Appositive or Scops Indicating?: The W-… W- Construction

Höhle, Tilman N.

doi:10.1075/la.37.10hoh

Part of

Wh-Scope Marking
Edited by Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller and Arnim von Stechow
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 37] 2000
► pp. 249–270

The W-… W- Construction

Appositive or Scops Indicating?

Tilman N. Höhle

Published online: 15 September 2000

https://doi.org/10.1075/la.37.10hoh

Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Order by:

Fanselow, Gisbert, Sjef Barbiers, Jessica M. M. Brown, Natasja Delbar, Sophia Nauta & Johannes Rothert

2024. On the asymmetry of wh-doubling in varieties of German and Dutch. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 43:1 ► pp. 41 ff.

Bross, Fabian

2023. Wh-doubling in German Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 258 ff.

Gutierrez-Mangado, M. Juncal

2021. Expanding the scope of L3 transfer study designs. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 11:1 ► pp. 60 ff.

Hopp, Holger, Michael T. Putnam & Nora Vosburg

2019. Derivational complexity vs. transfer effects. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 9:3 ► pp. 341 ff.

Slavkov, Nikolay

2015. Long-distance wh-movement and long-distance wh-movement avoidance in L2 English: Evidence from French and Bulgarian speakers. Second Language Research 31:2 ► pp. 179 ff.

Franks, Steven L.

2014. Multiattachment syntax, “Movement” effects, and Spell-Out. In Minimalism and Beyond [Language Faculty and Beyond, 11], ► pp. 195 ff.

Pankau, Andreas

2014. Wh-copying in German as replacement. In Dependency Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 215], ► pp. 299 ff.

Lipták, Anikó & Malte Zimmermann

2007. Indirect scope marking again: a case for generalized question formation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25:1

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.