Commentary published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 4:1 (2014) ► pp.6188
References
Bergman, B., & Engberg-Pedersen, E.
(2010) Transmission of sign languages in the Nordic countries. In D.. Brentari (Ed.), Sign languages (pp. 74–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R.
(1973) A first language. The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, C., & Mayberry, R. I.
(2008) American Sign Language syntactic and narrative comprehension in skilled and less skilled readers: Bilingual and bimodal evidence for the linguistic basis of reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 291, 367–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J.
(1991) Interdependence of first- and second-language proficiency in bilingual children. In E.. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 70–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Ontario, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education.Google Scholar
Eklund Heinonen, M.
(2009) Processbarhet på prov. Bedömning av muntlig språkfärdighet hos vuxna andraspråksinlärare. [Processability in tests. Assessment of oral proficiency in adult second language learners.] Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Glahn, E., Håkansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., Hvenekilde, A., & Lund, K.
(2001) Processability in Scandinavian second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 231, 389–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Kreiter, J.
(2003) Understanding child bilingual acquisition by using parent and teacher reports. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 267–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C.
(2007) Processability Theory applied to written and oral Swedish. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 81–94). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Environmental influence on language acquisition: Comparing second and foreign language acquisition of Swedish. Language Learning, 60(3), 628–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A.
(1991) The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
Heiling, K.
(1993) Döva barns utveckling i ett tidsperspektiv: kunskapsnivå och sociala processer. [Deaf children’s development in a temporal perspective. Academic achievement levels and social processes.] Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
(1996) Deaf children’s reading and writing. A comparison between pupils in different ages from oral and bilingual schools. In A. Muruvik Vonen, K. Arnesen, T.R. Enerstvedt, & A. Varran Nafstad (Eds.), Bilingualism and literacy concerning deafness and deaf-blindness. Proceedings of an International Workshop 10th–13th November 1994 (pp. 101–114). Oslo: The Research and Development Unit, Skådalen Resource Centre.Google Scholar
Hunt, K.
(1965) Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research Report, No. 3. Urbana, IL: The National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Lane, H.
(1984) When the mind hears. A history of the deaf. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Lee, H.J., Giraud, A.L., Kang, E., Oh, S.H., Kang, H., Kim, C.S., & Lee, D.S.
(2007) Cortical activity at rest predicts cochlear implantation outcome. Cerebral Cortex, 17(4), 909–917. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Loman, B., & Jörgensen, N.
(1971) Manual för analys och beskrivning av makrosyntagmer. [Manual for analyzing and describing macrosyntagms]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Mahshie, S.N.
(1995) Educating deaf children bilingually. With insights and applications from Sweden and Denmark. Washington, D.C.: Pre-College Programs, Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Mansouri, F.
(2005) Agreement morphology in Arabic as a second language: Typological features and their processing implications. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 117–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marschark, M. & Hauser, P.C.
(2008) Cognitive underpinnings of learning by deaf and hard-of-hearing students: Differences, diversity, and directions. In M. Marschark & P.C. Hauser (Eds.), Deaf cognition. Foundations and outcomes (pp. 3–23). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayer, C., & Leigh, G.
(2010) The changing context for sign bilingual education programs: Issues in language and the development of literacy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(2), 175–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3(2), 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niederberger, N.
(2008) Does the knowledge of a natural sign language facilitate deaf children’s learning to read and write? Insights from French Sign Language and written French data. In C. Plaza-Pust & E. Morales-López (Eds.), Sign bilingualism. Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations (pp. 29–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Percy-Smith, L., Cayé-Thomasen, P., Breinegaard, N., & Hedegaard Jensen, J.
(2010) Parental mode of communication is essential for speech and language outcomes in cochlear implanted children. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 1301, 708–715. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Philipsson, A.
(2007) Interrogative clauses and verb morphology in L2 Swedish. Theoretical interpretations of grammatical development and effects of different elicitation techniques. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University: Stockholm, Sweden.
Pienemann, M.
Pienemann, M.
(Eds.) (2005) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G.
(1999) A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: A processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 211, 383–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Keßler, J-U., & Itani-Adams, Y.
(2011) Comparing levels of process-ability across languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(2), 128–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plaza-Pust. C.
(2008) Why variation matters: On language contact in the development of L2 written German. In C. Plaza-Pust & E. Morales-López (Eds.), Sign bilingualism. Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations (pp. 73–135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Proposition 1980/81
Proposition 1980/81:100, Bilaga 12 [Proposition 1980/1981:100, Appendix 12]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
Rahkonen, M., & Håkansson, G.
(2008) Production of written L2-Swedish – processability or input frequencies? In J.U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 135–161). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Selinker, L.
(1972) Interlanguage. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 101, 209–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skotara, N., Kügow, M., Salden, U., Hänel-Faulhaber, B., & Röder, B.
(2011) ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition. BMC Neuroscience, 12(1), 48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
SOU 1996:102
TUFF – Teckenspråksutbildning för föräldrar [TUFF – Sign language education for parents]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartmentet.
SPM 2004
Specialskolemyndighetens årsredovisning 2004 [The national agency for special school annual report 2004].
SPSM 2009
Specialpedagogiska skolmyndighetens årsredovisning 2009 [The national agency for special needs education and school annual report 2009].
SPSM 2010
Specialpedagogiska skolmyndighetens årsredovisning 2010 [The national agency for special needs education and school annual report 2010].
Strong, M., & Prinz, P. M.
(2000) Is American Sign Language skill related to English literacy? In C. Chamberlain, J.P. Morford, & R.I. Mayberry (Eds.), Language acquisition by eye (pp. 131–141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Svartholm, K.
(1984) Döva och samhällets skrivna språk. En forskningsöversikt och en tillbakablick [Deaf and the written language of the society. A research overview and a retrospect]. Forskning om teckenspråk XII. Stockholm: Institutionen för lingvistik, Stockholms universitet.Google Scholar
(1987a) Subjekt och objekt i dövas skrivna svenska [Subjects and objects in the written Swedish of deaf people]. In E. Wande (Ed.), Aspects of bilingualism. Proceedings from the Fourth Nordic Symposium on Bilingualism, 1984 (pp. 419–435). Studia Multiethnica Upsaliensia. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
(1987b) Relativsatser och andra konstruktioner i dövas skrivna svenska. [Relative clauses and other constructions in the written Swedish of deaf people]. MINS 241. Stockholm: Institutionen för nordiska språk, Stockholms universitet.Google Scholar
(1993) Bilingual education for the deaf in Sweden. Sign Language Studies, 811, 291–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) The written Swedish of deaf children: A foundation for EFL. In C.J. Kellett Bidoli & E. Ochse (Eds.), English in international deaf communication (pp. 211–249). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2010) Bilingual education for deaf children in Sweden. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(2), 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L., & Crasborn, O.
(Eds.) (2007) Simultaneity in signed languages. Form and function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Duggan, Nora, Ingela Holmström & Krister Schönström
2023. Translanguaging practices in adult education for deaf migrants. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada 39:1 DOI logo
Gärdenfors, Moa, Victoria Johansson & Krister Schönström
2019. Spelling in Deaf, Hard of Hearing and Hearing Children With Sign Language Knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo
Holmström, Ingela & Krister Schönström
2017. Resources for deaf and hard-of-hearing students in mainstream schools in Sweden. A survey. Deafness & Education International 19:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Nicholas, Howard & Donna Starks
Roos, Carin & Åsa Wengelin
2016. The text telephone as an empowering technology in the daily lives of deaf people—A qualitative study. Assistive Technology 28:2  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Türker-van der Heiden, Emel & Gözde Mercan

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.