Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 7:5 (2017) ► pp.583–613

Language interaction effects in bimodal bilingualism

Argument omission in the languages of hearing ASL-English bilinguals

| Central Connecticut State University
The focus of the paper is a phenomenon well documented in both monolingual and bilingual English acquisition: argument omission. Previous studies have shown that bilinguals acquiring a null and a non-null argument language simultaneously tend to exhibit unidirectional cross-language interaction effects — the non-null argument language remains unaffected but over-suppliance of overt elements in the null argument language is observed. Here subject and object omission in both ASL (null argument) and English (non-null argument) of young ASL-English bilinguals is examined. Results demonstrate that in spontaneous English production, ASL-English bilinguals omit subjects and objects to a higher rate, for longer, and in unexpected environments when compared with English monolinguals and bilinguals; no effect on ASL is observed. Findings also show that the children differentiate between their two languages — rates of argument omission in English are different during ASL vs. English target sessions differ. Implications for the general theory of bilingual effects are offered.
Keywords: argument omission, bimodal bilingualism, cross-linguistic influence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research: Argument omission in english
    • 2.1Monolinguals
    • 2.2Bilinguals
  • 3.Study: ASL-English bilinguals
    • 3.1Predictions
    • 3.2Subjects and methodology
    • 3.3Part 1: English-target
      • 3.3.1Results
      • 3.3.2Analysis at later stages (Stages 3–4)
    • 3.4Part 2 (follow-up): ASL-target
      • 3.4.1Results
      • 3.4.2Analysis
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1Overview of the results
    • 4.2Bimodality
  • 5.Account and directions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.13047.kou
References (99)
References
Allen, S. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38(3), 483–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
AnderBois, S. (2011). Issues and Alternatives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Asudeh, A. (2004). Resumption as Resource Management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bahan, B., Kegl, J., Lee, R., MacLaughlin, D., & Neidle, C. (2000). The licensing of null arguments in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 311, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berk, S. & Lillo-Martin, D. (2012). The two-word stage: Motivated by linguistic and cognitive constraints? Cognitive Psychology 65, 118–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, R. & Pancheva, R. (2006). Implicit arguments. Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 558–588. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I., & Sheehan, M. (2010). Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, M. (2009). Bimodal bilingualism in hearing, native users of American Sign Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Blais, M.J., Oshima-Takane, Y. Genesee, F., & Hirakawa, M. (2010). Cross-linguistic influence on argument realization in Japanese-French bilinguals. Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) 341, 34–45. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (1990). Subjectless sentences in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 2(1), 491–504.Google Scholar
Borer, H. & Wexler, K. (1987). The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & Williams, E., (Eds.) Parameter Setting, 123–172. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, H. & Rohrbacher, B. (2002). Minding the absent: Arguments for the full competence hypothesis. Language Acquisition 10(2), 123–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boster, C. T. (1997). Processing and parameter setting in language acquisition: A computational approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Brackenbury, T., Ryan, T., & Messenheimer, T. (2006). Incidental word learning in a hearing child of deaf adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(1), 76–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A First Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantone, K. F. (2007). Code-switching in Bilingual Children. The Netherlands: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Capirci, O., Iverson, J. M., Montanari, S., & Volterra, V. (2002). Gestural, signed and spoken modalities in early language development: The role of linguistic input. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5(1), 25–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casey, S. & Emmorey, K. (2009). Co-speech gesture in bimodal bilinguals. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(2), 290–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, C. & Mayberry, R. I. (2008). American Sign Language syntactic and narrative comprehension in skilled and less skilled readers: Bilingual and bimodal evidence for the linguistic basis of reading. Applied Psycholinguistics 29 (3), 367–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, D., Hochgesang, J., Lillo-Martin, D., & Quadros, R. (2010). Conventions for sign and speech transcription in child bimodal bilingual corpora. Language, Interaction and Acquisition/Language, Interaction et Acquisition 1(1), 11–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999). Lexical selection in bilinguals: Do words in the bilingual’s two lexicons compete for selection? Journal of Memory and Language. 411, 365–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, M. (2011). The Distributed Morphology of code-switching. Paper presented at 2010 UIC Bilingualism Forum. University of Chicago, IL.
Donati, C. & Branchini, C. (2009). Challenging linearization: Simultaneous mixing in the production of bimodal bilinguals. Proceedings of the European Summer School on Language, Logic and Information (ESSLI), Bordeaux, France, July 2009.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Borinstein, H. B., Thompson, R., & Gollan, T. H. (2008). Bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11(1), 43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K., Luk, G., Pyers, J.E., & Bialystok, E. (2008). The source of enhanced cognitive control in bilinguals. Psychological Science 19(12), 1201–1206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N. (1992) Resumptive pronouns in islands. In Goodluck, H. & Rochemont, M. (eds.) Island Constraints: Theory, Acquisition and Processing, 89–108. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S. (1990). The head parameter in ADL. In Edmondson, W. H. & Karlsson, F. (eds.) SLR ’87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 75–85. Hamburg: Signum.7 3Y6Google Scholar
Frascarelli, M. (2007). Subjects, topics and the interpretation of pro: A new approach to the Null Subject Parameter. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 251, 691–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. (1991). The metrical basis for children’s subjectless sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 30(4), 431–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González-Vilbazo, K. & Lòpez, L. (2012). Little v and parametric variation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(1), 33–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guerriero, S., Cooper, A., Oshima-Takane, Y., & Kuriyama, Y. (2001). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument realization and omission in English and Japanese children’s speech. Proceedings of BUCLD 251, 319–330. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hacohen, A. & Schaeffer, J. (2007). Subject realization in early Hebrew/English bilingual acquisition: The role of crosslinguistic influence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(3), 333–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B. (2010). Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Pronominal subjects in bilingual Turkish. Second Language Research 26(3), 355–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A. (2005). Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 361, 533–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, P-Y. (1999). The Development of Null Arguments in a Cantonese-English Bilingual Child. Unpublished Masters in Philology thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Hughes, M. & Allen, S. (2008). Child-directed speech and the development of referential choice in child English. Presented at the International Association for the Study of Child Language Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 2008.Google Scholar
Hulk, A., & Müller, N. (2000). Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3(3), 227–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N. (2011). Missing Subjects in Early child Language. In J. De Villiers & T. Roeper (eds.), Handbook of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition, 13–52. The Netherlands: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarque, M. J. (2010). Sign bilingualism: Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 13(2), 265–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J., Watkins, R., & Rice, M. (1992). Bimodal bilingual language development in a hearing child of deaf parents. Applied Psycholinguistics 13(1), 31–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juan-Garau, M. & Perez-Vidal, C. (2000). Subject realization in the syntactic development of a bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 31, 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koulidobrova. (2012). When the quiet surfaces: ‘Transfer’ of argument omission in the speech of ASL-English bilinguals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
. (2013a). She said __ was ok: Embedded subject omission in the English of ASL-English bilinguals. Presented at the LSA 2013 (Winter). Boston, MA, January 2013.Google Scholar
Kovelman, I., Baker, S.A., & Petitto, L.A. (2008). Bilingual and monolingual brains compared: An fMRI investigation of syntactic processing and a possible “neural signature” of bilingualism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20(1), 153–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovelman, I., Shalinsky, M. H., White, K. S., Schmitt, S. N., Berens, M. S., Paymer, N., & Petitto, L. (2009). Dual language use in sign-speech bimodal bilinguals: FNIRS brain imaging evidence. Brain and Language 109(2–3), 112–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism 9(2), 119–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liceras, J., Fernández Fuertes, R., & de la Fuente, A. (2012) Subject and copula omission in the English grammar of English-Spanish bilinguals: On the issue of directionality of interlinguistic influence. First Language, 321: 88–115 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. (1991). Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the Null Argument Parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Berk, S., Hopewell-Albert, C. & Quadros, R., Müller, de (2015). MLU and Sign Language development. Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Sign Language Acquisition. University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, July 2015.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Quadros, R., Koulidobrova, H., & Chen Pichler, D. (2009). Bimodal Bilingual Cross-Language Influence in Unexpected Domains. Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (GALA), Lisbon, Portugal, September 2009.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Koulidobrova, H., Quadros, R., & Chen Pichler, D. (2010). Bilingual Language Synthesis: Evidence from WH-Questions in Bimodal Bilinguals. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
MacSwan, J. (2000). The architecture of the bilingual language faculty: Evidence from code-switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3(1), 7–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2004). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marshall, J., Atkinson, J., Woll, B., & Thacker, A. (2005). Aphasia in a bilingual user of British Sign Language and English: Effects of cross-linguistic cues. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22(6), 719–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Messing, L.S. (1999). Two modes – two languages? In L. S. Messing & R. Campbell (eds.) Gesture, Speech, and Sign, 83–200. Oxford University Press, New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mishina-Mori, S. (2007). Argument representation in Japanese/English simultaneous bilinguals: Is there a crosslingusitic influence? Proceedings of BUCLD 311, 441–450. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. (2000). Discourse cohesion in sign and speech. International Journal of Bilingualism 4(3), 279–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, N. (1998). Transfer in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1(3), 151–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, J., & Slorach, N. (1983). The language development of pre-preschool hearing children of deaf parents. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 18(2), 118–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunes, J. & Müller de Quadros, R. (2007). Phonetic realization of multiple copies in Brazilian Sign Language. In Josep Quer (ed.) Signs of the Time, 179–192. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Petitto, L.A., Katerlos, M., Levy, B.G., Gauna, K., Tetreault, K., & Ferraro, V. (2001). Bilingual signed and spoken language acquisition from birth: implications for the mechanisms underlying early bilingual language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 281, 453–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petitto, L. A. & Holowka, S. (2002). Evaluating attributions of delay and confusion in young bilinguals: Special insights from infants acquiring a signed and spoken language. Sign Language Studies 3(1), 4–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petitto, L. A. & Kovelman, I. (2003). The Bilingual Paradox: How signing-speaking bilingual children help us to resolve it and teach us about the brain’s mechanisms underlying all language acquisition. Learning Languages 8(3), 5–18.Google Scholar
Petroj, V., Guerrera, K., & Davidson, K. (2014). ASL-dominant code-blending in the whispering of bimodal bilingual children. Proceedings of BUCLD 381, 319–330. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Pinto, M. (2006). Subject pronouns in bilinguals: Interference or maturation? In V. Torrens, & L. Escobar (eds.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance Languages, 331–350. Amsterdam; Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Tracking reference with null subjects. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 30(1), 131–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pizer, G. (2008). Sign and Speech in Family Interaction: Language Choices of Deaf Parents and their Hearing Children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Quadros, R., Lillo-Martin, D., & Mathur, G. (2001). What does deaf children’s language acquisition teach us about the stage of optional infinitives? Letras De Hoje 36(3), 391–397.Google Scholar
Quadros, R. & Lillo-Martin, D. (2007). Aquisição das Línguas de Sinais e a morfologia verbal nas Línguas de Sinais Brasileira e Americana. In Anais do I Encontro do Nordeste em Aquisição da Linguagem (I ENEAL 2005) 11, 1–14. Recife: UNICAP (CD ROM).Google Scholar
Quadros, R. Müller de, Lillo-Martin, D., & Chen Pichler, D. (2014). Methodological considerations for the development and use of sign language acquisition corpora. In T. Raso & H. Mello (Eds.) Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies, 84–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, W. (2015). Reference tracking in the narratives of early bimodal bilingual children. Presented at Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR) 12, Melbourne, Australia, January 2016.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (2005). Grammatically-based target-inconsistencies in child language. Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference of GALANA. Cambridge, MA: UCONN/MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. & Holmberg, A. (2010). Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 1–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roeper, T. & Weissenborn, J. (1990). How to make parameters work: Comments on Valian. In Frazier, L. and de Villiers, J. (Eds.) Language Processing and Language Acquisition. (pp. 147–162). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. (1983). Talking about the there and then: The emergence of displaced reference in parent–child discourse. In K. E. Nelson (ed.), Children’s Language, vol. 41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sachs, J., Bard, B., & Johnson, M. (1981). Language learning with restricted input: Case studies of two hearing children of deaf parents. Applied Psycholinguistics 2 (1), 33–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saito, M. (2007). Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis. Language Research 431, 203–227.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. & Lillo-Martin, D. (2006). Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiff, N. & Ventry, I. (1976). Communication problems in hearing children of deaf parents. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 41(3), 348–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiff-Myers, N. (1988). Hearing children of deaf parents. In D. Bishop and K. Mogford (Eds.) Language Development in Exceptional Circumstances (pp. 47–61). Edinburgh etc.: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Schmitz, K., Patuto, M., & Muller, N. (2012). The null-subject parameter at the interface between syntax and pragmatics: Evidence from bilingual German-Italian, German-French and Italian-French children. First Language 32(1–2), 205–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seal, B. & Hammett, L. (1995). Language intervention with a hearing child whose parents are deaf. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 4(4), 15–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L. & Sorace, A. (2003). Overt and Null Subjects in Monolingual and Bilingual Italian Acquisition. Proceedings of BUCLD 271, 739–750. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S. (2004). Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7 (3), 183–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., Filiaci, F., & Baldo, M. (2011). Pronominal objects in English–Italian and Spanish–Italian bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, H. & Maling, J. (2010). The empty left edge condition. In M. Putnam (ed.) Exploring Crash-Proof Grammars, 59–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, H. (2011). Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 421, 267–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, W., Senghas, A., & Inman, I. (2001) Agreement morphology and the acquisition of noun-drop in Spanish. Language Acquisition 91, 157–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suppes, P. (1974). The semantics of children’s language. American Psychologist, 29(2):103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todd, P. (1971). A case of structural interference across sensory modalities in second-language learning. Word 27(1–3), 102–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Does ASL Really Have Just Two Grammatical Persons? Sign Language Studies, 9(2), 166–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. (2011). External interfaces and the notion of ‘default’. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1), 101–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valian, V. (1991). Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition 40, 21–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van den Bogaerde, B. & Baker, A. (2005). Code mixing in mother-child interaction in deaf families. Sign Language & Linguistics 8(1–2), 153–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q., Lillo-Martin, D., Best, C., & Levitt, A. (1992). Null subject versus null object: Some evidence from the acquisition of Chinese and English. Language Acquisition 21, 221–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weir, A. (2009). Subject drop in informal English. Ms. Available online at [URL]. Accessed on April 20, 2010.
Wulf, A., Dudis, P., Bayley, R., & Lucas, C. (2002). Variable Subject Presence in ASL Narratives. Sign Language Studies 3(1), 54–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwanziger, E. E., Allen, S. E. M., & Genesee, F. (2005). Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual acquisition: Subject omission in learners of Inuktitut and English. Journal of Child Language 32(4), 893–909. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Novogrodsky, Rama, Rose Stamp & Sabrin Shaban-Rabah
2023. Word order in simple sentences of tri-lingual tri-modal deaf students*. Sign Language & Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Jonathan Henner
2021. Acquisition of Sign Languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 395 ff. DOI logo
Quadros, Ronice Müller de, Kathryn Davidson, Diane Lillo-Martin & Karen Emmorey
2020. Code-blending with depicting signs. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10:2 ► pp. 290 ff. DOI logo
Frederiksen, Anne Therese & Rachel I. Mayberry
2019. Reference tracking in early stages of different modality L2 acquisition: Limited over-explicitness in novice ASL signers’ referring expressions. Second Language Research 35:2 ► pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Koulidobrova, Elena V.
2019. Argument omission in SignL2 acquisition by deaf learners. In Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 63], ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Gladys W. L. & Jia Li
2018. Acquisition of Classifier Constructions in HKSL by Bimodal Bilingual Deaf Children of Hearing Parents. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Lillo-Martin, Diane, Ronice Müller de Quadros & Deborah Chen Pichler
2016. Synthesizing commentaries and responses. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:6 ► pp. 839 ff. DOI logo
Lillo-Martin, Diane, Ronice Müller de Quadros & Deborah Chen Pichler
2016. The development of bimodal bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:6 ► pp. 719 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.