References
Adams, K. (2004, May). Variability in the perception of past tense -ed by L2 learners of English. Paper presented at SUNY/CUNY/NYU 5, Stony Brook, NY.
Austin, G., Chang, H., Kim, N., & Daly, E. (submitted). Prosodic transfer across constructions and domains in L2 inflectional morphology.
Borer, H. & Rohrbacher, B. (1997). Features and projections: Arguments for the full competence hypothesis. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), BUCLD 21: Proceedings of the 21st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 24–35). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruhn de Garavito, J. (1986). EI muchacha tiene tres balon: Number and gender in the Spanish of a group of francophone learners (Master’s thesis, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buckley, M. (2005). Prosodic constraints and the syntax-phonology interface: The phonology of object clitics in L2 French. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), BUCLD 29: Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 122–133). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cabrelli Amaro, J., Campos Dintrans, G., & Rothman, J. (2018). The role of L1 phonology in L2 morphological production: L2 English past tense production by L1 Spanish, Mandarin, and Japanese speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 401, 503–527. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charette, M. (1991). Conditions on phonological government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dekydtspotter, L., Donaldson, B., Edmonds, A. C., Liljestrand Fultz, A., & Petrush, R. A. (2008). Syntactic and prosodic computations in the resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguity by English-French learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 301, 453–480. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dell, F. (1984). L’accentuation dans les phrases en français. In Dell, F., Hirst, D., & Vergnaud, J.-R. (Eds.), Forme sonore du langage (pp. 65–122). Paris: Hermann.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duanmu, S. (2000). The phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 241, 37–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eckstein, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 251, 130–143. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erguvanli, E. E. (1984). The function of word order in Turkish grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feldscher, C., & Durvasula, K. (2017). Excrescent stops in American English. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 2, 20, 1–15.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gerken, L. (1996). Prosodic structure in young children’s language production. Language, 721, 683–712. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gerken, L., & McIntosh, B. (1993). The interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology, 291, 448–457. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goad, H., Guzzo, N. B., & White, L. (submitted). Parsing ambiguous relative clauses in L2 English: Learner sensitivity to prosodic cues.
Goad, H., & White, L. (2004). Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: Effects of L1 prosodic structure. In S. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood Smith, A. Sorace, & M. Ota (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 4 (pp. 119–145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goad, H., & White, L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 221, 243–268. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goad, H., & White, L. (2008). Prosodic structure and the representation of L2 functional morphology: A nativist approach. Lingua, 1181, 577–594. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goad, H., White, L., & Bruhn de Garavito, J. (2011). Prosodic transfer at different levels of structure: The L2 acquisition of Spanish plurals. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development: Online Proceedings Supplement.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goad, H., White, L., Garcia, G. D., Guzzo, N. B., Mortazavinia, M., Smeets, L., & Su, J. (2018, September). Pronoun interpretation in L2 Italian: prosodic effects revisited. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America (GALANA) 8, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Goad, H., White, L., & Steele, J. (2003). Missing inflection in L2 acquisition: Defective syntax or L1-constrained prosodic representations? Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 481, 243–263.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimshaw, J., & Rosen, S. T. (1990). Knowledge and obedience: The developmental status of the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 211, 187–222.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, R. (2000). Persistent selective fossilisation in second language acquisition and the optimal design of the language faculty. Essex Research Reports in Linguistics, 341, 75–90.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B. D. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 257–268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herschensohn, J., & Gess, R. (2018). Acquisition of L2 French object pronouns by advanced anglophone learners. Languages, 3(2),15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huebner, T. (1985). System and variability in interlanguage syntax. Language Learning, 351, 141–163. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ionin, T., Baek, S., Kim, E., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2012).
That’s not so different from the: Definite and demonstrative descriptions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 281, 69–101. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 121, 3–69. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jun, S.-A., & Fougeron, C. (2000). A phonological model of French intonation. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology (pp. 209–242). Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kabak, B., & Vogel, I. (2001). The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology, 181, 315–360. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaye, J. (1990). ‘Coda’ licensing. Phonology, 71, 301–330. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klassen, J. (2015). Second language acquisition of focus prosody in English and Spanish (Doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, E., Stoyneshka, I., Adams, K., Rose, T., Pugash, Y., & Solt, S. (2004). Past tense affixation in L2 English: The effects of lexical aspect and perceptual salience. In A. Brugos, L. Micciulla & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development: Online Supplement.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lamontagne, J., & Goad, H. (submitted). Weight and prominence in French: An examination of corpus data from a Laurentian variety.
Lardiere, D. (1998). Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 141, 1–26. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lardiere, D. (2000). Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In J. Archibald (Ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 102–129). Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lardiere, D. (2003). Second language knowledge of [±past] vs. [±finite]. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002): L2 Links (pp. 176–189). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lardiere, D. (2007). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieberman, M. (2013, January). The importance of comprehension to a rounded view of second language acquisition. Paper presented at the Department of Linguistics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCarthy, J., & Prince, A. (1995). Prosodic morphology. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 318–366). Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Foris: Dordrecht.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paradis, C., & Deshaies, D. (1990). Rules of stress assignment in Québec French: Evidence from perceptual data. Language Variation and Change, 21, 135–154. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierce, L., & Ionin, T. (2011). Perception of articles in L2 English. In L. Plonsky & M. Schierloh (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2009 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 121–128). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plag, I., Homann, J., & Kunter, G. (2017). Homophony and morphology: The acoustics of word-final S in English. Journal of Linguistics, 531, 181–216. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prévost, A.-E., Goad, H., & Steinhauer, K. (2011). Prosodic transfer: An event-related potentials approach. In M. Wrembel, M. Kul, & K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech, Vol II1 (pp. 217–225). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 161, 103–133. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pugach, Y., Stoyneshka, I., Solt, S., & Klein, E. (2004, May). L2 perception and production of the English past: The role of L1 and L2 phonology. Paper presented at SUNY/CUNY/NYU 5, Stony Brook, NY.
Robertson, D. (2000). Variability in the use of the English article system by Chinese learners of English. Second Language Research, 161, 135–172. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scullen, M. E. (1997). French prosodic morphology: A unified account. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 121: 40–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, E. O. (1980). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 111, 563–605.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, E. O. (1996). The prosodic structure of function words. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 187–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shadle, C. H. (2012). The acoustics and aerodynamics of fricatives. In A. Cohn, & M. K. Fougeron (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology (pp. 511–526). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skrzypek, D. (2009). The formation of the definite article in the Nordic languages. Lingua Posnaniensis, 511, 65–76. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snape, N., & Kupisch, T. (2010). Ultimate attainment of second language articles: A case study of an endstate second language Turkish-English speaker. Second Language Research, 261, 527–548. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Solt, S., Pugach, Y., Klein, E., Adams, K., Stoyneshka, I., & Rose, T. (2004). L2 perception and production of the English regular past: Evidence of phonological effects. In A. Brugos, L. Micciulla, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 553–564). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 21, 191–196. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thibault, L., & Ouellet, M. (1996). Tonal distinctions between emphatic stress and pretonic lengthening in Quebec French. International Conference on Spoken Language Processing-1996, 21, 638–641.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trenkic, D. (2007). Variability in L2 article production – beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, 231, 289–327. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsimpli, I. M., & Mastropaviou, M. (2007). Feature interpretability in L2 acquisition and SLI: Greek clitics and determiners. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 143–183). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ueyama, M. (2000). Prosodic transfer: An acoustic study of L2 English vs. L2 Japanese (Doctoral dissertation, University of California Los Angeles).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Underhill, R. (1976). Turkish grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, L. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 61, 129–141. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, L. (2008). Some puzzling features of L2 features. In J. Liceras, H. Goodluck, & H. Zobl (Eds.), The role of features in second language acquisition (pp. 300–326). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, L. (2009). Grammatical theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49–68). Leeds, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, L., Goad, H., Su, J., Smeets, L., Mortazavinia, M., Garcia, G. D., & Guzzo, N. B. (2017). Prosodic effects on pronoun interpretation in Italian. In M. LaMendola & J. Scott (Eds.), BUCLD 41: Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 744–752). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wright, R. (2004). A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. In B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, & D. Steriade (Eds.), Phonetically based phonology (pp. 34–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zec, D. (2005). Prosodic differences among function words. Phonology, 221, 77–112. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubizaretta, M. L., & Nava, E. (2011). Encoding discourse-based meaning: Prosody vs. syntax. Implications for second language acquisition. Lingua, 1211, 652–669. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)