Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 10:5 (2020) ► pp.728744
Acevedo, R.
(2000) Perspectiva histórica del paradigma verbal en el español de California. In A. Roca (Ed.), Research on Spanish in the United States: Linguistic Issues and Challenges (pp. 110–120). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A.
(2014) A guide to subjunctive and modals in Spanish: Questions and analyses. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 3(2), 1–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gragera, A.
(2002) LI attrition and L2 acquisition of Spanish subjunctive. A functionalist approach. Valladolid: Universitas Castellae.Google Scholar
Guitart, J.
(1982) On the use of the Subjunctive among Spanish-English bilinguals. Word, 331, 59–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, M.
(2003) Simplification and innovation in U.S. Spanish. Multilingua, 221, 169–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J.
(1978) The variable constraints on mood in Puerto Rican-American Spanish. In M. Suñer (Ed.), Contemporary studies in Romance linguistics, (pp. 193–217). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, A.
(1999) The subjunctive in Miami Cuban Spanish: Bilingualism, contact, and language variability (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Montrul, S.
(2009) Knowledge of tense-aspect and mood in Spanish heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 239–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ocampo, F.
(1990) El subjuntivo en tres generaciones de hablantes bilingües. In J. Bergen (Ed.), Spanish in the United States: Sociolinguistic issues (pp. 39–48). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R., & Zentella, A. C.
(2012) Spanish in New York: Language contact, dialectal leveling and structural continuity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otheguy, R., & Lapidus, N.
(2005) Matización de la teoría de la simplificación en las lenguas en contacto: El concepto de la adaptación en el español de Nueva York. In O. López & M. Lacorte (Eds.), Contactos y contextos lingüísticos: El español en los Estados Unidos y en contacto con otras lenguas (pp. 143–160). Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Poplack, S., Torres Cacoullos, R., Dion, N., de Andrade Berlinck, R., Digesto, S., LaCasse, D. & Steuck, J.
(2018) Variation and grammaticalization in Romance: A cross-linguistic study of the subjunctive. In W. Ayres-Bennett & J. Carruthers (Eds.), Manual in Linguistics: Romance Sociolinguistics 18 (pp. 217–252). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shin, N.
(2014) Grammatical complexification in Spanish in New York: 3sg pronoun expression and verbal ambiguity. Language Variation and Change, 26(3), 303–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C.
(1994) The gradual loss of mood distinctions in Los Angeles Spanish. Language Variation and Change, 61, 255–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres, L.
(1989) Mood selection among New York Puerto Ricans. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. Special issue in I. Wherritt & O. Garcia (Eds.), U.S. Spanish: The Language of Latinos, 791, 67–77.Google Scholar
Viner, K. M.
(2017) Subjunctive Use in the Speech of New York City Spanish Heritage Language Bilinguals: A Variationist Analysis. Heritage Language Journal, 14(3), 307–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018a) The Optional Spanish Subjunctive Mood Grammar of New York City Heritage Bilinguals. Lingua, 210–2111, 79–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018b) Conditional Morphology in New York Heritage Spanish: General and Variable Usage. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 11(2), 429–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Viner, Kevin Martillo
2021. Generational differences in the placement of clitic se in New York City Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism 25:5  pp. 1460 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.