Akatsuka, Noriko
1977What is the “Emphatic Root Transformation” phenomenon? In Papers from the 13th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Woodford A. Beach, Samuel E. Fox & Shulamith Philosph (eds), 384–400. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Authier, J.-Marc & Haegeman, Liliane
2019The syntax of mirative focus fronting: Evidence from French. In Contributions of Romance Languages to Current Linguistic Theory, Deborah Arteaga (ed.), 39–63. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batllori, Montserrat & Hernanz, Maria-Lluïsa
2015Weak focus and polarity: Asymmetries between Spanish and Catalan. In Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Information-Structural Interactions Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds), 280–298. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio
2016Focus fronting, unexpectedness, and evaluative implicatures. Semantics and Pragmatics 9: 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breitbarth, Anne, De Clercq, Karen & Haegeman, Liliane
2013The syntax of polarity emphasis. Lingua 128: 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2005Negative inversion. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds), 1–22. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Castroviejo Miró, E.
2008Deconstructing exclamations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 7: 41–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1971Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, Danny D. Steinberg & Leon A. Jacobovits (eds), 183–216. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris & Postal, Paul
2014Classical NEG Raising. An Essay on the Syntax of Negation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2011Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W.
1991Topicalization, inversion and complementizers in English. In Going Romance and Beyond, Denis Delfitto, Martin Everaert, Arnold Evers & Frits Stuurman (eds), 1–45. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
De Clercq, Karen, Liliane Haegeman, and Terje Lohndal
2012Medial Adjunct PPs in English: Implications for the Syntax of Sentential Negation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 35 (1): 5–26.Google Scholar
Delancey, Scott
1997Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001The mirativity and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giurgea, Ion & Remberger, Eva-Maria
2012Verum focus and polar questions. In Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 14, Alexandra Cornilescu (ed.), 21–41. Bucharest: University of Bucharest.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel & Castroviejo Miró, Elena
2011The dimensions of Verum. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 8, Oliver Bonami & Patricia C. Hofherr (eds), 143–165. Paris: CSSP.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1995The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Negative preposing, negative inversion, and the split CP. In Negation and Polarity, Lawrence Horn & Yasuhiko Kato (eds), 21–61. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and the Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Zanuttini, Raffaella
1991Neg-movement and the Neg-criterion. The Syntactic Review 8: 233–252.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-Hye & Romero, Maribel
2004Disjunction, focus, and scope. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 197–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, Maria-Lluïsa
2007From polarity to modality: Some (a)symmetries between bien and in Spanish. In Coreference, Modality and Focus [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 111], Luis Eguren & Olga Fernández-Soriano (eds), 133–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N.
1992Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 4: 13–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hooper, John & Thompson, Sandra A.
1973On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–497.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel & Miyagawa, Shigeru
2014A feature-inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation. Lingua 145: 276–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel
2015Towards a typology of focus: Subject position and microvariation at the discourse-syntax interface. Ampersand 2: 49–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward S.
1964Negation in English. In The Structure of Language, Jerry A. Foder & Jerrold J. Katz (eds), 264–323. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Koizumi, Masatoshi
1995Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax. PhD dissertation. MIT.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2007Basic notions of information structure. In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6], Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 13–55. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
Laka, Miren Itziar
1990Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel & Escandell-Vidal, Victoria
2009Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages, Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 155–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lohnstein, Horst
2016Verum focus. In Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 290–313. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Quer, Josep
2002Edging quantifiers. On QP fronting in western Romance. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 232], Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen & Paola Monachesi (eds), 253–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1996Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. In Parameters and Functional Heads, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 63–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-Movement: Moving On, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rochemont, Michael S.
1978A Theory of Stylistic Rules in English. PhD dissertation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
1986Focus in Generative Grammar [Studies in Generative Linguistic Analysis 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero, Maribel & Han, Chung-Hye
2004On negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 609–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani
1982Towards a description of negatively conditioned subject operator inversion in English. English Studies 63: 348–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veselovská, Ludmila
2011Inversion and fronting in English: A cartography of discourse in a generative framework. Czech and Slovac Linguistic Review 1: 53–72.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul
2003Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79: 39–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, María L.
1998Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar