Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 7:2 (2017) ► pp.199–229

Coreference and discourse coherence in L2

The roles of grammatical aspect and referential form

 | University of Hawai‘i
 | University of Edinburgh
 | University of Hawai‘i
Discourse-level factors, such as event structure and the form of referential expressions, play an important role in native speakers’ referential processing. This paper presents an experiment with Japanese- and Korean-speaking learners of English, investigating the extent to which discourse-level biases that have gradient effects in L1 speakers are also implicated in L2 speakers’ coreference choices. Results from a story continuation task indicate that biases involving referential form were remarkably similar for L1 and L2 speakers. In contrast, event structure, indicated by perfective versus imperfective aspect, had a more limited effect on L2 speakers’ referential choices. The L2 results are discussed in light of existing accounts of L1 reference processing, which assume that referential choices are shaped by speakers’ continually updated expectations about what is likely to be mentioned next, and argued to reflect L2 speakers’ reduced reliance on expectations.
Keywords: reference, aspect, expectation, adult L2 acquisition, pragmatics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Event structure and referential form in L1 coreference processing
  • 3.The potential roles of event structure and referential form in L2 coreference processing
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Participants
    • 4.2Materials and procedure
      • 4.2.1Story continuation task
      • 4.2.2Knowledge-of-aspect task
    • 4.3Results
      • 4.3.1Knowledge-of-aspect task
      • 4.3.2Story continuation task
        • Coreference
        • Choice of referring expression
        • Coherence relation
  • 5.Discussion and Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15011.gru
References (60)
References
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 731, 247–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. E. (2001). The effects of thematic roles on pronoun use and frequency of reference. Discourse Processes, 311, 137–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). How speakers refer: the role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass, 41, 187–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakeman, R., & McArthur, D. (1996). Picturing repeated measures: Comments on Loftus, Morrison, and others. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 281, 584–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2000). Tense and aspect in second language acquisition: Form, meaning and use. Oxford: Blackwell.
Barr, D. (2013). Coding categorical variables when analyzing factorial experiments with regression. Retrieved from [URL]/Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 251, 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. D. (1980). Relative merits of four methods for scoring cloze tests. Modern Language Journal, 641, 311–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Grober, E., Garvey, C., & Yates, J. (1977). Comprehension of Anaphoric Pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 161, 601–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carminati, M. N. (2002). The processing of Italian subject pronouns. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Chambers, C. G., & Cooke, H. (2009). Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 351, 1029–1040.Google Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Troyer, M., & Kutas, M. (2014). Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Language and Linguistic Compass, 81, 631–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 81, 1117–1121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 441, 491–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferretti, T. R., Rohde, H., Kehler, A., & Crutchley, M. (2009). Verb aspect, event structure, and coreferential processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 611, 191–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferstl, E. C., Garnham, A., & Manouilidou, C. (2011). Implicit causality bias in English: a corpus of 300 verbs. Behavioral Research Methods, 431, 124–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A., Martin, C. D., Moreno, E. M., & Costa, A. (2014). Can Bilinguals See It Coming? Word Anticipation in L2 Sentence Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 401, 1461–1469.Google Scholar
Fukumura, K., van Gompel, P. G. (2010). Choosing anaphoric expressions: Do people take into account likelihood of reference? Journal of Memory and Language, 621, 52–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabriele, A. (2005). The acquisition of aspect in a second language: A bidirectional study of learners of English and Japanese. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). City University of New York Graduate Center.Google Scholar
(2009). Transfer and transition in the SLA of aspect: A bidirectional study of learners of English and Japanese. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 311, 371–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gatt, A., Krahmer, E., van Deemter, K., & van Gompel, R. P. G. (2014). Models and empirical data for the production of referring expressions. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Special Issue on the Production of Referring Expressions: Models and Empirical Data, 291, 899–911.Google Scholar
Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., & Weinstein, S. (1995). Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 211, 203–225.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 691, 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, J. R. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science, 31, 67–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H. (2009). The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and online performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 121, 463–483.Google Scholar
Hwang, M. O. (1983). Topic continuity/discontinuity in Korean narrative. Korean Linguistics, 31, 47–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 434–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E. (2014). Predictive sentence processing in L2 and L1: What is different? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 41, 257–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E., Dallas, A., & Wijnen, F. (2010). Syntactic predictions in second-language sentence processing. In J.-W. Zwart & M. de Vries (Eds.), Structure preserved. Festschrift in the honor of Jan Koster (pp. 207–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, E. (2011). Focusing on pronouns: Consequences of subjecthood, pronominalisation, and contrastive focus. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 1625–1666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehler, A. (2002). Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kehler, A., Hayes, E., & Barner, D. (2011). Pragmatically-driven biases in children’s pronoun interpretation. Poster presented at the 24th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Kehler, A., Kertz, L., Rohde, H., & Elman, J. L. (2008). Coherence and coreference revisited. Journal of Semantics, 251, 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kehler, A. & Rohde, H. (under review). Pronoun Interpretation in a QUD Model of Discourse.
Kilborn, K. (1992). On-line integration of grammatical information in a second language. In Harris, R. (Ed.), Cognitive Processing in Bilinguals (pp. 337–350). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. (1997). Referential choice for third persons in Korean conversation. Discourse and Cognition, 41, 121–158.Google Scholar
Kim, K., Grüter, T., & Schafer, A. J. (2013) Effects of event-structure and topic/focus-marking on pronoun reference in Korean. Poster presented at the 26th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Lee, E. H. (2006). Stative progressives in Korean and English. Journal of Pragmatics, 381, 695–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2006). Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 101, 447–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madden, C. J. & Zwaan, R. A. (2003). How does verb aspect constrain event representations? Memory & Cognition, 311, 663–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magliano, J. P., & Schleich, M. C. (2000). Verb aspect and situation models. Discourse Processes, 291, 83–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 81, 243–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 691, 574–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G., Greene, S., & Ratcliff, R. (1993). Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 191, 1040–1052.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Reading in a second language: studies with adult and child learners. In S. R. Goldman & H. T. Trueba (Eds.), Becoming literate in English as a second language (pp. 57–70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Miltsakaki, E. (2007). A rethink of the relationship between salience and anaphora resolution. In A. Branco (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th discourse anaphora and anaphor resolution colloquium (pp. 91–96). Lagos, Portugal: Discourse anaphora and anaphora resolution colloquium.Google Scholar
Moens, M., Steedman, M. (1988). Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference. Computational Linguistics, 141, 15–28.Google Scholar
Obana, Y. (2003). Anaphoric choices in Japanese fictional novels: The discourse arrangement of noun phrases, zero and third person pronouns. Text, 231, 405–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson (2011). Versant English Test: test description and validation summary. Palo Alto, CA: Pearson Knowledge Technologies. ([URL])
Pyykkönen, P., & Järvikivi, J. (2010). Activation and persistence of implicit causality information in spoken language comprehension. Experimental Psychology, 571, 5–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L., Gullberg, M., & Indefrey, P. (2008). Online pronoun resolution in L2 discourse: L1 influence and general learner effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 301, 333–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohde, H., Kehler, A., & Elman, J. L. (2006). Event structure and discourse coherence biases in pronoun interpretation. In R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 617–622). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rohde, H., & Kehler, A. (2014). Grammatical and information-structural influences on pronoun production. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 291, 912–927. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y. (2000). The semantics of the Japanese imperfective -teiru: An integrative approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 327–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 221, 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, R. J., Crawley, R. A., & Kleinman, D. (1994). Thematic roles, focusing and the representation of events. Language and Cognitive Processes, 91, 519–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ueno, M., Kehler, A. (2010). The interpretation of null and overt pronouns in Japanese: Grammatical and pragmatic factors. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2057–2062). Austin: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Cited by (68)

Cited by 68 other publications

Covey, Lauren, Robert Fiorentino & Alison Gabriele
2024. Island sensitivity in L2 learners: Evidence from acceptability judgments and event-related potentials. Second Language Research 40:1 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Fang, Shaohua & Zhiyi Wu
2024. Syntactic prediction in L2 learners: evidence from English disjunction processing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
Ghanim, Iyad, Ilse Wambacq & Lauren Covey
2024. Contribution of semantic context to bilingual processing. International Journal of Bilingualism 28:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Lee, Chanyoung, Gyu-Ho Shin & Boo Kyung Jung
2024. How ‘good-enough’ is second language comprehension? Morphological causative and suffixal passive constructions in Korean. Applied Linguistics Review 15:6 ► pp. 2685 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Huan, Shifa Chen, Ruiyong Liu & Huinan Du
2024. The Influence of Verb-Based Implicit Causality Information and Second Language Proficiency on Chinese English Learners’ Pronoun Anaphoric Inference: Evidence from Eye Movements. Behavioral Sciences 14:11 ► pp. 1034 ff. DOI logo
Luk, Zoe Pei-sui & Liubov Darzhinova
2024. Do L2 learners show attachment preferences? The processing of participial relative clauses in L2 Russian by English–Russian bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Lyu, Jun, Zuzanna Fuchs & Elsi Kaiser
2024. Anticipatory processing of cataphora is constrained by binding principles in L2 English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Perpiñán, Sílvia & Michael T. Putnam
2024. Filler-gap dependencies in bi- and multilingual grammars: Findings, challenges, and unknowns. Second Language Research 40:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Pérez, A. I., E. Schmidt & I. M. Tsimpli
2024. Inferential evaluation and revision in L1 and L2 text comprehension: An eye movement study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 27:4 ► pp. 585 ff. DOI logo
Tachihara, Karina & Adele E. Goldberg
2024. Learning Unacceptability: Repeated Exposure to Acceptable Sentences Improves Adult Learners’ Recognition of Unacceptable Sentences. Language Learning DOI logo
Wang, Tingting, Utako Minai & Alison Gabriele
2024. Examining how topicality impacts pronoun resolution in second language processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 18 DOI logo
Ahn, Hyunah & Mi-Jeong Song
2023. L1-Korean speakers’ definiteness processing in L2 English: A visual world paradigm eye tracking study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26:3 ► pp. 556 ff. DOI logo
Covey, Lauren & Alison Gabriele
2023. Psycholinguistic Methods in Second Language Research. In Current Approaches in Second Language Acquisition Research, ► pp. 170 ff. DOI logo
Ghanim, Iyad & Aida Perovic
2023. The use of lexical semantics for processing face-masked speech in monolinguals and bilinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 154:2 ► pp. 1202 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Hyunwoo & Eunjin Chun
2023. Effects of topicality in the interpretation of implicit consequentiality: evidence from offline and online referential processing in Korean. Linguistics 61:1 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Klassen, Gabrielle, Aline Ferreira & John W. Schwieter
2023. The role of immersion learning in the acquisition and processing of L2 gender agreement. Applied Linguistics Review 14:2 ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Koch, Eva Marie, Bram Bulté, Alex Housen & Aline Godfroid
2023. The predictive processing of number information in subregular verb morphology in a first and second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 44:5 ► pp. 750 ff. DOI logo
Moreno, Eva M., Clara D. Martin & Alice Foucart
2023. Lexical anticipation in bilinguals. In Bilingualism through the Prism of Psycholinguistics [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 17], ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Tingting & Alison Gabriele
2023. Individual differences modulate sensitivity to implicit causality bias in both native and nonnative processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:4 ► pp. 853 ff. DOI logo
Bovolenta, Giulia & Emma Marsden
2022. PREDICTION AND ERROR-BASED LEARNING IN L2 PROCESSING AND ACQUISITION. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:5 ► pp. 1384 ff. DOI logo
Brown, James Dean & Theres Grüter
2022. The same cloze for all occasions?. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:3 ► pp. 599 ff. DOI logo
Foltz, Anouschka, Beatriz Martín-Gascón, Florencia Paz Silva Marytsch, Javier Olloqui-Redondo & Thora Tenbrink
2022. Syntax and object types contribute in different ways to bilinguals’ comprehension of spatial descriptions. Language and Cognition 14:4 ► pp. 645 ff. DOI logo
Kang, Hyun-Sook, Nayoung Kim & Kiel Christianson
2022. Grammatical aspect and world knowledge in second language reading . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:2 ► pp. 411 ff. DOI logo
Kang, Xin & Haoyan Ge
2022. Tracking Object-State Representations During Real-Time Language Comprehension by Native and Non-native Speakers of English. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Reuter, Tracy, Mia Sullivan & Casey Lew-Williams
2022. Look at that: Spatial deixis reveals experience-related differences in prediction. Language Acquisition 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ahn, Hyunah
2021. From Interlanguage grammar to target grammar in L2 processing of definiteness as uniqueness. Second Language Research 37:1 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Alemán Bañón, José & Clara Martin
2021. The role of crosslinguistic differences in second language anticipatory processing: An event-related potentials study. Neuropsychologia 155 ► pp. 107797 ff. DOI logo
Bañón, José Alemán, David Miller & Jason Rothman
2021. EXAMINING THE CONTRIBUTION OF MARKEDNESS TO THE L2 PROCESSING OF SPANISH PERSON AGREEMENT. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:4 ► pp. 699 ff. DOI logo
Colonna, Saveria
2021. Introduction à l'acquisition des langues étrangères. In Introduction à l'acquisition des langues étrangères [Pratiques pédagogiques, ], ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Foltz, Anouschka
2021. Adaptation in Predictive Prosodic Processing in Bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Foltz, Anouschka
2021. USING PROSODY TO PREDICT UPCOMING REFERENTS IN THE L1 AND THE L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:4 ► pp. 753 ff. DOI logo
Foucart, Alice
2021. Language prediction in second language. In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Gambi, Chiara
2021. The role of prediction in second language vocabulary learning. In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12], ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Grüter, Theres & Hannah Rohde
2021. Limits on expectation-based processing: Use of grammatical aspect for co-reference in L2. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:1 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Grüter, Theres, Yanxin Alice Zhu & Carrie N. Jackson
2021. Forcing prediction increases priming and adaptation in second language production. In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12], ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Karaca, Figen, Susanne Brouwer, Sharon Unsworth & Falk Huettig
2021. Prediction in bilingual children. In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Keating, Gregory D.
2021. Online methods in research on input processing and processing instruction. In Research on second language processing and processing instruction [Studies in Bilingualism, 62], ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Koch, Eva M., Bram Bulté, Alex Housen & Aline Godfroid
2021. Using verb morphology to predict subject number in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A visual-world eye-tracking experiment. Journal of the European Second Language Association 5:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Navarro-Torres, Christian A., Anne L. Beatty-Martínez, Judith F. Kroll & David W. Green
2021. Research on bilingualism as discovery science. Brain and Language 222 ► pp. 105014 ff. DOI logo
Scherger, Anna-Lena, Gianna Urbanczik, Timon Ludwigs & Jasmin M. Kizilirmak
2021. The Bilingual Native Speaker Competence: Evidence From Explicit and Implicit Language Knowledge Using Elicited Production, Sentence-Picture Matching, and Pupillometry. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Fernandez, Leigh B, Paul E Engelhardt, Angela G Patarroyo & Shanley EM Allen
2020. Effects of speech rate on anticipatory eye movements in the visual world paradigm: Evidence from aging, native, and non-native language processing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 73:12 ► pp. 2348 ff. DOI logo
Hopp, Holger
2020. Morphosyntactic adaptation in adult L2 processing: Exposure and the processing of case and tense violations. Applied Psycholinguistics 41:3 ► pp. 627 ff. DOI logo
Hopp, Holger
2021. Prediction and grammatical learning in second language sentence processing. In Prediction in Second Language Processing and Learning [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 12], ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Hopp, Holger
2022. Second Language Sentence Processing. Annual Review of Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Jackson, Carrie N. & Holger Hopp
2020. Prediction error and implicit learning in L1 and L2 syntactic priming. International Journal of Bilingualism 24:5-6 ► pp. 895 ff. DOI logo
Kaiser, Elsi
2020. Linguistic consequences of event segmentation in visual narratives: implications for prominence. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:3 ► pp. 402 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Hyunwoo, Gyu-Ho Shin & Haerim Hwang
2020. INTEGRATION OF VERBAL AND CONSTRUCTIONAL INFORMATION IN THE SECOND LANGUAGE PROCESSING OF ENGLISH DATIVE CONSTRUCTIONS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:4 ► pp. 825 ff. DOI logo
Mitsugi, Sanako
2020. Generating predictions based on semantic categories in a second language: A case of numeral classifiers in Japanese. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 58:3 ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Mitsugi, Sanako
2022. Polarity adverbs facilitate predictive processing in L2 Japanese. Second Language Research 38:4 ► pp. 869 ff. DOI logo
Slabakova, Roumyana, Tania Leal, Amber Dudley & Micah Stack
2020. Generative Second Language Acquisition, DOI logo
CHENG, WEI & AMIT ALMOR
2019. A Bayesian approach to establishing coreference in second language discourse: Evidence from implicit causality and consequentiality verbs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:3 ► pp. 456 ff. DOI logo
Contemori, Carla & Paola E. Dussias
2019. Prediction at the Discourse Level in Spanish–English Bilinguals: An Eye-Tracking Study. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Felser, Claudia
2019. Structure-sensitive constraints in non-native sentence processing. Journal of the European Second Language Association 3:1 ► pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
KIM, HYUNWOO & THERES GRÜTER
2019. Cross-linguistic activation of implicit causality biases in Korean learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22:3 ► pp. 441 ff. DOI logo
Kim, Hyunwoo & Theres Grüter
2021. PREDICTIVE PROCESSING OF IMPLICIT CAUSALITY IN A SECOND LANGUAGE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43:1 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason, Fatih Bayram, Ian Cunnings & Jorge González Alonso
2019. Formal Linguistic Approaches to Adult L2 Acquisition and Processing. In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning, ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019. Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, DOI logo
Schafer, Amy J., Amber Camp, Hannah Rohde & Theres Grüter
2019. Contrastive Prosody and the Subsequent Mention of Alternatives During Discourse Processing. In Grammatical Approaches to Language Processing [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 48], ► pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Armstrong, Andrew, Nyssa Bulkes & Darren Tanner
2018. QUANTIFICATIONAL CUES MODULATE THE PROCESSING OF ENGLISH SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT BY NATIVE CHINESE SPEAKERS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:4 ► pp. 731 ff. DOI logo
Covey, Lauren, Alison Gabriele & Robert Fiorentino
2018. Can learners use morphosyntactic cues to facilitate processing? Evidence from a study of gender agreement in Hindi. Language Acquisition 25:3 ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Dekydtspotter, Laurent, Mark Black, Rodica Frimu & Amber Rae Panwitz
2018. Animacy-based processing loads in anaphora resolution in (non-native) French. In Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism, 55], ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Roberts, Leah, Jorge González Alonso, Christos Pliatsikas & Jason Rothman
2018. Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies: Can it actually inform linguistic/language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications?. Second Language Research 34:1 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason & Roumyana Slabakova
2018. THE GENERATIVE APPROACH TO SLA AND ITS PLACE IN MODERN SECOND LANGUAGE STUDIES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:2 ► pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Jessen, Anna, Julia Festman, Oliver Boxell & Claudia Felser
2017. Native and Non-native Speakers’ Brain Responses to Filled Indirect Object Gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 46:5 ► pp. 1319 ff. DOI logo
Johnson Fowler, Courtney & Carrie N. Jackson
2017. Facilitating morphosyntactic and semantic prediction among second language speakers of German. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 29:8 ► pp. 883 ff. DOI logo
Leal, Tania, Roumyana Slabakova & Thomas A. Farmer
2017. THE FINE-TUNING OF LINGUISTIC EXPECTATIONS OVER THE COURSE OF L2 LEARNING. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:3 ► pp. 493 ff. DOI logo
Shirai, Yasuhiro & Alan Juffs
2017. Introduction: Convergence and divergence in functional and formal approaches to SLA. Second Language Research 33:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Bilingualism, Language Development and Processing across the Lifespan [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 15], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.