Commentary
Variable competence
References (41)
References
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M.H., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schonemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system. Position paper. Language Learning, 59(Supplement 1), 1–26.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bock, J.K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 181, 355–387. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bod, R., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S. (Eds.). (2003). Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chipere, N. (2001). Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: Implications for first language teaching. Language Awareness, 101, 107–124. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christiansen, M.H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral & Brain Sciences [target article for multiple peer commentary], 311, 489–509. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, L., & Ellis, N.C. (2009). Input and second language construction learning: frequency, form, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93(2).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dąbrowska, E. (1997). The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics, 351, 735–766. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dąbrowska, E. (2008a). The later development of an early-emerging system: The curious case of the Polish genitive. Linguistics, 461, 629–650. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dąbrowska, E. (2008b). The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 931–951. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dąbrowska, E., & Street, J. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 281, 604–615. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Divjak, D.S., & Gries. S.T. (Eds.). (in press). Frequency effects in language: Linguistic representation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ellis, N.C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 271, 305–352. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 1–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C. (2008). Optimizing the input: Frequency and sampling in Usage-based and Formfocussed Learning. In M.H. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C. (2011). Frequency-based accounts of SLA. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 193–210). London: Routledge / Taylor Francis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & Cadierno, T. (Eds.). (2009). Constructing a second language (Vol. Special section, 7).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 27(4). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Language as a Complex Adaptive System (Special Issue). Language Learning, 59(Supplement 1), 1–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & O’Donnell. M.B. (2011). Robust language acquisition — an emergent consequence of language as a complex adaptive system. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3512–3517). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N.C., & O’Donnell. M.B. (2012). Statistical construction learning: Does a Zipfian problem space ensure robust language learning? In P. Rebuschat & J.N. Williams (Eds.), Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (1985). A variable competence model of second language acquisition. IRAL, 231, 47–59.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition, (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, N., & Levinson, S.C. (2009). The myth of language universals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 321, 429–492. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gregg, K.R. (1990). The variable competence model of second language acquisition, and why it isn’t. Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 364–381. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gries, S.T., & Divjak, D.S. (Eds.). (in press). Frequency effects in cognitive linguistics: Statistical effects in learnability, processing and change (Vol. 1). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2008). Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 301, 31–47. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). Using priming methods in second language research. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pickering, M.J., & Ferreira, V.S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 1341, 427–459. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pickering, M.J., & Garrod, S.C. (2006). Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation, 41, 203–228. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, P., & Ellis, N.C. (Eds.). (2008). A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slobin, D.I. (1997). The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 51, pp. 265–323). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E., 2010. More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua 1201, 2080–2094. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T. (Eds.). (2012). Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, J.N., & Rebuschat, P. (Eds.). (2012). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Gudmestad, Aarnes, Amanda Edmonds & Thomas Metzger
2020.
Modeling variability in number marking in additional-language Spanish.
Journal of the European Second Language Association 4:1
► pp. 24 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Hulstijn, Jan H.
2019.
An Individual‐Differences Framework for Comparing Nonnative With Native Speakers: Perspectives From BLC Theory.
Language Learning 69:S1
► pp. 157 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.