Cover not available
Part of
A Theory of Distributed Number
Myriam Dali and Eric Mathieu
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 269] 2021
► pp. 139–150

Bibliography

Acquaviva, P.
2008 Lexical Plurals: A Morphosemantic Approach. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2015 Singulatives. In Word Formation. An International Handbook for the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2, P. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (eds), 1171–1192. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2016 Structures for plurals. Lingvisticae Investigationes 59: 217–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 Categorization as noun construction: Gender, number, and entity types. In Gender and Noun Classification, E. Mathieu, M. Dali & G. Zareikar (eds), 41–63. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A.
1991 Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A.
2001 Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Nominalizations: A probe in the architecture of grammar, Part 1: The nominalization puzzle. Language and Linguistic Compass 4: 496–511. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Plural mass nouns and the morpho-syntax of number. In Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, M. B. Washburn, K. McKinney-Bock, E. Varis, A. Sawyer & B. Tomaszewicz (eds), 33–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Anand, P., Andrews, C., Farkas, D. & Wagers, M.
2011 The exclusive interpretation of plural nominals in quantificational environments. In Proceedings of SALT 21, P. Saint-Dizier (ed.), 176–196. [URL]> (19 February 2021) DOI logo
Arad, M.
2005 Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-syntax [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 63]. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2003 Locality constraints on the interpretations of roots. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 737–778. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arregi, K. & Nevins, A.
2012 Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aspesi, F.
1990 Genre des noms et genre des morphèmes personnels en chamito-sémitique. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Hamito-Semitic Congress, Vol. 1, H. G. Mukařovski (Ed.), 11–28. Veröffentlichungen der Institute für Afrikanistik und Agyptologie der Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Bale, A., Gagnon, M. & Khanjian, H.
2010 Cross-linguistic representations of numerals and number marking. In Proceedings of SALT 20, Nan Li & David Lutz (eds), 1–15. [URL]> (19 February 2021) DOI logo
2011 On the relationship between morphological and semantic markedness: The case of plural morphology. Morphology 21: 197–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bale, A. & Khanjian, H.
2014 Syntactic complexity and competition: The singular-plural distinction in Western Armenian. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barker, C.
1992 Group terms in English: Representing groups as atoms. Journal of Semantics 9: 69–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeston, A.
1975 Some features of Modern Standard Arabic. Journal of Semitic Studies 20: 62–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belnap, K.
1991 Grammatical Agreement Variation in Cairene Arabic. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Belnap, K. R. & Gee, J.
1994 Classical Arabic in contact: The transition to near-categorical agreement patterns. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics VI: Papers from the Sixth Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 115], M. Eid, V. Cantarino & K. Walters (eds), 121–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belnap, K. R. & Shabaneh, O.
1992 Variable agreement and nonhuman plurals in Classical and Modern Standard Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics IV: Papers from the Fourth Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 85], E. Broselow, M. Eid & J. McCarthy (eds), 245–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belnap, R. K.
1999 A new perspective on the history of Arabic variation in marking agreement with plural heads. Folia Linguistica 33: 169–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blanc, H.
1970 Dual and pseudo-dual in the Arabic dialects. Language 46: 42–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bliss, H.
2004 The Semantics of the Bare Noun in Turkish. MA thesis, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J.
2017 Distributed morphology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, G.
1996 Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, G. Booij & J. van Marle (eds), 1–16. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H.
2005 Structuring Sense, Vol. 1: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Borer, H. & Ouwayda, S.
2010 Men and their apples: Dividing plural and agreement plural. Paper presented at GLOW in Asia VIII, Beijing Language and Culture University.
Boris, G.
1945–1948 Sur l’emploi des pluriels féminins dans un parler arabe moderne. Comptes Rendus du Groupe Linguistique d’ Études Chamito-Sémitiques (GLECS), 21–23.Google Scholar
Boudelaa, S. & Gaskell, M. G.
2002 A re-examination of the default system for Arabic plurals. Language and Cognitive Processes 17(3): 321–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brocklemann, C.
1908 Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der semitischen Sprachen. Berlin: Reuther Reichard.Google Scholar
Brustad, K.
2000 The Syntax of Spoken Arabic. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bunt, H.
1985 The formal representation of (quasi-)continuous concepts. In J. Hobbs & R. Moore (eds), Formal Theories of the Commonsense World, 37–70. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Butler, L.
2012 Crosslinguistic and experimental evidence for non-number plurals. Linguistic Variation 12: 27–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
2006 From usage to grammar: The minds response to repetition. Language 82: 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G.
1977 Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Carstens, V.
2000 Concord in minimalist theory. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 319–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Multiple agreement and case deletion: Against phi- (in)completeness. Syntax 4: 147–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caubet, D., Simeone-Senelle, M.-C. & Vanhove, M.
1989 Genre et accord dans quelques dialectes arabes. LINX 21: Genre et langage. Actes du colloque tenu à Paris X – Nanterre, les 14–16 décembre 1988.Google Scholar
Cheng, C.-Y.
1973 Response to Moravcsik. In Approaches to Natural Language, J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik & P. Suppes (eds), 286–288. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G.
1998 Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4): 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagerka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, D.
1964 Remarques sur la dérivation nominale par affixes dans quelques langues sémitiques. Semitica 14: 73–93.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
1975 Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language 51(4): 406–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 Derivation, inflection, and semantic change in the development of the Chukchi verb paradigm. In Historical Semantics and Historical Word Formation, J. Fisiak (Ed.), 85–96. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G.
1991 Gender. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Number. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Hybrid nouns and their complexity. In Agreement from a Diachronic Perspective, J. Fleischer, E. Rieken & P. Widmer (eds), 191–214. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowell, M.
1964 A Reference Grammar of Syrian Arabic (Based on the Dialect of Damascus). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
2003 Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dali, M.
2015 The Feminine Operator in Arabic. MA thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
2017 On the contrastive use of plurals in Tunisian Arabic. Ms, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
2020 Gender and Number in Tunisian Arabic: A Case of Allosemy. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Dali, M. & Mathieu, E.
2016 Les pluriels internes féminins de l’arabe tunisien. Lingvisticae Investigationes 59: 253–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 Broken plurals and (mis)matching of φ-features in Tunisian Arabic. Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 12(2): 164–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, M., Kanazawa, M., Kim, Y., Mchombo, S. & Peters, S.
1998 Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 159–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Anna, L.
2017 Agreement in plural controllers in Fezzānī Arabic. Folia Orientala LIV: 101–122.Google Scholar
Danon, G.
2011 Agreement and DP-internal feature distribution. Syntax 14: 297–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Agreement alternations with quantified nominals in Modern Hebrew. Journal of Linguistics 49: 55–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Belder, M.
2008 Size matters: Towards a syntactic decomposition of countability. In N. Abner & J. Bishop (eds), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL), Los Angeles, UCLA, 16–18 May, 116–122. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2011 A morphosyntactic decomposition of countability in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 14(3): 173–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deal, A. R.
2017 Countability distinctions and semantic variation. Natural Language Semantics 25: 125–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S.
1999 The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
den Dikken, M.
2001 Pluringulars, pronouns and quirky agreement. The Linguistic Review 18: 19–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diakonov, I. M.
1965 Semito-Hamitic Languages: An Essay in Classification. Moscow: Central Department of Oriental Literature.Google Scholar
Diertani, C. E. A.
2011 Morpheme Boundaries and Structural Change: Affixes Running Amok. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, G.
1983 The Turkana Language. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Number marking and noun categorization in Nilo-Saharan languages. Anthropological Linguistics 42: 214–261.Google Scholar
Doetjes, J.
2012 Count/mass distinctions across languages. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Part III, C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (eds), 2559–2580. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Donabédian, A.
1993 Le pluriel en arménien moderne. Faits de Langue 2: 179–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doron, E. & Müller, A.
2013 The cognitive basis of the mass-count distinction: Evidence from bare nouns. In Crosslinguistic Studies on Noun Phrase Structure and Reference, C. Hofherr & A. Zribi-Hertz (eds), 73–101. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Driver, G. R.
1948 Gender in Hebrew numbers. Journal of Jewish Studies 1: 90–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, D.
2010 Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, D. & Marantz, A.
2008 Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, D. & Noyer, R.
2001 Movement after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 595–595.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (eds), 289–324. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Enger, H.
2004 Scandinavian pancake sentences as semantic agreement. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 3: 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Scandinavian pancake sentences revisited. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36: 275–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erwin, W. M.
2004 A Short Reference Grammar of Iraqi Arabic. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Farkas, D. & de Swart, H.
2010 The semantics and pragmatics of plurals. Semantics and Pragmatics 3: 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fassi Fehri, A.
1988 Agreement in Arabic, binding and coherence. In Agreement in Natural Language: Approaches, Theories, Description, M. Barlow & C. Ferguson (eds), 107–158. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
1993 Issues in the Structure of Arabic Clauses and Words. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Nominal classes and parameters across interfaces and levels, with a particular reference to Arabic. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 41–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Key Features and Parameters in Arabic Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 182]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Constructing Feminine to Mean: Gender, Number, Numeral, and Quantifier Extensions in Arabic. New York NY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
2019 Multiple facets of constructional Arabic gender and ‘functional universalism’ in the DP. In Gender and Noun Classfication, É. Mathieu, M. Dali & G. Zareikar (eds), 67–92. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Féghali, M. & Cuny, A.
1924 Du genre grammatical en sémitique. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A.
1989 Grammatical agreement in Classical Arabic and the modern dialects: A response to Versteegh’s Pidginization Hypothesis. Al-’Arabiyya 22(1–2): 5–18.Google Scholar
Ferrando, I.
2006 The plural of paucity in Arabic and its actual scope: On two claims by Siibawayhi and Al-farraa. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XVI: Papers from the Sixteenth Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Cambridge, March 2002 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 266], S. Boudelaa (ed.), 39–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, W.
2002 A Grammar of Classical Arabic, 3rd edn, J. Rodgers (transl.). New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fleisch, H.
1961 Traité de philologie Arabe. Beirut: Dar El-Machreq.Google Scholar
Gardelle, L.
2019 Semantic Plurality. English Collective Nouns and Other Ways of Denoting Pluralities of Entities [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 349]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gebhardt, L.
2009 Numeral Classifiers and the Structure of DP. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, E.
2011 The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghaniabadi, S.
2012 Plural marking beyond count nouns. In Count and Mass across Languages, D. Massam (ed.), 112–128. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghomeshi, J.
2003 Plural marking, indefiniteness, and the noun phrase. Studia Linguistica 57: 47–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gillon, C.
2015 Innu-aimun plurality. Lingua 162: 128–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Görgülü, E.
2012 Semantics of Nouns and the Specification of Number in Turkish. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J.
1963 Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, J. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H.
1966 Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies [Janua Linguarum Series Minor]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1972 Numeral classifers and substantive number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers on Language Universals 9: 2–39.Google Scholar
1974 Studies in numeral systems, I: Double numeral systems. Working Papers in Language Universals 14: 75–89.Google Scholar
Grimm, S.
2012a Inverse number marking and individuation in Dagaare. In Count and Mass across Languages, D. Massam (ed.), 75–98. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b Number and Individuation. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J.
2005 Extended projection. In Words and Structure, J. Grimshaw (ed.), 1–74. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Haelewyck, J.-C.
2016 Grammaire comparée des langues sémitiques. Bruxelles: Éditions Safran.Google Scholar
Halle, M.
1997 Fission and impoverishment. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: 425–449.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Marantz, A.
1993 Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection, 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994 Some Key Features of Distributed Morphology, 275–288. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hamedani, L.
2011 The Function of Number in Persian. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Hammerly, C.
2018 Limiting gender. In E. Mathieu, M. Dali & G. Zareikar (eds), Gender and Noun Classification, 93–118. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammond, M.
1988 Templatic transfer in Arabic broken plurals. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6(2): 247–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harbour, D.
2008 Mass, non-singularity, and augmentation. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49: 239–266.Google Scholar
2011 Valence and atomic number. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 561–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Paucity, abundance, and the theory of number. Language 90: 185–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Impossible Persons. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, H.
2014 On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3–4): 225–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, A. C. & Campbell, L.
1995 Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
1998 How young is Standard Average European? Language Sciences 20: 271–287.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselbach, R.
2014a Agreement and the development of gender in Semitic (Part I). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlāndischen Gesellschaft 164: 33–64.Google Scholar
2014b Agreement and the development of gender in Semitic (Part II). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlāndischen Gesellschaft 164: 319–344.Google Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U. & Hünnemeyer, F.
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hetzron, R.
1967 Agaw numerals and incongruence in Semitic. Journal of Semitic Studies 12: 169–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hieda, O.
2006 On singulative languages in Nilotic languages. Nilo-Ethiopian Studies 10: 1–14.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F.
1958 A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, J.
1983 Plurality and conjunction. In Studies in Model-Theoretic Semantics, A. ter Meulen (ed.), 63–83. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holes, C.
1990 Gulf Arabic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & Traugott, E.
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & Traugott, E. C.
2003 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howell, M.
1900 A Grammar of the Classical Arabic Language, Part I. Published under the authority of the Northwest Provinces and the Government of Oudh. Allahabad.Google Scholar
Ivlevia, N.
2013 Scalar Implicatures and the Grammar of Plurality and Disjunction. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Jacobson, S.
1984 Yup’ik Eskimo Dictionary. Fairbanks AK: Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. A. & Joseph, B. D.
2014 Morphology and syntax … and semantics … and pragmatics: Deconstructing “semantic agreement”. Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37: 306–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kienast, B.
2001 Historische semitische Sprachwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kihm, A.
2003 Les pluriels internes de l’arabe: Système et conséquences pour l’architecture de la grammaire. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 32: 109–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Noun class, gender, and the lexicon-syntax-morphology interfaces: A comparative study of Niger-Congo and Romance languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, G. Cinque & R. S. Kayne (eds), 459–512. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Koutsoukos, N.
2018 Constructional change on the contentful-procedural gradient. The case of the -idz(o) construction in griko. In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language], K. Van Goethem, M. Norde, E. Coussé & G. Vanderbauwhede (eds), 263–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koutsoukos, N. & Ralli, A.
2013 Elements with ambiguous morphological status: The marker -idz(o) in griko. Quaderns de Filologia 18: 13–23. Special issue on Theoretical and Empirical Advances in Word-formation.Google Scholar
Kramer, R.
2009 Definite Markers, Phi-features, and Agreement: A Morphosyntactic Investigation of the Amharic DP. PhD dissertation, UC Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
2012 A split analysis of plurality: Evidence from Amharic. Linguistic Inquiry 47(3): 226–236.Google Scholar
2015 The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 A split analysis of plurality: Number in Amharic. Linguistic Inquiry 47(3): 527–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. & Winchester, L.
2018 Number and gender agreement in Saudi Arabic: Morphology vs. syntax. In The Proceedings of the 17th Texas Linguistic Society, F. Cooley, M. Everdell, H. Al Bulushi, A. Gutierrez Lorenzo, L. Orjuela & S. D. Gualapuro Gualapuro (ed.), 39–53. [URL]> (25 February 2021).
Krifka, M.
1989 Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification. In Semantics and Contextual Expression, R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem & P. van Emde Boas (eds), 75–111. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of English and Chinese. In The Generic Book, M. Krifka, G. Carlson & J. Pelletier (eds), 389–411. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J.
1965 The evolution of grammatical categories. Diogenes 51: 55–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, W.
1980 On the notion affective in the analysis of negative-polarity items. Journal of Linguistic Research 1: 1–16.Google Scholar
Lahrouchi, M. & Lampitelli, N.
2015 On plurals, noun phrase and num(ber) in Moroccan Arabic and Djibouti Somali. In The Form of Structure, the Structure of Form: Essays in Honor of Jean Lowenstamm [Language Faculty and Beyond 12], S. Bendjaballah, N. Faust, M. Lahrouchi & N. Lampitelli (eds), 303–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahrouchi, M. & Ridouane, R.
2016 On diminutives and plurals in Moroccan Arabic. Morphology 26(3):453–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, I.
2015 DP-internal semantic agreement: A configurational analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34: 975–1020. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langdon, M.
1992 Yuman plurals: From derivation to inflection to noun agreement. International Journal of American Linguistics 58: 405–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lecarme, J.
2002 Gender “polarity”: Theoretical aspects of Somali nominal morphology. In Many Morphologies, P. Boucher & M. Plénat (eds), 109–141. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Levy, M. M.
1971 The Plural of the Noun in Modern Standard Arabic. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D.
1999 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Link, G.
1983 The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice-theoretic approach. In Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, R. Buerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds), 302–323. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipinski, E.
2001 Semitic Languages Outline of a Comparative Grammar, 2nd edn. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, J.
2008 On little n, ROOT, and types of nouns. In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, J. Hartmann, V. Hegedus & H. van Riemsijk (eds), 105–144. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Marantz, A.
1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): Article 14.Google Scholar
2001 Words. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
2007 Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, S.-H. Choe, D.-W. Yang, Y.-S. Kim, S.-H. Kim & A. Marantz (eds), 191–222. Seoul: Dong-In Publishing.Google Scholar
2013 Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130: 152–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martí, L.
2018 Inclusive plurals and the theory of number. lingbuzz/003528.Google Scholar
2020 Inclusive plurals and the theory of number. Linguistic Inquiry 51(1): 37–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, E.
2009 On the mass/count distinction in Ojibwe. Article presented at the Mass/count workshop, University of Toronto, 7–8 February.
2012 Flavors of division. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 650–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 On the plural of the singulative. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 23(1).Google Scholar
2014 Many a plural. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219], A. Aguilar-Guevara, B. L. Bruyn & J. Zwarts (eds), 157–181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, E. & Zareikar, G.
2015 Measure words, plurality, and cross-linguistic variation. Linguistic Variation 15(2): 169–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 The syntax of higher plurals. Ms, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Matushansky, O.
2013 Gender confusion. In Diagnosing Syntax, L. L.-S. Cheng & N. Corver (eds), 271–294. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A.
1990a Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8(2): 209–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990b Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics, II: Papers from the Second Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Salt Lake City, Utah 1988 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 72], Mushira Eid & John McCarthy (eds), 1–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D.
1968 Review of ‘Current Trends in Linguistics, Vol. 3: Theoretical Foundations’. Language 44: 556–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975 Lexicography and the count-mass distinction. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 1: 314–321.Google Scholar
Meillet, A.
1921 Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Genève/Paris: Slatkine/Champion.Google Scholar
Meinhof, C.
1912 Die Sprachen der Hamiten. Hamburg: L.R. Friederischsen.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T.
1956 An Introduction to Egyptian Colloquial Arabic. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mithun, M.
1988 Lexical categories and the evolution of number marking. In Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, M. Hammond & M. Noonan (eds), 211–233. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2010 The reordering of morphemes. In Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 43], J. Wohlgemuth & M. Cysouw (eds), 231–258. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohammad, M. A.
1990 The problem of subject-verb agreement in Arabic: Towards a solution. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics, 1: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Salt Lake City, Utah 1987 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 63], Mushira Eid (ed.), 95–125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murtonen, A.
1964 Broken Plurals, Origin and Development of the System. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Nevins, A.
2011 Marked targets versus marked triggers and impoverishment of the dual. Linguistic Inquiry 42(3): 413–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noyer, R.
1992 Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
ÓhAnluain, L. A.
1999 Graiméar Gaeilge na mBráithre Críostaí. Dublin: An Gúm.Google Scholar
Ojeda, A.
1992 The semantics of number in Arabic. In Proceedings of SALT 2, Chris Barker & David Dowty (eds), 303–326. [URL]> (25 February 2021) DOI logo
1995 The semantics of the italian double plural. Journal of Semantics 12(3): 213–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ouwayda, S.
2014 Where Number Lies: Plural Marking, Numerals, and the Collective-distributive Distinction. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Pearson, H., Khan, M. & Snedeker, J.
2011 Even more evidence for the emptiness of plurality: An experimental investigation of plural interpretation as a species of scalar implicature. In Proceedings of SALT 20, N. Li & D. Lutz (eds). [URL]> (26 February 2021).
Percus, O.
2011 Gender features and interpretation: A case study. Morphology 21(2): 167–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A.
2014 On number and numberlessness in languages with andwithout articles. In Crosslinguistic Studies on Noun Phrase Structure and Reference, P. Cabredo-Hofherr & A. Zribi-Hertz (eds), 52–73. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Preminger, O.
2014 Agreement and its Failures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O.
1960 Word and Object. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, R. R.
1998 The ‘Broken’ Plural Problem in Arabic and Comparative Semitic: Allomorphy and Analogy in Non-concatenative Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 168]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritter, E.
1993 Where is gender? Linguistic Inquiry 24(4): 795–803.Google Scholar
Roberts, I.
1985 Agreement parameters and the development of english modal auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. & Roussou, A.
1999 A formal approach to grammaticalization. Linguistics 37(6): 1011–1041. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, S.
2010 Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics 27(3): 343–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rullmann, H. & You, A.
2006 General number and the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite bare nouns in mandarin chinese. In Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics, K. von Heusinger & K. Turner (eds), 175–196. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sauerland, U.
2003 A new semantics for number. In Proceedings of SALT 13, R. Young & Y. Zhou (eds), 258–275. [URL]> (26 February 2021).. DOI logo
Sauerland, U., Andersen, J. & Yatsuhiro, K.
2005 The plural is semantically unmarked. In Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives, S. Kepser & M. Reis (eds), 413–433. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sağ, Y.
2016 On the semantics of classifiers: A new perspective from an optional classifier language, Turkish. lingbuzz/002999.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, R.
1996 Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Stubborn distributivity, multiparticipant nouns and the count/mass distinction. In Proceedings of NELS 39, S. Lima, K. Mullin & B. Smith (eds), 661–678. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, D.
2018 Distributed morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of Morphological Theory, J. Audring & F. Masin (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sigler, M.
1996 Specificity and Agreement in Standard Western Armenian. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Smith, P.
2015 Feature Mismatches: Consequences for Syntax, Morphology and Semantics. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Smith, P. W.
2017 The syntax of semantic agreement in English. Journal of Linguistics 53(4): 823–863. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spector, B.
2007 Aspects of the pragmatics of plural morphology: On higher order implicature. In Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (eds), 243–281. Basingstoke: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speiser, E. A.
1936 Studies in Semitic formatives. Journal of the American Oriental Society 56: 22–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stankiewicz, E.
1962 The singular-plural contrast opposition in the Slavic languages. International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 5: 1–15.Google Scholar
Steriopolo, O. & Wiltschko, M.
2010 Distributed GENDER hypothesis. In Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics. Proceedings of Formal Description of Slavic Languages 7, G. Zybatow, P. Dudchuk, S. Minor & E. Pshehotskaya (eds), 155–172. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stolz, T.
2001 Singulative-collective: Natural morphology and stable classes in Welsh number inflexion on nouns. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 54: 52–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tieu, L., Cory, B., Romoli, J. & Crain, S.
2014 Plurality inferences are scalar implicatures: Evidence from acquisition. In Proceedings SALT 24, T. Snider, S. D’Antonio & M. Weigand (ed.), 122–136. [URL]> (26 February 2021).
Tsoulas, G.
2009 On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek. In C. Halpert, J. Hartman & D. Hill (eds), Proceedings of the Workshop in Greek Syntax and Semantics [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 57], 131–146. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Van Geenhoven, V.
2000 Pro properties, contra generalized kinds. In Proceedings of SALT 10, B. Jackson & T. Matthews (eds), 221–238. [URL]> (26 February 2021) DOI logo
Vásquez-Rojas, V.
2012 The Syntax and Semantics of Purépecha Noun Phrases and the Mass/count Distinction. PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
de Vries, H.
2013 Distributivity and agreement: New evidence for groups as sets. In Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, M. Aloni, M. Franke & F. Roelofsen (eds), 241–248. Amsterdam: ILLC, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2015 Shifting Sets, Hidden Atoms: The Semantics of Distributivity, Plurality and Animacy. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Watanabe, A.
2010 Vague quantity, numerals, and natural numbers. Syntax 13: 37–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, S. & Zlatić, L.
2003 The Many Faces of Agreement. Stanford CA: CLSI.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, M.
2008 The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 639–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Decomposing the mass/count distinction. Evidence from languages that lack it. In Count and Mass across Languages, D. Massam (ed.), 120–146. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, Y.
2001 Plural predication and the strongest meaning hypothesis. Journal of Semantics 18: 333–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, J.
2012 Icelandic Morphosyntax and Argument Structure. PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Wright, W.
1967 A Grammar of the Arabic Language, Vol. I. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S.
2015 Does gender depend on number? Snippets 30: 14–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, W. U.
1987 System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection. Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology 10: 59–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zabbal, Y.
2002 The semantics of number in the Arabic noun phrase. MA thesis, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Zareikar, G.
2019 The Distribution and Function of Number in Azeri. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Zeuss, J. C.
1853 Grammatica Celtica. Leipzig: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Zhang, N.
2012 Countability and numeral classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. In Count and Mass across Languages, D. Massam (ed.), 220–237. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, J.
2004 Competition between word meanings: The polysemy of around. Sinn und Bedeutung 8: 349–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zweig, E.
2009 Number-neutral bare plurals and the multiplicity implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 353–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar