Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 8:2 (2018) ► pp.163–192

Acquisition of scalar implicatures

Evidence from adult Japanese L2 learners of English

 | Gunma Prefectural Women’s University | Chuo University
 | Gunma Prefectural Women’s University | Chuo University
Our study investigates the second language (L2) acquisition of scalar implicatures some and all. We set out to answer two research questions based on three theoretical accounts, the lexical, pragmatic and syntactic accounts. In an experiment we include English and Japanese native speakers, and intermediate and advanced Japanese L2 learners of English. We used quantifiers some and all in ‘Yes/No’ questions in a context with sets of toy fruits, where pragmatic answers are expected, e.g., a ‘No’ response to the question ‘Are some of the strawberries in the red circle?’ (when a set of 14/14 strawberries are placed inside a red circle). Our individual results indicate that L2 learners are generally more pragmatic in their responses than native English speakers. But, there are neither significant differences between groups nor significant differences between L2 proficiency levels. We consider the implications of our findings for the acquisition of L2 semantics and pragmatics.
Keywords: second language acquisition, scalar implicatures, conversational implicature, lexical account, pragmatic account, syntactic account
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical accounts of scalar implicatures
    • 2.1The (Relevance Theory) pragmatic account of SIs
    • 2.2The lexical account of SIs
    • 2.3The syntactic account of SIs
  • 3.First language acquisition of SIs
  • 4.Second language acquisition of SIs
  • 5.Japanese quantifiers
  • 6.The present study
    • 6.1Participants, materials and procedure
    • 6.2Research questions
    • 6.3Predictions
      • The English native speaker group
      • The Japanese native speaker group
      • The Japanese L2 learners
    • 6.4Group and individual results
  • 7.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18010.sna
References (43)
References
Antoniou, K., & Katsos, N. (2017). The effect of childhood multilingualism and bilectalism on implicature understanding. Applied Psycholinguistics, 381, 787–833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barner, D., Chow, K., & Yang, S. (2009). Finding one’s meaning: A test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development. Cognitive Psychology, 581, 195–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A. (2011). Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition, 1881, 87–96.Google Scholar
Bott, L. & Noveck, I. (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 511, 433–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breheny, R., Katsos, N., & Williams, J. (2006). Are generalized scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 1001, 434–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. (1998). Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 179–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G. (2004). Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond (Vol. 31, pp. 39–103), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Broaden your views: implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry, 371, 535–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2001). The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. In A. H. -J. Do, L. Dominguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 157–168). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B. (2012). Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In P. Portner, C. Maienborn, & K. von Heusinger (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp. 2297–2331). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. & Hathorn, J. (2005). Quelque chose … de remarquable in English – French acquisition: mandatory, informationally encapsulated computations in second language interpretation. Second Language Research, 21(4), 291–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Meyer, T. (2005). Was für N interrogatives and quantifier scope In English-German interpretation. In L. Dekydtspotter, R. A. Sprouse, & A. Liljestrand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 86–95). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
De Neys, W. & Schaeken, W. (2007). When people are more logical under cognitive load: Dual task impact on scalar implicature. Experimental Psychology, 541, 128–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, L., Stateva, P., Andreetta, S., Cheylus, A., Déprez, V., van der Henst, J. B., Jayez, J., Stepanov, A., & Reboul, A. (2018). Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals: The case of scalar implicatures. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism (Published online: 16 Jan 2018). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feeney, A., Scrafton, S., Duckworth, A., & Handley, S. (2004). The story of some: everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 121–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. (2007). Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics, (pp. 71–120). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. (1995). Quantity, volubility, and some varieties of discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy, 181, 83–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L. (2005). Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(5), 667–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. (1988). The categorial status of modals and L2 acquisition. In S. Flynn & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 252–276). Boston: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Chan, Y. (1997). The partial availability of UG in SLA: the failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research, 13(3), 187–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirschberg, J. (1985). A theory of scalar implicature. Doctoral dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Doctoral dissertation. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
(1997). All John’s children are as bald as the king of France: existential import and the geometry of opposition. Proceedings from the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 155–179). Chigago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. T. & Snedeker, J. (2009). On-line interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantic-pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology, 501, 376–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, M. (2009). L2 Acquisition of scalar implicatures: Interpretation at the syntax/pragmatics interface. Paper presented at the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA) conference, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A.
Miller, D. (2017). Combining behavioral and neurolinguistic methodologies to investigate Spanish scalar indefinites among mono- and bilinguals: An event-related potential study. Doctoral dissertation. University of Reading.Google Scholar
Miller, D., Giancaspro, D., Iverson, M., Rothman, J. and Slabakova, R. (2016). Not just algunos, but indeed unos L2ers can acquire scalar implicatures in L2 Spanish. In A. A. de la Fuente, E. Valenzuela & C. Martínez Sanz (Eds.). Language acquisition beyond parameters. Studies in honour of Juana M. Liceras, (pp. 125–145). Studies in Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benajmins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milsark, G. (1977). Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 31, 1–29.Google Scholar
Musolino, J. & Lidz, J. (2002). Preschool logic: truth and felicity in the acquisition of quantification. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A. H. -J. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 406–416). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Noveck, I. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 781, 165–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, I. A. & Posada, A. (2003). Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language, 851, 203–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A. & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: experiments at the syntax semantics interface. Cognition, 861, 253–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2), 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2010). Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua, 1201, 2444–2462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. L. (1980). Quantifiers and question answering in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 301, 191–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Storto, G. & Tanenhaus, M. (2005). Are scalar implicatures computed online? In E. Maier, C. Bary, & J. Huitink (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 91 (pp. 431–445). Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre for Semantics.Google Scholar
Sudo, M. & Kiritani, S. (1997). Comparison of acoustic features in perception of English articles between native speaker of English and Japanese learners. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 11, 51–57.Google Scholar
Tavano, E. & Kaiser, E. (2009). The cost of being cooperative: Evidence of effort in the processing of scalar implicature. Proceedings from the 45th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 593–607). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
von Fintel, K. & Matthewson, L. (2008). Universals in semantics. The Linguistic Review, 25(1–2), 139–201.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. Horn & G. Ward, (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Destruel, Emilie & Glenn Starr
2024. Scalar diversity in L2 French speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Feng, Shuo & Kailun Zhang
2024. Online processing and offline judgments of different types of presupposition triggers by second language speakers. Second Language Research DOI logo
Khorsheed, Ahmed & Bob van Tiel
2024. Why second-language speakers sometimes, but not always, derive scalar inferences like first-language speakers: Effects of task demands. Language Acquisition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Yi & Kook-Hee Gil
2024. Second language acquisition of English plurals by Chinese learners. In Current Perspectives on Generative SLA – Processing, Influence, and Interfaces [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 70], ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Researcher: Maha Khaled Yasseen, Maha Khaled Yasseen & Kamal H. Hussein . Kamal Hazim Hussein Ali
2024. EFL Learners' Pragmatic Tolerance of Quantity Maxim Violation. Al-Noor Journal for Humanities 2:3 DOI logo
Schulz, Johannes & Elizabeth Wonnacott
2024. Pragmatic competence and pragmatic tolerance in foreign language acquisition—revisiting the case of scalar implicatures. Applied Psycholinguistics 45:4 ► pp. 717 ff. DOI logo
Starr, Glenn & Emilie Destruel
2024. A bidirectional study in L2 acquisition of pragmatics: The case of (un-)bounded adjectival scales. Second Language Research DOI logo
Destruel, Emilie
2023. Processing pragmatic inferences in L2 French speakers. Second Language Research 39:4 ► pp. 969 ff. DOI logo
Nehls, Paul N., Kodai Aramaki & Tomohiro Fujii
2023. Is a quantifier mismatch a problem for L1 Japanese learners of English?. Linguistics Beyond and Within (LingBaW) 9 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Jun & Yan Wu
2023. Epistemic reasoning in pragmatic inferencing by non-native speakers: The case of scalar implicatures. Second Language Research 39:3 ► pp. 697 ff. DOI logo
Cho, Jacee
2022. Crosslinguistic influence on L2 implicature computation for determiners. Journal of Second Language Studies 5:1 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Shuo
2022. The computation and suspension of presuppositions by L1-Mandarin Chinese L2-English speakers. Second Language Research 38:4 ► pp. 737 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Shuo
2024. L2 tolerance of pragmatic violations of informativeness. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:2 ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Khorsheed, Ahmed, Sabariah Md. Rashid, Vahid Nimehchisalem, Lee Geok Imm, Jessica Price, Camilo R. Ronderos & Claudia Felser
2022. What second-language speakers can tell us about pragmatic processing. PLOS ONE 17:2 ► pp. e0263724 ff. DOI logo
Ren, Wei
2022. Second Language Pragmatics, DOI logo
Starr, Glenn & Jacee Cho
2022. QUD sensitivity in the computation of scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition 29:2 ► pp. 182 ff. DOI logo
Mazzaggio, Greta, Daniele Panizza & Luca Surian
2021. On the interpretation of scalar implicatures in first and second language. Journal of Pragmatics 171 ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Shuo & Jacee Cho
2019. Asymmetries Between Direct and Indirect Scalar Implicatures in Second Language Acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Fekete, István, Petra Schulz & Esther Ruigendijk
2018. Exhaustivity in single bare <i>wh</i>-questions: A differential-analysis of exhaustivity. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.