References
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential
object marking: Iconicity vs.
economy, Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory, 21(3), 435–483. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Antonov, A., & Mardale, A. (2014). From perlative to differential object marking. The curious case of the Romanian PE. Paper presented at the international workshop The Diachronic Typology of Differential Argument Marking, 5–6 April, University of Konstanz.
Avram, L. (2004). Differential
object marking in Romanian: The view from
acquisition. Paper presented
at AICED (= Annual International Conference of the English Department), University of Bucharest 16.
Avram, L., & Zafiu, R. (2017). Semantic
hierarchies in the evolution of differential object marking in
Romanian. In A. Dragomirescu et al. (Ed.), Sintaxa
ca mod de a fi. Omagiu Gabrielei Pană-Dindelegan, la
aniversare (pp. 29–42). Bucureşti: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, M. (2015). Case.
Its principles and
parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bárány, A. (2018). DOM
and dative
case. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 3(1), 97, 1–40. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bárány, András. (2021). Partially ordered case hierarchies. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6(1): 76. 1–19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, A. (2018). On a-marking of object topics in the Italian left periphery. In R. Petrosino, P. C. Cerrone, & H. van der Hulst (Eds.), From
sounds to
structures (pp. 445–466). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benito, R. (2016). Differential
object marking in Catalan: Contexts of appearance and
analysis (Unpublished MA
thesis). Universitat de Barcelona.
Benito, R. (forthcoming). Processament,
coneixement i ús del Marcatge Diferencial d’Objecte en parlants
monolingües i bilingües d’espanyol i
català (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Bossong, G. (1985). Empirische
Universalienforschung. Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den
neuiranischen
Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bossong, G. (1991). Differential
object marking in Romance and
beyond. In D. Wanner & D. A. Kibbee (Eds.), New
analyses in Romance linguistics. Selected papers from the XVIII
Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Urbana-Champaign, April
7–9,
1988 (pp. 43–171). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bossong, G. (1998). Le
marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues
d’Europe. In J. Feuillet (Ed.), Actance
et valence dans les langues de
l’Europe (pp. 258–293). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, B. (1989). Language
universals and linguistic
typology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornilescu, A. (2000). On
the interpretation of the prepositional accusative in
Romanian. Bucharest Working Papers in
Linguistics, 2(1), 91–110.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cyrino, S., & Irimia, M. A. (2019). Differential
object marking in Brazilian
Portuguese. Revista Letras
UFPR, 99, 177–201.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (1994). The
syntax of Romanian. Comparative studies in
Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fiorentino, G. (Ed.). (2003). Romance
objects. Transitivity in Romance
languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
García García, M. (2018). Nominal
and verbal parameters in the diachrony of differential object
marking in
Spanish. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack-Makarevich (Eds.), The
diachronic typology of differential argument
marking (pp. 207–239). Berlin: Language Science Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heusinger, K. von, & Kaiser, G. A. (2005). The
evolution of differential object marking in
Spanish. In Proceedings
of the Workshop: Specificity and the Evolution / Emergence of
Nominal Determination Systems in
Romance (pp. 33–69). University of Konstanz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heusinger, K. von, & Onea, G. E. (2008). Triggering
and blocking effects in the development of DOM in
Romanian. Probus, 20, 67–110. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, V., & Mardale, A. (2021). The
diachrony of differential object marking in
Romanian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irimia, M. A. (2020a). Types
of structural objects. Some remarks on differential object marking
in
Romanian. In A. Bárány & L. Kalin (Eds.), Case,
agreement and their interactions. New perspectives on differential
argument
marking (pp. 77–126). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irimia, M. A. (2020b). Variation
in differential object marking. On some differences between Spanish
and Romanian. Open Linguistics,
2020(6), 424–462. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irimia, M. A. (2021). When
DOM is not dependent on the external
argument. Proceedings of
SICOGG, 23, 1–20.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irimia, M. A. (2022). DOM
and nominal structure. Some notes on DOM with bare
nominals. Languages, 7(175), 1–32. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irimia, M. A. (2023). Oblique DOM in enriched case hierarchies. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics.8(1): 1–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiménez-Gaspar, A. (2020). Bilingualism
and language change: The production of the pronominal clitics and
the differential object marking in Majorcan Catalan and
Spanish (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Universitat de les Illes Balears.
Jones, M. A. (2003). Sintassi
della lingua
sarda. Condaghes.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kabatek, J., Obrist, P., & Wall, A. (Eds.). (2021). Differential
object marking in Romance. The third
wave. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazard, G. (1994). L’actance. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leonetti, M. (2003). Specificity
and differential object marking in
Spanish. Catalan Journal of
Linguistics, 3, 75–114. [URL] ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leonetti, M. (2008). Specificity
in clitic doubling and in
DOM. Probus, 20(1), 33–66. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
López, L. (2012). Indefinite
objects: Scrambling, choice functions and differential
marking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. R., & Franco, L. (2016). Goal
and DOM datives. Natural Language and
Linguistic
Theory, 34, 197–240. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mardale, A. (2008). Notes
on bare plurals and differential object marking in
Romance. In Hommage
à la professeure Ioana
Vintilă-Rădulescu. Special issue
of Studii şi Cercetări
Lingvistice, LIX(2), 411–424.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mardale, A. (2010). Éléments
d’analyse du marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues
romanes. Faits de Langues. Les
Cahiers, 2, 161–197. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mardale, A. (2015). Differential
object marking in the first original Romanian
texts. In V. Hill (Ed.), Formal
approaches to DPs in Old
Romanian (pp. 200–245). Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mardale, A. (2017). Le
marquage différentiel de l’objet dans les langues romanes: Quelques
nouvelles pièces du puzzle. Revue
Roumaine de
Linguistique, LXII(4), 351–359.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mardale, A., & Karatsareas, P. (Eds.). (2020). Differential
object marking and language
contact. Special issue
of Journal of Language
Contact, 13(1). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Niculescu, A. (1965). Obiectul
direct prepoziţional în limbile romanice. Individualitatea limbii
române între limbile
romanice. Bucureşti: Editura Ştiinţifică.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Odria, A. (2017). Differential
object marking and datives in Basque
syntax (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). UPV/EHU.
Odria, A. (2019). Differential
object marking in Basque and Spanish
dialects. In A. Berro, B. Fernández, & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Basque
and Romance: Aligning
grammars (pp. 243–275). Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (2007). The
object agreement constraint. Natural
Language and Linguistic
Theory, 25(2), 315–347. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (2013a). Differential
object marking, case and
agreement. Borealis: An International
Journal of Hispanic
Linguistics, 2(2), 221–239. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (2013b). Non
accusative objects. Catalan Journal
of
Linguistics, 12, 155–173. [URL] ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perpiñán, C. (2018). On
convergence, ongoing language change, and crosslinguistic influence
in direct object expression in Catalan–Spanish
bilingualism. Languages, 3(14), 1–23. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Puig-Mayenco, E., Cunnings, I., Bayram, F., Miller, D., Tubau, S., & Rothman, J. (2018). Language
dominance affects bilingual performance and processing outcomes in
adulthood. Frontiers in
Psychology, 9, 1–16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Puig-Mayenco, E., Miller, D., & Rothman, J. (2017). Adult
outcomes of early child second language (L2) acquisition:
Differential object marking in the child L2 Spanish of Catalan
natives. In M. LaMendola & J. Scott (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language
Development (pp. 546–558). Cascadilla Press![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M. (2007). The
syntax of objects. Agree and differential object
marking (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of Connecticut.
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, I. (2016). DOM
in Basque: Grammaticalization, attitudes and ideological
representations (Unpublished
doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, I. (2017). Reexamining
differential object marking as a linguistic contact-phenomenon in
Gernika Basque. Journal of Language
Contact, 10, 318–352. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roegiest, E. (1979). A
propos de l’accusatif prépositionnel dans quelques langues
romanes. Vox
Romanica, 38, 312–334. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohlfs, G. (1971). Autour
de l’accusatif prépositionnel dans les langues romanes: Concordances
et discordances. Revue de
Linguistique
Romaine, 35, 312–327. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seržant, I. A., & Witzlack-Makarevich, A. (Eds.). (2018). The
diachronic typology of differential argument
marking (pp. 207–239). Berlin: Language Science Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy
of features and
ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Grammatical Categories
in Australian
languages (pp. 112–171). Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torrego, E. (1998). The
dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)