Article published In:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “The illusion of language acquisition” by William O’Grady[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3] 2013
► pp. 373–383
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3] 2013
► pp. 373–383
response-to-the-commentaries
Facts and issues
Response to the commentaries
Article outline
- 1.The processor
- 2.Scope
- 3.Language acquisition
- 4.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (11)
Grüter, T., Lieberman, M., & Gualmini, A. (2010). Acquiring the scope of disjunction and negation in L2: A bidirectional study of learners of Japanese and English. Language Acquisition 171, 127–154. 
Hawkins, J. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Jespersen, O. (1933). Essentials of English grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
Lee, S. (2009). Interpreting scope ambiguity in first and second language processing: Universal quantifiers and negation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.
O’Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Mahah, NJ: Erlbaum.
. (2010). Rethinking rules and representations: Binding in Korean and English. In Sang-Oak, L. (Ed.), Contemporary Korean linguistics: International perspective (pp. 118– 148). Seoul: Thaehaksa.
. (2012). Three factors in the design and acquisition of language. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 31, 493–499.
Reinhart, T. (2006). Interface strategies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Reuland, E. (2011). Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sprouse, J., Wagers, M., & Phillips, C. (2012). A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language 881, 82–123.
Unsworth, S., Gualmini, A., & Helder, C. (2008). Children’s interpretation of indefinites in sentences containing negation: A reassessment of the cross-linguistic picture. Language Acquisition 151, 315–328.