Commentary published In:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “The illusion of language acquisition” by William O’Grady[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3] 2013
► pp. 350–356
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3] 2013
► pp. 350–356
Commentary
Individual differences and streams of processing
References (30)
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Clahsen, H., Lück, M., & Hahne, A. (2007). How children process over-regularizations: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Child Language, 341, 601–622. 
Van Herten, M., Chwilla, D.J., & Kolk, H.H.J. (2006). When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 181, 1181–1197.
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 991, 122–149.
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P.J. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 151, 159–201.
Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 521, 205–225.
King, J.W., & Just, M.A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 301, 580–602.
King, J.W., Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 71, 376–395.
Kuperberg, G.R. (2007). Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research, 11461, 23–49.
Kuperberg, G.R., Kreher, D.A., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P.J. (2007). The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 1001, 223–237.
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K.D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 41, 463–470.
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S.A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic anomaly. Science, 2071, 203–205.
. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 3071, 161–163.
McLaughlin, J., Tanner, D., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., Inoue, K., Valentine, G., & Osterhout, L. (2010). Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60(Suppl. 2), 123–150.
Van de Meerendonk, N., Kolk, H.H.J., Vissers, C.T.W.M., & Chwilla, D.J. (2010). Monitoring in language perception: Mild and strong conflicts elicit different ERP patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 221, 67–82.
Miyake, A., Carpenter, P.A., & Just, M.A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 111, 671–717.
Molinaro, N., Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 471, 908–930.
Nakano, H., Saron, C., & Swaab, T.Y. (2010). Speech and span: Working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 221, 2886–2898.
Oines, L., Miyake, A., & Kim, A. (2012). Individual differences in verbal working memory predict reanalysis vs. integration in syntax-semantics conflict scenarios.
Poster presented at the Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference. Riva del Garda, Italy.
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P.J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 311, 785–806.
Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P.J., & Swinney, D.A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence for the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 281, 786–803.
Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., Pitkänen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C., & Molinaro, N. (2006). Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. Language Learning, 56(Suppl. 1), 199–230.
Van Petten, C.K., Weckerly, J., McIsaac, H.K., & Kutas, M. (1997). Working memory capacity dissociates lexical and sentential context effects. Psychological Science, 81, 238–242.
Rugg, M.D., & Coles, M.G.H. (1995). The ERP and cognitive psychology: Conceptual issues. In M.D. Rugg, & M.G.H. Coles (Eds.), Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition (pp. 27–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tanner, D. (2011). Agreement mechanisms in native and nonnative language processing: Electrophysiological correlates of complexity and interference. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J.G. (2012). ERPs reveal individual differences in syntactic processing strategies.
Poster presented at the Psychonomics Society Conference. Minneapolis, MN.
Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J. G. (2013). ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (in press). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
Tanner, D., Inoue, K., & Osterhout, L. (in press). Brain-based individual differences in on-line L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
Vos, S.H., Gunter, T.C., Kolk, H.H.J., & Mulder, G. (2001). Working memory constraints on syntactic processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 381, 41–63.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Rastelli, Stefano
2018. Neurolinguistics and second language teaching: A view from the crossroads. Second Language Research 34:1 ► pp. 103 ff. 
Roberts, Leah, Jorge González Alonso, Christos Pliatsikas & Jason Rothman
2018. Evidence from neurolinguistic methodologies: Can it actually inform linguistic/language acquisition theories and translate to evidence-based applications?. Second Language Research 34:1 ► pp. 125 ff.
Christianson, Kiel
2017. Psycholinguistics. In The Handbook of Linguistics, ► pp. 345 ff.
Mehravari, Alison S., Karen Emmorey, Chantel S. Prat, Lindsay Klarman & Lee Osterhout
2017. Brain-based individual difference measures of reading skill in deaf and hearing adults. Neuropsychologia 101 ► pp. 153 ff.
Rothman, Jason, José Alemán Bañón & Jorge González Alonso
2015. Neurolinguistic measures of typological effects in multilingual transfer: introducing an ERP methodology. Frontiers in Psychology 6
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.