References
Avrutin, S.
(2006) Weak syntax. In K. Amundt & Y. Grodzinsky (Eds.), Broca’s Region. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chipere, N.
(2001) Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: Implications for first language teaching. Language Awareness, 101, 107–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E.
(2008) The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 931–951. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, E., & Street, J.
(2006) Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 281, 604–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hackman, D., & Farah, M.
(2009) Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Science, 131, 65–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hackman, D., Farah, M., & Meaney, M.
(2010) Socioeconomic status and the brain: Mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 111, 651–659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neville. H.J., Stevens, C., Klein, S., Fanning, J., Bell, T., Isbell, E., & Pakulak, E.
(2011) Improving behavior, cognition and neural mechanisms of attention in lower SES children. Society for Neuroscience, 371.Google Scholar
Novick, J.M., Trueswell, J.C., & Thompson-Schill, S.L.
(2005) Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioural Neuroscience, 51, 263–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pakulak, E., & Neville, H.
(2011) Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 231, 2752–2765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M.
Sorace, A.
(1993) Incomplete vs divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 91, 22–-47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E.
(2010) More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua, 1201, 2080–2094. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Street, J., & Dąbrowska, E
in press). Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics.
Ye, Z., & Zhou, X.
(2009) Executive control in language processing. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 331, 1168–1177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Birdsong, David
2021. Analyzing variability in L2 ultimate attainment. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 12:1  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Dąbrowska, Ewa
2018. Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment. Cognition 178  pp. 222 ff. DOI logo
Hulstijn, Jan H.
2019. An Individual‐Differences Framework for Comparing Nonnative With Native Speakers: Perspectives From BLC Theory. Language Learning 69:S1  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason, Fatih Bayram, Vincent DeLuca, Grazia Di Pisa, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Khadij Gharibi, Jiuzhou Hao, Nadine Kolb, Maki Kubota, Tanja Kupisch, Tim Laméris, Alicia Luque, Brechje van Osch, Sergio Miguel Pereira Soares, Yanina Prystauka, Deniz Tat, Aleksandra Tomić, Toms Voits & Stefanie Wulff
2023. Monolingual comparative normativity in bilingualism research is out of “control”: Arguments and alternatives. Applied Psycholinguistics 44:3  pp. 316 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.