Cover not available
Part of
Narrative Absorption
Edited by Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Ed S. Tan, Katalin Bálint and Miruna M. Doicaru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 27] 2017
► pp. 29–47

Chapter 2
Towards a new understanding of absorbing reading experiences

| Utrecht University
| Utrecht University
| Utrecht University | University of Augsburg
| University of Amsterdam
| University of Amsterdam | University of Copenhagen
When reading literary narratives, we assume that readers can get absorbed in the story world and in the story’s artifice. Since most absorption research focuses primarily on popular media, virtually no attention has been paid to the possibility that literary devices such as deviation could elicit absorption experiences or that absorption could be aesthetic in nature. This chapter takes an interdisciplinary approach combining insights from media psychology, literary studies, and aesthetics to present a theoretical framework for two different varieties of narrative aesthetic absorption during reading: story world absorption and artifact absorption. We propose that these varieties mirror the distinction made by narratologists between story and discourse and the distinction made by emotion psychologists between F and A emotions.
Keywords: story world absorption, artifact absorption, narrative, literature, reading experience, foregrounding
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Absorption research taxonomy
    • 2.1Story world absorption
  • 3.There is more to a narrative than story world
    • 3.1Foregrounding and absorption
    • 3.2Empirical studies on the relationship between absorption and foregrounding
    • 3.3Introducing artifact absorption
  • 4.Towards a new understanding of narrative aesthetic absorption
    • 4.1“Weaving in and out” of narrative aesthetic absorption
  • 5.Discussion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 9 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.03kui
References (67)
References
Appel, M. (2008). Fictional narratives cultivate just world beliefs. Journal of Communication, 58, 62–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2010). Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion: A mediated moderation model. Media Psychology, 13, 101–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bálint, K. (2013, March). Exploratory study on the subjective experience of absorption. Paper presented at the Lost in Story Worlds Symposium, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Bálint, K. & Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M. M., Tan, E. S., Doicaru, M. M. (2016). Reconceptualizing foregrounding: Identifying response strategies to deviation in absorbing narratives. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bálint, K., & Tan, E. S. (2015). “It feels like there are hooks inside my chest”: The construction of narrative absorption experiences using image schemata. Projections, 9(2), 63–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, C. (1982). The aesthetic hypothesis. In Chatto & Windus (Eds.), Modern art and modernism: A critical anthology (pp. 3–30). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(5), 279–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biocca, F. (2002). The evolution of interactive media: Toward “being there” in nonlinear narrative worlds. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 97–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, I. K., & Cupchik, G. C. (2001). Phenomenological and quantitative analyses of absorption in literary passages. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 19(1), 85–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brecht, B. (1964). A short organum for the theatre. Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic, 179–205.Google Scholar
Brown, D. (2003). The Da Vinci Code. Ealing: Bantam Press.Google Scholar
Bullough, E. (1912). ‘Psychical distance’ as a factor in art and as an aesthetic principle. British Journal of Psychology, 5, 87–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18, 255–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chatman, S. B. (1980). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohn, D. (1999). The distinction of fiction. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal performance. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cupchik, G. C. (1994). Emotion in aesthetics: Reactive and reflective models. Poetics, 23(1), 177–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doicaru, M. M. (2016). Gripped by movies. From story-world to artifact absorption. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fforde, J. (2007). First among sequels. London: Hodder.Google Scholar
Gawronski, B. (2009). Ten frequently asked questions about implicit measures and their frequently supposed, but not entirely correct answers. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 50(3), 141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. (1988). Narrative Discourse Revisited. (Jane E. Lewin, trans.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Green, M. C. (2005). Transportation into narrative worlds: Implications for the self. In A. Tesser, J. V. Wood & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), On building, defending and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 53–75). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. DOI logo Google Scholar
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., Kass, S., Carrey, J., Herzig, B., Feeney, R., & Sabini, J. (2008). Transportation across media: Repeated exposure to print and film. Media Psychology, 11(4), 512–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hager, M., Hagemann, D., Danner, D., & Schankin, A. (2012). Assessing aesthetic appreciation of visual artworks – The construction of the art reception survey (ARS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, J. F. (2004). Foregrounding and its effect on readers. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 193–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakemulder, F. (2013). Travel experiences: A typology of transportation and other absorption states in relation to types of aesthetic responses. In J. Ludtke (Ed.), Wie gebannt: Aesthetische Verfahren der affektiven Bildung von Aufmerksamkeit (pp. 163–182). Berlin: Freie Universitaet.Google Scholar
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369–1385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoyle, R. (1995). Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and applications. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens (Neurocognitive poetics: elements of a model of literary reading). In R. Schrott & A. M. Jacobs (Eds), Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (pp. 492–524). München: Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.) Style in language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, J. (1922). Ulysses. Paris: Shakespeare & Company.Google Scholar
Kinnebrock, S., & Bilandzic, H. (2006). How to make a story work: Introducing the concept of narrativity into narrative persuasion. Presented at the International Communication Association Conference in Dresden.
