scholar
Béjar, Susana & Rezac, Milan
2009Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 35–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005Structuring Sense, Vol. 1: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
1998Some remarks on the Latin case system and its development in Romance. In Theoretical Advances on Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 157], José Lema & Esthela Trevino (eds), 71–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008On absolute and contextual syncretism. In The Bases of Inflectional Identity, Andrew Nevins & Asaf Bachrach (eds), 156–205. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki
2001Multiple agreement and case deletion: Against φ-(in)completeness. Syntax 4: 147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1998Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘Semantic Parameter’. In Events and Grammar, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174: 99–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Gallego, Ángel & Ott, Dennis
To appear. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. In Generative Syntax: Questions, Crossroads, and Challenges, Ángel Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds) Special issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics
Clackson, James
2007Indo-European Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, Joao & Figueiredo Silva, Cristina
2002Notes on nominal and verbal agreement in Portuguese. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 17–29.Google Scholar
Crisma, Paola, Lutz, Marten & Sybesma, Rint
2011The point of Bantu, Chinese and Romance nominal classification. Italian Journal of Linguistics 23: 251–299.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, Girard, Raphaël, Mudzingwa, Calisto & Wiltschko, Martina
2014The internal syntax of Shona class prefixes. Language Sciences 43: 18–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf
2001Movement operations after Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader
2016Semantic gender diversity and its architecture in the grammar of Arabic. Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 8: 154–199.Google Scholar
Ferrari Bridgers, Franca
2008A unified syntactic analysis of Italian and Luganda nouns. In The Bantu-Romance Connection [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 131], Cécile De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds), 239–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vaux, Bert
1998Theoretical aspects of Indo-European nominal morphology: The nominal declensions of Latin and Armenian. In Mír Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins, Jay Jasanoff, H. Craig Melchert & Lisi Oliver (eds), 223–240. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Harris, James & Halle, Morris
2005Unexpected plural inflections in Spanish: Reduplication and Metathesis. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 195–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James
1985On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–621.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
2010aComparisons and Contrasts. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010bToward a syntactic reinterpretation of Harris and Halle (2005). In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2008: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Groningen (2008) [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2], Reineke Bok-Bennema, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Bart Hollebrandse (eds), 145–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kihm, Alain
2005Noun class, gender, and the lexicon/syntax/morphology interfaces: A comparative study of Niger-Congo and Romance languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne (eds), 459–512. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ruth
2014Gender in Amharic: A morphosyntactic approach to natural and grammatical gender. Language Sciences 43: 102–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2005I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2007A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011aGrammatical Categories. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011c(Definite) denotation and case in Romance. In Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Nice 2009 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 3],Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs & Tobias Scheer (eds), 149–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2011dMesoclisis in the imperative: Phonology, morphology or syntax? Lingua 121: 1101–1120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014From Latin to Romance: Case loss and preservation in pronominal systems. Probus 26(2): 217–248.Google Scholar
2017aN morphology and its interpretation: The neuter in Italian and Albanian varieties. In Constraints on Structure and Derivation in Syntax, Phonology and Morphology, Anna Bloch-Rozmej & Anna Bondaruk (eds), 213–236. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2017bGender, number and inflectional class in Romance: Feminine/plural -a . In Language Use and Linguistic Structure, Joseph Emonds & Markéta Janebova (eds), 263–282. Olomouc: Palacky University OlomoucGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201–25.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew
2011Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, Isabel & Arregi, Karlos
2005Stress-by-structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 43–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Percus, Orin
2011Gender features and interpretation: A case study. Morphology 21: 167–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Picallo, Carme
2008Gender and number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio VII: 47–66.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2010Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation and Defective Goals Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1968[1949]Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Morfologia. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Salvioni Carlo
1902Il plurale del femminili di 1° declinazione esposto per -a ed -an in qualche varietà alpina di Lombardia. Rendiconti del Reale Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere, Serie II 35.851: 905–919.Google Scholar
Savoia Leonardo M.
2015I dialetti italiani. Sistemi e processi fonologici nelle varietà di area italiana e romancia. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Steriopolo, Olga & Wiltschko, Martina
2010Distributed Gender hypothesis. In Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Gerhild Zybatow, Philip Dudchuk, Serge Minor & Ekaterina Pshehotskaya (eds), 155–172. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1997Vº-to-Iº movement and inflection for person in all tenses. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 189–213. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1994Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Manzini, Maria Rita, Leonardo M. Savoia & Benedetta Baldi
2021. Chapter 8. -ŋ plurals in North Lombard varieties. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 357],  pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Microvariation in Verbal and Nominal Agreement: An Analysis of Two Lombard Alpine Dialects. Probus 33:2  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Microvariation in Verbal and Nominal Agreement: An Analysis of Two Lombard Alpine Dialects. Probus 33:2  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.