Gender and number processing in second language Swahili
For native speakers, congruent gender marking on determiners and adjectives facilitates recognition of subsequent nouns, while
incongruent marking inhibits recognition (e.g.,
Bates et al., 1996). However, there is
conflicting evidence regarding whether second language learners demonstrate this effect. We investigated this issue in Swahili.
Native speakers and English-speaking L2 learners of Swahili in their 3rd-5th semester completed two word repetition tasks, one
examining gender and one number. Participants heard verb-noun phrases in Swahili with verbal marking that was congruent,
incongruent or neutral with respect to gender or number. The time to repeat each noun was recorded. Both language groups appeared
sensitive to number marking; however, only native speakers appeared sensitive to gender marking. The findings suggest the lack of
a feature in the L1 may impede online processing in the L2, while the presence of a feature may mean that native-like processing
is possible, even at early levels of proficiency.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.L2 morphology: Number vs. gender
- 3.Gender and number in Swahili
- 4.Grammatical priming with gender and number agreement
- 5.Method
- 5.1Participants
- 5.2Tasks
- 5.3Procedure
- 6.Results
- 6.1Word rating task
- 6.2Word repetition tasks
- 6.3Gender task
- 6.4Number task
- 7.Discussion
- 8.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (69)
References
Alcock, K., & Ngorosho, D. (2004). Interaction between phonological and grammatical processing in single word production in Kiswahili. Language and Speech, 471, 1–30. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alemán Bañón, J., Fiorentino, R., & Gabriele, A. (2014). Morphosyntactic processing in advanced second language (L2) learners: An event-related potential investigation of
the effects of L1 – L2 similarity and structural distance. Second Language Research, 30(3), 275–306. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2003). Integrating gender and number information in Spanish word pairs: An ERP study. Cortex, 391, 465–482. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 171, 137–153. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., Hernández, A., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 581, 992–1004. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bianchi, G. (2013). Gender in Italian-German bilinguals: A comparison with German L2 learners of Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 538–557. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruhn De Garavito, J., & White, L. (2002). L2 acquisition of Spanish DPs: The status of grammatical features. In A. -T. Pérez-Leroux & J. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1/L2 connection (pp. 153–178). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carstens, V. (1991). The morphology and syntax of determiner phrases in Kiswahili (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, CA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carstens, V. (1993). On nominal morphology and DP structure. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar (pp. 151–176). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carstens, V. (2000). Concord in minimalist theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 311, 319–355. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carstens, V. (2005). Agree and EPP in Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 231, 219–279. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 271, 3–42.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Colé, P., & Ségui, J. (1994). Grammatical incongruency and vocabulary types. Memory and Cognition, 221, 387–394. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Contini-Morava, E. (2002). What do noun class markers mean? In W. Reid & R. Otheguy (Eds.), Signal, meaning, and message: Perspectives on sign-based linguistics (pp. 3–64). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corbett, G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge Applied Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foote, R. (2011). Integrated knowledge of agreement in early and late English–Spanish bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 321, 187–220. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foote, R. (2014). Age of acquisition and sensitivity to gender in Spanish word recognition. Language Acquisition, 211, 365–385. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foucart, A., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (2011). Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1–L2 syntactic
similarity. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 141, 379–399. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Franceschina, F. (2001). Against an L2 morphological deficit as an explanation for the differences between native and non-native
grammars. In S. H. Foster-Cohen, & A. Nizegorodcew (Eds.), EUROSLA yearbook, 11 (pp. 143–158). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gillon, B., Kehayia, E., & Taler, V. (1999). The mass/count distinction: Evidence from on-line psycholinguistic performance. Brain and Language, 681, 205–211. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gillon Dowens, M., Guo, T., Guo, J., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish: Evidence from event related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 491, 1651–1659. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gillon Dowens, M., Vergara, M., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 221, 1870–1887. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grosjean, F., Dommergues, J -Y., Cornu, E., Guillelmon, D., & Besson, C. (1994). The gender-marking effect in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 561, 590–598. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 281, 191–215. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guillelmon, D., & Grosjean, F. (2001). The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 291, 503–511. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gunter, T., Friederici, A., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 121, 556–568. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, R. (2009). Second language acquisition of morphosyntax. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (2nd ed.) (pp. 211–236). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, R., & Casillas, G. (2008). Explaining frequency of verb morphology in early L2 speech. Lingua, 118(4), 595–612. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) September 1996 (pp. 257–268). Boston, MA: Somerville: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Helsinki Corpus of Swahili (2004). Compilers: Institute for Asian and African Studies (University of Helsinki) and CSC – IT Center for Science.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflectional morphology: Performance similarities between non-native and native
speakers. Lingua, 1201, 901–931. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopp, H. (2012). The online integration of inflection in L2 gender processing: Predictive processing of German
gender. Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development, 361, 226–245.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopp, H. (2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 291, 33–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopp, H. (2016). Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 321, 277–307. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiang, N. (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 571, 1–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X. (2011). Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, 611, 940–967. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamide, Y. (2008). Anticipatory processes in sentence processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 21, 647–670. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (106–140). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2010). Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 631, 447–464. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lopez Prego, B., & Gabriele, A. (2012). Examining the nature of variability in gender and number agreement in native and non-native Spanish. Proceedings of the Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 361, 315–327.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lukatela, G., Kostic, A., Feldman, L. B., & Turvey, M. T. (1983). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns. Memory & Cognition, 111, 59–63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lukatela, G., Kostic, A., Todorovic, D., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1987). Type and number of violations and the grammatical congruency effect in lexical decision. Psychological Research, 491, 37–43. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCarthy, C. (2008). Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over
computation. Second Language Research, 24(4), 459–486. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montrul, S. Davidson, J., de la Fuente, I., & Foote, R. (2014). Early language experience facilitates the processing of gender agreement in Spanish heritage
speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(1), 118–138. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montrul, S., de la Fuente, I., Davidson, J., & Foote, R. (2013). The role of experience in the acquisition and production of diminutives and gender in Spanish: Evidence from L2
learners and heritage speakers. Second Language Research, 29(1), 87–118. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and
theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading (pp. 264 – 336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neely, J. H., & Keefy, D. E. (1989). Semantic context effects in visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing
theory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 241, pp. 207–248). New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevins, A., Dillon, B., Malhotra, S., & Phillips, C. (2007). The role of feature–number and feature–type in processing Hindi verb agreement violations. Brain Research, 11641, 81–94. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nurse, D., Hinnebusch, T. J., & Philipson, G. (1993). Swahili and Sabaki: A linguistic history. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and
agreement. Second Language Research, 161, 103–133. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, L. (2013). Processing of gender and number agreement in late Spanish bilinguals: A commentary on Sagarra and
Herschensohn. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17(5), 628–633. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Romanova, N., & Gor, K. (2016). Processing of gender and number agreement in Russian as a second language: The devil is in the
details. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Advance online publication. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sabourin, L., & Stowe, L. (2008). Second language processing: When are first and second languages processed similarly? Second Language Research, 241, 397–430. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sagarra, N. & Herschensohn, J. (2010). The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2
Spanish. Lingua, 1201, 2022–2039. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2013). Processing of gender and number agreement in late Spanish bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17(5), 607–627. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scherag, A., Demuth, L., Rosler, F., Neville, H., & Roder, B. (2004). The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic
language aspects. Cognition, 931, 97–108. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwartz, B. & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 121, 40–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spinner, P. (2013). The second language acquisition of number and gender in Swahili: A Feature Reassembly Approach. Second Language Research, 29(4), 455–479. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spinner, P., & Juffs, A. (2008). L2 grammatical gender in a complex morphological system: The case of German. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 461, 315–348. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tokowicz, N., & MacWhinney, B. (2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: an event-related potential
investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 271, 173–204. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsimpli, I., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The Interpretability Hypothesis: Evidence from wh interrogatives in second language
acquisition. Second Language Research, 231, 215–242. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vainio, S., Hyönä, J., & Pajunen, A. (2003). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of grammatical agreement: Evidence from readers’ eye fixation
patterns. Brain & Language, 851, 197–202. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-Macgregor, M., & Leung, Y -K. (2004). Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 251, 105–133. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Ayoun, Dalila & Stefano Maranzana
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.