Part of
Language Contact, Continuity and Change in the Genesis of Modern Hebrew
Edited by Edit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Yael Reshef and Moshe Taube
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 256] 2019
► pp. 143178
2010Argument Structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface: A case study in Latin and other languages. PhD dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Victor & Mateu, Jaume
2013Satellite-framed Latin vs. verb-framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus 25: 227–265.Google Scholar
Alonge, A.
1997 “Semantica lessicale e propriet`a sintattiche dei verbi di movimento italiani: Analisi di dati acquisiti da dizionari di macchina e da un corpus testuale computerizzato”, in L. Agostiniani, P. Bonucci, G. Giannecchini, F. Lorenzi and L. Reali, eds., Atti del III Convegno della Societ`a Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, Naples, Italy, 31-63.Google Scholar
Bar-Asher, Moshe
2015Morphology of Mishnaic Hebrew. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute & the Academy of the Hebrew Language. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A
2017Diachronic syntactic studies in Hebrew pronominal reciprocal constructions. In Diachrony in Biblical Hebrew, Cynthia Miller & Ziony Zevit (eds), 209–244. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Beavers, John
2008On the nature of goal marking and delimitation: Evidence from Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 44: 283–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John, Levin, Beth Wei & Tham, Shiao
2010The typology of motion events revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Slobin, Dan I.
1994Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Borochovsky, Esther & Sovran, Tamar
2003Hebrew Construction Grammar. In Hebrew– A Living Language III, Rina Ben-Shahar & Gideon Toury (eds), 31–50. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute, Tel Aviv University, and Hakibbutz Hame’uxad. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis
1995The Semantics of Syntax. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Cummis, Sarah
1996Movement and direction in French and English. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 31–54Google Scholar
Croft, William A., Barðdal, Jóhanna, Hollmann, Willem B., Sotirova, Violeta & Taoka, Chiaki
2010Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 10], 201–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummins, S.
1998 “Le mouvement directionnel dans une perspective d’analyse monos´emique”, Langues et Linguistique 24: 47-66.Google Scholar
Doron, Edit & Dubnov, Keren
2017The locative alternation in Biblical (and Modern) Hebrew. In Studies in Biblical Hebrew Linguistics, Adina Moshavi & Tania Notarius (eds), 321–360. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Dowty, David
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, Maria Theresa & Mateu, Jaume
2010On classes of idioms and their interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 1397–1411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Even Shoshan, Avraham
1986Hamilon Hehadash. Jerusalem: Kiryat Sefer.Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio
2007The exhaustive lexicalisation principle. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in Linguistics 34(2): 165–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Ramchand, Gilliam
2005Prepositions and results in Italian and English: An analysis from event decomposition. In Perspectives on Aspect, Henk Verkuyl, Henriëtte de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds), 81–105. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2016Against deficiency-based typologies. Manner-alternation parameters in Italian and English. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from `Going Romance’ 28, Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo & Sandra Perei (eds), 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fong, Vivienne
1997The Order of Things: What Directional Locatives Denote. PhD dissertation, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, Georgia
1973A syntactic syncretism in English and French. In Issues in Linguistics, Braj B. Kachru, Robert B. Lees, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli & Sol Saporta (eds), 257–278. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Henkin, Roni
1998Motion in Hebrew: Issues in the typology and rhetoric of motion expressions. Lešonenu 61(4). (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1990Semantic Structures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997Twisting the night away. Language 73: 534–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenni, Ernst
2013Preposition: Biblical Hebrew. In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Geoffrey Khan (ed.) Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan
1996Foundations of French Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayegama, Taro
2003Why English motion verbs are special. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 3: 341–373. Seoul: The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kopecka, A.
2013Describing motion events in Old and Modern French: Discourse effects of a typological change. In Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events [Human Cognitive Processing 41], Juliana Goschler & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 163–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lepetit, X. & Schosler, Lena
2009Verbs of movement in a diachronic and typological perspective. In Mélanges plurilingues offerts à Suzanne Schlyter à l’occasion de son 65 ème anniversaire, Petra Bernardini, Verner Egerland & Jonas Granfeldt (eds), 269–280. Lund: Lunds Universitet.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995Unaccusativity. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2012Lexicalized meaning and manner/result complementarity. In Studies in Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates, Berit Gehrke and Boban Arsenijevic (eds). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2013Manner and result: A view from clean . In Language Description Informed by Theory [Studies in Language Companion Series 147], Rob Pensalfini, Myfany Turpin & Diana Guillemin (eds), 337–358. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2019 In Lexicalization Patterns, Robert Truswell (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Event Structure. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca
2005Multi-word expressions between syntax and the lexicon: The case of Italian verb particle constructions. SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 145–173.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume
2010On the l-syntax of manner and causation. In Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 158], Maia Duguine, Susana Huidobro & Nerea Madariaga (eds), 89–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions. In Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, Violete Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 252–278. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateu, Jaume and Gemma Rigau
2009Romance Paths as Cognate Complements. Dins P. Masullo Erin, O’Rourke & Chia-Hui Huang, eds. Romance Linguistics: Structures, Interfaces, and Microparametric Variation. 227–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume & Rigau, Gemma
2010Verb-particle constructions in Romance: A lexical-syntactic account. Probus 22: 241–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McClure, William
1994Syntactic Projections of the Semantics of Aspect. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew
2004Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP shells. Linguistics 42: 523–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2008Lexicalized meaning and the internal temporal structure of events. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to Aspect [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan D. Rothstein (ed.), 13–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Building scalar changes. In The Roots of Syntax and the Syntax of Roots, Hagit Borer, Artemis Alexiadou & Florian Schaeffer (eds). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015A constructional idiom in Modern Hebrew: The influence of English on a native Hebrew collocation. Journal of Jewish Languages 3: 325–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
2001An event structure account of English resultatives. Language 77(4): 766–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Reflections on the complementarity of manner and result. In Syntax, Lexicon and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, Ronald
1985Motion in Tswana and its characteristic lexicalization. Studies in African Linguistics 16: 57–87.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I
1997Mind, code, and text. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type. Dedicated to T. Givón, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 437–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
2000Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Evidence for Linguistic Relativity [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 198], Susanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds), 107–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative, 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds), 219–257. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sobin, Dan I.
2006What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories [Typological Studies in Language 66], Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds), 59–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, William
2012Parameter theory and motion predicates. In Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, Violete Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 279–299. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Son, Minjeong
2007Directionality and resultativity: The cross-linguistic correlation revisited. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in Linguistics 34(2): 126–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Grace
1997Cross-linguistic Differences in the Expression of Motion Events and their Implications for Second Language Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Song, Grace & Levin, Beth
1998A compositional approach to cross-linguistic differences in motion expressions. Presented at the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New York.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Zaretskaya, Marina
1998Verb prefixation in Russian as lexical subordination. Linguistics 36: 1- 39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, James H-Y
2003Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 4(2): 301–316.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1975Semantics and syntax of motion. In Syntax and Semantics 4, John P. Kimball (ed.), 181–238. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1966Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Verkerk, Annemarie
2013Scramble, scurry and dash: The correlation between motion event encoding and manner verb lexicon size in Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change 3: 169–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Diachronic change in Indo-European motion event encoding. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4: 40–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinay, Jean-Paul & Darbelnet, Jean
1958Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Wienold, Götz
1995Lexical and conceptual structures in expressions for movement and space: With reference to Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Indonesian as compared to English and German. In Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 114], Urs Egli, Peter E. Pause, Cristoph Schwarze, Arnim von Stechow & Götz Wienold (eds), 301– 340. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Louisa & Oh, Eunjeong
2007On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar