References (13)
References
Brady, S., Braze, D., & Fowler, C. (2011). Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence. New York: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, A., & Stanovich, K. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 331, 934–945. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, Spring/Summer1, 1–8.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Hayes, D. (1988). Speaking and writing: Distinct patterns of word choice. Journal of Memory and Language, 271, 572–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W., Herman, P., & Anderson, R. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 201, 233–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Skehan, P., & Ducroquet, L. (1988). A comparison of first and foreign language ability. Working Documents No. 8. ESOL Department, Institute of Education, London University.Google Scholar
Snowling, M., & Hulme, C. (2007). The science of reading: A handbook. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2009). Long-term cross linguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2. Language Learning, 591, 203–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(in press-a). Do L1 reading achievement and L1 print exposure contribute to the prediction of L2 proficiency? Language Learning.
(in press-b). Relationships among L1 print exposure and early L1 literacy skills, L2 aptitude, and L2 proficiency. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
Stanovich, K. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Street, James A.
2017. This is the native speaker that the non-native speaker outperformed: Individual, education-related differences in the processing and interpretation of Object Relative Clauses by native and non-native speakers of English. Language Sciences 59  pp. 192 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.