References (14)
References
Babyonyshev, M., & Marin, S. (2006). Acquisition of pronominal clitics in Romanian. Catalan journal of linguistics, 51, 17–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. (1986). Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Felser, C., Marinis, T., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Children’s processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of relative clause attachment. Language Acquisition 111, 127–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J.D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 61, 291–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodall, G. (2007). Inversion in wh-questions in child Romance and child English. In M.J. Cabrera, J. Camacho, V. Déprez, N. Flores, & L. Sánchez (Eds.), Romance Linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the 36th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL) (pp. 169–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goodluck, H., & Tavakolian, S. (1982). Competence and processing in children’s grammar of relative clauses. Cognition, 111, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., & Strik, N. (2008). Scope-marking strategies in the acquisition of long distance wh-questions in French and Dutch. Language and Speech 511, 101–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Junkal Gutierrez Mangado, M. (2009). Asymmetries in the comprehension of wh-movement in L1 Basque. Paper presented at the EHU International Workshop on Ergative Languages, Bilbao. Available from [URL] Google Scholar
O’Grady, W. (2010). An emergentist approach to syntax. In H. Narrog, & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 257–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rackowski, A., & Travis, L. (2000). V-initial languages: X or XP movement and adverbial placement. In A. Carnie, & E. Guilfoyle, (Ed.), The syntax of verb-initial languages (pp. 117–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J.C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49(3, 238–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weissenborn, J., Roeper, T., & de Villiers, J. (1995). Wh-acquisition in French and German: connections between case, Q-features and unique triggers. Recherches Linguistiques 241, 125–155.Google Scholar
Wexler, K., Gavarró, A., & Torrens, V. (2004). Feature checking and object clitic omission in child Catalan and Spanish. In R. Bok-Bennema, B. Hollebrandse, B. Kampers-Manhe, & P. Sleeman (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, Groningen, 28–30 November 2002 (pp. 253–269). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Jegerski, Jill & Irina A. Sekerina
2021. The Psycholinguistics of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics,  pp. 449 ff. DOI logo
Muchnik, Malka, Marina Niznik, Anbessa Teferra & Tania Gluzman
2016. Introduction. In Elective Language Study and Policy in Israel,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
O'Grady, William
2015. Anaphora and the Case for Emergentism. In The Handbook of Language Emergence,  pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics,  pp. 373 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.