Cover not available
Part of
Cognitive Grammar in Contemporary Fiction
Chloe Harrison
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 26] 2017
► pp. 137–150

References

Alford, S. 1995. Spaced-out: Signification and space in Paul Auster’s The New York Trilogy. Contemporary Literature 36(4): 613–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allington, D. 2007. “How come most people don’t see it?”: Slashing The Lord of the Rings. Social Semiotics 17(1): 45–64.Google Scholar
Allington, D. & Swann, J. 2009. Researching literary reading as social practice. Language and Literature 18(3): 219–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. Reading and social interaction: A critical approach to individual and group reading practices. In The History of Reading, Vol 3: Methods, Strategies, Tactics, R. Crone & S. Towheed (eds), 247–264. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Arnett, C. & Jernigan, H. 2014. A Cognitive Grammar account of case for L2 students of German. GFL: 68–93. <[URL]>
Atchison, T. 2010. “Why I am writing from where you are not”: Absence and presence in Jonathan Safran Foer’s Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. Journal of Postcolonial Writing 46(3): 359–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atwood, M. 1985[1996]. The Handmaid’s Tale. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Auster, P. 1987[2004]. The New York Trilogy. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. 1973. Questions of Literature and Aesthetics. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Baldry, A. & Thibault, J. 2006. Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis: A Multimedia Toolkit and Coursebook. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bartlett, F. 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Belmonte, M. K. 2008. Does the experimental scientist have a “Theory of Mind”? Review of General Psychology 12(2): 192–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bennett, P. 2014. Langacker’s Cognitive Grammar. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (eds), 29–48. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bergen, B. & Chang, N. 2005. Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions [Constructional Approaches to Grammer 3], J. Östman & M. Fried (eds), 147–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergs, A. 2009. Contexts and Constructions [Constructional Approaches to Grammer 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, M., Butler, C., Fawcett, R. & Huang, G. (eds). 1996. Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Interpretations. Stamford CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bielak, J. & Pawlak, M. 2013. Applying Cognitive Grammar in the Foreign Language Classroom: Teaching English Tense and Aspect. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birkerts, S. 1998. Grand delusion. The New York Times, 25 January 1998, <[URL]> (30 April 2016).
Broccias, C. & Hollman, W. 2007. Do we need summary and sequential scanning in (cognitive) grammar? Cognitive Linguistics 18(4): 487–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Browse, S. 2014. Resonant metaphor in Never Let Me Go . In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17], C. Harrison, L. Nuttall, P. Stockwell & W. Yuan (eds), 69–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burke, M. 2011. Literary Reading, Cognition and Emotion: An Exploration of the Oceanic Mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014. Rhetoric and poetics: The classical heritage of stylistics. In The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics, M. Burke (ed.), 11–30. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burton, D. 1982. Through glass darkly: Through dark glasses. On stylistics and political commitment – via a study of a passage from Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar . In Language and Literature: Reader in Stylistics, R. Carter (ed.), 195–214. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Butler, C. S. & Gonzálvez-García, F. 2005. Situating FDG in functional-cognitive space: An initial study. In Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar, J. L. Mackenzie & M. de los Ángeles Gómez-González (eds), 109–158. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Carter, R. & Stockwell, P. 2008. Stylistics: Retrospect and prospect. In The Language and Literature Reader, R. Carter & P. Stockwell (eds), 291–302. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. 1865. Alice in Wonderland. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chatman, S. 1978. Story and Discourse. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Childs, P. 2007. Adaptations. In Ian McEwan’s Enduring Love: A Routledge Study Guide, P. Childs (ed.), 123–136. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Churchwell, S. 2011. A Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer Egan – Review. The Guardian, 13 March 2011, <[URL]> (15 March 2012).
Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V. 1977. Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Cobley, P. 2001. Narrative. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012. The reactionary art of murder: Contemporary crime fiction, criticism and verisimilitude. Language and Literature 21(3): 286–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cockcroft, R. & Cockcroft, S. 1992[2014]. Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric, 3rd edn. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. 1994. Discourse and Literature. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Crisp, P. 2008. Between extended metaphor and allegory: Is blending enough? Language and Literature 17(4): 291–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. & Cruse, D. A. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Currie, M. 1995. Metafiction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dabrowska, E. & Divjak, E. 2015. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. 2007. Narrative anchors and the processes of story construction. Style 41(2): 133–152.Google Scholar
2008. The text and the story: Levels of blending in fictional narratives. In Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 170], T. Oakley & A. Hougaard (eds), 51–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. The Language of Stories: A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E. 2005. Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B. & Vandelanotte, L. 2009. Judging distances: Mental spaces, distance and viewpoint in literary discourse. In Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps, G. Brône & J. Vandaele (eds), 319–369. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Diack, H. 1960. Reading and the Psychology of Perception. Nottingham: E. H. Lee & Co.Google Scholar
Dickens, C. 1852-1853[1994]. Bleak House. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dimovitz, S. 2006. Public personae and the private I: De-compositional ontology in Paul Auster’s The New York Trilogy . Modern Fiction Studies 52(3): 613–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R. & Pörings, R. 2002. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dodge, E. & Lakoff, G. 2005. From linguistic analyses to neural grounding. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, B. Hampe & J. Grady (eds), 57–92. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dolezel, L. 1995. Fictional worlds: Density, gaps and inference. Style 29(2): 201–214.Google Scholar
Doloughan, F. 2011. Contemporary Narrative: Textual Production, Multimodality and Multiliteracies. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67: 574–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duchan, J. F., Bruder, G. A. & Hewitt, L. E. (eds). 1995. Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Egan, J. 1995. Invisible Circus. London: Corsair, Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
2008. The Keep. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
2010. A Visit from the Goon Squad. New York NY: Knopf Publishing Group.Google Scholar
2011. Look at Me. London: Corsair, Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
Emmott, C. 1992. Splitting the referent: An introduction to narrative enactors. In Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, M. Davies & L. Ravelli (eds), 221–228. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1995. Consciousness and context-building: Narrative inferences and anaphoric theory. In New Essays in Deixis, K. Green (ed.), 81–97. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1997. Narrative Comprehension: A Discourse Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2003. Reading for pleasure: A cognitive poetic analysis of ‘twists in the tale’ and other plot reversals in narrative texts. In Cognitive Poetics in Practice, J. Gavins & G. Steen (eds), 145–160. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Emmott, C. & Alexander, M. 2014. Foregrounding, burying and plot construction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds), 329–343 Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmott, C., Sanford, J. A. & Morrow, L. I. 2006. Capturing the attention of readers? Stylistic and psychological perspectives on the use and effect of text fragmentation in narratives. Journal of Literary Semantics 35: 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. & Green, M. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. 1985. Mental Spaces. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2): 222–254.Google Scholar
1992. Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, A. Lehrer & E. Kittay (eds), 75–102. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J. 2010. Five best book recommendation services. Lifehacker, 25 July 2010, <[URL]> (1 December 2010).
Foer, J. S. 2002a. Everything Is Illuminated. New York NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
2002b. ‘A Primer for the Punctuation of Heart Disease’. In The Unabridged Pocketbook of Lightning, J. S. Foer (ed), 1–9. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
2005. Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. New York NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
2006. ‘If the Aging Magician Should Begin to Believe’. In A Convergence of Birds: Original Fiction and Poetry Inspired by Joseph Cornell, J. S. Foer (ed), 203–222. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
2010. ‘Here We Aren’t, So Quickly.’ In 20 under 40: Stories from the New Yorker, D. Treisman (ed), 139–144. New York NY: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux. This short story was originally published in The New Yorker (June 14 & 21, 2010).Google Scholar
Fokkema, A. 1991. Postmodern Characters: A Study of Characterization in British and American Postmodern Fiction. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Forceville, C. 1999. Educating the eye? Kress and van Leeuwen’s Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (1996) . Language and Literature 8(2): 163–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Pictorial and multimodal metaphor in commercials. In Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric, E. McQuarrie & B. Phillips (eds), 178–204. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
2009. Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forrest, L. B. 1996. Discourse goals and attentional processes in sentence production: The dynamic construal of events. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, A. Goldberg (ed.), 149–161. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Forster, E. M. 1905. Aspects of the Novel. Cambridge: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. 1986[1996]. Linguistic Criticism, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Frank, A. 2010. Letting Stories Breathe: A Socio-Narratology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeman, M. 1995. Metaphor making meaning: Dickinson’s conceptual universe. Journal of Pragmatics 24(6): 643–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. Grounded spaces: Deictic-self anaphors in the poetry of Emily Dickinson. Language and Literature 6(1): 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeman M. 2006. The fall of the wall between literary studies and linguistics: Cognitive poetics. In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds), 403–428. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. 2007. Cognitive linguistic approaches to literary studies: State of the art in cognitive poetics. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds), 1175–1202. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fulford, R. 2010. Jennifer Egan’s A Visit from the Goon Squad is all about the timing. National Post, 1 December 2010, <[URL]> (15 October 2012).
Fuller, D. 2008. Reading as social practice: The beyond the book research project. Journal of Popular Narrative Media 1(2): 211–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaiman, N. 2002. Coraline. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Gavins, J. 2000. Absurd tricks with bicycle frames in the text world of The Third Policeman . Nottingham Linguistic Circular 15: 17–33.Google Scholar
2003. Too much blague? An exploration of text-worlds of Donald Barthelme’s Snow White . In Cognitive Poetics in Practice, J. Gavins & G. Steen (eds), 129–144. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. (Re)thinking modality: A text-world perspective. Journal of Literary Semantics 34(2): 79–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, J. & Stockwell, P. 2012. About the heart, where it hurt exactly, and how often. Language and Literature 21(1): 33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
1988. Narrative Discourse Revisited. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbons, A. 2008. Multimodal literature ‘moves’ us: Dynamic movement and embodiment in VAS: An Opera in Flatland . Hermes 41: 107–124.Google Scholar
2012a. Multimodality, Cognition and Experimental Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012b. Altermodernist fiction. In Routledge Companion to Experimental Literature, J. Bray, A. Gibbons & B. McHale (eds), 238–252. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gibbons, A. & Whiteley, S. (eds). Forthcoming. Contemporary Stylistics: Language, Cognition, Interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gibbs, J. 2011. A Visit from the Goon Squad, by Jennifer Egan. The Independent, 8 April 2011, <[URL]> (15 October 2012).
Gibbs, R. 2002. Feeling moved by metaphor. In Textual Secrets: The Message of the Medium, S. Csabi & J. Zerkowitz (eds), 13–28. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Aschkenazi, K., and Alkabets–Zlozover, I. 2007. Negation in context: A functional approach to suppression. Discourse Processes�43: 153–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Heruti, V., Metuki, N. & Fein, O. 2009. ‘When we say no we mean no’: Interpreting negation in vision and language. Journal of Pragmatics 41(11): 2222–2239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giovanelli, M. 2013. Text World Theory and Keats’ Poetry: The Cognitive Poetics of Desire, Dreams and Nightmares. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
2014. The ‘missive from the trench’: Conceptual proximity and the experience of war in Siegfried Sassoon’s ‘A Working Party.’ In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17], C. Harrison, L. Nuttall, P. Stockwell & W. Yuan (eds), 145–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giovanelli, M. & Harrison, C. Forthcoming. Cognitive Grammar in Stylistics: A Practical Guide. London: Bloomsbury.
Goldberg, A. 1995. Construction: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
1996. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Gooding, R. 2008. “Something very old and very slow”: Coraline, uncanniness, and narrative form. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly 33(4): 390–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M., Strange, J. & Brock, T. 2002. Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gregoriou, C. 2012. ‘Times like these, I wish there was a real Dexter’: Unpacking serial murder ideologies and metaphors from TV’s Dexter internet forum’. Language and Literature 21(3): 274–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greimas, A. J. 1971. Narrative Grammar: Units and Levels. Modern Language Notes 86: 793–806.Google Scholar
1973. Les actants, les acteurs et les figures. In Semiotique Narrative et Textuelle, C. Chabrol (ed.), 161–176. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
1977. Elements of a Narrative Grammar. Diacritics 7: 23–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J. 2004. Foregrounding and its effects on readers’ perception. Discourse Processes 38: 193–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1971. Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors . In Literary Style: A Symposium, S. Chatman (ed.), 330–365. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1978. Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthieson, C. 1985[2004]. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C. 2003. A cognitive grammar of ‘Hospital Barge’ by Wilfred Owen. In Cognitive Poetics in Practice, J. Gavins & G. Steen (eds), 55–65. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014. The cognitive poetics of if . In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17], C. Harrison, L. Nuttall, P. Stockwell & W. Yuan (eds), 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hampe, B. & Grady, J. 2005. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C. 2014. Attentional windowing in ‘The Soul Is Not a Smithy.’ In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17], C. Harrison, L. Nuttall, P. Stockwell & W. Yuan (eds), 53–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Finding Elizabeth: Construing episodic memory in Elizabeth Is Missing by Emma Healey. Journal of Literary Semantics.
Harrison, C. & Mason, J. In preparation. Re-imagining innocence? Mind-modelling younger readers in Young Adult fiction.
Harrison, C. & Nuttall, L. In preparation. Cognitive Grammar and reconstrual: Re-experiencing Margaret Atwood’s ‘The Freeze-Dried Groom’.
Harrison, C., Nuttall, L., Stockwell, P. & Yuan, W. (eds). 2014. Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C. & Stockwell, P. 2014. Cognitive poetics. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, J. Littlemore & J. Taylor (eds), 218–233. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hart, C. 2014a. Construal operations in online press reports of political protests. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, C. Hart & P. Cap (eds), 167–188. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
2014b. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Head, D. 1992. The Modernist Short Story: A Study in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. The Cambridge Introduction to Modern British Fiction, 1950–2000. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Ian McEwan. Manchester: Manchester University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Healey, E. 2014. Elizabeth Is Missing. New York NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Heine, B. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Herman, D. 2002. Story Logic. Nebraska NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
2009a. Beyond voice and vision: Cognitive Grammar and focalization theory. In Narratology: Point of View, Perspective, and Focalization: Modeling Mediation in Narrative, P. Hühn, W. Schmid & J. Schönert (eds), 119–142. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009b. Cognitive approaches to narrative analysis. In Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains and Gaps, G. Brône & J. Vandaele (eds), 79–118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011. The Emergence of Mind: Representations of Consciousness in Narrative Discourse in English. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Herman, D., Manfred, J. & Ryan, M.-L. (eds). 2005. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Downing, L. 2000a. Negation, Text Worlds and Discourse: The Pragmatics of Fiction. Stamford CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
2000b. Negation in discourse: A text world approach to Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 . Language and Literature 9(3): 215–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoeken, H. & van Vliet, M. 2000. Suspense, curiosity and surprise: How discourse structure influences the affective and cognitive processing of a story. Poetics 27(4): 277–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, J., Rullmann, H., Sánchez-Valencia, V. & van der Wouden, T. (eds). 2001. Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 40]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, T. & Sybesma, R. 2004. Arguments and Structure: Studies on the Architecture of the Sentence. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hollman, W. B. 2013. Nouns and verbs in Cognitive Grammar: Where is the ‘sound’ evidence? Cognitive Linguistics 24(2): 275–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, L. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2010. The Expression of Negation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, C. 2011. A Visit from the Goon Squad, by Jennifer Egan: Ambitious dispatches from America’s nattiest frontier. The Independent, 13 March 2011, <[URL]> (15 October 2012).
Iser, W. 1978. The Act of Reading. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ishiguro, K. 2005. Never Let Me Go. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 1987. On beyond zebra: The relation of linguistic and visual information. Cognition 26(2): 89–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ji, Y. & Shen, D. 2004. Transitivity and mental transformation: Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook . Language and Literature 13(4): 335–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. & Ells, K. 2011. Chaos and complexity in Paul Auster’s The New York Trilogy . In Restoring the Mystery of the Rainbow: Literature’s Refraction of Science, C. Barfoot & V. Tinkler (eds), 627–640. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Kamp, H. & Reyle, U. 2003. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kaveney, R. 2009. Mother shudder. The Times Literary Supplement, 5 June 2009, <[URL]> (28 April 2009).
Kay, P. & Fillmore, C. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalisations: The what’s doing X to Y? construction. Language 75(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, C. 1982. Systemic grammar and its use in literary analysis. In Language and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Stylistics, R. Carter (ed.), 82–99. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M. 2011. From text-linguistics to literary actants – the force dynamics of (emotional) vampirism. Language and Cognition 3(2): 235–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klapcsik, S. 2008. Neil Gaiman’s irony, liminal fantasies, and fairy tale adaptations. Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies 14(2): 317–334.Google Scholar
Knox, J. 2010. Jonathan Safran Foer. The New Yorker, 14 June 2010, <[URL]> (27 May 2015).
