Cover not available
To be specified published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 7:1 (2017) ► pp.1–32
Article

Restrictions on definiteness in the grammars of German-Turkish heritage speakers

| University of Konstanz | The Arctic University of Norway
| University of Calgary
| Indiana University
| University of Hamburg
| McGill University
This paper reports on a study investigating restrictions on definiteness (the Definiteness Effect) in existential constructions in the two languages of Turkish heritage speakers in Germany. Turkish and German differ in how the Definiteness Effect plays out. Definite expressions in German may not occur in affirmative or negative existentials, whereas in Turkish the restriction applies only to affirmative existentials. Participants were adults and fell into two groups: simultaneous bilinguals (2L1) who acquired German before age 3 and early sequential bilinguals (2L1) who acquired German after age 4; there were also monolingual controls. The tasks involved acceptability judgments. Subjects were presented with contexts, each followed by a sentence to be judged, including grammatical and ungrammatical existentials. Results show that the bilinguals, regardless of age of acquisition, make judgments appropriate for each language. They reject definite expressions in negative existentials in German and accept them in Turkish, suggesting distinct grammars.
Keywords: definiteness effect, heritage speakers, Turkish-German bilingualism
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Turkish heritage speakers in Germany and age of onset
  • 3.The Definiteness Effect
    • 3.1Definiteness effects in English
    • 3.2Definiteness effects in German
    • 3.3Definiteness effects in Turkish
  • 4.Previous research on definiteness in L2 and bilingual acquisition
  • 5.Experiment
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Task
    • 5.3Sentence types: German version
    • 5.4Sentence types: Turkish version
    • 5.5Data analysis
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Monolingual German vs. monolingual Turkish
    • 6.2Monolingual vs. bilingual German
    • 6.3Monolingual vs. bilingual Turkish
    • 6.4Bilingual German vs. bilingual Turkish
    • 6.5Summary
  • 7.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 1 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.13031.kup
References (47)
References
Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: the case of systematicity. Language Learning, 331, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilla, S., & Babur, E. (2010). Specific Language Impairment in Turkish-German successive bilingual children: Aspects of assessment and outcome. In S. Topbaş, & M. Yavaş (Eds.), Communication disorders in Turkish in monolingual and multilingual settings (pp. 352–368). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Czinglar, C. (2002). Decomposing existence: Evidence from Germanic. In W. Abraham, & C. J.-W. Zwart (Eds.) (2002), Issues in Formal German(ic) Typology (pp. 245–254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (1997). Monolingual bias in second language acquisition research. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 341, 35–50.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. (1990). The acquisition of two languages from birth. A case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenbeiss, S. (2000). The Acquisition of the DP in German. In L. Rizzi, & M.-A. Friedemann (Eds.), Acquisition of Syntax. Issues in Developmental Linguistic (pp. 27–62). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Enç, M. (1991). The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry, 221, 1–25.Google Scholar
Fürstenau, S., Gogolin, I. & Yağmur, K. (Eds). (2003). Mehrsprachigkeit in Hamburg. Ergebnisse einer Sprachstanderhebung an den Grundschulen. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Garcia-Mayo, M., & Hawkins, R (Eds). (2009). Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genesee, F. 1989. Early bilingual development: One language or two? Journal of Child Language, 161, 161–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goad, H. & White, L. (2004). Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: effects of L1 prosodic structure. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood Smith, A. Sorace, & M. Ota (Eds.), Eurosla Yearbook Vol 41 (pp. 119–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2009). Prosodic transfer and determiners in Turkish-English interlanguage. In N. Snape, Y-k. I. Leung, & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in L2 acquisition (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 121, 3–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornfilt, J. (1984). Case marking, agreement and empty categories in Turkish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
(1997). Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2012). Generic subjects in the Italian of early German-Italian bilinguals and German learners of Italian as a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 151 (4), 736–756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102–129). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2004). Knowledge of definiteness despite variable article omission in second language acquisition. In A. Brugos, L. Micciulla, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. (pp. 328–339). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (1986). Word order and case marking in early child language. Evidence from the simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: French and German. Linguistics, 241, 123–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J.M. (2007). Mehrsprachigkeit in der frühen Kindheit: Zur Rolle des Alters bei Erwerbsbeginn. In T. Anstatt (Ed.), Mehrsprachigkeit bei Kindern und Erwachsenen: Erwerb, Formen, Förderung (pp. 93–113), Tübingen: Attempto.Google Scholar
(2009). Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 28(1), 5–34.Google Scholar
(2011). First and second language acquisition: Parallels and differences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milsark, G.L. (1977). Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 31, 1–29.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition on bilingualism: Re-examining the age-factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Multiple interfaces and incomplete acquisition. Lingua, 121(4), 591–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. & Ionin, T. (2010). Transfer effects in the interpretation of definite articles by Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (4), 449–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, N. & Hulk, A. (2001). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 41, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçelik, Ö. (2011). Representation and acquisition of stress: the case of Turkish. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. McGill University.Google Scholar
Öztürk, B. (2005). Case, referentiality and phrase structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D., & Rothman, J. (2012). The (il)logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 450–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: autonomous or interdependent. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 181, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, C. W. (1992). The issue of grammaticalization in early German second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 141, 273–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. (1997). American Russian: Language loss meets language acquisition. In E. Wayles Browne, N. Dornisch, N. Kondrashowva, & D. Ze (Eds.), Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Cornell Meeting (1995) (pp. 370–406). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publishers.Google Scholar
Putnam, M., & Sánchez, L. (2013). What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition? A prolegomenon to modeling heritage language grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(4), 478–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 161, 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2009). Understanding the Nature of Early Bilingualism: Romance Languages as Heritage Languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 131, 155–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothweiler, M. (2006). The acquisition of V2 and subordinate clauses in early successive acquisition of German. In C. Lleó (Ed.). Interfaces in Multilingualism: Acquisition, Representation and Processing (pp. 91–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Bilingualer Spracherwerb und Zweitspracherwerb. In M. Steinbach (Ed.), Schnittstellen der germanistischen Linguistik (pp. 103–135). Stuttgart/Weimar: Metzler.Google Scholar
Schönenberger, M. (2011). Are Difficulties with the Prosodic Representation the Origin of Prolonged Article Omission? In J. Herschensohn, & D. Tanner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2011) (pp. 135–142). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schönenberger, M., Sterner, F., & Ruberg, T. (2011). The Realization of Indirect Objects and Dative Case in German. In J. Herschensohn, & D. Tanner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2011) (pp. 143–151). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M., & Mastropavlou, M. (2007). Feature interpretability in L2 acquisition and SLI: Greek clitics and determiners. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 142–183). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
White, L. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 61, 129–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Definiteness effects in the L2 English of Mandarin and Turkish speakers. In H. Chan, H. Jacob, & E. Kapia (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 550,561). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Second language acquisition at the interfaces, Lingua 1211, 577–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L., Belikova, A., Hagström, P., Kupisch, T. & Özcelik, Ö. (2012). Restrictions on definiteness in second language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(1), 54–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Giannakou, Aretousa & Georgios P. Georgiou
2024. Subject position in Greek and Spanish monolingual and bilingual production: Exploring the influence of verb type and definiteness. Language Acquisition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Martynova, Maria, Onur Özsoy, Vasiliki Rizou, Luka Szucsich, Natalia Gagarina & Artemis Alexiadou
2024. Demonstratives in heritage Greek, Russian, and Turkish in Germany and the United States. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Jažić, Ilma, Natalia Gagarina & Alexandra Perovic
2023. Case marking is different in monolingual and heritage Bosnian in digitally elicited oral texts. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
YILMAZ, Gülsen & Antje SAUERMANN
2023. Complete acquisition in the heritage language: Evidence from indefiniteness in Turkish. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi :33 ► pp. 813 ff. DOI logo
Özsoy, Onur & Frederic Blum
2023. Exploring individual variation in Turkish heritage speakers’ complex linguistic productions: Evidence from discourse markers. Applied Psycholinguistics 44:4 ► pp. 534 ff. DOI logo
Andriani, Luigi, Roberta D'Alessandro, Alberto Frasson, Brechje van Osch, Luana Sorgini & Silvia Terenghi
2022. Adding the microdimension to the study of language change in contact. Three case studies. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1 DOI logo
Coskun Kunduz, Aylin & Silvina Montrul
2022. Sources of variability in the acquisition of Differential Object Marking by Turkish heritage language children in the United States. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25:4 ► pp. 603 ff. DOI logo
Ionin, Tania
2021. Semantics of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 668 ff. DOI logo
Jegerski, Jill & Irina A. Sekerina
2021. The Psycholinguistics of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Kupisch, Tanja
2021. Heritage Languages in Europe. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Jiangling, Ziyin Mai & Virginia Yip
2021. Bidirectional cross-linguistic influence in object realization in Cantonese–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24:1 ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Felser, Claudia
2020. Do processing resource limitations shape heritage language grammars?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Montanari, Elke G., Roman Abel, Lilia Tschudinovski & Barbara Graßer
2020. How do parental input and socio-economic status account for differences within and between the cohorts?. In Lost in Transmission [Studies in Bilingualism, 59], ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Domínguez, Laura, Glyn Hicks & Roumyana Slabakova
2019. TERMINOLOGY CHOICE IN GENERATIVE ACQUISITION RESEARCH. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:2 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
van Osch, Brechje, Elisabet García González, Aafke Hulk, Petra Sleeman & Suzanne Aalberse
2019. The Development of Subject Position in Dutch-Dominant Heritage Speakers of Spanish: From Age 9 to Adulthood. Languages 4:4 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Montrul, Silvina A.
2018. Chapter 6. The Bottleneck Hypothesis extends to heritage language acquisition. In Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism, 55], ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Putnam, Michael T., Tanja Kupisch & Diego Pascual y Cabo
2018. Chapter 12. Different situations, similar outcomes. In Bilingual Cognition and Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 54], ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
van Osch, Brechje & Petra Sleeman
2018. Spanish heritage speakers in the Netherlands: Linguistic patterns in the judgment and production of mood. International Journal of Bilingualism 22:5 ► pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Grammatical Aspects of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 579 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Heritage Languages around the World. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.