Grüter, T., Lieberman, M., & Gualmini, A
(2010) Acquiring the scope of disjunction and negation in L2: A bidirectional study of learners of Japanese and English. Language Acquisition 171, 127–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J
(2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O
(1933) Essentials of English grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lee, S
(2009) Interpreting scope ambiguity in first and second language processing: Universal quantifiers and negation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W
(2005) Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Mahah, NJ: Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Rethinking rules and representations: Binding in Korean and English. In Sang-Oak, L. (Ed.), Contemporary Korean linguistics: International perspective (pp. 118– 148). Seoul: Thaehaksa.Google Scholar
(2012) Three factors in the design and acquisition of language. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 31, 493–499.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T
(2006) Interface strategies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reuland, E
(2011) Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sprouse, J., Wagers, M., & Phillips, C
(2012) A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language 881, 82–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S., Gualmini, A., & Helder, C
(2008) Children’s interpretation of indefinites in sentences containing negation: A reassessment of the cross-linguistic picture. Language Acquisition 151, 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar