Cover not available
Part of
Language Contact, Continuity and Change in the Genesis of Modern Hebrew
Edited by Edit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Yael Reshef and Moshe Taube
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 256] 2019
► pp. 337–364

Variation and conventionalization in language emergence

The case of two young sign language of Israel

| University of Haifa
| University of Haifa
Languages are constantly formed and changed by the opposing forces of variation and conventionalization. Yet it is not clear whether one of the two forces is prior to the other in language emergence, nor do we know how the two interact early in the life of a language. By comparing two young sign languages, Israeli Sign Language (ISL) and Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language (ABSL), both about 90 years old, we argue that the initial stages of a language are characterized by great variation. Conventionalization ensues, but it does not proceed in a unified manner in all linguistic domains of a language or in all languages equally; some domains and structures conventionalize before others, and in some languages the drive towards conventionalization is stronger than in others. We provide evidence for the claim that the drive towards conventionalization is the result of various socio-linguistic factors, such as time, the expansion of the community, the expansion of language use to new communicative domains, and the need to signal social identity.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Conventionalization and variation in language
  • 2.ABSL and ISL: Two types of sign language
  • 3.The lexicon: Basic vocabulary
  • 4.The lexicon: Compounding
    • 4.1Lexical variation in compounds
    • 4.2Increased structural regularity in compounds
    • 4.3Variation and conventionalization in ABSL compounds
  • 5.Phonology: Sublexical variation
    • 5.1A comparative study of sublexical variation in three sign languages
    • 5.2Sublexical variation and characteristics of the community
  • 6.Signaling community identity: A signature accent in ABSL
  • 7.Discussion and conclusions: From variation towards conventionalization
    • 7.1Variation at the initial stages of a language
    • 7.2Later stages: Pressure for conventionalization
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.256.13mei
References (51)
References
Al-Fityani, Kinda & Padden, Carol A. 2010. Sign language geography in the Arab world. In Sign Languages: A Cambridge Survey, Diane Brentari (ed.), Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arbib, M. 2012. How the Brain Got Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol A. & Sandler, Wendy. 2008. The roots of linguistic organization in a new language. Interaction Studies 9(1): 131–150. Special issue on Holophrasis vs. Compositionality in the Emergence of Protolanguage .Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil. 1971. Class, Codes and Control, Vol. 1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 2012. Phonology. In Sign Language: An International Handbook, Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds), 21–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, Usage, and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Vos, Connie & Zeshan, Ulrike. 2012. Introduction: Demographic, sociocultural, and linguistic variation across rural signing communities. In Sign Languages in Village Communities: Anthropological and Linguistic Insights, Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (eds), 2–23. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Nijmegen: Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J. & Foulkes, Paul. 2000. Speaker, speech, and knowledge of sounds. In Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues, Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr & Gerard J. Docherty (eds), 105–129. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ergin, Rabia, Meir, Irit, Ilkbaşaran, Deniz, Padden, Carol A. & Jackendoff, Ray. In preparation. The development of argument structure in Central Taurus Sign Language.
Israel, Assaf. 2009. Sublexical Variation in Three Sign Languages. MA thesis, University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Israel, Assaf & Sandler, Wendy. 2010. Duality of patterning as an emergent property: Evidence from a new sign language. In The Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference (EVOLANG 8), Andrew D. M. Smith, Marieke Schouwstra, Bart de Boer & Kenny Smith (eds), 423–424. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
. 2011. Phonological category resolution: A study of hand shapes in younger and older sign languages. In Formational Units in Sign Language, Rachel Channon & Harry van der Hulst (eds), 177–202. Nijmegen: Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Language, consiousness, culture: Essays on mental structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kastner, Itamar, Meir, Irit, Sandler, Wendy & Dachkovsky, Svetlana. 2015. The emergence of embedded structure: Insights from Kafr Qasem Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1–15. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Kisch, Shifra. 2000. Deaf Discourse: The Social Construction of Deafness in a Bedouin Community. MA Thesis, Tel-Aviv University. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
. 2004. Negotiating deafness in a Bedouin community. In Genetics, Disability and Deafness, John V. Van Cleve (ed.), 148–173. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. The social construction of deafness in a Bedouin community in the Negev. Medical Anthropology 27(30): 283–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Demarcating generation of signers in the dynamic sociolinguistic landscape of a shared sign-language: The case of the Al-Sayyid Bedouin. In Sign Languages in Village Communities: Anthropological and Linguistic Insights, Ulrike Zeshan & Connie de Vos (eds), 87–125. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Nijmegen: Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of sound change. Word 19: 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Chang, Vol. I: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Chang, Vol. II: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert & Tabouret-Keller Andrée. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary & Dale Rick. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5:1.e8559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit. 2010. The emergence of argument structure in two new sign languages. In Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds), 101–113. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol A., Aronoff, Mark & Sandler, Wendy. 2007. Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics 43: 531–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit & Sandler, Wendy. 2008. A Language in Space: The Story of Israeli Sign Language. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Sandler, Wendy, Padden, Carol A. & Aronoff, Mark. 2010a. Emerging sign languages. In Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language, and Education, Vol. 2, Marc Marschark & Patricia Spencer (eds), 267–280. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Aronoff, Mark, Sandler, Wendy & Padden, Carol A. 2010b. Sign languages and compounding. In Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds), 301–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Israel, Assaf, Sandler, Wendy, Padden, Carol A. & Aronoff, Mark. 2013a. Community structure and language structure. Linguistic Variation 12(2): 247–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Sandler, Wendy, Padden, Carol A. & Aronoff, Mark. 2013b. Competing iconicities in the structure of languages. Cognitive Linguistics 24(2): 309–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir Irit, Sandler, Wendy, Ben-Zeev, Yifat Ziv, Lanesman, Sara & Sarsour, Meyad. 2016. How does a lexicon emerge in a new language? Insights from village sign languages of Israel. Iyunim be Safa ve-Hevra 8(1–2), 11–43. (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
Meir Irit, Aronoff, Mark, Börstell, Carl, Hwang, So-One, Ilkbasaran, Deniz, Kastner, Itamar, Lepic, Ryan, Lifshitz Ben Basat, Adi, Padden, Carol A. & Sandler, Wendy. 2017. The effect of being human and the basis of grammatical word order: Insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages. Cognition 158: 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2006. Morphology in pidgins and creoles. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Keith Brown (ed.), 305–308. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1989. Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The phonology of movement in sign language. In Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds), 577–603. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Phonological organization of sign languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(3): 162–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. The emergence of phonetic and phonological features in sign language. Nordlyd 14(1): 183–212. Special issue Features, Martin Krämer, Sandra-Iulia Ronai & Peter Svenonius (eds).Google Scholar
. 2017. The challenge of sign language phonology. Annual Review of Linguistics 3: 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol A. & Aronoff, Mark . 2005. The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. PNAS 102(7): 2661–2665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2006. Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Aronoff, Mark, Meir, Irit & Padden, Carol A. 2011. The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(2): 503–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Aronoff, Mark, Padden, Carol A. & Meir, Irit. 2014. Language emergence. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, Nicholas J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman & Jack Sidnell (eds), 250–284. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Belsitzman, Gal & Meir, Irit. to appear. Visual foreign accent in an emerging sign language. Sign Language and Linguistics, special issue in memory of Irit Meir.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1959. Course in General Linguistics, translated, with an introduction and notes by Wade Baskin. New York NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Scott, D. A., Carmi, R., Elbedour, K., Duyk, G. M., Stone, E. M. & Sheffield, V. C. 1995. Nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness is linked to the DFNB1 locus in a large inbred Bedouin family from Israel. American Journal of Human Genetics 54(4): 965–968.Google Scholar
Stokoe, William. 1960. Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communications Systems [Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8]. Buffalo NY: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2000. Sociolinguistics: An Introduction. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt. 2006. Variation in language: Overview. In Encyclopedia of Languages and Linguistics, Keith Brown (ed.), 333–340. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, Alison & Grace, George W. 2007. The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua 117: 543–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Barberà, Gemma & Josep Quer
2023. Chapter 8. Studying microdiachronic change with the Catalan Sign Language corpus. In Advances in Sign Language Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 108], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Placiński, Marek, Przemysław Żywiczyński, Theresa Matzinger, Marta Sibierska, Monika Boruta-Żywiczyńska, Anna Szala & Sławomir Wacewicz
2023. Evolution of Pantomime in Dyadic Interaction. A Motion Capture Study. Journal of Language Evolution DOI logo
Raviv, Limor, Marianne de Heer Kloots & Antje Meyer
2021. What makes a language easy to learn? A preregistered study on how systematic structure and community size affect language learnability. Cognition 210 ► pp. 104620 ff. DOI logo
Johnson, Tamar, Noam Siegelman & Inbal Arnon
2020. Individual Differences in Learning Abilities Impact Structure Addition: Better Learners Create More Structured Languages. Cognitive Science 44:8 DOI logo
Sandler, Wendy, Gal Belsitzman & Irit Meir
2020. Visual foreign accent in an emerging sign language. Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1-2 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Tkachman, Oksana & Carla L. Hudson Kam
2020. Measuring lexical and structural conventionalization in young sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1-2 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.