Koopman, E. (2015). Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 50, 62–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M. (2014). Absorbing stories. The effects of textual devices on absorption and evaluative responses. (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S. H., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Campbell, P., & Sopcak, P. (2012). The experiencing questionnaire: Locating exceptional reading moments. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 243–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsson, S. (2008). The girl with the dragon tattoo: Millennium I (R. Keeland, Trans.) London: MacLehose Press (original work published in 2005).Google Scholar
Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1995). Aspects of literary response: A new questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37–58. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Mukarovsky, J. (1964). Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague school reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style (pp. 17–30). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (1999). Meetings of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification, in reading fiction. Poetics, 26(5–6), 439–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, M. B. and Bartsch, A. (2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2011). Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 23(1), 29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. D. (2012). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning. Cognitive and emotional processing of media. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Preacher, K. J., Zhang, Z., & Zyphur, M. J. (2011). Alternative methods for assessing mediation in multilevel data: The advantages of multilevel SEM. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 161–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Proust, M. (1913–1927). À la recherché du temps perdu. Paris: Grasset and Gallimard.Google Scholar
Ravaja, N. (2004). Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology, 6, 193–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roche, S. M., & McConkey, K. M. (1990). Absorption: Nature, assessment, and correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 91–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. L. (2001). Narrative as virtual reality: Immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Scheff, T. J. (1979). Catharsis in healing, ritual, and drama. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Segal, E. M. (1995). A cognitive-phenomenological theory of fictional narrative. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 61–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In L. T. Lemon & M. J. Reis (Eds. & Trans.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment – education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tal-Or, N., & Cohen, J. (2010). Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics, 38(4), 402–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, E. S. H. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film. Film as an emotion machine. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, W. & Hakemulder, F. (2006). Foregrounding. In Keith Brown (ed.), The Pergamon encyclopaedia of language and linguistics (Vol. 4, pp. 546–551). Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, W., Hakemulder, J., & Zyngier, S. (2007). Lines on feeling: foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning. Language and Literature, 16(2), 197–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolf, W. (2004). Aesthetic illusion as an effect of fiction. Style-FayetteVille, 38(3), 325. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Mustazza, Chris
2024. I Am Become Data: Lytle Shaw's Narrowcast and the Era of Machine Listening. boundary 2 51:2 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Ready, Jonathan L.
2023. Immersion, Identification, and the Iliad, DOI logo
Pérez, Héctor J
2022. Aesthetics of the Narrative Climax in Contemporary TV Serials. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 80:2 ► pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Thissen, Birte A. K., Wolff Schlotz, Cornelius Abel, Mathias Scharinger, Klaus Frieler, Julia Merrill, Thomas Haider & Winfried Menninghaus
2022. At the Heart of Optimal Reading Experiences: Cardiovascular Activity and Flow Experiences in Fiction Reading. Reading Research Quarterly 57:3 ► pp. 831 ff. DOI logo
Dahy, Faten Abdelaziz & Khaled Mostafa Karam
2021. Potentials of Empathetic Stimuli in Creative Nonfiction: Zimbardo’sThe Lucifer Effectand Danner’sTorture and Truth. English Studies 102:4 ► pp. 468 ff. DOI logo
Hartung, Franziska, Yuchao Wang, Marloes Mak, Roel Willems & Anjan Chatterjee
2021. Aesthetic appraisals of literary style and emotional intensity in narrative engagement are neurally dissociable. Communications Biology 4:1 DOI logo
Hermida, Alberto, Mónica Barrientos Bueno & Héctor J. Pérez
2021. Interacción entre propiedades estéticas y valor cognitivo: más allá de la absorción narrativa en La Peste. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad 33:3 ► pp. 995 ff. DOI logo
Pianzola, Federico, Katalin Bálint & Jessica Weller
2019. Virtual reality as a tool for promoting reading via enhanced narrative absorption and empathy. Scientific Study of Literature 9:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Polvinen, Merja, Howard Sklar & Anezka Kuzmicova
2019. Mimetic and synthetic views of characters: How readers process “people” in fiction. Cogent Arts & Humanities 6:1 ► pp. 1687257 ff. DOI logo
Kuiken, Don & Shawn Douglas
2018. Living metaphor as the site of bidirectional literary engagement. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane
2018. The year’s work in stylistics 2017. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:4 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.