Commentary published In:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “The illusion of language acquisition” by William O’Grady[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3] 2013
► pp. 312–315
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3] 2013
► pp. 312–315
Commentary
Individual differences and the nature of the processor
References (9)
Dąbrowska, E. (2012). Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(3), 219–253. 
Han, C.-H., Lidz, J., & Musolino, J. (2007). V-Raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(1, 1–47.
Hofmeister, P., Staum Casasanto, L., & Sag, I.A. (2012a). How do individual cognitive differences relate to acceptability judgments?: A reply to Sprouse, Wagers, and Phillips. Language, 88(2, 390–400.
Hofmeister, P., Staum Casasanto, L., & Sag, I. A. (2012b). Misapplying working-memory tests: A reductio ad absurdum. Language, 88(2, 408–409.
O’Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
O’Grady, W., Kwak, H.-Y., Lee, O.-S., & Lee, M. (2011). An emergentist perspective on heritage language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 331, 223–245.
O’Grady, W., Lee, M., & Kwak, H.-Y. (2009). Emergentism and second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie, & T. Bhatia (eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 69–88). Bingley, UK: Emerald Press.
Sprouse, J., Wagers, M., & Phillips, C. (2012a). A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language, 88(1, 82–123.
. (2012b). Working-memory capacity and island effects: A reminder of the issues and the facts. Language, 88(2, 401–407.