Cover not available
Part of
Scientific Methods for the Humanities
Willie van Peer, Frank Hakemulder and Sonia Zyngier
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 13] 2012

Bibliography

Aaftink, C.
2004 Pivotal reading: Reading related to pivotal life experiences. Utrecht University: Unpublished M.A. thesis.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association
(1994) Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, 4th (ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Andringa, E.
1986 Perspektivierung und Perspektivenübernahme: Zur Wahrnehmung literarischer Figuren. Spiel, 5, 135–146.Google Scholar
Bailey, K. M.
1990 The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds), Second language teacher education (pp. 215–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, R. & Wright, H.
1955 Midwest and its children. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Bales, R. & Cohen, S.
1979 SYMLOG: A system for multiple level observation of groups. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., Ross, D. & Ross, S. A.
1963 Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 3–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barros, H. S.
2003 Desfamiliarização ou Preferência? O Estranhamento na Cidade de Deus. Caderno de Letras 20, 121–127.Google Scholar
Bechtel, R.
1967 Hodometer research in museums. Museum News, March, 23–5.Google Scholar
Bechtel, R. B. & Zeisel, J.
1987 Observation: The world under a glass. In R. B. Bechtel, R. W. Marans & W. M. Michelson (Eds.), Methods in environmental and behavioral research (pp. 11–40). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Berlyne, D. E.
1971 Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R.
1970 Kinesics in context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bourg, T., Risden, K., Thompson, S. & Davis, E. C.
1993 The effects of an empathy-building strategy on 6th graders’ causal inferencing in narrative text comprehension. Poetics, 22, 117–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bower, G. H.
1978 Experiments on story comprehension and recall. Discourse Processes, 1, 211–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brace, N., Kemp, R. & Snelgar, R.
2003 SPSS for Psychologists; A guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. New York, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bronowski, J.
1976 The Ascent of Man. London: BBC.Google Scholar
Cantor, J., Ziemke, D. & Sparks, G.
1984 The effect of forewarning on emotional responses to a horror film. Journal of Broadcasting, 28, 21–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carp, F. M. & Carp, A.
1981 The validity, reliability and generalizability of diary data. Experimental Aging Research, 7, 281–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, F. G. & Schrober, M. F.
2000 Clarifying question meaning in a household telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(1), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Th. & Campbell, D. T.
1979 Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cousins, N.
1985 Anatomy of an illness as perceived by the patient: Reflections on healing and regeneration. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Davis, S. & Andringa, E.
1995 Narrrative structure and emotional response. In G. Rusch (Ed.), Empirical approaches to literature (pp. 50–60). Siegen: Lumis.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.
2006 The God delusion. London: Random House.Google Scholar
Denscombe, M.
2010 The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Descartes, R.
1637 [2006] A discourse on the method. New York, NY: Oxford University Press 2006.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W.
1985 Poetry and experience. Selected works, vol. V. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
1994 The hermeneutics of the human sciences. In K. Mueller-Vollmer (Ed.), The hermeneutics reader: texts of the German tradition from the enlightenment to the present. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Earthman, E. A.
1992 Creating the virtual work: Readers’ processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 351–384.Google Scholar
Field, A.
2005 Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Flerx, V. C., Filder, D. S. & Rogers, R. W.
1976 Sex role stereotypes: Developmental aspects and early intervention. Child Development, 47, 998–1007. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flower, L. S. & Hayes, J. R.
1981 A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freud, S.
1975 The psychopathology of everyday life. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Transl.). The Pelican Freud Library, vol. 5, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
1979 On psychopathology. In J. Strachey (Ed, & Transl.). The Pelican Freud Library, vol. 10, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
1984 On metapsychology: The theory of psychoanalysis. In J. Strachey (Ed, & Transl.). The Pelican Freud Library, vol. 11, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Frost, W.
1969 The development of a technique for TV programme assessment. Journal of the Market Research Society, 11, 25–44.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. G.
1975 Truth and method. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. & Prentice, D. A.
1991 The representation of fictional information. Psychological Science, 2¸ 336–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, A.
n.d.). Focus Groups. Retrieved December 28, 2004, ([URL]).
Gibson, R., Aust, C. F. & Zillmann, D.
2000 Loneliness of adolescents and their choice and enjoyment of love-celebrating versus love-lamenting popular music. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 18(1), 43–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goss, J. D. & Leinbach, T. R.
1996 Focus groups as alternative research practice. Area, 28(2), 115–123.Google Scholar
Hakemulder, J.
2000 The moral laboratory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, S.
2010 The moral landscape. How science can determine human values. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hawkes, D. L.
1990 Communicating your results: A guide for postgraduates. Pontypridd: The Polytechnic of Wales.Google Scholar
Hess, R. G. & Lieger, L. H.
(2004) Creating effective poster presentations. Retrieved June 6, 2005 from [URL]
Holland, N.
1975 Five readers reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, M.
1993 History of psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Iser, W.
1975 Die Appellstruktur der Texte. In R. Warning (Ed.), Rezeptionsästhetik – Theorie und Praxis (pp. 228–52). München: Fink.Google Scholar
1978 The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kelle, U.
(Ed.) 1995 Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kinkade, R. G.
1974 Thesaurus of psychological index terms. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, J.
1995 Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311, 299–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreuger, R. A.
1988 Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lachenmann, J.
1999 Interviews mit Lesenden. Wirkungen von Literatur auf Musiker und Mediziner. [Interviews with readers. Effects of literature on musicians and physicians]. Unpublished MA-thesis, University of Munich.Google Scholar
Limbert, W. M. & Polzella, D. J.
1998 Influence of music style on observers’ perception of representational and abstract paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16(1), 33–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C.
1990 The clockwork muse. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mattos, M. J. & Mendes, M.
2002 Grupo de Enfoque na Ciência Empírica da Literatura: Atitude dos alunos em relação à literatura. Paper presented at the III ECEL (Encontro de Ciência Empírica da Literatura) in Rio de Janeiro.
McInerney, D. M.
2001 Publishing your psychology research: A guide to writing for journals in psychology and related fields. London: Sage.Google Scholar
McNamara, C.
n.d.). Basics of Conducting Focus Groups. Retrieved December 28, 2004, from [URL]
Mendes, M. & Menezes, D.
2003 The influence of authorial prestige on Brazilian students. Paper Presented at the IV ECEL (Encontro de Ciência Empírica da Literatura) in Rio de Janeiro.
Miall, D. S.
1990 Readers’ response to narrative: Evaluating, relating, anticipating. Poetics, 19, 323–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D.
1995 Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37–58.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. L., Kreuger, R. A. & King, J. A.
1998 The focus group kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Morris, D.
1977 Manwatching: A field guide to human behavior. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q.
1990 Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.
1948 The moral judgment of the child. M. Gabain, (Transl.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Plato
1906 The trial and death of Socrates. F. J. Church (Transl.), New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Powell, R. A. & Single, H. M.
1996 Focus groups. International Journal of Quality in Health Care, 8(5), 499–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radway, J. A.
1984 Reading the romance; Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Riessman, C. K.
1993 Narrative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. & Shoemaker, F. F.
1971 Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rose, J.
2001 The intellectual life of the British working classes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Saris, W. & Stronkhorst, H.
1984 Causal modelling in nonexperimental research. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Schreier, M.
2001 Qualitative methods in studying text reception. In D. Schram & G. Steen (Eds), The psychology and sociology of literature (pp. 35–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaughnessy, J. J. & Zechtmeister, E. B.
1985 Research methods in psychology. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M.
1999 The primacy of movement. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shklovsky, V.
(1917/1965) Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. Reis (Eds), Russian Formalist Criticism (pp. 3–24). Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH
(Ed.) 1987 Looking up. London: Collins ELT.Google Scholar
Skaife, A. M.
1967 The role of deviation and complexity in changing musical taste. Proceedings of the American Psychological Association, Vol. 2, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
Slater, A., Quinn, P. C., Hayes, R. & Brown, E.
2000 The role of facial orientation in newborn infants’ preference for attractive faces. Developmental Science, 3(2), 181–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, C. P.
(1959/1993) The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, D.
2010 Forms of vitality. Exploring dynamic experience in psychology, the arts, psychotherapy, and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J.
1988 The Psychologist’s Companion: A guide to scientific writing for students and researchers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stolnitz, J.
1991 On the historical triviality of art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 31, 195–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, W.
2001 Justice in Perspective. In W. Van Peer & S. Chatman (Eds), New perspectives on narrative perspective, (pp. 325–38). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Van Peer, W. & Stöger, I.
2001 Psycho-analysts and day-dreaming. In G. Steen & D. Schram (Eds), The Psychology and Sociology of Literature (pp. 185–200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, W., Zyngier, S. & Hakemulder, F.
2007 Foregrounding: Past, present, future. In D. Hoover (Ed.), Prospect and retrospect. Papers from the poetics and linguistics association international conference, New York, 2004. Amsterdam: Rodopi West. DOI logo
West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E. & Mitchell, H. R.
1993 Reading in the real world and its correlates. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(1), 34–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Windelband, W.
1894 Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft. Straßburg: Straßburger Rektoratsrede.Google Scholar
Zill, N. & Winglee, M.
1990 Who reads literature? Cabin John, MD: Seven Locks Press.Google Scholar
Zillmann, D. & Bryant, J.
1975 Viewer’s moral sanction of retribution in the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 572–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A.
1991 Some parameters of literary and news comprehension: Effects of discourse-type perspective on reading rate and surface structure representation. Poetics, 20, 139–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zyngier, S., Chesnokova, A., & Viana, V.
(Eds.) 2007 Acting and connecting: Cultural approaches to language and literature. Berlin: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Zyngier, S., van Peer, W. & Hakemulder, J.
2007 Complexity and foregrounding: in the eye of the beholder? Poetics Today 28, 653–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar