Cover not available
Part of
Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 283–296

Chapter 19
Phonological correlates of syntactic structure

The distribution of raddoppiamento fonosintattico in Calabrian

 | University of Cambridge
The present article considers the syntactic constraints operative on the distribution of a phonological fortition process, raddoppiamento fonosintattico ‘phonosyntactic doubling’, in the Calabrian dialect of Cosenza. It is shown that the relevant locality restrictions are best understood, not in terms of the three core structural configurations Spec-Head, Head-Head and Head-Comp, but in terms of phasal domains, highlighting how different phonological realizations represent the spell-out of deep syntactic differences mapped at the syntax-phonology interface. At the same time, the theoretical assumptions assumed here provide us with the key to understanding some intriguing empirical generalizations about the distribution of Cosentino RF which, in turn, throw new light on some current theoretical assumptions about clause structure and the nature of phases.
Keywords: syntax-phonology interface, phase, locality, raddoppiamento fonosintattico
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cosentino RF: An overview
    • 2.1RF triggers
    • 2.2Defining locality
      • 2.2.1Core configurations: Spec-head, head–head and head-comp
      • 2.2.2Phases
  • 3.Summary and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.252.19led
References (34)
References
Andalò, Adrina. 1991. Il raddoppiamento sintattico nel dialetto di Napoli. In Tra rinascimento e struttre attuali. Saggi di linguistica italiana, Luciano Giannelli et al. (eds) 241–251. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2006. Syntactic doubling and the encoding of voice in eastern Abruzzese. In Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Donald Baumer, David Montero & Michael Scanlon (eds) 87–95. Somverille MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Corr, Alice. 2017. Ibero-Romance and the Syntax of the Utterance. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta & Scheer, Tobias. 2015. Modular PIC, Linguistic Inquiry 46(4): 593–624.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Ovidio, Francesco. 1874. Fonetica del dialetto di Campobasso. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 4(1): 145–184.Google Scholar
Fanciullo, Franco. 1986. Syntactic reduplication and the Italian dialects of the centre-south. Journal of Italian Linguistics 8: 67–103.Google Scholar
. 1997. Raddoppiamento sintattico e ricostruzione linguistica nel sud italiano. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio. 1996. Alcune riflessioni sugli imperativi italiani. In Italiano e dialetto nel tempo. Saggi di grammatica per Giulio C. Lepschy, Paola Benincà, Guglielmo Cinque, Tullio De Mauro & Nigel Vincent (eds) 133–148. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2009. Grammatica diacronica del napoletano.[Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie Band 350] Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016a. Italian, Tuscan, and Corsican. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 206–227. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016b. The dialects of southern Italy. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 246–269. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. In press. Parameters in the development of Romance perfective auxiliary selection. In Historical Linguistics 2015. Selected Papers from the 22nd International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Naples, 27–31 July 2015, Michela Cennamo & Claudia Fabrizio (eds) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. In prep. The syntactic distribution of raddoppiamento fonosinttatico in Cosentino: A phase-theoretic account. Romance Languages and Linguistics Theory, Dragomirescu, Adina & Nicolae, Alexandru (eds), Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ledgeway, Adam & Lombardi, Alessandra. 2005. Verb movement, adverbs and clitic positions in Romance. Probus 17: 79–113.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 1988. History and geography of raddoppiamento fonosintattico: Remarks on the evolution of a phonological rule. In Certamen Phonologicum, Pier Marco Bertinetto & Michele Loporcaro (eds), 341–387. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
. 1997. Lengthening and raddoppiamento fonosintattico. In The Dialects of Italy, Martin Maiden & Mair Parry (eds) 41–51. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo. (2005). I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa., 3 Vols. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
. 2016. Quale informazione sintattica viene interpretata dai fenomeni fonosintattici? Evidenza dalle varietà italiane meridionali. In Actes du XXVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes, (Nancy, 15–20 juillet 2013), Section 4: Syntaxe, Adam Ledgeway, Michela Cennamo & Guido Mensching (eds) 403–414. Nancy: ATILF. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Rivero, María-Luisa. 1994a. Negation, imperatives and Wackernagel effects. Rivista di Linguistica 6: 39–66.Google Scholar
. 1994b. Clause structure and V movement in the languages of the Balkans. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 63–120.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rivero, María-Luisa & Terzi, Arhonto. 1995. Imperatives, V-movement and logical mood. Journal of Linguistics 31: 301–332.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Savoia, Leonardo. 1993. Conditions on /u/ propagation in southern Italian dialects. In Syntactic Theory and the Dialects of Italy, Adriana Belletti (ed.) 252–318. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1966. Grammatica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Fonetica,Vol. 1. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Sintassi e formazione delle parole, Vol. 3. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Sampson, Rodney. 2016. Sandhi phenomena. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 669–680. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savoia, Leonardo M. 1987. Teoria generativa, modelli fonologici e dialettologia. La propagazione di u in una varietà lucana. Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia XI: 185–263.Google Scholar
2015. I dialetti italiani. Sistemi e processi fonologici nelle varietà di area italiana e romancia. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Silvestri, Giuseppina. 2007. Il rafforzamento fonosintattico nel dialetto di Verbicaro (Cosenza). L’Italia Dialettale 68: 146–151.Google Scholar
. 2014. Rafforzamento fonosintattico as a phenomenon of the phonology-syntax interface. Paper presented at the Romance Linguistics Seminar, University of Cambridge, 28 October.Google Scholar
Torcolacci, Giuseppe. 2014a. Il raddoppiamento fonosintattico e la codifica di tratti morfosintattici. Il caso dei dialetti italiani meridionali.,In L’Italia Dialettale. In Approcci diversi alla dialettologia italiana contemporanea. Roberta D’Alessandro, Claudio Di Felice, Irene Franco & Adam Ledgeway (eds). Special issue ofL’Italia Dialettale 75: 247–271.Google Scholar
. 2014b. Marking the Default. Auxiliary Selection in Southern Italian Dialects. Leiden: LOT.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1988. Non-linear phonology in diachronic perspective: Stress and word-structure in Latin and Italian. In Certamen Phonologicum, Pier Marco Bertinetto & Michele Loporcaro (eds), 421–432. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Corr, Alice
2022. Utterances without commitment. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The Grammar of the Utterance, DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The grammar of dialogue. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The expression of affect. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. A grammar for the utterance. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Introduction. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Conclusions. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Interjections and particles. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Vocatives. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Doing things with utterance grammar. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Ledgeway, Adam
2021. The syntactic distribution of raddoppiamento fonosinttatico in Cosentino. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 355], ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Cruschina, Silvio, Adam Ledgeway & Eva-Maria Remberger
2019. The dialects of Italy at the interfaces. In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Abbreviations. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. General Preface. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Copyright Page. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.