Part of
Scientific Approaches to Literature in Learning Environments
Edited by Michael Burke, Olivia Fialho and Sonia Zyngier
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 24] 2016
► pp. 83104
References (36)
References
Alderson, J.C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andringa, E. (1991). Talking about literature in an institutional context: An empirical approach. Poetics, 20, 157—172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bortolussi, M., & Dixon, P. (1996). The effects of formal training on literary reception. Poetics, 23, 471—487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, M. (2011). Literary reading, cognition and emotion: An exploration of the oceanic mind. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carter, R. (1997). Investigating English discourse: Language, literacy, discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. (2004). Language and creativity: The art of common talk. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & Nash, W. (1990). Seeing through language: A guide to styles of English writing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culler, J. (1975). Structuralist poetics. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fialho, O. (2007). Foregrounding and refamiliarization: Understanding readers’ response to literary texts. Language and Literature, 16(2), 105—123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fish, S.E. (1980). Literature in the reader: Affective stylistics. New Literary History, 2, 123—163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J. (2007). Tracing foregrounding in responses to film. Language and Literature, 16(2), 125—139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, D.I. (2001). The task of poetry reading and second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 22(3), 295—323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). Attention and literary education: A model of literary knowledge development. Language Awareness, 8(1), 15—29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1998). Reading poetry: An empirical investigation of formalist, stylistics, and conventionalist claims. Poetics Today, 19(4), 565—580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2010). Reading and teaching short stories, based on process studies and experimental research. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of English, language and literacy Teaching (pp. 45—57). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2003). World Englishes: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kachru, B.B. (1992). The other tongue: English across cultures (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
McGregor, J. (2002). If nobody speaks of remarkable things. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Miall, D.S. (2006). Literary reading: Empirical and theoretical studies. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Miall, D.S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389—407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1999). What is literariness: Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes, 28, 121—138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olsen, G.M., Duffy, S.A., & Mack, R.L. (1984). Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension process. In D.E. Kieras & M.A. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading comprehension research (pp. 253—286). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sciriha, L., & Vassallo, M. (2001). Malta - A linguistic landscape, Socrates, Malta.
Steen, G. (1994). Understanding metaphor in literature. London: Longman.Google Scholar
van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigating foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
. (2007). Introduction to foregrounding: A state of the art. Language and Literature, 16(2), 99—104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vassallo, O. (2011). A multidisciplinary approach to literariness: An empirical study of literary reading processes in L2 ‘learner-readers’. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Watson, G., & Zyngier, S. (Eds.) (2007). Literature and stylistics for language learners: Theory and practice. Houndmills: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werth, P. (1999). Text worlds: Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Zeitz, C.M. (1994). Expert-novice differences in memory, abstraction, and reasoning in the domain of literature. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 277—312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. (1993). Aspects of literary comprehension. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lugea, Jane
2017. The year’s work in stylistics 2016. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4  pp. 340 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.