Part of
Brazilian Portuguese, Syntax and Semantics: 20 years of Núcleo de Estudos Gramaticais
Edited by Roberta Pires De Oliveira, Ina Emmel and Sandra Quarezemin
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 260] 2020
► pp. 191212
Bale, Alan C. & Barner, David
2009The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics 26(3): 217–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barner, David & Snedeker, Jesse
2005Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition 97: 41–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beviláqua, Kayron, Lima, Suzi & Pires de Oliveira, Roberta
2016Bare Nouns in Brazilian Portuguese: An experimental study on grinding. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, Vol. 11: Cognitive, Semantic and Crosslinguistic Approaches. Kansas KS: New Prairie Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beviláqua, Kayron & Pires de Oliveira, Roberta
2014Brazilian bare phrases and referentiality: Evidences from an experiment. Revista Letras 90: 253–275. Curitiba.Google Scholar
2017Brazilian bare nouns in comparatives: Experimental evidence for non-contextual dependency. Revista Letras 96: 354–376. Curitiba, UFPR.Google Scholar
2018What do bare nouns mean cross-linguistically? Preliminary results. The count-mass distinction – A linguistic misunderstanding? May 7–9, Bochum, Germany.Google Scholar
Carey, Susan, Xu, Fei
2001Infant’s knowledge of objects: Beyond object files and object tracking. Cognition 80: 179–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Gregory Norman
1977Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Sybesma, Rint
1998Yi-wan tang, yi-ge tang: Classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese studies 28(3): 385–412.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1998Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4): 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174: 99–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014How universal is the mass/count distinction? Three grammars of counting. In Chinese Syntax in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai (Eds.). Oxford Scholarship Online, November. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose
2017Countability distinctions and semantic variation. Natural Language Semantics 25(2), 125–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Pires de Oliveira, Roberta
2008Reference to kinds in Brazilian Portuguese: Definite singulars vs. bare singulars. Proceedings of SuB12. Oslo: ILOS, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Marcelo
2017Bare nominals in Brazilian Portuguese: An overview. Conference New Perspectives on the Form and Meaning of (Bare) Nominals. Universidade de São Paulo, 27–28 April, São Paulo, Brazil.
Grimm, Scott & Levin, Beth
2012Who has more furniture? An exploration of the bases for comparison. Mass/Count in Linguistics, Philosophy and Cognitive Science Conference, Ecole Normale Supérieure, December 20–21, Paris, France.
Huntley-Fenner, Gavin, Carey, Susan & Solimando, Andrea
2002Objects are individuals but stuff doesn’t count: Perceived rigidity and cohesivenss influence infants’ representations of small groups of discrete entities. Cognition 85: 203–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kulkarni, Ritwik, Rothstein, Susan & Treves, Alessandro
2010Computational constraints on composition interpretation: Refocusing the debate on language universal. Lingua 120(12): 2717–2722. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landman, Fred
2011Count nouns, mass nouns, neat nouns, mess nouns. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic, and Communication, Vol. 6: Formal Semantics and Pragmatics. Discourse, Context and Models. Kansas KS: New Prairie Press.Google Scholar
Link, Godehard
1983The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, Rainer Bauerle, Christoph Schwartze & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 302–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lima, Suzi
2014The Grammar of Individuation and Counting. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Lima, Suzi & Gomes, Ana Paula Quadros
2016The interpretation of Brazilian Portuguese bare singulars in neutral contexts. Revista Letras 93: 193–209. Curitiba.Google Scholar
Müller, Ana
2002Genericity and the denotation of common nouns in Brazilian Portuguese. Probus 1(14): 279–298.Google Scholar
Pelletier, Francis Jeffrey
2012Lexical nouns are both +mass and +count but they are neither +mass nor +count. [URL]> (11 December 2019) DOI logo
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Rothstein, Susan
2011Bare singular noun phrases are mass in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua 121: 2153–2175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Carturani, Tiago
2014The semantics of plural in Brazilian Portuguese. X Workshop on Formal Linguistics, 28–29 August, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Chierchia, Gennaro
In press. Contemporary issues in natural language semantics. To be published in DELTA.
Rothstein, Susan
2010Counting, measuring and the mass distinction. The Journal of Semantics 27(3): 343–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Semantics for Counting and Measuring. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Cristina & Munn, Alan
1999Against the nominal mapping parameter: Bare nouns in Brazilian Portuguese. In NELS 29: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, Nancy Hall, Masako Hirotani & Pius Tamanji (eds), 339–353. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Scontras, Gregory, Davidson, Kathryn, Deal, Amy Rose & Murray, Sarah E.
2017Who has more? The influence of linguistic form on quantity judgments. In Proceedings of Linguistic Society of America, Vol. 2, 41: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soja, Nancy N., Carey, Susan & Spelke, Elizabeth S.
1991Ontological categories guide young children’s inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms. Cognition 38(2): 179–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, A.
(2008) Bare Nouns in Dëne Sułine. Natural Language Semantics, 16, 39–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar