N morphology and its interpretation
Romance feminine singular/plural -a
This contribution deals with the -a inflection in Italian varieties, which realizes plural as well as feminine singular. Thus the -a inflection externalizes apparently irreducible contents (singular/plural). We try to answer the question whether it is possible to unify these two readings. Feminine plural -a alternating with masculine singular characterize standard Italian and many South-Italian dialects (§§ 1–3). On the contrary, in North-Lombard, Romansh and North-Tuscany varieties -a characterizes feminine singular and plural, while the specialized (-)i plural morphology occurs on determiners (§§ 4–7). We argue that in both types of languages, the -a plural externalizes a nominal class property [aggregate]. We propose that [aggregate] is at the basis of the superficial syncretism between plural and singular/feminine in the occurrence of the -a inflection. Indeed [aggregate] introduces a notion of plurality as aggregate of individuals compatible at least with mass singulars (aggregates of parts). In general, the inflectional vowels of Romance languages, or in any event Italian -a, are not mere byproducts of paradigmatic organization, but are lexical items, endowed with interpretive content.
Article outline
- 1.-a plurals in standard Italian and central Calabrian
- 2.The internal structure of the noun
- 3.Analysis of -a plurals in central Calabrian
- 4.-a plurals in North Lombard dialects: Tresivio (Valtellina)
- 5.
-a(-ŋ) plurals in Bregaglia Valley dialects (Casaccia)
- 6.A note on the syntactic distribution of plural inflections
- 7.North Tuscany singular/plural -a
- 8.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References (53)
References
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical Plurals. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2009. Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology. In York Working Papers – Special Issue York-Essex Morphology Meeting May 2009, Alexandra Galani, Daniel Redinger & Norman Yeo (eds), 1–21. York: University of York.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arregi, Karlos & Nevins, Andrew. 2017. Beware Occam’s syntactic Razor: Morphotactic analysis and Spanish mesoclisis. <[URL]> (25 november 2017).
Ascoli, Graziadio Isaia. 1873. Trascrizioni e altri additamenti elementari. Archivio Glottologico Italiano I: XLII–LIV.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark. 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baldi, Benedetta & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2017. Le vocali toniche nelle varietà friulane, ladine e romance. Ladinia, XLI: 53–80.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Béjar, Susana & Rezac, Milan. 2009. Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 35–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense, Vol. 1: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Calabrese, Andrea. 2008. On absolute and contextual syncretism. In The Bases of Inflectional Identity, Andrew Nevins & Asaf Bachrach (eds), 156–205. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carstens, Vicki. 2001. Multiple agreement and case deletion: Against φ-(in)completeness. Syntax 4: 147–163. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘Semantic Parameter’. In Events and Grammar, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2010. Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174: 99–149. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam, Gallego, Ángel & Ott, Dennis. To appear. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. In Generative Syntax: Questions, Crossroads, and Challenges, Ángel Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds). Special issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics.
Clackson, James. 2007. Indo-European Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Costa, Joao & Figueiredo Silva, Cristina. 2002. Notes on nominal and verbal agreement in Portuguese. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 17–29.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crisma, Paola, Lutz, Marten & Sybesma, Rint. 2011. The point of Bantu, Chinese and Romance nominal classification. Italian Journal of Linguistics 23: 251–299.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, Girard, Raphaël, Mudzingwa, Calisto & Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The internal syntax of Shona class prefixes. Language Sciences 43: 18–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf. 2001. Movement operations after Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–595. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 2016. Semantic gender diversity and its architecture in the grammar of Arabic. Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 8: 154–199.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris & Vaux, Bert. 1998. Theoretical aspects of Indo-European nominal morphology: The nominal declensions of Latin and Armenian. In Mír Curad: Studies in Honor of Calvert Watkins, Jay Jasanoff, H. Craig Melchert & Lisi Oliver (eds), 223–240. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, James & Halle, Morris. 2005. Unexpected plural inflections in Spanish: Reduplication and Metathesis. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 195–222. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–621.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard. 2010a. Comparisons and Contrasts. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard. 2010b. Toward a syntactic reinterpretation of Harris and Halle (2005). In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2008: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Groningen (2008) [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2], Reineke Bok-Bennema, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Bart Hollebrandse (eds), 145–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kihm, Alain. 2005. Noun class, gender, and the lexicon/syntax/morphology interfaces: A comparative study of Niger-Congo and Romance languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne (eds), 459–512. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kramer, Ruth. 2014. Gender in Amharic: A morphosyntactic approach to natural and grammatical gender. Language Sciences 43: 102–115. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kramer, Ruth. 2015. The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2007. A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2011a. Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2011c. (Definite) denotation and case in Romance. In Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Nice 2009 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 3],Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs & Tobias Scheer (eds), 149–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2011d. Mesoclisis in the imperative: Phonology, morphology or syntax? Lingua 121: 1101–1120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2014. From Latin to Romance: Case loss and preservation in pronominal systems. Probus 26(2): 217–248.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2017a. N morphology and its interpretation: The neuter in Italian and Albanian varieties. In Constraints on Structure and Derivation in Syntax, Phonology and Morphology, Anna Bloch-Rozmej & Anna Bondaruk (eds), 213–236. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2017b. Gender, number and inflectional class in Romance: Feminine/plural -a
. In Language Use and Linguistic Structure, Joseph Emonds & Markéta Janebova (eds), 263–282. Olomouc: Palacky University Olomouc![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201–25.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs. omnivorous number. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oltra-Massuet, Isabel & Arregi, Karlos. 2005. Stress-by-structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 36(1): 43–84. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Percus, Orin. 2011. Gender features and interpretation: A case study. Morphology 21: 167–196. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Picallo, Carme. 2008. Gender and number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio VII: 47–66.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation and Defective Goals Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1968[1949]. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Morfologia. Torino: Einaudi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salvioni Carlo. 1902. Il plurale del femminili di 1° declinazione esposto per -a ed -an in qualche varietà alpina di Lombardia. Rendiconti del Reale Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere, Serie II 35.851: 905–919.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Savoia Leonardo M. 2015. I dialetti italiani. Sistemi e processi fonologici nelle varietà di area italiana e romancia. Pisa: Pacini.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steriopolo, Olga & Wiltschko, Martina. 2010. Distributed Gender hypothesis. In Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Gerhild Zybatow, Philip Dudchuk, Serge Minor & Ekaterina Pshehotskaya (eds), 155–172. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vikner, Sten. 1997. Vº-to-Iº movement and inflection for person in all tenses. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 189–213. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin. 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Manzini, Maria Rita, Leonardo M. Savoia & Benedetta Baldi
Pescarini, Diego
2021.
Microvariation in Verbal and Nominal Agreement: An Analysis of Two Lombard Alpine Dialects.
Probus 33:2
► pp. 227 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Pescarini, Diego
2021.
Microvariation in Verbal and Nominal Agreement: An Analysis of Two Lombard Alpine Dialects.
Probus 33:2
► pp. 227 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.