Chapter 3. From ornament to armament
The epistolary rhetoric of Lady Elizabeth Tudor
Queen Elizabeth I is recognised as a monarch for whom language was an
essential tool in the construction of her authority and the maintenance of her
rule. This can be seen directly through her state communication e.g. parliamentary
speeches, or more indirectly in her activities in literary translation and
poetry undertaken throughout her life and reign. This paper explores two early
examples of her epistolary writing – a letter to her stepmother, Queen Katherine
Parr (1544) and a later epistle (written in 1554) to her sister, Mary I – to explore
how the pre-accessional Elizabeth developed these skills in rhetoric and literary
style. It combines a literary stylistic approach with Renaissance rhetorical
concepts to describe and evaluate how the epistolary language achieves identity
and inter-personal work, and how this can be seen to inform Elizabeth’s later
epistolary practices as queen.
References (33)
References
Adamson, S. 1999. Literary language. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3: 1476–1776, R. Lass (ed.), 539–649. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adamson, S. 2001. The grand style. In Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language: A Guide, S. Adamson, L. Hunter, L. Magnusson, A. Thompson & K. Wales (eds), 31–50. London: Arden Shakespeare.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adamson, S. 2007. Synonymia: Or, in other words. In Renaissance Figures of Speech, S. Adamson, G. Alexander & K. Ettenhuber (eds), 17–38. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruce, J. (ed.). 1844. The Leycester Correspondence [Camden Society] London: John Bowyer Nichols and Son.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borman, T. 2009. Elizabeth’s Women: The Hidden Story of the Virgin Queen. London: Vintage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Day, A. 1586. The English Secretorie. London: Robert Walde-Graue.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daybell, J. 2012. The Material Letter in Early Modern England: Manuscript Letters and the Culture and Practices of Letter-writing, 1512–1635 [Early Modern Literature in History]. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. 2009. The juvenile translations of Elizabeth Tudor. Translation and Literature 18: 157–180. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ettenhuber, K. 2007. Hyperbole: Exceeding similitude. In Renaissance Figures of Speech, S. Adamson, G. Alexander & K. Ettenhuber (eds), 197–216. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, M. 2013. The Language of Queen Elizabeth I: A Sociolinguistic Perspective on Royal Style and Identity [Transactions of the Philological Society Monograph Series 45]. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foxe, John. 1563. The Unabridged Acts and Monuments Online or TAMO, 1563 edn. HRI Online Publications, Sheffield. <[URL]> (14 April 2013).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frye, S. 1993. Elizabeth I: The Competition for Representation. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jenkins, E. 1958. Elizabeth the Great. London: Book Club Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Joseph, M. 1947. Shakespeare’s Use of the Arts of Language. New York NY: Columbia University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keller, S.D. 2009. The Development of Shakespeare’s Dialogue: A Study of Nine Plays [Swiss Studies in English]. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mack, P. 2002. Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Magnusson, L. 1999. Shakespeare and Social Dialogue: Dramatic Language and Elizabethan Letters. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Magnusson, L. 2001. Style, rhetoric and decorum. In Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language: A Guide, S. Adamson, L. Hunter, L. Magnusson, A. Thompson & K. Wales (eds), 17–30. London: Arden Shakespeare.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
May, S. (ed.). 2004. Elizabeth I: Selected Works. New York NY: Washington Square Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McDonald, R. 2007. Compar or parison: Measure for measure. In Renaissance Figures of Speech, S. Adamson, G. Alexander & K. Ettenhuber (eds), 39–60. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mueller, J. & Scodel, J. (eds). 2009. Elizabeth I: Translations 1544–1589. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neale, J.E. 1960. Queen Elizabeth I: A Biography. London: Penguin Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevalainen, T. 1999. Early Modern English lexis and semantics. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3: 1476–1776, R. Lass (ed.), 332–458. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peacham, H. 1593. The Garden of Eloquence, 2nd edn. London: Printed by R.F. R[ichard] F[ield] for H. Iackson.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perry, M. 1990. Elizabeth I: The Word of a Prince. A Life from Contemporary Documents. London: Folio Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Puttenham, G. 1589/2007. The Art of English Poesie. Middlesex: Echo Library.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pryor, F. 2003. Elizabeth I: Her Life in Letters. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Serjeantson, R.W. 2007. Testimony: The artless proof. In Renaissance Figures of Speech, S. Adamson, G. Alexander & K. Ettenhuber (eds), 181–196. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shenk, L. 2003. Turning learned authority into learned supremacy: Elizabeth I’s learned persona and her University Orations. In Elizabeth I: Always Her Own Free Woman, C. Levin, J. Eldrige-Carney & D. Barrett-Greaves (eds), 78–96. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stewart, Alan. 2008. Shakespeare’s Letters. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vickers, B. 1998. In Defence of Rhetoric. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whigham, F. 1981. The rhetoric of Elizabethan suitors’ letters. PMLA 96(5): 864–882. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woudhuysen, H. 2007. The Queen’s own hand: A preliminary account. In Elizabeth I and the Culture of Writing, P. Beal & G. Ioppolo (eds), 1–27. London: The British Library.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Lugea, Jane
2017.
The year’s work in stylistics 2016.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4
► pp. 340 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.