Köhler, W. 1947. Gestalt Psychology. New York NY: New American Library.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kress, G. R. & van Leeuwen, T. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. 1981. A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kuiken, D. & Miall, D. S. 1994. Foregrounding, defamiliarisation and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics 22: 389–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Miall. D. S. & Sikora, S. 2004. Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today 25(2): 171–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laberge, D. 1983. Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9(3): 371–379.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Language and the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lahey, E. 2004. All the world’s a subworld: Direct speech and subworld creation in ‘After’ by Norman MacCaig. Nottingham Linguistic Circular: 21–28.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1993a. Universals of construal. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 19: 447–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999a. Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences 29(2): 77–103.Google Scholar
2001. Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2): 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Cognitive Linguistics Research: Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lavender, W. 1993. The novel of critical engagement: Paul Auster’s City of Glass . Contemporary Literature 34(2): 219–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, A. & Kittay, E. (eds). 1992. Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Leinfeller, E. 1994. The broader perspective of negation. Journal of Literary Semantics 13(2): 77–98.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. 1950–1956. The Chronicles of Narnia. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Little, W. 1997. Nothing to go on: Paul Auster’s City of Glass . Contemporary Literature 38(1): 133–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J. & Taylor, J. R. 2014. Introduction. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (eds), 1–26. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Ljungberg, C. 2015. Iconicity. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics, V. Sotirova (ed.), 476–489. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Long, E. 2003. Book Clubs – Women and the Uses of Reading in Everyday Life. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
March-Russell, P. 2009. The Short Story: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Mars-Jones, A. 1999. I think I’m right, therefore I am. The Guardian, 7 September 1999, <[URL]> (30 April 2016).
Martin, T. 2011. Jennifer Egan: Profile. The Telegraph, 25 March 2011, <[URL]> (15 October 2012).
Martínez, M. A. 2014. Storyworld possible selves and the phenomenon of narrative immersion: Testing a new theoretical construct. Narrative 22: 110–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, J. 2014. Narrative. In Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds), 179–195. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Intertextuality in Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mather, G. 2006. Foundations of Perception. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Matlock, T. 2004. Fictive motion as cognitive stimulation. Memory and Cognition 32(8): 1389–1400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition 2(2): 243–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, N. 2008. Bridges between cognitive linguistics and second language pedagogy: The case of corpora and their potential. SKY Journal of Linguistics 21: 125–153.Google Scholar
McEwan, I. 1997. Enduring Love. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
McHale, B. 1989. Postmodernist Fiction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1992. Constructing Postmodernism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012. Postmodernism and experiment. In Routledge Companion to Experimental Literature, J. Bray, A. Gibbons & B. McHale (eds), 141–153. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McIntyre, D. 2006. Point of View in Plays. A Cognitive Stylistic Approach to Viewpoint in Drama and Other Text-types [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. 2006. Literary Reading: Empirical and Theoretical Studies. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
1990. Readers’ responses to narrative: Evaluating, relating, anticipating. Poetics 19: 323–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D. 1999. What is literariness? Three components of literary reading. Discourse Processes 28(2): 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. A feeling for fiction: Becoming what we behold. Poetics 30(4): 221–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, S. 2002. Feminist Stylistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nahajec, L. 2009. Negation and the creation of implicit meaning in poetry. Language and Literature 18(2): 109–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesset, T. 2009. Review of Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction (2008), R. Langacker. Journal of Linguistics 45(2): 477–480.Google Scholar
Nicol, B. 2009. The Cambridge Introduction to Postmodern Fiction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolajeva, M. 2009. Devils, demons, familiars, friends: Toward a semiotics of literary cats. Journal of Fairy-Tale Studies 23(2): 248–267.Google Scholar
Nørgaard, N. 2007. Disordered collarettes and uncovered tables: Negative polarity as a stylistic device in Joyce’s “Two Gallants”. Journal of Literary Semantics, 36(1): 35–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuttall, L. 2014. Constructing a text world for The Handmaid’s Tale . In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17], C. Harrison, L. Nuttall, P. Stockwell & W. Yuan. (eds), 83–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Attributing minds to vampires in Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend. Language and Literature 24(1): 23–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J. 2007. Cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds), 543–565. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Oakley, T. 2014. Afterword: From Cognitive Grammar to systems rhetoric. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17], C. Harrison, L. Nuttall, P. Stockwell & W. Yuan (eds), 231–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, J. & Fried, M. (eds). 2005. Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions [Constructional Approaches to Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padley, S. 2006. Key Concepts in Contemporary Literature. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. 2004. Fictional Minds. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
2009. Attributions of Madness in Ian McEwan’s Enduring Love. Style 43(3): 291–308.Google Scholar
Paradis, C. 2005. Ontologies and construals in lexical semantics. Axiomathes 15(4): 541–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parsons, E., Sawers, N. & McInally, K. 2008. The Other Mother: Neil Gaiman’s postfeminist fairytales. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly 33(4): 371–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavel, T. 1973. Some remarks on narrative grammars. Poetics 2(4): 5–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peplow, D. 2012. ‘Oh, I’ve known a lot of Irish people’: Reading groups and the negotiation of literary interpretation. Language and Literature 20(4): 295–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pleyer, M. & Schneider, C. 2014. Construal, cognition, and comics: Analysing the multimodal construction of a Gothic autobiography in Alison Blechdel’s Fun Home . In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17], C. Harrison, L. Nuttall, P. Stockwell & W. Yuan (eds), 35–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, G. 1973. A Grammar of Stories. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Propp, V. 1968. Morphology of the Folktale. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Pullman, P. 2002. The other mother. The Guardian, 31 August 2002, <[URL]> (8 March 2013).
RA–RE. 2008–2012. Goodreads: Coraline reviews, December 2008 – January 2012, <[URL]> (15 February 2012).
RF–RJ. 2006–2012. Amazon: Coraline reviews, April 2006 – April 2012, <[URL]> (17 April 2012).
R1–R6. 2008–2012. Goodreads: The New York Trilogy reviews. February 2008 – April 2012, <[URL]> (15 February 2012).
R7–R11. 2005–2012. Amazon: The New York Trilogy reviews, September 2005 – September 2012, <[URL]> (17 April 2012).
Rapp, D. N. & Gerrig, R. J. 2006. Predilections for narrative outcomes: The impact of story contexts and reader preferences. Journal of Memory and Language 54: 54–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, B. 2002. Beyond story and discourse: Narrative time in postmodern and nonmimetic fiction. In Narrative Dynamics: Essays on Time, Plot, Closure and Frames, B. Richardson (ed.), 47–63. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
2006. Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. 2009. Foreword: Ian McEwan and the Rational Mind. In Ian McEwan Contemporary Critical Perspectives, S. Groes (ed), vii–xii. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Rowen, N. 1991. The detective in search of the lost tongue of Adam: Paul Auster’s City of Glass . Critique 32(4): 224–234.Google Scholar
Rowling, J. K. 1997–2007. The Harry Potter series. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Rubba, J. 1996. Alternate grounds in the interpretation of deictic expressions. In Spaces, Worlds, and Grammars, G. Fauconnier & E. Sweetser (eds), 227–261. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rudd, D. 2008. An eye for an I: Neil Gaiman’s Coraline and questions of identity. Children’s Literature in Education 39: 159–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, A. 1990. Deconstructing The New York Trilogy . Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 31(2): 71–84.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. L. 1998. The text as world versus the text as game: Possible worlds semantics and postmodern theory. Journal of Literary Semantics 27(3): 137–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-García, J. 2007. Toward a cognitively-oriented discourse analysis: Framing, construal and violence-related emotional meaning. In Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis, C. Hart & D. Lukeš (eds), 207–231. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schank, R. 1982. Reading and Understanding. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schank, R. & Abelson, R. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schemberg, C. 2002. Achieving ‘At-One-Ment’: Storytelling and the Concept of the Self in Ian McEwan’s The Child in Time, Black Dogs, Enduring Love and Atonement. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Segal, E. 2010. Closure in detective fiction. Poetics Today 31(2): 153–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Narrative comprehension and the role of deictic shift theory. In Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder & L. E. Hewitt (eds), 3–17. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Semino, E. 1995. Schema theory and the analysis of text worlds in poetry. Language and Literature 4(2): 79–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. A cognitive stylistic approach to mind style in narrative fiction. In The Language and Literature Reader, R. Carter & P. Stockwell (eds), 268–277. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014. Pragmatic failure, mind style and characterisation in fiction about autism. Language and Literature 23(2): 141–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E. & Short, M. 2004. Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shiloh, L. 2002. Paul Auster and the Postmodern Quest: On the Road to Nowhere. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2010. Double, the Labyrinth, and the Locked Room: Metaphors of Paradox in Crime Fiction and Film. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Short, M. & van Peer, W. 1989. Accident! Stylisticians evaluate: Aims and methods of stylistics analysis. In Reading, Analysing and Teaching Literature, M. Short (ed.), 22–71. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Simpson, P. 2004. Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2014. Just what is narrative urgency? Language and Literature 23(1): 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P. & Canning, P. 2014. Action and event. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds), 281–299. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smethurst, P. 2000. The Postmodern Chronotype: Reading Space and Time in Contemporary Fiction. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Steen, G. 1989. Metaphor and literary comprehension: Towards a discourse theory of metaphor in literature. Poetics 18(1–2): 113–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. The empirical study of literary reading: Methods of data collection. Poetics 20(5–6): 559–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P. 2000. The Poetics of Science Fiction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2002. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2007. (Sur)real stylistics: From text to contextualising. In The Language and Literature Reader, R. Carter & P. Stockwell (eds), 198–208. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009. Texture: A Cognitive Aesthetics of Reading. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
2014. War, worlds and Cognitive Grammar. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17], C. Harrison, L. Nuttall, P. Stockwell & W. Yuan (eds), 17–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, P. & Mahlberg, M. 2015. Mind-modelling with corpus stylistics in David Copperfield . Language and Literature 24(2): 129–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Styles, E. 2006. The Psychology of Attention. New York NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Swann, J. & Allington, D. 2009. Reading groups and the language of literary texts: A case study in social reading. Language and Literature 18(3): 247–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabakowska, E. 1993. Cognitive Linguistics and Poetics of Translation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Tabkowska, E. 2014. Point of view in translation: Lewis Carroll’s Alice in grammatical wonderlands. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17], C. Harrison, L. Nuttall, P. Stockwell & W. Yuan (eds), 101–116. New York: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12(1): 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000a. Towards a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2000b. Towards a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008. Aspects of attention in language. In The Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, P. Robinson (ed.), 27–38. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011. Cognitive Semantics: An overview. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Portner (eds), 622–642. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. 2002. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. & Short, M. (eds). 1996. Using Corpora for Language Research. Studies in Honour of Geoffrey Leech. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Tobin, V. 2009. Cognitive bias and the poetics of surprise. Language and Literature 18(2): 155–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Todorov, T. 1977. The Poetics of Prose. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tomashevsky, B. 2002. Story, plot and motivation. In Narrative Dynamics: Essays on Time, Plot, Closure and Frames, B. Richardson (ed.), 164–178. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Toolan, M. 1988[2001]. Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. & Pratt, M. 2008. Language, linguistics and literary analysis. In The Language and Literature Reader, R. Carter & P. Stockwell (eds), 39–48. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsur, R. 1992. Towards a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Uspensky, B. 1973. A Poetics of Composition [trans. V. Zavarin & S. Wittig]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
van Peer, W. & Chatman, S. (eds). 2001. New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective. New York NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
van Peer, W. Hakemulder, J. & Zyngier, S. 2007. Lines on feeling: Foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning. Language and Literature 16(2): 197–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Vliet, S. 2009. Reference points and dominions in narrative: A discourse level exploration of the reference point model of anaphora. In New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics [Human Cognitive Processing 24], V. Evans & S. Pourcel (eds), 441–464. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, A. 2007. Construal and perspectivization. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds), 48–81. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wales, K. 1990[2001]. A Dictionary of Stylistics, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2014. The stylistics tool-kit: Methods and sub-disciplines. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds), 13–31. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waugh, P. 2002. Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. 1898. The War of the Worlds. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Werth, P. 1995a. How to build a world (in a lot less than six days, using only what’s in your head). In New Essays in Deixis: Discourse, Narrative, Literature, K. Green (ed.), 49–80. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1995b. ‘World enough and time’: Deictic space and the interpretation of prose. In Twentieth Century Fiction: From Text to Context, P. Verdonk & J. Weber (eds), 181–205. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Whiteley, S. 2011. Text World Theory, real readers and emotional responses to The Remains of the Day . Language and Literature 20(1): 23–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Ethics and alternativity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, P. Stockwell & S. Whiteley (eds), 393–407. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wójcik-Leese, E. 2000. Salient ordering of free verse and its translation. Language and Literature 9(2): 170–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, W. 2014. Fictive motion in Wordsworthian nature. In Cognitive Grammar in Literature [Linguistic Approaches to Literature 17], C. Harrison, L. Nuttall, P. Stockwell & W. Yuan (eds), 177–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zunshine, L. 2006. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. 1993. Aspects of Literary Comprehension [Utrecht Publications in General and Comparative Literature 35]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar