Barbosa, P.
(2019) Pro as a minimal nP: towards a unified approach to pro-drop. Linguistic Inquiry, 50(3), 487–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, M., Clemens, L. E., & Nevins, A.
(2017) Generalization of French and Portuguese plural alternations and initial syllable protection. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 35(2), 299–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I., & Sheenan, M.
(2014) Complexity in comparative syntax: the view from modern parametric theory. In F. J. Newmeyer & L. B. Preston (Eds.), Measuring grammatical complexity. The view from modern parametric theory (pp. 103–127). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boecks, C.
(2014) What Principles and Parameters got wrong. In M. C. Picallo (Eds.), Linguistic variation in the Minimalist Framework (pp. 155–178). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinkmann, M., Fünter, A., d’Aurizio, L., & Müller, N.
under review). Die Repräsentation von Genus im Französischen: Psycholinguistische Evidenz für ein dreigliederiges System.
Chomsky, N.
(1994) Language and problems of knowledge. The Managua lectures. MIT Press, 6th edition.Google Scholar
Demuth, K., & Tremblay, A.
(2008) Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 351, 99–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duguine, M.
(2017) Reversing the approach to null subject: A perspective from language acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 81, 27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granfeldt, J.
(2018) The development of gender in simultaneous and successive bilingual acquisition of French – Evidence for AOA and input effects. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(4), 674–693. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, H.
(1993) Principled variability. Parametrization without parameter fixing? In G. Fanselow (Ed.), Parametrization of Universal Grammar (pp. 1–16). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R.
(2020) Grammatical gender: A close look at gender assignment across languages. Annual Reviews of Linguistics, 61, 45–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(2008) Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106–140). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lohndal, T., & Putnam, M. T.
(2024) The importance of features and exponents: Dissolving Feature Reassembly. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 14(1).Google Scholar
Lyster, R.
(2006) Predictability in French gender attribution: A corpus analysis. French Language Studies, 161, 69–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M.
(2016) Early child second language acquisition: French gender in German children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(4), 656–673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, N.
(1993) Komplexe Sätze. Der Erwerb von COMP und von Wortstellungsmustern bei bilingualen Kindern (Französisch/Deutsch). Narr.Google Scholar
(1994) Gender and number agreement within DP. In J. M. Meisel (Ed.), Bilingual first language acquisition: French and German grammatical development (pp. 53–88). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
under review). AAiMLL: Acquisition Advantages in MultiLingual Learners: The case of the multilingual child. under review.
Newmeyer, F. J.
(2004) Against a parameter-setting approach to typological variation. In P. Pica (Ed.), Linguistic variation yearbook (pp. 181–234). John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Where, if anywhere, are parameters? A critical historical overview of parametric theory. In L. Bowern, L. Horn & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), On looking into words (and beyond) (pp. 547–569). Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Perdue, C.
(1984) Second language acquisition by adult immigrants: A field manual. Newbury House.Google Scholar
Roberts, I.
(2019) Parameter hierarchies & Universal Grammar. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. O.
(1984) Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stahnke, J.
(2022) The acquisition of French determiners by bilingual children: A prosodic account. Languages, 71: 200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar