Cover not available
Commentary published In:
Epistemological issue: The importance of features and exponents: Dissolving Feature Reassembly
Edited by Cristina Flores and Neal Snape
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:1] 2024
► pp. 48–52
Commentary

Feature Reassembly is concerned with syntax, but its main goal is to account for the (second) language acquisition process

ORCID logo | University of Southampton
ORCID logo | University of Southampton
Published online: 1 February 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.23059.dom
References (15)
References
Cho, J., & Slabakova, R. (2017). A feature-based contrastive approach to the L2 acquisition of specificity. Applied Linguistics, 38(3), 318–339.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. Y. H. (1997). The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research, 131, 187–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hicks, G., & Domínguez, L. (2020). A model for L1 grammatical attrition. Second Language Research, 36 (2), 143–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hwang, S. H., Lardiere, D. (2013). Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach. Second Language Research, 29 1, 57–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language acquisition, 12(1), 3–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ko, H., Ionin, T., & Wexler, K. (2010). The role of presuppositionality in the second language acquisition of English articles. Linguistic inquiry, 41(2), 213–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In: Liceras, J., Zobl, H., and Goodluck, H. (eds) The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 106–140.Google Scholar
(2009). Some thoughts on a contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 251: 173–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lohndal, T. & Putnam, M. T. (2024). The importance of features and exponents: Dissolving Feature Reassembly. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 14(1).Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2), 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2016). Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snape, N., García Mayo, M. del P. & Gürel, A. (2013). L1 transfer in article selection for generic reference by Spanish, Turkish and Japanese L2 learners. International Journal of English Studies, 13(1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic approaches to bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuniyan, E. (2018). Second language acquisition of definiteness: a feature-based contrastive approach to second language learnability (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton).
White, L. (2003). Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Lohndal, Terje & Michael T. Putnam
2024. Modeling multilingual grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 14:1 ► pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Thane, Patrick D.
2024. School, age, and exposure effects in the child heritage language acquisition of the Spanish volitional subjunctive. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.