Commentary
Why and how individual differences matter for linguistic theory and experimental research but not for UG
Article outline
- Why and how individual differences matter for linguistic theory
- Why and how individual differences matter for experimental research
- Notes
-
References
References (24)
References
Bayer, J. (1984). COMP in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review, 31, 209–274. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. J. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 141, 597–612. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Villiers. J.G., & de Villiers. P.A. (1973). Development of the use of word order in comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(4), 331–341. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drozd, K. (2004). Learnability and linguistic performance. Journal of Child Language, 311, 431–457. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Genesee, F. (1989). Early bilingual development: One language or two? Journal of Child Language, 161, 161–179. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kepser, S., & Reis, M. (2005). Evidence in linguistics. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic evidence: Empirircal, theoretical, and computational perspectives (pp. 1–6). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koch, C., Schulz, P., & Katsos, N. (2010). Do children compute some or most scalar implicatures? — Evidence from German. In A. Castro, J. Costa, M. Lobo, & F. Pratas (Eds.), Language acquisition and development. Proceedings of GALA 2009. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Musolino, J. (2009). The logical syntax of number words: Theory, acquisition and processing. Cognition, 1111, 24–45. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Penner, Z., & Weissenborn, J. (1998). Strong continuity, parameter setting, and the trigger hierarchy: on the acquisition of the DP in Bernese Swiss German and High German. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 161–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schütze, C.T. (2005). Thinking about what we are asking speakers to do. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic evidence: Empirircal, theoretical, and computational perspectives (pp. 457–484). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schulz, P., & Kieburg, A. (2007, September). What does every child know about all the universal quantifiers? Evidence from German. Poster presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (GALA), Barcelona, Spain.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schulz, P., & Penner, Z. (2002). How you can eat the apple and have it too: Evidence from the acquisition of telicity in German. In J. Costa & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Proceedings of the GALA’ 2001 Conference on Language Acquisition, 239–246.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schulz, P., & Roeper, T. (2011). Acquisition of exhaustivity in wh-questions: A semantic dimension of SLI? Lingua, 121(3), 383–407. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schulz, P., & Tracy, R. (2011). Linguistische Sprachstandserhebung — Deutsch als Zweitsprache (LiSe-DaZ). Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stromswold, K. (2006). Why Children Understand and Misunderstand Sentences: An Eyetracking Study of Passive Sentences. Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stromswold, K., Pinker, S., & Kaplan, R. (1985). Cues for understanding the passive voice. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 241, 123–130.
Tracy, R., & Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I. (2000). Bilingualismus in der frühen Kindheit. In H. Grimm (Hrsg.), Sprachentwicklung. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, CIII, Band 3 (S. 495–535). Göttingen: Hogrefe.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Lely. H.K.J. (1996). Specifically language impaired and normally developing children: Verbal passive vs. adjectival passive sentence interpretation. Lingua, 981, 243–272. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weiß, H. (1998). Syntax des Bairischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weiß, H. (2005). The double competence hypothesis. On diachronic evidence. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical and computational perspectives (pp. 557–575). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Schulz, Petra & Angela Grimm
2019.
The Age Factor Revisited: Timing in Acquisition Interacts With Age of Onset in Bilingual Acquisition.
Frontiers in Psychology 9
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.