Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism: Online-First Articles

Inter-generational attrition

Language transmission between long-term UK residents and heritage speakers of Italian on production of clitic pronouns

ORCID logo | University of East AngliaNorwich | University of Siena
| University of EdinburghEdinburgh
| University of EdinburghEdinburgh
| University of East AngliaNorwich
The phenomenon of language change in contact has been explored most significantly in speakers of a language who migrate, while fewer studies explore how language is affected across different generations. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of inter-generational attrition on the production of clitic pronouns and clitic clusters. 86 adult speakers of Italian took part in the study: homeland residents, long-term UK residents, and heritage speakers born and living in the UK from Italian families. Participants were tested on the production of different instances of clitic pronouns including clusters, a novelty of the study, and differences in response distribution were analysed with General Additive Models. Results reveal that the homeland population shows a strong preference for the production of clitics and clitic clusters, long-term residents retain a preference for clitics but not clusters, and heritage speakers disfavour the use of both clitics and clusters across the board, preferring the use of lexical items. This neat pattern of use across generations of migrants suggests a loss of the specificity and preference of clitics through language transmission between different generations of speakers of Italian removed from the homeland and immersed in a non-clitic language.
Keywords: clitics, attrition, heritage speakers, Italian, intergenerational attrition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Pronominal system in Italian and English
    • 1.2The current study
  • 2.Methods and participants
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Methods
      • 2.2.1Background language tasks
      • 2.2.2Elicitation tasks
    • 2.3Coding and statistical analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Single clitics
    • 3.2Clitic clusters
    • 3.3A look at accuracy
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 November 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.23002.smi
References (92)
References
Adger, D., & Harbour, D. (2007). The syntax and syncretisms of the person case constraint. Syntax, 10 (1), 2–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Dixon, R. M. (2007). Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology (Vol. 41). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Almor, A. (1999). Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review, 106 (4), 748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andriani, L., D’Alessandro, R., Frasson, A., van Osch, B., Sorgini, L., & Terenghi, S. (2022). Adding the microdimension to the study of language change in contact: Three case studies. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 7 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arosio, F., Branchini, C., Barbieri, L., & Guasti, M. T. (2014). Failure to produce direct object clitic pronouns as a clinical marker of SLI in school-aged Italian speaking children. Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 28 (9), 639–663. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68 (3), 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baum, S., & Titone, D. (2014). Moving toward a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35 (5), 857–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bar-Shalom, E. G., & Zaretsky, E. (2008). Selective attrition in Russian-English bilingual children: Preservation of grammatical aspect. International journal of bilingualism, 12 (4), 281–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayram, F., Pascual y Cabo, D., & Rothman, J. (2019). Intra-generational attrition: Contributions to heritage speaker competence. In M. Schmid & B. Köpke (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language attrition (pp. 446–457). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A. (2007). Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25 1, 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, V. (2006). On the syntax of personal arguments. Lingua, 116 (12), 2023–2067. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. (2003). Test of Reception of Grammar (Trog-2). Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2016). The signal and the noise: Finding the pattern in human behavior. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6 (5), 517–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolibaugh, C., Vanek, N., & Marsden, E. (2021). Towards a credibility revolution in bilingualism research: Open data and materials as stepping stones to more reproducible and replicable research. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24 (5), 801–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonet, E. (1994). The person-case constraint: A morphological approach. MIT working papers in linguistics, (22), 33–52.Google Scholar
Bortolini, U., Caselli, C. M., Deevy, P., & Leonard, L. B. (2002). Specific language impairment in Italian: The first steps in the search for a clinical marker. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37 (2): 77–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bortolini, U., Arfé, B., Caselli, C. M., Degasperi, L., Deevy, P., & Leonard, L. B. (2006). Clinical markers for specific language impairment in Italian: the contribution of clitics and non-word repetition. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41 (6): 695–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camblin, C. C., Ledoux, K., Boudewyn, M., Gordon, P. C., & Swaab, T. Y. (2007). Processing new and repeated names: Effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP. Brain Research, 1146 1, 172–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caprin, C., & Guasti, M. T. (2009). The acquisition of morphosyntax in Italian: A cross-sectional study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30 (1), 23–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. (2007). On different types of clitic clusters. Working Papers in Linguistics, 17 1, pp. 27–76.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M. (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In J. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in languages of Europe 8 1 (pp. 145–233). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, C., Di Domenico, A., Garraffa, M., & Papagno, C. (2012). Comprendo. Batteria per la Comprensione di frasi negli adulti. Raffaello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar
Chamorro, G., Sorace, A., & Sturt, P. (2016). What is the source of L1 attrition? The effect of recent L1 re-exposure on Spanish speakers under L1 attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19 (3), 520–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamorro, G., & Sorace, A. (2019). The Interface Hypothesis as a Framework for Studying L1 Attrition. In M. S. Schmid and B. Köpke (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of language attrition (pp. 24–35). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Schwartz, R. (2020). Case marking and word order in Greek heritage children. Journal of Child Language, 47 (4), 766–795. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coco, M. I., Smith, G., Spelorzi, R., & Garraffa, M. (submitted). Moving to continuous classifications of bilingualism through machine learning trained on production data.
Davies, A. (2013). Native speakers and native users: Loss and gain. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, R. (2021). Syntactic Change in Contact: Romance. Annual Review of Linguistics, 7 1, 309–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bruin, A. (2019). Not all bilinguals are the same: A call for more detailed assessments and descriptions of bilingual experiences. Behavioral Sciences, 9 (3), 33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores, C., Rinke, E., & Wagner, C. (2022). To hón ich imma insistieat: Syntactic stability in heritage Hunsrückisch German spoken in Brazil. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 12 (3), 251–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gargiulo, C. & van de Weijer, J. (2020). Anaphora resolution in L1 Italian in a Swedish-speaking environment before and after L1 re-immersion: A study on attrition. Lingua, 233 1, 102746. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavarró, A. & Mosella, M. (2009). Testing syntactic and pragmatic accounts of clitic omission. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America [GALANA 3] (pp. 25–35). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17 (3), 311–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grenoble, L. A., & Osipov, B. (2023). The dynamics of bilingualism in language shift ecologies. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 13 (1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T. (1993/1994). Verb syntax in Italian child grammar: Finite and non-finite verbs. Language Acquisition, 3 1, 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Palma, S., Genovese, E., Stagi, P., Saladini, G., & Arosio, F. (2016). The production of direct object clitics in pre-school–and primary school–aged children with specific language impairments. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 30 (9), 663–678. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gullifer, J. W., Chai, X. J., Whitford, V., Pivneva, I., Baum, S., Klein, D., & Titone, D. (2018). Bilingual experience and resting-state brain connectivity: Impacts of L2 age of acquisition and social diversity of language use on control networks. Neuropsychologia, 117 1, 123–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gullifer, J. W., & Titone, D. (2020). Characterizing the social diversity of bilingualism using language entropy. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23 (2), 283–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C., & Belletti, A. (2006). Developmental patterns in the acquisition of the complement clitic pronouns. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 31 1, 39–78.Google Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2006). The changing languages of Europe. Oxford University Press on Demand. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1975). French syntax: The transformational cycle. PhD thesis, MIT press.
(1991). Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry, 22 (4), 647–686.Google Scholar
(2000). Person morphemes and reflexives in Italian, French, and related languages. In R. S. Kayne, Parameters and Universals (pp. 131–162). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., Polinsky, M. (2022). Language history on fast forward: Innovations in heritage languages and diachronic change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25 1, 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T., & Rothman, J. (2018). Terminology matters! Why difference is not incompleteness and how early child bilinguals are heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22 (5), 564–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laleko, O., & Kisselev, O. (2023). Embracing linguistic variation in shift ecologies. The dominant language varies too. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 13 (1), 60–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laleko, O., & Polinsky, M. (2016). Between syntax and discourse: Topic and case marking in heritage speakers and L2 learners of Japanese and Korean. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6 (4), 396–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonini, C. (2006a). Object clitics and determiners in the acquisition of Italian as L1 and L2. In M. Watorek, S. Benazzo, & M. Hickmann (Eds.), Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2005 (pp. 343–348). Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
(2006b). The acquisition of object clitics and definite articles. University of Siena, PhD dissertation.
Mantione, F., Vender, M., Melloni, C., & Delfitto, D. (2017, April). Effects of dyslexia on the production of complex constructions [Conference presentation]. PRIN workshop. Theory, Experimentation, Applications: Long distance dependencies in forms of linguistic diversity, Siena, Italy.
(in preparation). Clitic cluster production in children with dyslexia.
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50 (4), 940–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, V., & Hayakawa, S. (2021). Measuring bilingualism: The quest for a “bilingualism quotient”. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42 (2), 527–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, N. (2016). Heritage languages as new dialects. In M. Jones, E. Smith, & R. Brown (Eds.), The future of dialects: Selected papers from Methods in Dialectology XV1 (pp. 15–34). Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Nevins, A. (2007). The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25 1, 273–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pascual y Cabo, D., & Rothman, J. (2012). The (il)logical problem of heritage speaker bilingualism and incomplete acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 33 (4), 450–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pescarini, D. (2017). Clitic clusters. In M. Everaert & H. C. Riemsdijk (Eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Syntax. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires, A., & Rothman, J. (2009). Disentangling sources of incomplete acquisition: An explanation for competence divergence across heritage grammars. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13 (2), 211–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2006). Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14 (2), 191–262.Google Scholar
(2011). Reanalysis in adult heritage language: New evidence in support of attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33 (2), 305–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Bilingual children and adult heritage speakers: The range of comparison. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22 (5), 547–563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Scontras, G. (2020). Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23 (1), 4–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). A roadmap for heritage language research. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23 (1), 50–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posit team (2022). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA. URL [URL]
Rinke, E. & Flores, C. (2014). Morphosyntactic knowledge of clitics by Portuguese heritage bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17 (4), 681–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romano, F. (2020). Ultimate attainment in heritage language speakers: Syntactic and morphological knowledge of Italian accusative clitics. Applied Psycholinguistics, 41 (2). 347–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). L1 versus dominant language transfer effects in L2 and heritage speakers of Italian: A structural priming study. Applied Linguistics, 42 (5), 945–969. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). Ultimate attainment of gender in heritage and L2 Italian. In F. Romano (Ed.), Studies in Italian as a heritage language (pp. 95). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J. (2007). Heritage speaker competence differences, language change, and input type: Inflected infinitives in Heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11 (4), 359–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., Bayram, F., DeLuca, V., Di Pisa, G., Duñabeitia, J., Gharibi, K., . . . Wulff, S. (2023a). Monolingual comparative normativity in bilingualism research is out of “control”: Arguments and alternatives, Applied Psycholinguistics, 44 (3), 316–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J., Bayram, F., DeLuca, V., Alonso, J. G., Kubota, M., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2023b). Defining bilingualism as a continuum. In G. Luk, J. G. Grundy, J. A. E. Anderson (Eds.) Understanding language and cognition through bilingualism: In honor of Ellen Bialystok (pp. 38). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2009). On L1 attrition and the linguistic system. EuroSLA yearbook, 9 (1), 212–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2013). First language attrition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3 (1), 94–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, M. S., & Jarvis, S. (2014). Lexical access and lexical diversity in first language attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17 (4), 729–748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., Filiaci, F., & Baldo, M. (2012). Pronominal objects in English–Italian and Spanish–Italian bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33 (4), 725–751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. (2021). Patterns in clitic pronouns: Assessment of clitics in Italian typical and non-typical populations. PhD dissertation, University of Trento.
Smith, G., Spelorzi, R., Sorace, A., & Garraffa, M. (2022). Language Competence in Italian Heritage Speakers: The Contribution of Clitic Pronouns and Nonword Repetition. Languages, 7 (3), 180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2023). The grammatical competence of adult heritage speakers of Italian compared to adult immigrants on linguistic markers, In F. Romano (Ed.) Studies in Italian as heritage language. (pp. 65). De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2005). Selective optionality in language development. In K. P. Corrigan & L. Cornips (Eds.), Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social (pp. 55–80). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second language research, 22 (3), 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1 (1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Referring expressions and executive functions in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6 (5), 669–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spelorzi, R., Sturt, P., & Sorace, A. (in preparation). BE or HAVE: where is the trick? English-Italian bilingual populations on the selection of the auxiliary in a semi-spontaneous production.
Thomason, S. G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torregrossa, J., Flores, C., & Rinke, E. (2023). What modulates the acquisition of difficult structures in a heritage language? A study on Portuguese in contact with French, German and Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 26(1), 179–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M. (2014). Early, late or very late?: Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4 (3), 283–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I., Sorace, A., Heycock, C., & Filiaci, F. (2004). First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International journal of bilingualism, 8 (3), 257–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vender, M., Guasti, M. T., Garraffa, M., & Sorace, A. (2016). How early L2 children perform on Italian clinical markers of SLI: a study of clitic production and nonword repetition. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 30 (2). 150–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vender, M., Hu, S., Mantione, F., Delfitto, D., & Melloni, C. (2018). The production of clitic pronouns: A study on bilingual and monolingual dyslexic children. Frontiers in Psychology, 9 1, 2301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. N. (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 73 (1), 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Coco, M. I., G. Smith, R. Spelorzi & M. Garraffa
2024. Moving to continuous classifications of bilingualism through machine learning trained on language production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.