Part of
Discourse Particles: Syntactic, semantic, pragmatic and historical aspects
Edited by Xabier Artiagoitia, Arantzazu Elordieta and Sergio Monforte
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 276] 2022
► pp. 101130
Akkuş, Faruk & Hill, Virginia
2021Overt speakers in syntax. Glossa 6(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anand, Pranav & Nevins, Andrew
2004Shifty operators in changing contexts. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 14, Robert B. Young (ed), 20–37. Ithaca: CLC Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C., & Bobalijk, Jonathan
2017On Inherent and Dependent Theories of Ergative Case. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam, & Lisa De Mena Travis (eds), 113–134. Oxford: Oxford University Press. < DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn M. & Zeijlstra, Hedde
2019Checking up on (ϕ-) Agree. Linguistic Inquiry 50(3): 527–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeder, Winfried
2002Speech and thought representation in the Kartvelian (South Caucasian) languages. In Reported Discourse: A meeting ground of different domains [Typological Studies in Language 52], Tom Güldemann & Manfred von Roncador (eds), 3–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. < DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Božič, Jurij
2019Constraining long-distance allomorphy. The Linguistic Review 36(3): 485–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brasoveanu, Adrian
2013Modified numerals as post-suppositions. Journal of Semantics 30(2): 155–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstens, Vicki
2016Delayed valuation: a reanalysis of goal features, “upwards” complementizer agreement, and the mechanics of Case. Syntax 19(1): 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays in honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 1–52. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. < DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deal, Amy Rose
2020A Theory of Indexical Shift. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demirok, Ömer & Öztürk, Balkız
2015The logophoric complementizer in Laz. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi [Journal of Linguistics Research] 26(2): 45–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demirok, Ömer, Özyıldız, Deniz, & Öztürk, Balkız
2019Complementizers with attitude. In Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 49, Maggie Baird & Jonathan Pesetsky (eds), 213–222. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Diercks, Michael
2013Lubukusu complementizer agreement as a logophoric relation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31(2): 257–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo
2008On quotative constructions in Iberian Spanish. In Pragmatics of Clause Combining, Ritva Laury (ed), 35–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. < DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010From hearsay evidentiality to samesaying relations. Lingua 120(3), 604–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Quotative expansions. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Utrecht 2011, Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen, Luisa Meroni & Manuela Pinto (eds), 93–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. < DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
1985Logophoric Systems in Chadic. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7(1): 23–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Güldemann, Tom
2002When ‘say’ is not say: the functional versatility of the Bantu quotative marker ti with special reference to Shona. In Reported discourse: a meeting ground for different linguistic domains, Tom Güldemann & Manfred von Roncador (eds.), 253–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. < DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David
1989Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In Themes from Kaplan, Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds), 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Magdalena
2012Interpreting imperatives. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Fine-tuning natural language imperatives. Journal of Logic and Computation 29(3): 321–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klamer, Marian
2000How report verbs become quote markers and complementisersLingua 110(2): 69–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2001Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics 9(1): 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Quantifiers in questions. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 3(4): 449–526.Google Scholar
Lacroix, René
2009Description du dialecte laze d’Arhavi (caucasique du sud, Turquie): grammaire et textes. PhD dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2. [URL]
Lord, Carol
1993Historical Change in Serial Verb Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Podobryaev, Alexander
2014Persons, imposters, and monsters. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Portner, Paul
1997The semantics of mood, complementation, and conversational force. Natural Language Semantics 5(2): 167–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 14, Robert B. Young (ed), 235–252. Ithaca: LSA and CLC Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul, Pak, Miok & Zanuttini, Raffaella
2019The speaker-addressee relation at the syntax-semantics interface. Language 95(1): 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2014Agreement and Its Failures. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe
1999Propositional attitudes and indexicality. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
2003A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(1): 29–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shklovsky, Kirill, & Sudo, Yasutada
2014The syntax of monsters. Linguistic Inquiry 45(3): 381–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sundaresan, Sandhya
2019A New Theory of Indexical Shift. Ms, University of Leipzig. [URL] (30 September 2021)
Szabolcsi, Anna
2015What do quantifier particles do?. Linguistics and Philosophy 38(2): 159–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2007Modal Concord. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 17, Masayuki Gibson & Tova Friedman (eds), 317–332. Ithaca: CLC Publications. < DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review 29(3): 317–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar