Cover not available
Part of
Brazilian Portuguese, Syntax and Semantics: 20 years of Núcleo de Estudos Gramaticais
Edited by Roberta Pires De Oliveira, Ina Emmel and Sandra Quarezemin
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 260] 2020
► pp. 167–190

Chapter 7
Diagnosing verb raising

The view from cartography

| Universidade Estadual de Campinas
Adverbs have been largely taken as diagnostics for movements. The enrichment of structures by the “Cartographic Program” brings about an important question to the theory of verb raising: which AdvPs should be considered reliable diagnostics? The paper brings data from Brazilian Portuguese and Peruvian Spanish to argue that low adverbs are bona fide diagnostics for verb raising. The position of the finite and the infinitive relative to the nine lowest adverbs of Cinque’s hierarchy in four possible orders is tested in these two languages. Data from BP, testing the position of high adverbs relative to the lexical verb, is presented in the sequence. Those data allow one to argue that high adverbs cannot be used as diagnostic tools for movements. Further data on VP-ellipsis confirms the contention that only low adverbs are bona fide diagnostics for V raising.
Keywords: generative syntax, cartography, verb raising, adverbs, the Cinque Hierarchy
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cross-linguistic differences on V-to-I and the split-IP
  • 3.Cinque’s (1999) hierarchy of adverbs
  • 4.A pinch of methodology
  • 5.Verb raising across low AdvPs in BP and PS: The finite and infinitive forms
  • 6.High adverbs
  • 7.Conclusions and further issues
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.260.07tes
References (48)
References
Ambar, Manuela. 1989. Sobre a posição do sujeito, movimento do verbo e estrutura da frase. In Actas do 5º Encontro da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, 369–399. Lisboa: APL.Google Scholar
Ambar, Manuela, Negrão, Esmeralda Vaillatii, Veloso, Rita & Graça, Luís. 2009. Tense domains in BP and EP – vP, CP and phases. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2007 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1], Enoch O. Aboh, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer & Petra Sleeman (eds.), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
. 2001. Agreement projections. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 482–510. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brito, Ana Maria. 2001. Clause structure, subject positions and verb movement. About the position of sempre in European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1999: Selected Papers from ’Going Romance 1999, Leiden, 9–11 December 1999 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 221], Yves D’hulst, Johan Rooryck & Jan Schroten (eds), 63–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camacho, José & Sánchez, Liliana. 2017. Does the verb raise to T in Spanish? In Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces: Case Studies in Honor of Violeta Demonte [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 239], Olga Fernández-Soriano, Elena Castroviejo & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez (eds), 47–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Giusti, Giuliana. 1991. Partitive “ne” and the QP-Hypothesis: A case study. University of Venice WPL 1: 1–19.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114: 683–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and Its Exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36, pp. 315-332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads: the Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 4. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. The Syntax of Adjectives. A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Again on tense, aspect, mood morpheme order and the “mirror principle”. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 9, Functional Structure from Top to Toe, ed. P. Svenonius, pp. 232–65. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. On the status of functional categories (heads and phrases) Language and Linguistics 18:4, pp. 521–576.Google Scholar
. 2013. Cognition, universal grammar, and typological generalizations. Lingua 130: 50–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, João. 1996. Adverb positioning and V-movement in English. Studia Linguistica 50(1): 22–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Word Order Variation: A Constraint-Based Approach. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia. 2013. On richness of tense and verb movement in Brazilian Portuguese. In Information Structure and Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 197], Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel L. Jiménez Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds), 297–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia & Matos, Gabriela. 2002. VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese – a comparative analysis.” Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1(2): 177-195.Google Scholar
. 2002. VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese a comparative analysis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1(2): 177–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1978. The verbal complex V′-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry 9(2): 151–175.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 2001. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Justin Michael. 2006. The Syntactic and Semantic Roots of Floating Quantification. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Galves, Charlotte. 1993. O enfraquecimento da concordância no Português Brasileiro. In Português Brasileiro: Uma Viagem Diacrônica, Ian Roberts & Mary A. Kato (eds), 387–408. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.Google Scholar
. 1994. V-movement, levels of representation and the structure of S. Letras de Hoje 96: 35–58.Google Scholar
. 2001. Ensaios sobre as gramáticas do português. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1998. Overt vs. covert movements. Syntax 1: 128–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lacerda, Renato. 2012. Quantificadores flutuantes no português brasileiro. MA thesis, USP.Google Scholar
. 2016. Rebel without a case. In The Morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin America, Francisco Ordóñez & Mary A. Kato (eds). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laenzlinger, Christopher. 2002. A feature-based theory of adverb syntax. GG@G (Generative Grammar in Geneva) 3: 67–105.Google Scholar
. 2011. Elements of Comparative Generative Grammar: A Cartographic Approach. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Laenzlinger, Christopher & Soare, Gabriela. 2005. A cartographic approach to the Romance mittelfeld. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 30: 17–69.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.Google Scholar
Matos, Gabriela & Cyrino, Sonia. 2001. Elipse de VP no Português Europeu e no Português Brasileiro. Boletim da Abralin 26: 386–390. Special issue.Google Scholar
Mioto, Carlos & Mria Cristina Figueiredo. 2012. Novo manual de sintaxe. São Paulo: Editora Contexto.Google Scholar
Modesto, Marcello. 2000. On the Identification of Null Arguments. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365–474.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Schifano, Norma. 2018. Verb Movement in Romance: A Comparative Study. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, Gláucia. 2001. Word order in Brazilian Portuguese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva, Cláudia Roberta Tavares. 2009. Morfologia flexional e movimento do verbo em português: Por uma análise unificada a partir da proposta vickneriana. Revista do GELNE 11: 1–18.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1988. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3): 425–449.Google Scholar
Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2013. On Verb Movement in Brazilian Portuguese: A Cartographic Study. PhD dissertation, Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia.Google Scholar
. 2015. Por que advérbios altos não são diagnósticos para o movimento do verbo? Lingüística 31–32: 27–46.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa de Mena. 1984. Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Vicente, Helena Guerra. 2006. O quantificador flutuante ‘todos’ no Português Brasileiro e no Inglês: Uma abordagem gerativa. PhD dissertation, Universidade de Brasilia.Google Scholar
Vicente, Helena Guerra & Quadros Gomes, Ana Paula. 2013. Um tratamento unificado de grau para o quantificador flutuante e o intensificador todo. Linguística 9: 112–132. Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Tescari Neto, Aquiles
2022. On the Raising of the Finite Main Verb in Angolan Portuguese and in Mozambican Portuguese: Cartographic Hierarchies, Microvariation and the Use of Adverbs as Diagnostics for Movement. Probus 34:1 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Tescari Neto, Aquiles
2022. “Adverbs and functional heads” twenty years later: cartographic methodology, verb raising and macro/micro-variation. The Linguistic Review 39:2 ► pp. 293 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.