Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 12:3 (2022) ► pp.347–376

Second language immersion impacts native language lexical production and comprehension

ORCID logo | University of Missouri
 | University of California, Irvine
 | University of Missouri
 | Beijing Normal University
We investigated whether the features of the second language (L2) matter when we consider the consequence of short-term L2 immersion on performance in the native language (L1). We compared L1 performance in English-speaking learners of a typologically-dissimilar L2-Chinese immersed in Chinese while living in Beijing, China and learners of a typologically-similar L2 (Spanish or French) exposed to the L2 in a classroom setting only. The groups were matched on cognitive abilities. Each group performed a battery of language tasks in English that assessed the ability to produce and recognize spoken words, as well as to name written words and pseudo-words in the native language. Immersed learners produced fewer words in their native language, made more semantic errors, and benefited more from higher lexical frequency when retrieving L1 words relative to classroom learners. Immersed learners also revealed reduced competition from dense phonological neighborhoods when listening to English words presented in noise, but no difference in English word reading and phonemic decoding performance compared to classroom learners. Results are consistent with the view that L2 immersion reduces access to the native language, but suggest that the consequences of L2 immersion on the L1 may be dependent upon the form of cross-language differences.
Keywords: second language immersion, native language performance, word production, spoken word recognition, visual word recognition
Article outline
  • The current study
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Materials and procedure
      • Spoken word production
      • Phonemic decoding
      • English spoken word recognition
      • English visual word recognition
      • Cognitive control
      • Working memory
      • Language learning experience
    • Data analysis
  • Results
    • Picture naming
    • Spoken word production
    • Spoken word recognition
    • Visual word recognition
    • Correlations
    • Discussion
    • Spoken word production
    • Spoken word recognition
    • Visual word recognition
    • General discussion
  • References
Published online: 26 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.19059.bot
References (95)
References
Ameel, E., Malt, B. C., Storms, G., & Van Assche, F. (2009). Semantic convergence in the bilingual lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language, 601, 270–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 386–393.Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Bojesen Christensen, R. H., Singmann, H., … Green, P. (2016). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–11. [URL]. Retrieved from [URL]
Baus, C., Costa, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). On the effects of second language immersion on first language production. Acta Psychologica, 1421, 402–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Luk, G. (2008a). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 341, 859–873.Google Scholar
(2008b). Lexical access in bilinguals: Effects of vocabulary size and executive control. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 211, 522–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Freedman, M. (2007). Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 451, 459–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bice, K., & Kroll, J. F. (in press). English only? Monolinguals in linguistically diverse contexts have an edge in language learning. Brain and Language. DOI logo
(2015). Native language change during early stages of second language learning. Neuroreport, 261, 966–971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2007). Constraints on parallel activation in bilingual spoken language processing: Examining proficiency and lexical status using eye-tracking. Language and Cognitive Processes, 221, 633–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Parallel language activation and cognitive control during spoken word recognition in bilinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 251, 547–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borodkin, K., & Faust, M. (2014). Native language phonological skills in low-proficiency second language learners. Language Learning, 641, 132–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botezatu, M. R., Landrigan, J.-F., Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2015). Phonological neighborhood density modulates errors in spoken word recognition. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Botezatu, M. R., & Mirman, D. (2019). Impaired lexical selection and fluency in post-stroke aphasia. Aphasiology, 331, 667–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Pisoni, D. B. (1999). Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: Talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1061, 2074–2085. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 411, 977–990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canseco-Gonzalez, E., Brehm, L., Brick, C. A., Brown-Schmidt, S., Fischer, K., & Wagner, K. (2010). Carpet or carcel: The effect of age of acquisition and language mode on bilingual lexical access. Language and Cognitive Processes, 251, 669–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. B. (2012). Rapid and multifaceted effects of second-language learning on first-language speech production. Journal of Phonetics, 401, 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). A novelty effect in phonetic drift of the native language. Journal of Phonetics, 411, 520–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles-Luce, J., & Luce, P. A. (1990). Similarity neighbourhoods of words in young children’s lexicons. Journal of Child Language, 17(01), 205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 201, 1197–1211.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (2018). Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition, 1781, 222–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cara, B., & Goswami, U. (2003). Phonological neighbourhood density: effects in a rhyme awareness task in five-year-old children. Journal of Child Language, 301, 695–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degani, T., Prior, A., & Tokowicz, N. (2011). Bidirectional transfer: The effect of sharing a translation. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 231, 18–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Sagarra, N. (2007). The effect of exposure on syntactic parsing in Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 101, 101–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ecke, P., & Hall, C. J. (2013). Tracking tip-of-the-tongue states in a multilingual speaker: Evidence of attrition or instability in lexical systems? International Journal of Bilingualism, 171, 734–751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C. (1993). Use of orthographic redundancies and word identification speed in bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 221, 397–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 787–814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Weissberger, G. H., Runnqvist, E., Montoya, R. I., & Cera, C. M. (2012). Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 151, 594–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 1771, 263–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, N., & Suderman, K. (2004). The American National Corpus First Release. Paper presented at the Language resources and evaluation conference (lrec), Lisbon.Google Scholar
Imai, S., Walley, A. C., & Flege, J. E. (2005). Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1171, 896–907. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2007). Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica, 1271, 277–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 361, 505–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 461, 723–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jared, D., & Kroll, J. F. (2001). Do bilinguals activate phonological representations in one or both of their languages when naming words? Journal of Memory and Language, 441, 2–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 211, 60–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Hoshino, N. (2014). Two languages in mind: Bilingualism as a tool to investigate language, cognition, and the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 231, 159–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., Misra, M., & Guo, T. (2008). Language selection in bilingual speech: evidence for inhibitory processes. Acta Psychologica, 1281, 416–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Dussias, P. E., Bice, K., & Perrotti, L. (2015). Bilingualism, mind, and brain. Annual Review of Linguistics, 11, 377–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R. (2002). The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 181, 137–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lacruz, I., & Folk, J. R. (2004). Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high-and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57A1, 1261–1284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., Spalek, K., & Schriefers, H. (2008). Cross-language effects of grammatical gender in bilingual word recognition and production. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 312–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levy, B. J., McVeigh, N. D., Marful, A., & Anderson, M. C. (2007). Inhibiting your native language: The role of retrieval-induced forgetting during second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 181, 29–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Hughes, M. M., Campbell, S. G., Silbert, N. H., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., … Doughty, C. J. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 631, 530–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Kroll, J. F., & Sunderman, G. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 201, 1507–1515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. (2013). Working memory and second language learning, comprehension, and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 211, 861–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A., & Weiss, D. J. (2015). Can working memory and inhibitory control predict second language learning in the classroom? SAGE Open, 5(4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lü, C. (2017). The roles of Pinyin skill in English-Chinese biliteracy learning: Evidence from Chinese immersion learners. Foreign Language Annals, 501, 306–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, I., Wu, J. T., & Chou, T. L. (1996). Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect. Cognition, 591, 149–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luce, P. A. (1986). Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon. Retrieved from Bloomington:Google Scholar
Luce, P. A., & Large, N. R. (2001). Phonotactics, density, and entropy in spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16(5–6), 565–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear & Hearing, 191, 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luo, L., Luk, G., & Bialystok, E. (2010). Effect of language proficiency and executive control on verbal fluency performance in bilinguals. Cognition, 1141, 29–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magnuson, J. S., Dixon, J. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2007). The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition. Cognitive Science, 311, 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malins, J. G., & Joanisse, M. F. (2010). The roles of tonal and segmental information in Mandarin spoken word recognition: An eyetracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 621, 407–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Setting the tone: An ERP investigation of the influences of phonological similarity on spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese. Neuropsychologia, 501, 2032–2043. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Spivey, M., & Hirsch, J. (2003). Shared and separate systems in bilingual language processing: Converging evidence from eyetracking and brain imaging. Brain and Language, 86(1), 70–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Boukrina, O. V. (2008). Sensitivity to phonological similarity within and across languages. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 371, 141–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 501, 940. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). Cross-linguistic transfer and borrowing in bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 281, 369–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M. (2003). Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 61, 97–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Misra, M., Guo, T., Bobb, S. C., & Kroll, J. F. (2012). When bilinguals choose a single word to speak: Electrophysiological evidence for inhibition of the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 671, 224–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nosarti, C., Mechelli, A., Green, D. W., & Price, C. J. (2010). The impact of second language learning on semantic and nonsemantic first language reading. Cerebral Cortex, 201, 315–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2005). Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems. Reading and Writing, 181, 193–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 241, 101–118.Google Scholar
Plat, R., Lowie, W., & De Bot, K. (2018). Word Naming in the L1 and L2: A Dynamic Perspective on Automatization and the Degree of Semantic Involvement in Naming. Frontiers in Psychology, 81, 2256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Psychology Software Tools Incorporated. (2012). E-Prime. Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved from [URL]
R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Raupach, M. (1980). Temporal variables in first and second language speech production. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.) Temporal variables in speech (pp. 49–60). The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., Araujo, K., Weekes, V. A., Caracciolo, V., Padilla, M., & Ostrosky-Solí, F. (2000). Verbal fluency and repetition skills in healthy older Spanish-English bilinguals. Applied Neuropsychology, 71, 17–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., Salvatierra, J., Marquez, M., Matos, L., & Weekes, V. A. (2002). A cross-linguistic comparison of verbal fluency tests. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112(6), 759–776. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Nojack, A., & Limbach, M. (2008). A mouse with a roof? Effects of phonological neighbors on processing of words in sentences in a non-native language. Brain and Language, 1041, 132–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmalz, X., Marinus, E., & Castles, A. (2013). Phonological decoding or direct access? Regularity effects in lexical decisions of grade 3 and 4 children. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 661, 338–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, A. I., Kroll, J. F., & Diaz, M. (2007). Reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 221, 106–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shu, H., Chen, X., Anderson, R. C., Wu, N., & Xuan, Y. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 741, 27–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 511, 300–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, H. R., Banich, M. T., & Munakata, Y. (2014). All competition is not alike: Neural mechanisms for resolving underdetermined and prepotent competition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 261, 2608–2623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M. J., & Marian, V. (1999). Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science, 101, 281–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E., & Bauer, D. W. (1978). Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 61, 410–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stein, M., Dierks, T., Brandeis, D., Wirth, M., Strik, W., & Koenig, T. (2006). Plasticity in the adult language system: A longitudinal electrophysiological study on second language learning. Neuroimage, 331, 774–783. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
Tsai, P. T. (2007). The effects of phonological neighborhoods on spoken word recognition in Mandarin Chinese. Master’s thesis at University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 281, 127–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 151, 181–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, W., Li, X., Ning, N., & Zhang, J. X. (2012). The nature of the homophone density effect: An ERP study with Chinese spoken monosyllable homophones. Neuroscience Letters, 5161, 67–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children’s and adults’ use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory and Cognition, 121, 293–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weber, A., & Cutler, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 501, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yao, Y., & Sharma, B. (2017). What is in the neighborhood of a tonal syllable? Evidence from auditory lexical decision in Mandarin Chinese. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 21, 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, M. C. (2002). Access to homophonic meanings during spoken language comprehension: Effects of context and neighborhood density. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 1665–1668.Google Scholar
Zhang, S., Perfetti, C. A., & Yang, H. (1999). Whole word, frequency-general phonology in semantic processing of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 251, 858–875.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Bailey, Lyam M., Kate Lockary & Eve Higby
2024. Cross-linguistic influence in the bilingual lexicon: Evidence for ubiquitous facilitation and context-dependent interference effects on lexical processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 27:3 ► pp. 495 ff. DOI logo
Botezatu, Mona Roxana & Dalia L. Garcia
2024. Inhibitory and facilitative effects of lexical neighbors in spoken word recognition: The role of language experience. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 46:2 ► pp. 550 ff. DOI logo
Botezatu, Mona Roxana, Maya Misra & Judith F. Kroll
2024. Proficiency in a second language influences processing of print-to-sound mappings. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:3 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Casado, Alba, Jonas Walther, Agata Wolna, Jakub Szewczyk, Antonella Sorace & Zofia Wodniecka
2023. Advantages of visiting your home country: how brief reimmersion in their native country impacts migrants’ native language access. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26:5 ► pp. 1026 ff. DOI logo
Yenkimaleki, Mahmood & Vincent J. van Heuven
2023. Effect of pedagogic intervention in enhancing speech fluency by EFL students: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research DOI logo
Bajo, M. Teresa, Carlos J. Gómez-Ariza & Alejandra Marful
2021. Inhibitory Control of Information in Memory Across Domains. Current Directions in Psychological Science 30:5 ► pp. 444 ff. DOI logo
Salig, Lauren K., Jorge R. Valdés Kroff, L. Robert Slevc & Jared M. Novick
2021. Moving From Bilingual Traits to States: Understanding Cognition and Language Processing Through Moment-to-Moment Variation. Neurobiology of Language 2:4 ► pp. 487 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.