Cover not available
Part of
Linguistics and Literary History: In honour of Sylvia Adamson
Edited by Anita Auer, Victorina González-Díaz, Jane Hodson and Violeta Sotirova
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 25] 2016
► pp. 49–70

Chapter 3. From ornament to armament

The epistolary rhetoric of Lady Elizabeth Tudor

ORCID logo
Queen Elizabeth I is recognised as a monarch for whom language was an essential tool in the construction of her authority and the maintenance of her rule. This can be seen directly through her state communication e.g. parliamentary speeches, or more indirectly in her activities in literary translation and poetry undertaken throughout her life and reign. This paper explores two early examples of her epistolary writing – a letter to her stepmother, Queen Katherine Parr (1544) and a later epistle (written in 1554) to her sister, Mary I – to explore how the pre-accessional Elizabeth developed these skills in rhetoric and literary style. It combines a literary stylistic approach with Renaissance rhetorical concepts to describe and evaluate how the epistolary language achieves identity and inter-personal work, and how this can be seen to inform Elizabeth’s later epistolary practices as queen.
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.25.04eva
References (33)
References
Adamson, S. 1999. Literary language. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3: 1476–1776, R. Lass (ed.), 539–649. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The grand style. In Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language: A Guide, S. Adamson, L. Hunter, L. Magnusson, A. Thompson & K. Wales (eds), 31–50. London: Arden Shakespeare.Google Scholar
. 2007. Synonymia: Or, in other words. In Renaissance Figures of Speech, S. Adamson, G. Alexander & K. Ettenhuber (eds), 17–38. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J. (ed.). 1844. The Leycester Correspondence [Camden Society] London: John Bowyer Nichols and Son.Google Scholar
Borman, T. 2009. Elizabeth’s Women: The Hidden Story of the Virgin Queen. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Day, A. 1586. The English Secretorie. London: Robert Walde-Graue.Google Scholar
Daybell, J. 2012. The Material Letter in Early Modern England: Manuscript Letters and the Culture and Practices of Letter-writing, 1512–1635 [Early Modern Literature in History]. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. 2009. The juvenile translations of Elizabeth Tudor. Translation and Literature 18: 157–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ettenhuber, K. 2007. Hyperbole: Exceeding similitude. In Renaissance Figures of Speech, S. Adamson, G. Alexander & K. Ettenhuber (eds), 197–216. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. 2013. The Language of Queen Elizabeth I: A Sociolinguistic Perspective on Royal Style and Identity [Transactions of the Philological Society Monograph Series 45]. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foxe, John. 1563. The Unabridged Acts and Monuments Online or TAMO, 1563 edn. HRI Online Publications, Sheffield. <[URL]> (14 April 2013).Google Scholar
Frye, S. 1993. Elizabeth I: The Competition for Representation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jenkins, E. 1958. Elizabeth the Great. London: Book Club Associates.Google Scholar
Joseph, M. 1947. Shakespeare’s Use of the Arts of Language. New York NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, S.D. 2009. The Development of Shakespeare’s Dialogue: A Study of Nine Plays [Swiss Studies in English]. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Mack, P. 2002. Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, L. 1999. Shakespeare and Social Dialogue: Dramatic Language and Elizabethan Letters. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Style, rhetoric and decorum. In Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language: A Guide, S. Adamson, L. Hunter, L. Magnusson, A. Thompson & K. Wales (eds), 17–30. London: Arden Shakespeare.Google Scholar
May, S. (ed.). 2004. Elizabeth I: Selected Works. New York NY: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. 2007. Compar or parison: Measure for measure. In Renaissance Figures of Speech, S. Adamson, G. Alexander & K. Ettenhuber (eds), 39–60. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J. & Scodel, J. (eds). 2009. Elizabeth I: Translations 1544–1589. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neale, J.E. 1960. Queen Elizabeth I: A Biography. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. 1999. Early Modern English lexis and semantics. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3: 1476–1776, R. Lass (ed.), 332–458. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Peacham, H. 1593. The Garden of Eloquence, 2nd edn. London: Printed by R.F. R[ichard] F[ield] for H. Iackson.Google Scholar
Perry, M. 1990. Elizabeth I: The Word of a Prince. A Life from Contemporary Documents. London: Folio Society.Google Scholar
Puttenham, G. 1589/2007. The Art of English Poesie. Middlesex: Echo Library.Google Scholar
Pryor, F. 2003. Elizabeth I: Her Life in Letters. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, R.W. 2007. Testimony: The artless proof. In Renaissance Figures of Speech, S. Adamson, G. Alexander & K. Ettenhuber (eds), 181–196. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shenk, L. 2003. Turning learned authority into learned supremacy: Elizabeth I’s learned persona and her University Orations. In Elizabeth I: Always Her Own Free Woman, C. Levin, J. Eldrige-Carney & D. Barrett-Greaves (eds), 78–96. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Stewart, Alan. 2008. Shakespeare’s Letters. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vickers, B. 1998. In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Whigham, F. 1981. The rhetoric of Elizabethan suitors’ letters. PMLA 96(5): 864–882. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woudhuysen, H. 2007. The Queen’s own hand: A preliminary account. In Elizabeth I and the Culture of Writing, P. Beal & G. Ioppolo (eds), 1–27. London: The British Library.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lugea, Jane
2017. The year’s work in stylistics 2016. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4 ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.