Cover not available
Part of
Stative Inquiries: Causes, results, experiences, and locations
Alfredo García-Pardo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 264] 2020
► pp. 241–256

Bibliography

Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
2016 The Morphosyntax of Transitions. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aelbrecht, Lobke & Harwood, William
2015 To be or not to be elided: VP ellipsis revisited. Lingua 153: 66–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian & Wasow, Thomas
1975 The constituent structure of VP and AUX and the position of the verb be. Linguistic Analysis 1: 205–245.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
2001 Functional Structure in Nominals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Statives and nominalization. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 40: 25–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The problem with internally caused change-ofstate verbs. Linguistics 52(4): 879–909. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2008 Structuring participles. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 33–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
2006 The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–211. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Gehrke, Berit & Schäfer, Florian
2014 The argument structure of adjectival participles revisited. Lingua 149: 118–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
2015 External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
1999 On experiencers. In Studies in Greek Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou, Geoffrey C. Horrocks & Melita Stavrou (eds), 67–93. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Participles and voice. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 1–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Voice, manners, and results in adjectival passives. In The Verbal Domain, Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel Gallego (eds), 105–128. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Samioti, Yota
2013 Allosemy, idioms, and their domains: Evidence from adjectival participles. In Syntax and its Limits, Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds), 218–250. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arad, Maya
1998a Psych notes. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 203–223.Google Scholar
1998b VP Structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
1999 What counts as a class? The case of psych verbs. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 35: 1–23.Google Scholar
2002 Universal features and language-particular morphemes. In Theoretical Approaches to Universals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 49], Artemis Alexiadou (ed.), 15–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arche, María Jesús
2006 Individuals in Time [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 94]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 On the aspectuality of the Individual-level/ Stagelevel dichotomy. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1(2): 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arche, María Jesús, Fábregas, Antonio & Marín, Rafael
2017 Towards a unified treatment of Spanish copulas. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11. Selected papers from the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), London, Ontario, Silvia Perpiñán, David Heap, Itziri Moreno-Villamar & Adriana Soto-Corominas (eds), 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Emmon
1986 The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9(1): 5–16.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark, Johnson, Kyle & Roberts, Ian
1989 Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20(2): 219–251.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1985 The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 23(4): 373–415.Google Scholar
1988 Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1997 Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In Elements of Grammar, Lilliane Haegeman (ed.), 73–137. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
1988 Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 291–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paula
1986 Il lata sinistro della frase Italiana. Association of Teachers of Italian Journal 47: 57–85.Google Scholar
Bennett, Michael & Partee, Barbara
1972 Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Santa Monica CA: System Development Corporation. Reprinted with an afterword by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington 1978.Google Scholar
Bentley, Delia
2017 Result state adjectives: Valence and voice. Talk given at the Cambridge Workshop on Voice, University of Cambridge, 22–24 May.
Boeckx, Cedric
2014 What principles and parameters got wrong. In Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, M. Carme Picallo (ed.), 155–178. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1994 The projection of arguments. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Elena Benedicto & Jeff Runner (eds), 19–47. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2005a Structuring Sense, Vol. I: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005b Structuring Sense, Vol. II: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013 Structuring Sense, Vol. III: Taking Form. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio
1990 Sobre el aspecto en los adjetivos y en los participios. In Tiempo y aspecto en español, Ignacio Bosque (ed.), 177–214. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
1999 El sintagma adjetival. Modificadores y complementos del adjetivo. Adjetivo y participio. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol 1, Ch. 4, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 217–310. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
2014 On resultative past participles in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 13: 41–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Denis
1995 The Semantics of Syntax: A Minimalist Approach to Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2014 Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1): 27–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan W.
1982 The passive in lexical theory. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Joan W. Bresnan (ed.), 3–86. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael
2000 Mirror theory: Syntactic representation in perfect syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 31(1): 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2010 Review of Gillian Catriona Ramchand, Verb Meaning and the Lexion: A First-Phase Syntax. Journal of Linguistics 46: 260–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 363–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 The Lexicalist Hypothesis: Both wrong and superfluous. Language 49: 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugger, Gerhard
2001 Temporal modification, the 24-hour rule and the location of reference time. In Current Issues in Spanish Syntax and Semantics, Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach & Luis Silva-Villar (eds), 243–270. Berlin: Mouton de Gryuter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, William
1965 Spanish for Teachers. New York NY: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986 Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caha, Pavel
2009 The Nanosyntax of Case. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N.
1977 Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published in Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics series 1980 New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Carrier, Jill & Randall, Janet H.
1992 The argument structure and syntactic structure of resultatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23(2): 173–234.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
2004 A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds), 22–59. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1986a Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986b Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008 On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & María Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 291–321. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve & Clark, Herbert
1979 When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55(4): 767–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Conti-Jiménez, Carmen
2004 Construcciones pasivas con estar. ELUA 18: 21–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corver, Norbert
1997 The internal syntax of the Dutch extended adjectival projection. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 289–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1991 Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo, María Cristina
2003 Datives at Large. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1967 The logical form of action sentences. In The Logic of Decision and Action, Nicholas Rescher (ed.), 81–95. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Reprinted in Davidson, Donald 2006 The Essential Davidson, 37–71. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
de Miguel, Elena
1999 El aspecto léxico. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 2, Ch. 46, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2977–3060. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Dimitriadis, Alexis
1999 On clitics, prepositions and case licensing in Standard and Macedonian Greek. In Studies in Greek Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou, Geoffrey C. Horrocks & Melita Stavrou (eds), 95–112. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doron, Edit
2003 Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic templates. Natural Language Semantics 11: 1–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 The interaction of adjectival passive and voice. In The Roots of Syntax and the Syntax of Roots. Hagit Borer, Artmis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds), 164–191. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1979 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 546–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubinsky, Stanley & Simango, Silvester Ron
1996 Passive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for modular distinctions in grammar. Language 72(4): 749–781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David
2004 On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3): 355–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernst, Thomas
2016 Modification of stative predicates. Language 92(2): 237–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, María Teresa
2010 Bare nominals in Catalan and Spanish. Their structure and meaning. Lingua 120: 984–1009. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Espinal, María Teresa & McNally, Louise
2011 Bare singular nominals and incorporating verbs in Spanish and Catalan. Journal of Linguistics 47: 87–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio
2007 The Exhaustive Lexicalization Principle. Nordlyd, Tromsø Working Papers in Language & Lingusitics 34(2): 165–199.Google Scholar
2014 Un análisis sintáctico de dos tipos de causante. Estudios de Lingüística de la Universidad de Alicante 28: 191–214.Google Scholar
2016 Las nominalizaciones. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio & Marín, Rafael
2012 Syntactic and semantic properties of Davidsonian state verbs. Talk presented at the 42 Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Southern Utah University, 20–22 April.
2015a Deriving individual-level and stage-level psych verbs in Spanish. The Linguistic Review 32(2), 227–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b How insertion in non terminal nodes explains two participle puzzles. Talk given at Colloquium on Generative Grammar 25, IKER, May 21–23.
2017 On non-dynamic eventive verbs in Spanish. Linguistics 55(3): 451–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Leborans, María Jesús
1999 La predicación: Las oraciones copulativas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol.2, Ch. 37, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2357–2460. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Fernández Ordóñez, Inés
1999 Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 1, Ch. 21, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 1317–1398. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ramírez, Salvador
1951 Gramática española. El verbo y la oración, Vol. 4. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Fernández-Soriano, Olga & Mendikoetxea, Amaya
2011 Non-selected dative subjects in anticausative constructions. Archivio Glottologico Italiano XCVI: 87–128.Google Scholar
Filip, Hana
1999 Aspect, Eventuality Types an Nominal Reference. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry
1970 Three reasons for not deriving kill’ from cause to die’. Linguistic Inquiry 1(4): 429–438.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry & Lepore, Ernest
1999 Impossible words? Linguistic Inquiry 30(3): 445–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2005 Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian and English. In Aspectual Inquiries, Roumyana Slabakova & Paula Kempchinsky (eds), 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Teleology and animacy in external arguments. Lingua 118(2): 190–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Against deficiency-based typologies: Manner-alternation parameters in Italian and English. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from Going Romance 28, Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo & Sandra Pereira (eds), 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, Jon
1990 Towards a typology of experiencer verbs: Evidence from Spanish. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 46–62.Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki & Speas, Margaret
1986 Specifiers and projection. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 128–172.Google Scholar
Fults, Scott
2006 The Structure of Comparison: An Investigation of Gradable Adjectives. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
García-Pardo, Alfredo
2015 The aspectual structure of the VP: A case study in adjectival passives. Qualifying Paper, USC.Google Scholar
2016a The aspectual composition of adjectival passives. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 175–89. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
2016b Deriving aspect-alternating verbs without θ-roles. In Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol. 1, Christopher Hammerly & Brandon Prickett (eds), 287–300. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2017 Aspect and argument structure in adjectival passives. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 6(1): 21–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 El agente implícito en pasivas verbales y adjetivales. Revista de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística 48: 199–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Pardo, Alfredo & Menon, Mythili
2020 The aspectual structure of the adjective: Spanish ser and estar. In Hispanic Linguistics: Current Issues and New Directions [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 26], Alfonso Morales-Front, Michael J. Ferreira, Ronald P. Leow & Cristina Sanz (eds), 138–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, Berit
2011 Stative passives and event kinds. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15, Ingo Reich, Eva Horch & Dennis Pauly (eds), 241–257. Germany: Universaar – Saarland University Press.Google Scholar
2012 Passive states. In Telicity, Change and State. A Cross-categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 185–211. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Still puzzled by adjectival passives? In Syntax and its Limits, Raffaella R. Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds), 175–191. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Adjectival participles, event kind modification and pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33: 897–938. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, Berit & Sánchez-Marco, Cristina
2014 Different by-phrases with adjectival and verbal passives: Evidence from Spanish corpus data. Lingua 149: 188–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Las pasivas psicológicas. In Los predicados psicológicos, Rafael Marín (ed.), 145–184. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Gese, Helga
2011 Events in adjectival passives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15, Ingo Reich, Eva Horch & Dennis Pauly (eds), 259–273. Germany: Universaar – Saarland University Press.Google Scholar
Gili Gaya, Samuel
1961 Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Bibligraf.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Pianesi, Fabio
1997 Tense and Aspect. From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
2002 Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics 13: 327–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Torrego, Leonardo
1988 Perífrasis verbales. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Gómez Vázquez, Diana & García Fernández, Luis
2013 Estados controlados. In De la unidad del lenguaje a la diversidad de las lenguas: Actas del X Congreso Internacional de Lingüística General, José Francisco Val Álvaro (ed.), 335–346. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Yael
2006 Structuring aspectual and temporal relations with two Hebrew adverbials and the semantics/pragmatics of still. In Proceedings of the 9th Symposium on Logic and Language, Beáta Gyuris, Lászlo Kálmán, Chris Piñón, & Károly Varasdi (eds), 62–69. Budapest: Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Theoretical Linguistics Programme, Eotvös Loránd University.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1990 Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth L. & Keyser, Samuel J.
1993 On argument structure and lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20. Essays on Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 Adjectives, other stative predicates and the roots of stativity. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
2002 Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Aspect and the syntax of argument structure. In The Syntax of Aspect, Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 11–41. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays on Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hallman, Peter
2013 Predication and movement in passive. Lingua 125: 76–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 The temporal nature of state/ event distinction. Talk given at the GLOW Workshop on States and Events, Paris (France), 18 April.
Harley, Heidi
1995 Subjects, Events and Licensing. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
2013 External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v. Lingua 125: 34–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 The “bundling” hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v. In The Verbal Domain, Roberta D’Alessandro, Irene Franco & Ángel Gallego (eds), 3–28. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi, Tubino-Blanco, Mercedes & Haugen, Jason
2009 Applicative constructions and suppletive verbs in Hiaki (Yaqui). In Rice Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol.1, Linda Lanz, Amy Franklin, Jennifer Hoecker Elizabeth Gentry Brunner Michelle Morrison & Cassandra Pace (eds), 42–51. Houston TX: Rice Linguistics Society, Rice University.Google Scholar
Harwood, William
2013 Being Progressive is just a Phase: Dividing the Functional Hierarchy. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.Google Scholar
2015 Being progressive is just a phase: Celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33: 523–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Reduced relatives and extended phases: A phasebased analysis of the inflectional restrictions on English reduced relative clauses. Studia Linguistica 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth
1999 Scale structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 127–144. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1986 Copular verbs in a functional grammar of Spanish. Linguistics 24: 393–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James T.
1997 Location and causation. Ms, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun
1992 Aspect and theta theory. In Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, Iggy M. Roca (ed.), 145–174. Berlin: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Julia & Siloni, Tal
2008 Active lexicon: Adjectival and verbal passives. In Generative Approaches to Hebrew Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 134], Sharon Armon-Lotem, Gabi Danon & Susan Rothstein (eds), 105–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek
2004 Unaccusativity as telicity checking. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds), 60–83. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Husband, Matthew E.
2012 On the Compositional Nature of States [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 188]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Izvorsky, Roumyana
2001 Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 189–238. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ippolito, Michaela
2004 An analysis of still. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14, Robert B. Young (ed.), 127–144. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Jaque, Matías
2013 La expresión de la estatividad en español: Niveles de representación y grados de dinamicidad. PhD dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Kallulli, Dalina
2006a Argument demotion as feature suppression. In Demoting the Agent. Passive, Middle and Other Voice Phenomena [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 96], Benjamin Lyngfeldt & Torgrim Solstad (eds), 143–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006b Unaccusatives with dative causers and experiencers: A unified account. In Datives and Other Cases [Studies in Language Companion Series 75], Daniel Hole, André Meinunger & Werner Abraham (eds), 271–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe
1993 From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Model-theoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans, Reyle, Uwe & Rossdeutscher, Antje
2015 Perfects as feature shifting operators. Ms, Universität Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1975 French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kearns, Kate
2000 Semantics. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher
1997 Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony
1963 Action, Emotion and Will. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973 Elsewhere in phonology. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 93–106. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Koenig, Jean-Pierre & Davis, Anthony R.
2006 The KEY to lexical semantic representations. Journal of Linguistics 42: 71–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Hilda & Sportiche, Dominique
1985 Theta theory and extraction. GLOW Newsletter 14: 57–88.Google Scholar
1988 Subjects. Ms, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
1991 The position of subjects. Lingua: 211–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Ruth
2014 Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 593–634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana & Cinque, Guglielmo
2008 Clitic reduplication constructionsin Bulgarian. In Clitic Doubling in the Balkan Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 130], Dalina Kalluli & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), 257–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1995 Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The Generic Book, Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds), 125–175. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
1996 Severing the external argument from the verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Building statives. In Proceedings of the 26th Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Lisa J. Conathan, Jeff Good, Darya Kavitskaya, Alyssa B. Wulf & Alan C. L. Yu (eds), 385–399. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
2002 The event argument. Ms, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
2005 Building resultatives. In Event Arguments in Syntax, Semantics and Discourse, Claudia Maienbaum & Angelke Wöllstein-Leisen (eds), 178–212. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1989 Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and Contextual Expression, Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & Peter van Emde Boas (eds), 75–115. Stanford CA: CSLI. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical Matters, Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szablocsi (eds), 29–53. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2000 Alternatives for aspectual particles: Semantics of still and already. In Proceedings of the 26th Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Lisa J. Conathan, Jeff Good, Darya Kavitskaya, Alyssa B. Wulf & Alan C. L. Yu (eds), 401–412. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1988 Whether we agree or not: A comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Lingvisticae Investigationes 12(1): 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laka, Itziar
1990 Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1970 Irregularity in Syntax. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2010 The Locative Syntax of Experiencers [Linguistic InquiryMonograph 53]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Larsson, Ida
2009 Participles in Time: The Development of the Perfect Tense in Swedish. PhD dissertation, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
Larsson, Ida & Svenonius, Peter
2013 Phases and categories in passive and perfect participles. Talk presented at the Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop 28, University of Leipzig, 4 October.
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1970 Towards a Semantic Description of English. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Legate, Julie Anne
2014 Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 69]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legendre, Géraldine
1989 Inversion with certain French experiencer verbs. Language 65(4): 752–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Antipassive with French psych-verbs. In Proceedings of WCCFL 12, Erin Dunca, Donka Farkas & Philip Spaelti (eds), 373–388. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Legendre, Géraldine & Akimova, Tanya
1993 Inversion and antipassive in Russian. In The Second Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, Sergey Avrutin, Steven Franks & Ljiljana Progovac (eds), 286–318. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport, Malka
1986 The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17(4): 623–261.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport-Hovav, Malka
1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 26]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005 Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David
1973 Causation. The Journal of Philosophy 70(17): 556–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
1980 On the Organization of the Lexicon. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lin, Jimmy
2004 Event Structure and the Encoding of Arguments: The Syntax of the Mandarin and English Verb Phrase. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
1989 German schön – erst – noch: An integrated analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 167–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lohndal, Terje
2014 Phrase Structure and Argument Structure. A Case Study of the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia
2005 On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 275–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 On Davidsonian and Kimian states. In Existence: Semantics and Syntax, Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds), 107–130. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2009 Building event-based ad hoc properties: On the interpretation of adjectival passives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 13, Arndt Riester & Torgrim Solstad (eds), 31–46. [URL] (4 June 2020).
Marantz, Alec
1984 On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 200–225.Google Scholar
1999 Creating words above and below little v. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
2013 Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130: 152–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín, Rafael
2000 El componente aspectual de la predicación. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
2004 Entre ser y estar. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
2011 Casi todos los predicados psicológicos son estativos. In Sobre estados y estatividad, Ángeles Carrasco Gutiérrez (ed), 26–44. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2015 Los predicados psicológicos: Debate sobre el estado de la cuestión. In Los predicados psicológicos, Rafael Marín (ed), 11–50. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael & McNally, Louise
2005 The Aktionsart of Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9, 212–225. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
2011 Inchoativity, change of state and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(2): 467–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín, Rafael & Sánchez-Marco, Cristina
2012 Verbos y nombres psicológicos: Juntos y revueltos. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2: 91–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Fabienne
2006 Prédicats statifs, causatifs et résultatifs en discours. PhD dissertation, Université Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Martin, Fabienne & Schäfer, Florian
2014 Causation at the syntax-semantics interface. In Causation in Grammatical Structures, Bridget Copley & Fabienne Martin (eds), 209–244. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Massam, Diane
2001 Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 153–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateu, Jaume
2002 Argument Structure: Relational Construal at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Jonathan
2008 The Syntactic Nature of Inner Aspect [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 133] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1971 Tense and time reference in English. In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds), 97–113. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1973 Pre-lexical syntax. In Grammar and Meaning: Papers on Syntactic and Semantic Topics, 343–356. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981 Notes on the English perfect. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 81–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mchombo, Sam
1993 A formal analysis of the stative construction in Bantu. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 14: 5–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew
2013 Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English. In Non-Canonical Passives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 205], Artemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds), 21–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Event modifiers in (German) adjectival participles: Remarks on Gehrke (this issue). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33: 939–953. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, Aya
2005 Adjectival Passives and Adjectival Decausatives in Hebrew. M.Phil thesis, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Meltzer-Asscher, Aya
2011 Adjectival passives in Hebrew: Evidence for parallelism between the adjectival and verbal systems. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 815–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A.
1993 “Continuity” within three scalar models: The polysemy of adverbial still. Journal of Semantics 10: 193–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 The ambiguity of the English present perfect. Journal of Linguistics 30: 111–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984 The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60: 847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita
1988 Aspects of English aspect: on the interaction of perfect, progressive and durational phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 203–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 In defense of Vendler’s achievements. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 6: 71–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moens, Marc
1987 Tense, Aspect and Temporal Reference. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Moens, Marc & Steedman, Mark
1988 Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14(2): 15–28.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jerry
1969 On arguing about semantics. Papers in Linguistics 1: 49–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mourelatos, Alexander P. D.
1978 Events, states and processes. Linguistics and Philosophy 2: 415–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navas-Ruiz, Ricardo
1987 Usos de “ser” y “estar”. Madrid: Sociedad Española de Librería.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & van de Koot, Hans
2012 The linguistic expression of causation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds), 20–51. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishiyama, Atsuko & Koenig, Jean-Pierre
2010 What is a perfect state? Language 86: 611–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Mari Broman
1994 The semantics and pragmatics of lexical aspect features. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences 24: 361–375.Google Scholar
1997 A Semantic and Pragmatic Model of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Pancheva, Roumyana
2003 The aspectual makeup of the Perfect participle. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 277–306. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Terence
1990 Events in the Semantics of English. A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Paslawska, Alla & von Stechow, Arnim
2003 Perfect readings in Russian. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 307–362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya
1997 The genitive of negation. In Proceedings of the Fifth Meeting of the Israeli Association of Theoretical Linguistics, Adam Z. Weiner (ed.), 167–190. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Akademon.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M.
1978 Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Jeri Jaeger (ed.), 157–190. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995 Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Picallo, M. Carme
1991 Nominals and nominalizations in Catalan. Probus 3: 279–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul
2003 The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 459–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1991 The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41: 47–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2000 On stativity and causation. In Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 417–445. Chicago IL: CSLI.Google Scholar
2002 Introducing Arguments. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2014 Causal chains and instrumental case in Hindi/Urdu. In Causation in Grammatical Structures, Bridget Copley & Fabienne Martin (eds), 245–278. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian & Svenonius, Peter
2014 Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences 46: 152–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C.
2005 Post-Davidsonianism. Theoretical Linguistics 31(3): 359–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Minimalist semantics. In Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 449–471. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2018 Situations and Syntactic Structures [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 77]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Verbal symbols and demonstrations across modalities. Open Linguistics 5(1): 94–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Irene
1996 Zustand? Passiv? Überlegungen zum sogenannten “Zustandspassiv”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 15(2): 231–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Partizipen und semantische Struktur. Zu passivischen Konstruktionen des 3. Status. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2011 The attributive past participle: Structure and temporal interpretation. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae: A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 392–409. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Rappaport-Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
1998 Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Syntactic Constraints, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2010 Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure, Malka Rappaport-Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds), 21–38. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1997 Syntactic effects of lexical operations: Reflexives and unaccusatives. Ms, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
2000 The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts. UiL-OTS Working Papers in Linguistics 00/01/TL. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
2001 Experiencing deviations. In Proceedings of SALT 11, Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolensky (eds), 127–144. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
2002 The theta system – An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Siloni, Tal
2004 Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds), 288–331. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36(3): 389–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Lilliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1991 NP-movement, crossover and chain formation. In Representation and Derivation in the Theory of Grammar, Hubert Haider & Klaus Netter (eds), 17–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R.
1967 Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1972 Doubling. Linguistic Inquiry 3(1): 61–86.Google Scholar
Rothmayr, Antonia
2009 The Structure of Stative Verbs. [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 143] Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, Susan
2004 Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Blackwell: Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Another look at accomplishments and incrementality. In Telicity, Change and State. A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 60–102. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roy, Isabelle
2013 Non-Verbal Predication: Copular Sentences at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert
1949 The Concept of Mind. London: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Sánchez López, Cristina
1999 La negación. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 2, Ch. 40, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2561–2634. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2008 The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives: External Arguments in Change-of-State Contexts [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 126]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The causative alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2): 641–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlücker, Barbara
2005 Event-related modifiers in German adjectival passives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9, Emar Maier, Corien Bary & Janneke Huitink (eds), 415–430. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre of Semantics.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger
2002 The grammar of measurement. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory 12, Brendan Jackson (ed.), 225–245. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A.
1994 The grammaticalization of anterior in progress: Evidence from a Peninsular Spanish dialect. Studies in Language 18(1): 71–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1976 The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 1–40. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Jane
1983 Resultatives. In Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, Lori Levin, Malka Rappaport Hovav & Annie Else Zaenen (eds), 143–158. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S.
1961 A class of complex modifiers in English. Language 37: 342–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota
1983 A theory of aspectual choice. Language 59: 479–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella
2004 Gradience at the lexicon-syntax interface: Evidence from auxiliary selection and implications for unaccusativity. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds), 243–268. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spathas, Giorgos, Alexiadou, Artemis & Schäfer, Florian
2015 Middle voice and reflexive interpretations: Afto-prefixation in Greek. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(4): 1293–1350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starke, Michal
2009 Nanosyntax – A short primer to a new approach to language. Special Issue on Nanosyntax , Peter Svenonius, Gillian Ramchand, Michal Starke & Tarald Taraldsen (eds). Tromsø: CASTL, University of Tromsø. Nordlyd 36: 1–6.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim
1981 Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2006 The emergence of axial parts. Special issue on Adpositions , Peter Svenonius & Marina Pantcheva (eds). Tromsø: CASTL, University of Tromsø. Nordlyd 33: 49–77.Google Scholar
2008 Projections of P. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlacil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 63–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Spatial P in English. In Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 127–160. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012a Spanning. Ms, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
2012b Structural decomposition of spatial adpositions. Talk presented at The Meaning of P workshop, Ruhr Universität Bochum, 24 November.
2016 Spans and words. In Morphological Metatheory, [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229], Daniel Siddiqi & Heidi Harley (eds), 201–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1975 Figure and ground in complex sentences. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Cathy Cogen (ed.), 419–430. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
1976 Semantic causative types. In Syntax and Semantics, 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 43–116. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, I: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Taylor, Barry
1977 Tense and continuity. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 199–220.Google Scholar
Tenny, Carol
1987 Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1992 The aspectual interface hypothesis. In Lexical Matters, Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szablocsi (eds), 1–28. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
1994 Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tikagawa, Yoshihisa
1986 Subjects in Japanese and English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa
2000 Event Structure in Syntax. In Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 145–185. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2010 Inner Aspect. The Articulation of the VP. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
1990 Semantic parameters of split transitivity. Language 66: 221–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy
1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanhoe, Henk
2004 Aspectos de la sintaxis de los verbos psicológicos en español. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957 Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review 66(2): 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk J.
1972 On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 Aspectual classes and aspectual composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(1): 39–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vivanco, Margot
2015 Causatividad y cambio de estado en español: La alternancia causativo-inacusativa. PhD dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Vlach, Frank
1981 The semantics of the progressive. In Syntax and Semantics, 14: Tense and Aspect, Philip J. Tedeschi & Annie Zaenen (eds), 271–292. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim
1995 Lexical decomposition in syntax. In Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 114], Urs Egli, Peter Pause, Christoph Schwarze, Arnim von Stechov & Götz Wienold (eds), 81–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 The different readings of wieder again: A structural account. Journal of Semantics 13: 87–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 German participles II in Distributed Morphology. Ms, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas
1977 Transformations and the lexicon. In Formal Syntax, Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 327–360. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen
2005 Resultatives under the ‘event-argument homomorphism’ model of telicity. In The Syntax of Aspect, Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rappoport (eds), 255–273. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1981 Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi
2013 QR and selection: Covert evidence for phasehood. In Proceedings of NELS 42, Stephan Keine & Shayne Slogget (eds), 277–290. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2014 Tense and aspect in English infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry 45(3): 403–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiqués, Teresa Maria
2012 Re-examining the hodiernal present perfect: Towards a unified account. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XX, Enrico Boone, Marin Kohlberger & Maartje Schulpen (eds). Leiden: SOLE.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, María Luisa & Oh, Eunjeong
2007 On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar