Part of
Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 161175
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2012Moving verbal chunks in the low functional field. In Cartography of Syntactic Structures 7, Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds) 129–137. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bonet, M. Eulàlia
1991Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Brandi, Luciana & Savoia, M. Leonardo
1990Proprietà morfosintattiche e assegnazione del caso nel causativo arbëresh. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 15: 29–121.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2014Defects of Defective Intervention. Linguistic Inquiry 45 (4). 707–719.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1981Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1986Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Shlonsky, Ur
2004Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 35(4): 519–557.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003The interaction of passive, causative, and ‘restructuring’ in Romance. In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Cristina Tortora (ed.) 50–66. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004‘Restructuring’ and functional structure. In Structures and Beyond, Adriana Belletti (ed.) 132–191. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006Restructuring and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris
2005A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8: 81–120.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2007Causation, obligation, and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 197–238.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grano, Thomas
2015Control and Restructuring. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa
1993Causative and Perception Verbs: A Comparative Study. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
1996Semantic restrictions in Romance causatives and the incorporation approach. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 294–313.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2004Wanting, having, and getting: A note on Fodor and Lepore 1998. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 255–267.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harves, Stephanie
2008Intentional transitives and silent HAVE: Distinguishing between want and need. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds) 211–219. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Harves, Stephanie & Kayne, Richard
2012Having need and needing have . Linguistic Inquiry 43: 120–132.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1975French Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1993Towards a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47(1): 3–31.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2016Italian, Tuscan, and Corsican. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 206–227. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. ‘The verb phrase: VP-related functional projections’. In The Syntax of Italian, Giuseppe Longobardi ed. Cambridge CUP
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2007A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchis Moreno, Mihaela & Carolina Petersen
2016In defense of defective intervention: Locality effects in Romance. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo & Sandra Pereira, 171–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2017Is there any defective intervention in the syntax? In Aaron Kaplan, Abby Kaplan, Miranda K McCarvel & Edward J Rubin (eds), Proceedings of WCCFL 34, 355–363. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Martha
1998Locality in A-movement. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
2000Phases and the syntax of applicatives. In Proceedings of NELS 31, Min-joo Kim & Uri Strauss (eds) 333–349. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David
1971Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1976Ristrutturazione. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 1: 1–54.Google Scholar
1986On chain formation. In Syntax and Semantics 19. The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Hagit Borer (ed.) 65–96. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2016Clitics. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 786–801. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R.
1976To ‘have’ and to not have ‘have’. In Linguistic and Literary Studies, in Honor of Archibald A. Hill, Mohammad Ali Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé & Werner Winter (eds) 263–270. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle
2016Complex predicates. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam, Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 981–993. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017The Romance Person Case Constraint is not about clitic clusters. Datives, ed. by Mateu, Jaume and Pineda, Anna. Language Science Press.Google Scholar
In progress. A parameter hierarchy for the Romance faire-infinitif. Ms, Anglia Ruskin University.
Vincent, Nigel
1988Italian. In The Romance Languages, Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent (eds) 279–313. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sheehan, Michelle
2020. The Development of Exceptional Case Marking in Romance with a Particular Focus on French. Probus 32:2  pp. 367 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.