Bowerman, M
(1982) Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 319–346). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chang, F., Dell, G., & Bock, J.K
(2006) Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 1131, 234–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coppieters, R
(1987) Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 631, 544–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J.G., & Roeper, T
(1995) Relative clauses are barriers to Wh-movement for young children. Journal of Child Language, 221, 389–404. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillon, B., Chow, W.-Y., Wagers, M., Guo, T., Liu, F., & Phillips, C
(2014) The structure-sensitivity of memory access: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 1025. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dillon, B., Nevins, A., Austin, A.C., & Phillips, C
(2012) Syntactic and semantic predictors of tense in Hindi: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 271, 313–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elman, J.L
(1993) Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 481, 71–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J.D. & Sakas, W
(2005) The subset principle in syntax: Costs of compliance. Journal of Linguistics, 411, 513–569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goro, T
(2007) Language-specific constraints on scope interpretation in first language acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Grüter, T., Lew-Wiliams, C., & Fernald, A
(2012) Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem. Second Language Research, 281, 191–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T.R
(1995) Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., & Naigles, L
(2002) How children use input to acquire a lexicon. Child Development, 731, 418–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, P., & Sag, I
(2010) Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language, 861, 366–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H
(2011) Internal and external factors in the child L2 development of the German determiner phrase. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11, 238–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 291, 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Waterfall, H., Vasilyeva, M., Vevea, J., & Hedges, L.V
(2010) Sources of variability in children’s language growth. Cognitive Psychology, 611, 343–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B
(1977) Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 81, 63–100.Google Scholar
Kluender, R., & Kutas, M
(1993) Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 81, 573–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monner, D., Vatz, K., Morini, G., Hwang, S., & DeKeyser, R
(2013) A neural network model of the effects of entrenchment and memory development on grammatical gender learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 161, 246–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newport, E
(1990) Maturational constraints on language learning. Cognitive Science, 141, 11–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., & Lidz, J
(2015) Linking parser development to acquisition of syntactic knowledge. Language Acquisition, 221, 158–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Omaki, A., Davidson White, I., Goro, T., Lidz, J., & Phillips, C
(2014) No fear of commitment: Children’s incremental interpretation in English and Japanese wh-questions. Language Learning and Development, 101, 206–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parodi, T., Schwartz, B.D., & Clahsen, H
(2004) On the L2 acquisition of the morphosyntax of German nominals. Linguistics, 421, 669–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C
(2010) Syntax at age two: Cross-linguistic differences. Language Acquisition, 171, 70–120. [Originally published 1995 in MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 26.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Some arguments and non-arguments for reductionist accounts of syntactic phenomena. Language and Cognitive Processes, 281, 156–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L
(2015) The role of language processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C., Wagers, M.W., & Lau, E.F
(2011) Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension. In J. Runner (Ed.), Experiments at the Interfaces (Syntax and Semantics, vol. 371), (pp. 147–180). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S
(1979) Formal models of language learning. Cognition, 71, 217–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Learnability and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowe, M. L
(2008) Child-directed speech: Relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 351, 185–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R
(2013) What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language: A generative perspective. In M. García Mayo, M. Junkal Gutierrez Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrían (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 5–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snedeker, J
(2013) Children’s sentence processing. In R. van Gompel (Ed.), Sentence Processing (pp. 189–220). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, W
(2011) Children’s grammatical conservatism: Implications for syntactic theory. In N. Danis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), BUCLD 35: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Boston University Conference in Language Development (Vol. 11, pp. 1–20). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thornton, R
(1990) Adventures in long-distance moving: The acquisition of complex wh-questions. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut. DOI logo
Trueswell, J.C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N.M., & Logrip, M.L
(1999) The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 731, 89–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, P.C.M., & Perrachione, T.K
(2007) Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 281, 565–585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zukowski, A., & Larsen, J
(2011) Wanna-contraction in children: Retesting and revising the developmental facts. Language Acquisition, 181, 211–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

2017. Interference in Native and Non-Native Sentence Processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20:4  pp. 712 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.