How explicit instruction improves phonological awareness and perception of L2 sound contrasts in younger and older
adults
Despite the importance of conscious awareness in second language acquisition theories, little is known about how
L2 speech perception can be improved by explicit phonetic instruction. This study examined the relationship between phonological
awareness and perception in Dutch younger and older adult L2 listeners, focusing on English contrasts of two types: a familiar
contrast in an unfamiliar position (word-final /t/-/d/) and an unfamiliar contrast (/æ/-/ε/). Awareness was assessed with a task
in which written minimal pairs and homophone pairs had to be judged as sounding the same or different. Perception was assessed
with a two-alternative forced-choice identification task with auditorily presented words from minimal pairs. We investigated
whether listeners’ awareness and perception improved after a video-based explicit instruction that oriented their attention to one
of these contrasts, and we tested whether including information about the phonetic cue of vowel duration increased learning.
Awareness and perception of each contrast were shown to be moderately correlated at the study’s outset. Furthermore, awareness and
perception for each contrast generally improved more after the instruction drawing attention to that contrast. However, the
effectiveness of explicit phonetic instruction varied depending on the combination of the contrast, cue information, and listener
age group.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1The present study
- 1.1.1Research questions
- 1.1.2Study design
- 1.1.3Hypotheses
- 2.Methods
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Materials
- 2.2.1Phonological awareness test
- 2.2.2Perception test
- 2.2.3Phonetic instruction videos
- 2.3Procedures
- 2.3.1Pre-Tests and post-tests
- 2.3.2Phonetic instruction video
- 3.Results
- 3.1Relationship between awareness and perception (RQ1)
- 3.2Effect of phonetic instruction on awareness (RQ2)
- 3.2.1Awareness in younger adults
- 3.2.2Awareness in older adults
- 3.2.3Summary of awareness results
- 3.3Effect of phonetic instruction on perception (RQ3)
- 3.3.1Perception in younger adults
- 3.3.2Perception in older adults
- 3.3.3Summary of perception results
- 4.Discussion
- Notes
-
References
References (43)
References
Anthony, J. L. & Francis, D. J. (2005). Development
of phonological awareness. Current Directions in Psychological
Science,
14
(5), 255–259. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bassetti, B., Escudero, P., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2015). Second
language phonology at the interface between acoustic and orthographic input. Applied
Psycholinguistics,
36
(1), 1–6. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting
linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical
Software,
67
(1), 1–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bieber, R. E., & Gordon-Salant, S. (2021). Improving
older adults’ understanding of challenging speech: Auditory training, rapid adaptation and perceptual
learning. Hearing
Research,
402
1, 108054. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Broersma, M. (2010). Perception
of final fricative voicing: native and nonnative listeners’ use of vowel duration. The Journal
of the Acoustical Society of
America,
127
(3), 1636–1644. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Broersma, M. (2012). Increased
lexical activation and reduced competition in second-language listening. Language and Cognitive
Processes,
27
(7–8), 1205–1224. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Broersma, M., & Cutler, A. (2008). Phantom
word activation in
L2. System,
36
(1), 22–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, A. (1995). Minimal
pairs: Minimal importance? ELT
Journal,
49
(2), 169–175. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (1999). The
phonology of Dutch. Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving
beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved
word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research
Methods,
41
1, 977–990. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chandrasekaran, B., Yi, H., Smayda, K. E., & Maddox, W. T. (2016). Effect
of explicit dimensional instruction on speech category learning. Attention, Perception, &
Psychophysics,
78
1, 566–582. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, Y., & Pederson, E. (2017). Directing
attention during perceptual training: A preliminary study of phonetic learning in Southern Min by Mandarin
speakers. In Proceedings of Interspeech
2017 (pp. 1770–1774). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, B., & Mees, I. M. (1996). The
phonetics of English and Dutch (3rd ed.). E. J. Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Díaz, B., Mitterer, H., Broersma, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2012). Individual differences in late bilinguals’ L2 phonological processes: From acoustic-phonetic analysis to lexical access. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 680–689. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eisner, F. & McQueen, J. M. (2005). The
specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception &
Psychophysics,
67
(2), 224–238. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Field, J. (2008). Listening
in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flege, J. E. & Bohn, O. -S. (2021). The
revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In R. Wayland. (Ed.), Second
language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical
progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2002). Selective
attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and
Performance,
28
(2), 349–366. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon-Salant, S. (2005). Hearing
loss and aging: New research findings and clinical implications. Journal of Rehabilitation
Research &
Development,
42
(4), 9–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hisagi, M., & Strange, W. (2011). Perception
of Japanese temporally-cued contrasts by American English listeners. Language and
Speech,
54
(2), 241–264. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
House, A. S. (1961). On
vowel duration in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America,
33
(9), 1174–1178. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hillenbrand, J. M., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic
characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America,
97
(5), 3099–3111. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Janssen, C., Segers, E., McQueen, J. M., & Verhoeven, L. (2015). Lexical
specificity training effects in second language learners. Language
Learning,
65
(2), 358–389. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kissling, E. M. (2014). Phonetics
instruction improves learners’ perception of L2 sounds. Language Teaching
Research,
19
(3), 254–275. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krenca, K., Segers, E., Chen, X., Shakory, S., Steele, J., & Verhoeven, L. (2020). Phonological
specificity relates to phonological awareness and reading ability in English-French bilingual
children. Reading and
Writing,
33
1, 267–291. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kubo, R., & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2006). Influence
of aging on perceptual learning of English phonetic contrasts by native speakers of
Japanese. Acoustical Science and
Technology,
27
(1), 59–61. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maddox, W. T., Chandrasekaran, B., Smayda, K., & Yi, H. (2013). Dual
systems of speech category learning across the lifespan. Psychology and
Aging,
28
(4), 1042–1056. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pederson, E., & Guion-Anderson, S. (2010). Orienting
attention during phonetic training facilitates learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society
of
America,
127
(2), EL54–59. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peelle, J. E., & Wingfield, A. (2005). Dissociations
in perceptual learning revealed by adult age differences in adaptation to time-compressed
speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance,
31
(6), 1315–1330. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Souza, P. E. (2003). Effects
of aging on auditory processing of speech. International Journal of
Audiology,
42
(Suppl2), 2S11–2S16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Porretta, V. J., & Tucker, B. V. (2014). Perception
of non-native consonant length contrast: The role of attention in phonetic processing. Second
Language
Research,
31
(2), 239–265. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raphael, L. J. (2005). Acoustic
cues to the perception of segmental phonemes. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez. (Eds.), The
handbook of speech
perception (pp. 182–206). Blackwell Publishing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sakai, M., & Moorman, C. (2018). Can
perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception
training research. Applied
Psycholinguistics,
39
1, 187–224. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schepens, J., Dijkstra, T., & Grootjen, F. (2012). Distributions
of cognates in Europe as based on Levenshtein distance. Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition,
15
(1), 157–166. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scharenbourg, O., & Janse, E. (2013). Comparing
lexically guided perceptual learning in younger and older listeners. Attention, Perception,
&
Psychophysics,
75
1, 525–536. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slis, I. H., & Cohen, A. (1969). On
the complex regulating the voiced-voiceless distinction I. Language and
Speech,
12
(2), 80–102. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sommers, M. S. (1997). Stimulus
variability and spoken word recognition. II. The effects of age and hearing impairment. The
Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America,
101
(4), 2278–2288. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svalberg, A. M. L. (2007). Language
awareness and language learning. Language
Teaching,
40
(4), 287–308. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomlin, R. S., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention
in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition,
16
1, 183–203. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Feest, S. V. H., & Swingley, D. (2011). Dutch
and English listeners’ interpretation of vowel duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society
of
America,
129
(3), EL57–EL63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Leussen, J. -W., & Escudero, P. (2015). Learning
to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in
Psychology,
6
1, 1000. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Mahmood, Rizgar Qasim
2024.
EFL Learners' Perspectives on Online Pronunciation Instruction. In
Teacher and Student Perspectives on Bilingual and Multilingual Education [
Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.